TRUMPUTIN'S THEFT OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
(including TrumPutin's Big Bad Bill
 That Benefits Billionaires
- and Putin)
Subsection 4 of Money Is Not Wealth.


"Trump's Big Ugly Bill" from U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, Timothy Noah's "How The Billionaires Took Over", an Interesting Offer from Elon Musk, and far-too-much more):

tRUmPUtin's Other Half:

Who Writes "Professor Gerdes Explains"?
[From his nearly-5,000 posts on many topics, we zero in on his articles and videos about tRUmPUtin and current wars at home and abroad. We find him insightful, and wonder why his own background information was hard to find. We found it.]
1. Dr. Darin L. Gerdes: "Professor Gerdes Explains"
[To view his following self-description online: Open the page; in his round face-shot at the lower-left, place your cursor on his nose; then move the cursor from his nose to the right end of that line; click on its " ...more".]
I discuss leadership & global conflicts. I am just a professor of leadership studies who spends time analyzing what is happening in real time in our world.
- If you care about Ukraine, you are in the right place.
- I also explain Iran, Venezuela, and other hot spots.
- I try to provide unique insights that help you understand the context.
- I am a Reagan-Republican who fully supports Ukraine.
- I am a conservative without a candidate.
- I always ground my analysis in facts.
2. Charleston Southern Univ.: Prof. Darin Gerdes
[Scroll down to its "About" section.]

Russo-Ukrainian WAR (history, current, etc.; Ukrainian Research Institute at Harvard University/HURI)
On February 24, 2022, the world watched in horror as Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, inciting the largest war in Europe since World War II. In the months prior, Western intelligence had warned that the attack was imminent, amidst a concerning build-up of military force on Ukraine's borders. Learn about the war and its historical context.


Dr. Darin L. Gerdes: DEEP DIVE: Trump's Sweeping New Peace Plan - What's Really Going On? (14-min. YouTube video; Professor Gerdes Explains; November 8, 2026)
I examine the European security framework outlined by Jared Kushner alongside President Trump's suggestion that a Ukraine settlement could become a much-larger deal involving all of Europe. The proposal invokes:
- sovereignty,
- alliance choice,
- security guarantees,
- crisis communications,
- military transparency, and
- a trilateral U.S.-Ukraine-Russia meeting in Abu Dhabi.
 Yet European partners have reportedly rejected terms that
could:
- constrain NATO's posture in the Baltic states. or
- limit Ukraine's ability to defend itself.
I argue that the central test is not whether Moscow can endorse broad principles on paper, but whether any agreement can deter renewed coercion in practice.
Russia signed the 1975 Helsinki Final Act and the 1990 Charter of Paris, while its record includes wars and occupations extending from Georgia to Ukraine. With Putin reportedly demanding terms while Russia strikes Ukrainian infrastructure, I assess whether this framework produces durable security - or formalizes a Russian veto over its neighbors' choices.
[Hmm. Why would Europe TRUST tRUmPUtin (lame-duck Trump AND his puppet-master, Putin) to not foul up through stupidity and/or traitorous intent? Why would the U.S. do so? He's already proved to be incompetent, a liar, a crook, a murderer and a traitor - ALL thoroughly-documented. Do a Trump-Dump NOW, and let the world deal with an honest U.S.A.!]
Ukraine Just Struck Putin's Iskander PARTS Plant - and Saratov BURNS. (18-min. YouTube video; VantaFront; November 8, 2026)
Last night, Ukraine's General Staff says Navy Neptune coastal missiles struck Proton-Electrotex in Oryol, about 160 km from the border, a sanctioned plant it says makes switch-inverters for the 9M723 Iskander-M missile and modules for Kh-71 cruise missiles.
Also last night, drones set Rosneft's Saratov refinery on fire about 600 km from Ukraine, at least the seventh Russian refinery hit since October 30, and Ukraine says it hit two Iskander launchers and a Pantsir-S1 in Bryansk region.
Russia fired 36 ballistic missiles and 172 drones at Ukraine that night.
Ukrainian Missile Devastates Russian Air Base. All Fighter Jets Reportedly Destroyed! (14-min. YouTube video; WAR ALERT; November 8, 2026)
On a single night, six of Russia's most-valuable bombers were parked wingtip to wingtip, fully loaded and ready for takeoff. Minutes later, they were burning, not in the air, but on their own runway, hundreds of miles inside Russia. That night was just one chapter of a five-week hunt in which Russia lost around 13 military aircraft. Meanwhile, refineries were burning, fuel lines were back and Moscow's airports were shut down.
Putin's "Killer Satellite" CAUGHT Stalking Ukraine's Spy Satellite. U.S. Reveals Secret Space Ambush. (AI; 23-min. YouTube video; The War Briefing; November 7, 2026)
Five-hundred kilometers above the Earth, a silent military ambush just unfolded in low-Earth orbit. Unable to stop Ukraine's long-range strike drones from hitting Russian missile bunkers, submarines, and AI data centers on the ground, the Kremlin decided to hunt down Ukraine's eyes in space. Orbital tracking data and an official warning from United States Under Secretary of State Thomas DiNanno exposed that a classified Russian military satellite - Kosmos-2612 - fired its thrusters and deliberately stalked ICEYE-X36, a Finnish Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite that feeds all-weather, nighttime targeting intelligence to Ukraine, closing the gap down to just a few hundred meters in a maneuver consistent with "on-orbit weapons operations".
In today's intelligence briefing, we examine:
- the orbital telemetry of how Kosmos-2612 stalked ICEYE-X36 across low Earth orbit,
- why Finland's cloud-penetrating radar satellites have been a nightmare for Russian generals,
- the "Matryoshka nesting-doll" weapons and electronic jammers hidden inside Russia's classified Nivelir inspector satellites,
- why Putin pivoted from kinetic anti-satellite missiles to gray-zone orbital sabotage,
- whether attacking a Finnish spacecraft crosses NATO's Article 5 red line, and
- the honest assessment of whether the satellite was damaged.
Dr. Darin L. Gerdes: Russia's War Machine Is Eating Its Own Economy. (18-min. YouTube video; Professor Gerdes Explains; November 7, 2026)
I examine the mounting pressure on Russia's war economy:
- from reported Ukrainian strikes on refineries with a combined nominal capacity of 32.9-million tons per year,
- to fuel queues in Moscow and Nizhny Novgorod.
- the reported shutdown of Rostov, Taganrog, and Azov seaports, where October grain shipments reportedly fell 67% to 2.4-million tons - deepening the strain on farmers, dealers, and regional port employment.
And the wider financial consequences:
-
proposed social-spending cuts,
- sharply-reduced recruitment bonuses and death benefits in some regions,
- 18.66-tons of central-bank gold sales in the third quarter,
- rising bankruptcies,
- weaker car sales, and
- a mortgage market reportedly down by half, year over year.
My central point is that Russia is not simply out of money. As NATO's secretary-general notes, its economic structure still gives military spending substantial purchasing power. But sustaining the war is shifting more of the burden onto households and the civilian economy.
The Frontline with Jerome Starkey: Ukraine Ramps Up Massive Strikes On Russian Oil And Shatters Moscow's Air Force. (22-min. YouTube video; The Sun; November 6, 2026)   with
Ukraine has struck five of Russia's primary oil refineries in just six days - hitting up to 20% of Moscow's total refining capacity - as Kyiv ramps up its domestic deep-strike drone campaign.
At the same time, newly-declassified British Defence Intelligence reveals that October was one of the worst months on record for the Russian Air Force, suffering catastrophic losses of tactical aircraft, including Su-34 strike fighters and an Su-57 stealth jet.
In this week's edition of Frontline, The Sun's Defence Editor Jerome Starkey breaks down the latest major shifts across the battlefield and the geopolitical arena:
- from unprecedented ground-combat robot assaults on the Lyman front
- to the grim reality of winter blackouts in Kyiv, following brutal Russian glide-bomb strikes.
Plus, an inside look at the high-stakes political fallout:
- Donald Trump's meetings with Vladimir Putin’s key envoy,
- a teased "pan-European" security pact, and
- why the controversial trans-Atlantic Russian diesel deal appears to be falling apart.
Andrew Marr, w/Christiane Amanpour and Sir John Sawers: On Chances Of A U.S. Nuclear Strike Against Iran, "It Sends Chills Down My Spine." (16-min. YouTube video; LBC/UK; November 3, 2026)
With Americans heading to the polls for the U.S. mid-terms, Andrew Marr is joined by Christiane Amanpour, Chief International Anchor at CNN and Sir John Sawers, former Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service, to assess:
- the Republican chances,
- the international climate, and
- how Trump may respond to the results.
Ben Parker and Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling (Ret.): Tucker Carlson Says Trump Is Considering A Nuclear Attack On Iran. (40-min. YouTube video; The Bulwark; November 2, 2026)
Ben Parker and Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling (Ret.) break down Tucker Carlson's alarming claims that the Trump administration could be preparing a nuclear strike on Iran.
- They dissect Carlson's claims about Netanyahu, Pickaxe Mountain and the possibility of nuclear escalation, explaining what's wrong with his analysis and what a nuclear strike would actually mean.
- They also examine Trump's fixation on the Iran War casualty counts,
- the limits of military force, and
- why there is no easy solution to the war with Iran.
U.S. Strikes Iran, Hours Before Key Election. (17-min. YouTube video; DW News; November 3, 2026)
Just hours before Americans head to the polls for the mid-term elections, the United States reportedly launched fresh strikes on Iran. Washington says the attacks were limited and defensive, but:
- The timing raises questions over whether a diplomatic deal with Tehran is still possible.
- So why strike now?
- What does it mean for the wider US-Iran confrontation?
- And could it influence today's U.S. elections that may shape the final chapter of Trump's presidency?
DW's Anja Kueppers-McKinnon speaks to U.S. journalist and analyst Gordon Robison and to Iran expert Rowena Binti Abdul Razak from SOAS University of London.
Jason Jay Smart: Ukraine VAPORIZES Russia's FINAL Cash Flow. (31-min. YouTube video; Jason Jay Smart; November 3, 2026)
Vladimir Putin faces a quiet breakdown of Kremlin authority as systemic crises overwhelm Russia's governing machinery. Behind official displays of wartime unity, the mechanisms ensuring domestic control are fracturing. The personal warlord pact keeping Chechnya subordinate under Ramzan Kadyrov threatens violent fragmentation without a viable successor, while regional administrators trapped between impossible voting quotas and public apathy can no longer conceal administrative exhaustion.
State security paranoia is directly crippling the domestic economy. Interior Ministry enforcement directed by senior official Andrei Kikot has forcibly expelled 75,000 foreign nationals and barred nearly 200,000 more, sparking a 17% plunge in Central Asian labor arrivals during early 2026. This purge blindsides critical infrastructure and factories that face a projected shortfall of 10.9-million replacement workers by 2030. Rather than repairing these structural deficits, presidential Decree Number 63 overhauled Rosgvardia under Viktor Zolotov, establishing a dedicated command headquarters explicitly prepared to suppress civilian unrest.
This reliance on escalating coercion reveals the fundamental vulnerability of modern authoritarian governance. A regime that manufactures electoral mandates and invents internal conspiracies cannot solve acute labor deficits or manage feudal succession crises.
By substituting militarized intimidation for functional governance, Moscow accelerates the structural instability it desperately seeks to prevent.
[Hopefully, this will catalyze the return to a democratic Russia, as we expect the U.S. to do today!]
Philip Ingram: Russia Loses 2,250 Troops In A Day, As Dead And Wounded Hit 1.56-Million. (20-min. YouTube video; Battle Plans Exposed; The Sun; November 3, 2026) 
- Russia has suffered its deadliest month and day of the war, losing more than 46,230 casualties in September and suffering 2,250 losses on October 21st.
- Former military intelligence officer Philip Ingram breaks down Ukraine's daring Operation Velez - where assault troops crawled 15km through disused underground pipes, to strike deep behind Russian positions.
- Ukraine is also ramping up the pressure around the critical tri-border town of Komar. Kyiv's forces are using the river line as an operational springboard to cut off Russian logistics and threaten the key hub of Velyka Novosilka just four miles away.
- Philip examines Kyiv's strikes on missile plants deep inside Russia, drone hits on rail supply lines in Donetsk, and the real casualty data behind Moscow's propaganda.
- Plus, how Sweden's highway-launching Gripen fighters are turning the Baltic into Vladimir Putin's worst nightmare.
Hoax Nuclear Alerts, After Cyber Attacks On Russia And Ukraine (43-min. YouTube video; Ukraine: The Latest and The Telegraph; November 2, 2026)
- Did Ukraine "disobey" Trump with its strikes on Russian oil refineries?
Today, after nearly 800 people made it back to Ukraine having endured years of Russian occupation in Oleshky, President Zelensky thanked First Lady Melania Trump for her efforts, and then sent a message of a different sort to her husband the president, by bombing three Russian oil refineries over the weekend; an act that had the Kremlin complaining to the U.S. President that he'd been "disobeyed".
- We report on possibly a hack against the Ukrainian emergency air alert app, followed almost immediately by a similar system being hit in Russia.
- Later, we hear directly from Kyiv from the commander of the only expat-manned air-defence unit in the Ukrainian armed forces.
Kaliningrad Will Fall - And Take Russia With It. (24-min YouTube video; The Domino Effect; November 2, 2026)
Vladimir Putin calls Kaliningrad an invincible fortress and recently threatened to put Russia's entire nuclear arsenal on the table to defend it. But the reality on the ground tells a different story. Stripped of its primary ground forces - like the 11th Army Corps - to feed the war in Ukraine, Russia's strategic Baltic exclave is currently leaning on a NATO neighbor just to keep the lights on and the gas flowing.
??     (November 1, 2026)
Dr. Darin L. Gerdes: Russia's Economy Is Barely Hanging On - Even With Trump's Lifeline. (21-min. YouTube video; Professor Gerdes Explains; October 31, 2026)
I examine:
- the mounting strains across Russia's wartime economy, from construction-company liquidations and frozen accounts to rising oil-export freight and insurance costs.
- tanker costs from Novorossiysk reportedly surged as Black Sea risk-premiums climbed, while Urals export volumes fell.
- Russia is also seeking costly work-arounds for grain exports: shipments through Murmansk require rail transport from southern Russia, adding an estimated $18–$25 per ton.
- record farm debt.
- losses among coal producers.
- drone-related damage to major businesses.
- delayed Defense Ministry payments.
- the pressure on consumer prices.
- higher projected Urals revenue gives Moscow some breathing room, but
- it does not eliminate the accumulating costs of transport disruption, debt, insurance, and wartime spending.
- Ukraine's reported October-30 strike on a refinery in Russia's Samara region.
- and why continued refinery strikes could compound these economic vulnerabilities.
[Another accounting of tRUmPUtin grief.]
Jason Jay Smart: Putin Just Broke the Only Deal Now Keeping Him in Power. (12-min. YouTube video; Jason Jay Smart: Videos in English; October 31, 2026)
(Dr. Jason Jay Smart, also known as Jason Smart and Jason J Smart, is a political adviser who has lived and worked in Ukraine, Moldova, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Latin America. In 2010, he was banned for life by the Kremlin for supporting Russia’s democratic opposition to Vladimir Putin.)
Nearly five years into Putin's war against Ukraine, the Kremlin is turning its security services against figures inside Russia's own political establishment. For decades, the Communist Party has operated as tolerated opposition, with obedience to Moscow's rules offering some protection. Now even politicians who supported the war face treason accusations and prosecution. That shift threatens the unwritten bargain that helped keep Putin's system stable.
Recent arrests of Communist politicians expose growing uncertainty over what loyalty still buys inside Putin's system:
- A former official accused of treason reportedly supported Russian troops.
- Another was detained after losing parliamentary immunity.
- National security verdicts have surged.
- Courts conceal defendants' names.
- Prosecutions involving alleged banned groups are increasing.
As prosecutions spread, even established politicians have less reason to believe their loyalty will protect them.
Putin depends on officials who can report failures without fearing retaliation, yet his expanding crackdown makes that increasingly difficult. Officials worried about becoming targets may conceal mistakes, suppress warnings, and tell superiors whatever seems safest. Moscow needs dependable information and functioning institutions as the war consumes resources and economic pressure grows. Greater repression may secure compliance today, while leaving Putin less able to recognize threats developing inside his own government.
[Putin AND tRUmPUtin...]
Professor Gerdes Explains: Ukraine Had Another REALLY GOOD NIGHT: More Oil Refineries And New Records. (12-min. YouTube video; October 31, 2026)
I examine:
- the reported October 31 Ukrainian strikes on Russia's Ufa oil refinery in Bashkortostan and the Kamensky Combine in Rostov Oblast. Ufa is far from the Ukrainian border, while the Kamensky facility reportedly produces solid rocket-propellant for Uragan, Smerch, and Tornado-S systems.
- reported disruption around Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport,
- a fire near a Rosneft oil depot, and
- the significance of strikes on supply and chemical-storage facilities.
I contrast these DEEP strikes, with Russia's continuing campaign against Ukrainian CIVILIAN infrastructure. Reported attacks hit:
- heat and power facilities in Kyiv,
- substations in the Dnipro region,
- railways,
- and a gas facility,
leaving more than 280,000 households without electricity as winter approaches.
I put the refinery campaign, Russian drone-interception claims, gas-station strikes, casualty estimates, the rejected March 2025 ceasefire, and Russia's reported military-salary delays into strategic context.
[Very good 12-min. video analysis.]
Jason Jay Smart: Putin's Allies TURN: The Cost Of HIS War Is BREAKING Them. (14-min. YouTube video; Jason Jay Smart: Videos in English; October 30, 2026) 
Some of Putin's wealthiest allies are questioning the Kremlin's demands for more money as wartime costs mount. Moscow must fund its army, while rewarding the FSB and insiders whose loyalty protects the regime. That arrangement depended on oil wealth, privileged access and the promise that loyalty would pay. Ukrainian strikes on refineries and declining energy-tax receipts are forcing the Kremlin deeper into its supporters' pockets.
Russian industrialists face proposed windfall taxes, while one-in-four firms is already late paying their own suppliers. State proposals to take control of vulnerable businesses give owners another reason to fear the government. The pattern recalls Yukos, when prized assets and influence shifted toward Putin's circle. Missed payments can spread through suppliers and banks, yet the Kremlin keeps demanding more from the businesses involved.
Global oil markets present a vulnerability no Kremlin decree can eliminate: foreign prices Moscow cannot set. Prices respond to events involving Iran, Saudi Arabia and decisions beyond Moscow's control. Western sanctions and frozen assets shape the options available to officials seeking relief. Squeezing businesses might raise cash now, but damage the companies that finance the state. Putin's challenge is keeping his protectors paid without exhausting the economy supporting them.
[Hmm. Is Elon Musk about to buy Russia?]
NEW: Ukraine Waited for Russia's Kalibr Frigate to Dock, Then Hit It. Admiral Essen Strike Explained. (15-min. YouTube video; NewsTrax; October 30, 2026)
Ukraine says a Neptune missile hit the Russian frigate Admiral Essen while it was docked at Novorossiysk in September 2026. UK Defence Intelligence judged the strikes likely put about 40% of Russia's Kalibr-capable surface fleet out of action for the short- to medium-term.
In this breakdown:
- why Russia's Black-Sea Fleet moved to Novorossiysk,
- the earlier attacks in March, May and August,
- how Neptune works,
- what was hit, and
- what's still unverified.
Note: Some claims come from Ukrainian sources and have not been independently verified. Animations are illustrative
NEW: Ukraine Just Hit Putin's Crown Jewel: Russia Can't Easily Replace It. (33-min. YouTube video; War Vision; October 30, 2026)
Ukraine has struck some of Putin's most valuable warships, exposing a dangerous weakness in Russia's Black Sea Fleet. After repeated missile and drone attacks on the heavily-defended Novorossiysk naval base, Russia's prized Kalibr cruise-missile carriers are facing a growing crisis. But the biggest problem may be something Moscow cannot easily replace.
In a major development in the Russia–Ukraine war, Ukrainian forces targeted the Admiral Essen and Admiral Makarov, two important Russian frigates capable of launching Kalibr cruise-missiles. Satellite imagery and open-source assessments have raised serious questions about the extent of the damage and the future combat-readiness of these vessels.
In this video, we examine:
- Ukraine's Neptune-missile strikes,
- Russia's increasingly-vulnerable Black Sea Fleet,
- the strategic importance of Novorossiysk, and
- why the Montreux Convention limits Moscow's naval options.
We also uncover how:
- Ukrainian-made naval engines,
- Western sanctions,
- repeated port disruptions, and
- Russia's difficult relationship with China
could complicate the Kremlin's long-term military strategy.
Meanwhile, Ukraine's counter-offensive near Lyman is adding pressure on Russian forces, raising another important question:
Can Putin maintain his military ambitions, while facing growing challenges on land and at sea?
Putin's Giant Nuclear Missile EXPLODED in Its Own Silo. Satellite Photos Show a 60-Meter Crater. (25-min. YouTube video; The War Briefing; October 30, 2026)
208 metric tons of liquid-fueled intercontinental ballistic missile - the RS-28 Sarmat, known to NATO intelligence as "Satan II" - has catastrophically exploded inside its own underground launch silo at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia. High-resolution commercial satellite-imagery from Maxar Technologies and Planet Labs, paired with NASA FIRMS thermal-anomaly data, reveals that the heavily-fortified Yubileynaya launch complex has been completely obliterated, leaving behind a smoking 60-meter-wide crater in the Arkhangelsk forest.
In today's 20-minute intelligence briefing, we examine:
- the satellite and reconnaissance evidence behind the Plesetsk disaster,
- the volatile hypergolic fuel chemistry ("Devil's Venom") of the 208-ton Sarmat missile,
- the two forensic failure scenarios (cold-launch mortar failure vs. in-silo fueling detonation),
- the hidden Ukrainian engineering connection (Yuzhmash in Dnipro) that crippled Moscow's heavy-ICBM program after 2014, and
- the honest assessment of Russia's remaining nuclear deterrent.
[Hmm. Who was in the building at that time?]
NEW: Dr. Sarah Paine: WW3 Threat Expert: The Warning We Are Ignoring, The Only Way Out Is THIS! (102-min. YouTube video; The Diary Of A CEO; October 29, 2026)
Are escalating geopolitical tensions hurtling humanity towards World War III? Dr. Sarah Paine:
- highlights the historical roots of geopolitical conflicts, and
- demonstrates how shifting away from a rules-based maritime order guarantees economic collapse.
Dr. Sarah Paine is a renowned geopolitical strategist, historian, and retired professor from the U.S. Naval War College, specializing in Russian and Chinese imperial history and maritime strategy. She applies historical models such as the Peloponnesian War and World War II to decode the actions of leaders like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping.
[and tRUmPUtin...]
In this episode, she explains:
- The Maritime vs. Continental Divide: How the world is split between maritime powers compounding wealth through free trade and continental empires burning wealth through territorial conquest.
- The Cost of Isolationism: Why sudden, aggressive tariffs and the abandonment of key international alliances rapidly accelerate inflation, shrink global influence, and destabilize the U.S. economy.
- The Death Ground Principle: How threatening an adversary's very existence removes all their strategic alternatives, transforming struggling nations into highly-lethal, unyielding military opponents.
- The Illusion of Dictatorial Stability: Why the lack of a peaceful transition of power in dictatorships guarantees that the death of a leader like Putin will trigger profound, unpredictable instability and violent internal power struggles.
- The Power of Negative Objectives: Why a government's most-vital job goes completely unnoticed, focusing on preventing catastrophic disasters before they happen rather than chasing highly-publicized achievements.
[Deserving of close attention - by competent leaders, unfortunately.]
Russia Just Suffered the DEADLIEST Day of the War… THOUSANDS of Soldiers Met Their Maker. (19-min. YouTube video; The Military Show; October 28, 2026)
Russia has just suffered its deadliest day of the entire war. On October 21, 2026, Ukraine's General Staff reported a staggering 2,250 Russian soldiers killed, wounded, or captured in a single 24-hour period - marking the third time in under a month that daily Russian losses have topped 2,000. From the fields of Dobropillia, where Russian commanders lied to Putin about capturing the city and sent thousands of troops into a meat grinder to cover up the lie, to an unprecedented 60% killed-in-action rate driven by Ukrainian drone swarms, discover why Moscow's volunteer recruitment has completely collapsed - and why Vladimir Putin is running out of ways to avoid a massive, destabilizing nationwide mobilization.
Philip Ingram: Putin's Blown-Up Dam Backfires As Ukraine Smashes Zaporizhzhia Assault. (20-min. YouTube video; Battle Plans Exposed; The Sun/UK; October 27, 2026)
Military expert and former intelligence planner Philip Ingram reveals the reality behind Moscow's front-line claims in this week's Battle Plans Exposed.
While the Kremlin claims to have seized huge areas of land, independent battlefield assessments reveal actual Russian gains are 45-times smaller than Vladimir Putin says. Russian forces are also suffering heavy losses, with over 2,100 troops lost in a single day.
In this episode, we reveal:
- front-line footage showing the world's first battlefield evacuation of an injured soldier using an aerial drone across 38 miles.
- an unmanned ground-robot destroying an infiltration route through an underground gas pipe.
- how Russia's attempted push through the dried-up Kakhovka reservoir backfired into a deadly trap in Zaporizhzhia.
- how Ukrainian troops bypassed Komar to take the high ground overlooking the key supply hub of Velyka Novosilka.
- a look at the operational and strategic picture as strikes hit deep into Russian hubs, and
- Donald Trump's diplomatic manoeuvres cause friction on the world stage. 
Watch as we expose the real battle plans and tactical manoeuvres reshaping the war.
[More progress. Vote DEM on Tuesday!]


NEW: David Kirichenko: Inside Ukraine's Kill Zone, Where Drones Hunt Everything That Moves (front-line photos; Ukrainian Research Institute at Harvard University/HURI; July 21, 2026; out of its time-sequence, because it's newly-posted and fits well here.)
Ukrainian-American journalist David Kirichenko reports from the front-lines of Ukraine, where he was embedded with the Unmanned Systems Battalion of Ukraine's 110th Separate Mechanized Brigade. Through a first-hand account of a supply-run into a forward drone position, he shows what Ukrainian soldiers endure every day in the kill zone, and how technology has transformed the face of war in the 21st century.)


Kevin Freking and Mae Anderson: Six Senators Call For Trump Administration To 'Immediately Reverse Course' On Russian Diesel Plan. (photos, comments; AP News; October 11, 2026)
WASHINGTON (AP) - A bipartisan group of six senators today called for President Donald Trump's administration to "immediately reverse course" on a plan to purchase diesel from Russia "as part of an effort to lower high fuel prices".
Trump shocked lawmakers when he announced on social media two days ago that he struck a deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin in a phone call. He said Russia will:
- immediately supply more than 300,000-tons of diesel oil to the American and global market,
- followed by an additional 500,000-tons in November
- and 1-million tons "immediately thereafter".
- Russia will deliver an additional 3-million tons "within a short period of time" after that, he wrote.
Four Republican senators and two Democratic senators signed onto the statement released today, protesting the deal.
They said the administration failed to consult with Congress or submit any explanation to justify its decision as required by statute. "The United States should not provide Putin with a financial lifeline while Russia continues to kill Ukrainian civilians. The Administration must immediately reverse course", they wrote.
- The Republican senators who signed onto the statement are Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and John Curtis of Utah.
- The Democratic senators are Sens. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut.
- Tillis, in an interview that aired today on NBC's "Meet the Press", said there's a legitimate case for saying the president is not following the law if the administration goes through with its diesel purchase plan. "We were very clear that Russia is the aggressor. Russia is the one who can end this war by backing out of territory that they occupied", Tillis said.
- Trump's announcement came just a few weeks after Congress passed legislation that directed Trump to impose substantial tariffs on the top importers of Russian oil or natural gas, with an exception for countries that import less than 15% of Russia's natural-gas exports and have taken significant steps to reduce those imports. The congressional effort was aimed at cutting the flow of money Russia receives from oil and gas sales to finance its war against Ukraine.
- The lawmakers also noted that Congress explicitly banned Russia energy imports in 2022, to prevent the United States from financing the war. "Congress was clear: the U.S. should not import oil from Russia until it ends its aggression against Ukraine and ceases threats against our NATO Allies", the six lawmakers wrote in their statement. "President Trump's decision to allow Russian diesel imports to the U.S. runs directly counter to that law."
- Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., when asked whether the president's action would be in violation of U.S. law, said Trump is focused on reducing the cost of energy. "The president is balancing and has to make tough decisions", Barrasso said on CBS's "Face the Nation". He also encouraged Trump to enforce the sanctions law that Congress passed last month. "This is just another point of leverage for the president to use against Putin in an effort to get a long-term solution in that part of the world", Barrasso said.
[Egad! It's blatantly FOR Putin, AGAINST Ukraine and, with mid-terms looming, AGAINST our once-democracy's requirement that Congress is a check against presidential power-grabs - which is to say, tRUmPUtin comes first, even when it's treason.]
- Energy experts say the Russia deal is unlikely to make a dent in high prices at the pump. Richard Nephew, a senior research scholar at Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy, noted that the total amount of diesel appears to be less than what the U.S. uses in a day. Nephew argued that Iran and Russia might benefit more than the U.S. "The Iranians are probably very excited, because it shows that there's a lot of pressure still on the U.S. And the Russians are excited because it puts a big hole in the sanctions regime", he said.
- Trump has recently sought to blame record U.S. diesel prices on Ukraine, rather than on the U.S.-led war in Iran, which has elevated world energy prices.
[tRUmPUtin against the USA, and most of its "allies".]
Jeremy Hsu: Ukraine's Drones Knock Out AI Data Center Belonging To Russia's Google. One Damaged Data Center Has Supercomputers Used For Training Yandex's AI Model. (photo, comments; Ars Technica; October 9, 2026)
Ukrainian drone strikes have knocked out two of five data centers belonging to the Russian tech giant Yandex.
The damage has left Yandex, known as "Russia's Google" because it operates the country's most-popular search engine, struggling to maintain its AI chatbot and other online services.
The Ukrainian drones struck Yandex data centers in the Sasovo and Kaluga regions of Russia on October 8 and October 9, according to Reuters. Those actions came as a direct response to a Russian drone-strike campaign targeting Ukraine's data centers, which has disrupted mobile phone and Internet services for thousands of Ukrainians since late September.
"We continue to respond to Russia's attacks on Ukraine, and we're doing so with high precision", said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a post on X. "Another data center was hit as well - our Symmetrical Response."
The Ukrainian company Firepoint said its FP-1 one-way attack drones were involved in the latest strike on the Kaluga data center that is Yandex's largest such facility, Reuters reported.
The first Ukrainian attack targeted Yandex's Sasovo data center, which houses two of the company's three supercomputers used for training the company's YandexGPT AI model. Yandex said no employees were hurt but acknowledged disruptions to some services.
Russian users reported problems accessing:
- media websites, and
- popular apps for the Ivi video-streaming platform,
- the digital banking service T-Bank, and
- the state-owned Russian Railways, according to independent Russian news publication Meduza.
- a dating app,
- a real-estate aggregator,
- a self-publishing book platform, and
- the website of the top professional soccer club in the Russian Premier League, according to Reuters.
Targeting data centers is just the latest example of them becoming wartime targets in 2026. After the United States and Israel attacked Iran in February, Iranian drones knocked out multiple Amazon data centers in Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates.
But Russia has been regularly launching mass missile and drone attacks against Ukraine's cities, targeting:
- power-grid infrastructure,
- transportation hubs,
- and even residential apartment buildings,
since Russian President Vladimir Putin first launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Ukraine has recently been grappling with a shortage of interceptor weapons capable of shooting down Russian missiles and jet-powered drones. But the Ukrainian military has also gradually ramped up its own medium-range and long-range drone-strike campaign in response to Russian attacks. Ukraine's drone strikes have focused on:
- Russian military bases and supply lines,
- Russian-linked shipping in the Sea of Azov and Black Sea, and
- Russian energy infrastructure such as oil refineries.
- In the summer of 2026, Ukraine also targeted multiple warehouses belonging to the Russian companies Wildberries and Ozon, which are Russia's Amazon equivalents.
In a sign of the potentially-widening war, coordinated aerial and sea-drone strikes sank two commercial ships - in the Black Sea within the exclusive economic zones of NATO member countries Romania and Bulgaria on October 5 and October 6. Ukraine's president Zelenskyy attributed those attacks to Russia.
[Also, coordinated with tRUmPUtin's October-9th Sudden Surprise Turn-Abouts:
- Abandoning Ukraine.
- Providing massive money to money-starved Russia to finance its on-going war WITH Ukraine (by rescinding HIS OWN multi-nations agreement to STOP funding Russian military costs by blocking purchases of Russian petroleum products including diesel oil. (Good articles re this:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6k_-UXXe98>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXWacJIfgKA>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cglj255jk8ko>)
Save and share this report of tRUmPUtin's Treason. TAKE BACK OUR U.S.A!]
NEW: Stefan Korshak: Analysis: Ukraine's Drone Offensive Gives Kyiv a 3-to-1 Edge Over Russia. ( Kyiv Post; September 26, 2026))
Ukraine has conducted approximately three times more long-range drone strikes against targets in Russia than the Kremlin has launched in the opposite direction over the past 100 days, according to a Kyiv Post analysis of open-source strike data.
The analysis found that even when Russia's cruise, ballistic, hypersonic, and anti-ship missiles are included, the cumulative explosive payload delivered by Ukraine's long-range drone campaign often matches, and at times exceeds, the total weight of warheads launched by Russia against Ukraine on a given night.
The study was based on open-source data tracking long-range strikes from the Ukrainian Air Force documenting Russian drones and missiles detected in Ukrainian airspace, alongside daily statements from Russia's defense ministry reporting Ukrainian drones and missiles it claimed to have intercepted.
Those databases, to some degree, under-count strike-weapon totals for Russia as not all launched weapons are detected by Ukrainian air defenses. For Ukraine, even if all Russian shoot-down claims are accurate, some Ukrainian drones and missiles are not stopped and go on to hit targets in Russia.
One problem with the Russian official data is that it is incomplete. On some days, Russia's defense ministry publishes shoot-down claims covering a full 24-hour period, while on others it reports figures for only 12 hours or less. Another challenge is the tendency to over-count. By the Kremlin's own figures, Russia has destroyed 17,936 Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), yet an independent Western analysis estimates that Ukraine has likely launched only about 4,620 UAVs at Russia.
[We welcome the Kyiv Post!]
Justin Elliott, Brett Murphy, Joshua Kaplan and Alex Mierjeski: Donald Trump Jr.'s Bahamas Wedding Was Secretly Bankrolled By A Russian Oligarch Close To Putin. The Oligarch, Umar Kremlev, Spent Hundreds Of Thousands On Expenses Like Renting Out A Private Island. He Appears To Have Met Trump Jr. Only Recently, But He Attended The Intimate Wedding With A Large Group Of Other Russian Guests. (ProPublica; September 14, 2026)
On May 24, Donald Trump Jr. was celebrating in the Bahamas. It was the last night of his wedding, a lavish, three-day party held across a pair of ultra-exclusive private islands. That night on the beach, Trump Jr. lifted his bride into the air while fireworks launched from a barge over the sea.
"It was everything we dreamed of and more", his wife later wrote on Instagram. That dream was heavily funded by a secret benefactor: Umar Kremlev, a Russian oligarch close to President Vladimir Putin.
Kremlev footed the bill for hundreds of thousands of dollars of wedding expenses, according to records reviewed by ProPublica and interviews with three people familiar with the event. The oligarch paid to rent out one of the private islands, where a reception was held and where guests slept. He also covered other big-ticket items, like the fireworks show, and his team helped plan the event. Kremlev is the head of the International Boxing Association, a scandal-plagued sports group that has been financed by the Russian state-owned energy giant Gazprom. The wedding payments came from an IBA-affiliated entity in Dubai that the boxing association uses for financial transactions.
[There's more. Lots more... Hmm, didn't Donald Trump Sr. spend a college year as a guest of the Russian government?]
Ben Hodges, NexusWarRoom: Ukraine Just Took Out The Last 12 Russian Shadow-Fleet Ships In The Black Sea. (26-min. YouTube video; August 9, 2026)
Ukraine's shadow-fleet strikes just took out 12 more Russian tankers and support-vessels in one week, part of a campaign that has now hit 218 ships since early July. This is the latest chapter in one of the most-consequential naval campaigns of the war.
Event Summary: Robert "Magyar" Brovdi, commander of Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces, says USF drones struck 12 shadow-fleet vessels between August 1 and 8 in the Black Sea and Sea of Azov, part of Operation MoLoChKa, launched July 6. The Kerch Strait has now been effectively blockaded for 30 straight days.
Context: This latest Ukraine-Russia war update fits a pattern this channel has tracked for over a year, Ukraine disabling rather than sinking tankers to avoid environmental disaster while gutting Russia's sanctioned oil-export network. Retired Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges explains why that distinction matters, making this essential breaking geopolitical news today for anyone following Black-Sea shadow-fleet news, military-escalation analysis, international crisis update coverage, and global-security developments.
Professor Gerdes Explains: Ukraine's Strikes Just Triggered A Cascading Crisis In Russia. How Ukrainian Drone Strikes Are Disrupting Russia's War Economy. Russia's Fuel Shortages And Banking Risks: The Cascading Effect - Wildberries, Refineries And Russia's Worsening Economic Strain. (18-min. YouTube video
with timestamps; August 9, 2026)
I examine how Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries, ports, ferries, and Wildberries logistics hubs may compound fuel shortages, export disruption, banking stress, and war-economy pressure. This analysis tracks Novorossiysk shipping, Crimea supply routes, Russian debt, retail logistics, and the strategic effects of Ukraine's drone campaign.
[Little countries CAN fight back! Just ask Russia. Or view this excellent analysis.]
The Hodges Explains: Ukraine Just Burned The One Logistics Hub Moving 2,000 Tons To The Front Daily. (33-min. YouTube video with timestamps; August 9, 2026)
Ukraine just burned the single logistics hub processing 2,000 tons of supplies to the eastern front every day - and the cascade effects hit Russian artillery batteries, armored units, and forward supply points within 48 to 72 hours. In this video I explain exactly:
- what the Rovenky Distribution Complex was in Russia's eastern logistics architecture,
- why it cannot be replaced by re-routing through adjacent nodes,
- how Ukraine's nine-week intelligence preparation produced a three-zone simultaneous strike that destroyed every functional section, and
- where this strike sits in the nine-operation campaign Ukraine has been executing since November 2025.
The numbers are unforgiving and the timing is deliberate.
Ben Hodges: Ukraine Just Set The One Saratov Refinery On Fire With 117 Drones. (27-min. YouTube video
; Nexus War Room; August 9, 2026)
Ukraine's drone campaign against Russia's fuel supply hit a new milestone overnight on August 2, 2026, striking the Saratov oil refinery for the 15th time since the war began, per independent-monitor Astra. The Rosneft-owned refinery, one of Russia's oldest, caught fire alongside a strike on the nearby Engels-2 strategic bomber airbase.
- Ukraine's General Staff confirmed the operation damaged the refinery's primary crude distillation unit.
- Russian Governor Roman Busargin acknowledged damage to civilian infrastructure without specifics.
- Bloomberg called it part of a record barrage on Russia's fuel industry, part of the broader military-escalation analysis behind this breaking geopolitical news today.
The strike came a day before Lukoil's Volgograd refinery also halted production, after a July that saw eight Russian refineries knocked off-line, including the country's largest at Omsk. Financial Times analysis found Ukrainian strikes have disrupted 30 to 45% of Russia's refining capacity, a global security developments story with international crisis update implications for front-line fuel logistics.
NEW: Google Just KILLED Russia's Secret. (19-min. YouTube video; The Military Show; August 6, 2026)
Russia's covert assassination unit, Center 795, was designed to be untraceable. Embedded inside the Kalashnikov Concern, it aimed to replace exposed GRU networks. But when a Russian operative and a Montenegrin hitman turned to Google Translate to bridge their language barrier, the FBI intercepted every detail of their $1.5-Million murder plot. Uncover the six fatal missteps that unraveled Moscow's most-secretive assassination squad.
[Speaking of War Games...]
Alex Boyd: Russia Charges Telegram Founder Pavel Durov With Facilitating Terrorism. (BBC News; July 30, 2026)
Russia has charged Telegram's founder Pavel Durov with facilitating terrorism over allegations the messenger app has been used for recruitment by Ukrainian secret services.
The FSB - Russia's domestic security service - said Telegram had been used "to prepare and co-ordinate acts of sabotage and terror" inside Russia and had failed to remove channels, chats and bots used by Ukraine.
An international arrest warrant has been issued for the Russian-born Durov, who lives abroad.
Shortly after the charge was announced, Telegram's account on X posted an image showing Durov holding up his middle finger. He has previously accused Russian authorities of "fabricating new pretexts to restrict Russians' access to Telegram".
Telegram is popular in Russia and is used by tens-of-millions of people, although authorities have been restricting access as part of a wider crackdown on internet freedom. The app is also popular in Ukraine.
Multi-billionaire Durov, 41, has lived outside of Russia for many years and holds French and United Arab Emirates (UAE) passports.
It is unclear whether other countries or authorities would comply with an arrest warrant issued by Russia.
Durov left Russia in 2014 after refusing to comply with government demands to shut down opposition communities on the platform. He had previously founded popular Russian social-media company VKontakte - dubbed the "Facebook of Russia".
Telegram is used by around 950-million people worldwide and has previously positioned itself as an app focused on its users' privacy, rather than the normal policies prioritized by other global social-media companies.
The platform has previously faced criticism of its app moderation, but has denied having insufficient practices.
Durov was arrested and placed under formal investigation in France in 2024 over allegations of failure to properly moderate the app to reduce criminality. He was allowed to go home months later, with the investigation continuing.
Sam:
BANK RUN - Putin's Banks COLLAPSE As Russians Withdraw BILLIONS! (39-min. YouTube video; Business Basics; July 30, 2026)
[Heavy Putin resentment and draft avoidance here, compared to the article below which was posted only 12 days earlier!]
Evgeny Pudovkin and Daria Mosolova: Russians Turn To Cash, Putting More Strain On Slowing Wartime Economy. (graphs; BBC News; July 18, 2026)
Russians are returning to cash, as mobile internet shutdowns disrupt card payments, and more businesses seek to dodge tax under mounting financial pressure more than four years into the war with Ukraine.
Russia has added 1.56tn roubles (£14.8bn; $20bn) in cash into circulation since the start of the year - the biggest rise for the equivalent period in any year outside the Covid-19 pandemic.
The spike comes amid a wave of Ukrainian drone attacks, which have repeatedly led the Kremlin to shut down mobile internet across large swathes of the country, leaving many unable to pay by card. The government says the aim of the shutdowns is to counter the drone strikes.
"Having cash on hand gives you some sense of control and security", one woman in Moscow told the BBC on condition of anonymity. "If there's an emergency in the city, I know I'll still be able to buy basic necessities, even if the mobile network goes down."
The latest increase follows several earlier wartime surges in cash withdrawals as Russians have sought a buffer against uncertainty. Now, the shift is making it harder for the state to collect tax, just as it faces a widening budget deficit and needs every rouble it can raise to fund the war in Ukraine.
Although Russia's oil and gas sector, which accounts for about a quarter of state revenues, has benefited from a recent rise in oil prices following the Iran war, the broader economy is slowing.
Denys Davydov: Update From Ukraine: Russian Army Collapses In The South. Russian Command Is Stupid. (18-min. Frontline video; June 2, 2026)
Cormac Smith: Putin Could Lose Crimea After Ukraine Strikes Fuel Trucks On Bridge. (28-min. Frontline video; June 1, 2026)
Ukraine has destroyed nearly two-thousand fuel trucks - most of these on the main road, on the land bridge between Donbas and Crimea.
Crimea is no longer a step too far, as Ukraine strikes the conflict's lynch-pin, says former British diplomat Cormac Smith.
NEW: Serhii Plokhii: Casus Belli: Did Lenin Create Modern Ukraine? (photo, lies, history; Ukrainian Research Institute at Harvard University/HURI; February 27, 2022)
Vladimir Putin has justified his ongoing invasion of Ukraine on the basis of a bizarre reading of history and accusations that Ukraine is at the same time Lenin's creation and the homeland of the Nazis.
Much has been said in the last few years to show the fraudulent nature of the "Nazi" claim. But the Lenin theme fully emerged only recently, in Putin's February 21 speech in which he recognized the "independence" of the two puppet-states created by Russia in eastern Ukraine at the start of the Russo-Ukrainian war in 2014. The bizarre nature of that claim is underlined by the fact that at least one of those "republics", the Donetsk one, claimed at its creation the legacy of an earlier puppet state, the Donetsk-Kryvyi Rih republic, which was formed by the Bolsheviks in 1918 to prevent that territory from being included in the Ukrainian state.
In his de-facto declaration of war, Putin stated that "modern Ukraine was entirely created by Russia or, to be more precise, by Bolshevik, Communist Russia. This process started practically right after the 1917 revolution, and Lenin and his associates did it in a way that was extremely harsh on Russia - by separating, severing what is historically Russian land". Putin developed that idea by stating: "Soviet Ukraine is the result of the Bolsheviks' policy and can rightfully be called 'Vladimir Lenin's Ukraine'. He was its creator and architect."
In Ukrainian social media, reaction to Putin's statement was almost immediate. Within a few hours, Facebook was flooded with images of Vladimir Lenin surprised to learn that he had created Ukraine. Another montage inserted Lenin into the monument to the legendary founders of Kyiv, the brothers Kyi, Shchek, and Khoryv and their sister, Lybid. Lenin replaced Lybid at the prow of the boat carrying the founders of the Ukrainian capital. The monument expresses Ukrainians' belief that their country's roots go back to the Middle Ages.
But what about modern Ukraine, a state that, according to Mr. Putin, came into existence at the expense of historical Russian lands? Even a cursory acquaintance with the history of the Russian Revolution and fall of the Russian Empire that accompanied it indicates that the modern Ukrainian state came into existence not thanks to Lenin but against his wishes and in direct reaction to the Bolshevik putsch in Petrograd in October (according to the Gregorian calendar, November) of 1917. The Bolsheviks tried to take control of Kyiv as well but were defeated, jump-starting the process of the modern Ukrainian state-building.
In January 1918 the Central Rada (Council), the revolutionary Ukrainian parliament, dominated by socialist and leftist parties and led by Ukraine's most-prominent historian, Mykhailo Hrushevsky, declared the creation of the Ukrainian People’s Republic. It encompassed most of today's Ukrainian territories within the borders of the Russian Empire, including the mining region of the Donbas (Donets Basin). The new state wanted to maintain federal ties with Russia, but after the Bolshevik invasion of January 1918, the Central Rada declared the independence of Ukraine.
The Bolsheviks waged war on the Ukrainian government under the banner of their own "Ukrainian Peoples Republic" - a fiction created to provide a degree of legitimacy for the Bolshevik takeover of Ukraine. Bolshevik troops massacred the population of Kyiv, killing hundreds if not thousands of its citizens, including Metropolitan Vladimir (Bogoiavlensky) of the Orthodox Church. The Bolshevik commander in Kyiv, Mikhail Muraviev, sent Lenin a telegram: "Order has been restored in Kyiv."
The Central Rada had to leave Kyiv but soon returned, having signed an agreement with Germany and Austria-Hungary, whose troops moved into Ukraine in the spring of 1918 and drove the Bolsheviks out of its territory, including the Donbas. The Germans soon replaced the democratic Central Rada with the authoritarian regime of Herman Pavlo Skoropadsky, but the democratic Ukrainian People's Republic was restored when the Germans withdrew from Ukraine late in 1918. The Bolsheviks moved in once again, this time under the banner of their adversary Ukrainian People's Republic, formally independent of Russia.
After the original defeats in Ukraine, Lenin came to the conclusion that the formal independence of the Ukrainian state, coupled with concessions in the realm of language and culture, was absolutely necessary if the Bolsheviks were to maintain their control over Ukraine. He felt that Ukrainian aspirations to independence were so strong, not only among Ukrainians in general but even among the Bolsheviks themselves, as to require the granting of a degree of AUTONOMY and a STATUS EQUAL TO RUSSIA within the Soviet Union, the new state whose creation was declared in 1922.
Lenin was indeed central to the formation of the USSR, as Mr. Putin has claimed. But Lenin's main contribution to the history of Russo-Ukrainian relations was NOT the formation of a modern Ukraine state, but the ENDOWMENT of the Russian Federation - the name under which it entered the Soviet Union - with a territory and institutions of its own, distinct for the first time in centuries from the territory and institutions of the empire that it was seeking to preserve. If anything, Lenin laid the foundations for the formation of modern Russia, not Ukraine. Boris Yeltsin, Mr. Putin's patron, took THAT STATE, the Russian Federation, OUT of the Soviet Union in 1991. It is over THAT STATE, NOT pre-revolutionary Russia, that Mr. Putin presides.
[This article is likely to become crucial, once the tRUmPUtin collusion is rectified.]


Climate Change (due to tRUmPUtin and friends):

EPA Repeals Climate Rules For Power Plants. NRDC Will Sue, As The Trump Administration Abandons Common-Sense Limits On Carbon Pollution From The Largest Industrial Source. (Natural Resources Defense Council; September 14, 2026)
The Trump administration just announced dangerous plans to repeal the EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse-gas pollution from power plants. At the same time, they repealed Biden-era rules limiting carbon pollution for old coal plants and for new gas plants built after 2024.
Power plants are responsible for one-quarter of U.S. carbon emissions. If this latest proposal is finalized, coal and gas plants would have free rein to spew climate pollution unchecked - and it would become harder for future administrations - that actually care about addressing climate change and pollution - to hold them accountable.
Tell the EPA they can't abandon their duty to hold dirty power plants accountable for their pollution. If the EPA abandons its statutory authority to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants, the consequences would be severe:
- More unnatural disasters - from devastating floods and wildfires to deadly heat waves that hit harder and harder every summer.
- Dirtier air and serious health impacts - more asthma attacks, respiratory illness, heat-related deaths, and premature death, especially in communities already overburdened by pollution.
- Higher costs for families - from healthcare bills to recovering from climate disasters to rising homeowners'-insurance rates.
The EPA is legally obligated under the Clean Air Act to regulate climate pollution. The science is settled. The law is settled. And we intend to fight this in court - but we need your voice on the public record first.
This proposal isn't just bad policy. It's part of a coordinated scheme to strip the EPA of its authority to regulate climate pollution altogether - the same illegal logic the agency used earlier this year to repeal the Endangerment Finding (a core scientific and legal foundation that allows the agency to regulate climate pollution), and to gut tailpipe-emissions standards for new cars and trucks.
NRDC promptly sued the administration challenging its repeal of the endangerment finding. Now we're preparing to challenge this latest repeal in court - and your public comment helps bolster our legal case.
We've done this before. Last year, activists like you barraged the EPA with public comments in support of keeping the Biden-era standards regulating power-plant carbon emissions. This level of outrage ultimately delayed this most recent repeal for over a year. We also submitted 56,000 public comments rejecting the EPA's proposal to repeal the Endangerment Finding - and that record is now part of our legal arsenal.
Let's do it again. Whether it's delaying bad decisions or laying the groundwork for a future lawsuit, we need you to submit a public comment to the EPA, telling them they can't walk away from their legal mandate to protect us from deadly pollution.
Submit Your Public Comment!
[TO the EPA, with copies to NRDC and your local legislators! Details to follow.]
White House Watch: Tracking Attacks on Our Environment & Health. (Natural Resources Defense Council; September 14, 2026)
Since the second Trump administration took office in January 2025, it has taken or proposed at least 550 actions that directly threaten the environment, climate, and human health. NRDC witnessed an immediate and unprecedented attack on our environment and public health. This includes:
- a rollback of crucial environmental safeguards,
- the repeal of bedrock environmental and health laws,
- the delay of critical protections for endangered species, and
- attacks on well-established science and scientists.
Sasha Abramsky: Wildfires Are Sweeping North America. Trump Fired The People Who Fight Them. (TruthOut; September 4, 2026)
As climate-change worsens wildfires, a gutted U.S. Forest Service is struggling to keep up.
The 2026 fire season has been devastating for the U.S. On September 1, the National Interagency Fire Center released data showing that, year-to-date, more than 52,000 wildfires had, cumulatively, burned 8.2-million acres of land in the U.S. That's 126% of the 10-year rolling average for the number of annual fires, and 163% of the average acreage burned each year. In Oregon alone, well over 2-million acres have turned to ash.
This is what happens when a government no longer works to reduce climate change and its consequences, and at the same time no longer invests adequately in the workers and agencies that have the skills to corral the increasingly-frequent fires breaking out in parched, drought-stricken regions.
As DOGE's assault on the U.S. government picked up steam last year, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) ended up in the cross-hairs. By year's end, more than 6,000 employees, many of them highly-skilled fire-fighters and fire-prevention specialists, had been severed from federal employment. Astoundingly, the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) estimated that 57 out of 77 research labs, whose employees were doing vital work both preparing for fires and responding once they broke out, were shuttered.
[Could "our" government do even worse? YES. tRUmPUtin and Co. keeps proving that it can.]
Chris Rivers: The Super Niño That Is Coming Will Be The Most Intense Ever Recorded For 150 Years. What Should We Expect In 2027? (thermal chart of oceans; Green Technology Investments; July 25, 2026)
An increasingly-warm ocean, global temperatures already at historic highs, and a natural phenomenon that could further amplify the effects of the climate crisis. This is the scenario that is worrying scientists: the return of El Niño, which, according to some projections, could turn into one of the most intense events ever recorded in the last 150 years.
This was reported by research published in Nature, which analyzed the latest data on ocean temperatures and available climate models. According to estimates, the phenomenon developing in the Pacific Ocean could reach exceptional levels, with important consequences on the global climate.
Max Saltman, Sharon Braithwaite/CNN: How Arsonists Used Cats To Spread Italy's Wildfires.
(short news videos on YouTube, by CNN, NBC, BBC, etc.; Signs Of The Times/SOTT; July 22, 2026)
As wildfires blazed in southern Italy this week, authorities probing for arson found a grisly clue: cats "with flammable-soaked rags tied to their tails". "These animals were released into the fields, running around and spreading the fire.", said Domenico Costarella of Calabria's Civil Protection Agency. He added that other pieces of evidence also pointed to arson, including candles lit among flammable rags and delayed ignition devices.
Firefighters are still working to contain blazes around Calabria's Pollino National Park; firefighting teams have completed more than 160 missions within Calabria in the past 24 hours.
Europe has been consumed by a nasty fire season this year; a wet winter provided new vegetation, much of which became tinder for fires after three successive summer heatwaves.
Using cats to spread fire is not a new phenomenon in southern Italy. In 2016, authorities in Sicily blamed The Mob for using cats to start forest fires in a national park. In 2017
, officials said the same tactic was used to set fires outside of Naples, near Mount Vesuvius.
UC Berkeley researcher Lauren Pearson told CNN last year that there is evidence that Mafia groups often set fires to gain control of territory, often buying land at a bargain in the aftermath. In recent years, Pearson said, some organized-crime groups have taken advantage of Italy's clean-energy transition; one farmer who testified to an anti-Mafia commission in 2022 said he was approached by solar panel companies to sell his land after it had been burned.
Sergio Nazzaro, a journalist and former spokesman for the president of the Anti-Mafia Parliamentary Commission, said that Mafia groups exploit emergencies through front organizations, "from the labor force that sets the fire to the concession to build on burned land."
In Calabria, Costarella of the Civil Protection Department warned that stopping arson would take a societal shift. "We are getting back to work and returning to our posts, but we need a shift in mindset", he said. "These are inhumane acts. Sadly, men are their own worst enemies."
[Why are the Mafia and weaponized cats in this tRUmPUtin section? Think MAGA and ICE - Trump's personal armies, enablers of his massive destruction and theft, as brutal and powerful as the Mafia in Italy or the NAZIs in Hitler's Germany.]
Wajahat Ali and Paging America: How Can Americans Survive The "Explosive Diarrhea" Parasite, Climate Change And MAGA? (49-min. video; The Left Hook; July 18, 2026)
[Our full article and links are in Subsection 6, Health Issues; but we also wanted to give credit here, where credit is due...]


Role Models TrumPutin Ignored:

Charlotte Clymer: Dolly Parton, 1946-2026; She Who Never Needed a Crown. (Charlotte's Web Thoughts; August 25, 2026)
God keeps taking the wrong 80-year-olds from us.
That was my first thought when I saw the news this afternoon. It's a selfish thought, I admit. I'm at peace with being selfish about this.
Every day of my life, Dolly Parton was somewhere on this earth strumming guitars with her acrylic nails, talking up the beauty of humanity, being honest about our frailties and shortcomings, asking solely through her music if we all couldn't be better to ourselves and each other.
Here's what I think needs to be said about Dolly Parton:
- You knew everything about her, everything real and true, by her actions.
- She was a Christian who spread the Gospel solely through taking care of the least fortunate among us.
- She was a patriot who thought the best of America was in our diversity and never backed down from that.
- She was a feminist who didn't like calling herself a feminist but somehow made her feminism clear through her refusal to let others define her or hold back women or anyone else.
- You always knew where she stood just by her example.
Did y'all know she was a prodigy?
- As a little girl, she put together her first guitar using a mandolin and bass strings.
- She was on the local radio by 10.
- She put out her first record by 11.
- She was introduced at the Grand Ole Opry by Johnny Cash at age 13.
She loved her family and she loved Jesus and she loved music. That's all she ever needed in the world from a young age. She worked her ass off for years toward her dream. No real connections. She just did the damn thing and wouldn't stop until she got there.
We love Dolly Parton because she never forgot where she came from, and had the awareness to understand there were places all over the world just like hers and people in them who needed some help.
We love Dolly Parton's music, but that's not why we love her.
We love her because she spent her entire life unconditionally loving us.
[That's the way to spread any religion's or culture's best teachings, and - yes, unlike that other 80-year old - Dolly Parton did it so very well!
If you'll be free Saturday, September 12, from 10AM-Noon Boston time, reserve your free online ticket for "Dolly Parton - Music History Livestream"!]

Saturday Free School: Paul Robeson: A Man For the Future (2023) (56-min. Paul Robeson Documentary; YouTube; April 9, 2025)
("Paul Robeson: A Man For the Future" is an original documentary produced by The Saturday Free School for Philosophy and Black Liberation. We celebrate Robeson as a complete human being and friend of world humanity. His contribution to the cause of building world peace and universal brotherhood highlights the centrality of the Black struggle in the fight against white-supremacy, imperialism and war. This documentary premiered on May 25th, 2023 as a part of the 125th Birth Anniversary celebration in Chicago at the DuSable Black History Museum and Education Center. More information on Robeson and the celebration can be found at www.robeson125th.org.)
Paul Robeson  (April 9, 1898 - January 23, 1976) was a great artist, revolutionary and  lifelong crusader for darker humanity's striving for self-determination and positive peace. The son of an escaped slave who rose to become one of the world's most famous singers and actors, he dedicated his artistic career to the struggle of the oppressed. As a pioneer of the study of African-American and world folk-culture, Robeson saw art as an articulation of human striving and potential that could unite the masses around the world on the basis of universal values of peace, justice and human dignity and provide a vision for the future.
Along with Dr. W.E.B. Du Bois, Robeson was a founding member of the World Peace Council and the Council of African Affairs - both these organizations worked in solidarity with the anti-colonial struggles in Africa and Asia. With the start of the Cold War and McCarthyism, he was persecuted by the U.S. state for his refusal to cease linking the struggle for civil rights in the US to the anti-colonial struggles and work towards peaceful co-existence with the USSR. His moral courage and indomitable spirit of sacrifice made him beloved by the peoples of the world.
Today, the question of peace is central to our times. The ongoing genocide in Gaza and possibility of ever-expanding war threaten the forces of democracy and self-determination. The US ruling elite are weakened by the rise of the discontented masses at home, and the ascending Afro-Asiatic world. These times call for a serious effort to unite against war and white supremacy, based on Robeson's vision for a human future. His belief in the moral capacity of working people and his love for humanity must show us a way forward. We must sing Robeson's "Song of the Rivers", which speaks of the merging of the Nile, Ganga, Yangtse, Volga, and the Mississippi into "the mightiest river of all -- the people's will for peace and freedom now surging in floodtide throughout the world".
[The biography details that follow are truly inspirational. The USA that treated the great Robeson so badly, and the awful Trump so well, should mend itself - in part, by reading the full online version of this article.]


tRUmPUtin's Latest "Let's Pretend":

Jessiah ?: Trump Signals Cabinet MASS PURGE! (13-min. YouTube video; Pondering Politics; November 7, 2026)
Jessiah reacts to breaking news that Donald Trump is signaling there will be a mass Cabinet purge.
[A thoughtful analysis.]
Ben Meiselas: Dems Put Trump ON NOTICE!!!
(15-min. YouTube video; MeidasTouch; November 7, 2026)
MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on:
- Democrats putting Donald Trump and his administration on notice to preserve records and evidence.
- Democrats warning corporations that benefited from the Trump administration, that cover-ups will also face consequences.
- Democrats' message that they're ready to punch back.
Amanda Bell: Abdul El-Sayed Sends Pointed Message To Trump On "The View". (November 5, 2026)
Abdul El-Sayed was the second new senator-elect to take a victory lap on The View this week, following James Talarico. The incoming Michigan politician was the featured guest of the day on today's new episode, and he came prepared to answer the panelists’ questions about his campaign, his policies, and the things that have been said about him.
In one standout moment from the interview, El-Sayed directed a message to Donald Trump. The comment came in response to a reminder of the flurry of insults that were levied at him during the race, including Trump's suggestion that El-Sayed, the first Muslim to be elected to the Senate in national history, would need to go through a metal detector to enter Capitol Hill.
Of that, El-Sayed reiterated his previous response, saying, "I'll do a metal detector all day because I have nothing to hide. But Donald, if you're watching, the lie detector is still on the table."
Himani Ediriweera: Fox News Co-Host Fires Back, After Trump's Scathing Text Was Read Out Live On-Air. (photo; MSN; November 5, 2026)
As U.S. midterm-election results rolled in, Donald Trump lashed out at Fox News, calling host Jessica Tarlov "DUMB AS A ROCK" and sending an angry text to her colleague.
She fired back amid a sweeping Democratic victory.

[As Fox News shops for a new audience, the truth will out?]

Never Forget! (and Definitely, Not Before You Vote!)

Dr. Mary Trump: The Origins Of My Uncle's Cruelty (; Transcend PAC; November 5, 2026)
People often ask me the same question: WHY is Donald like this? Why the CRUELTY, over and over, when there's so often nothing to gain from it?
Here's the short version:

When Donald was two-and-a-half, my grandmother was hospitalized and unavailable to her children for almost a year. The only parent left was my grandfather Fred, a high‑functioning sociopath with no interest in small children and no patience for their needs.
So a toddler learned the lesson that was available to him: Needing anything is humiliating, and the person you depend on most is also the person you should be afraid of.
Unfortunately, the child never got past it. I've said for years that underneath all of this, Donald is still the terrified little boy he has always been. And his terror makes him cruel, because cruelty is one of the few tools he has to manage his own fear.
I'm not telling you this so you'll feel sorry for him. I'm telling you because it explains his actions:
- It explains an administration that treats punishment as the point.
- It explains ICE agents pulling people out of their workplaces and off their streets.
- It explains the attacks on anyone who holds him accountable, from prosecutors to judges to the press.
The Trump regime has made cruelty its organizing principle, and the Republican Party covers for him because of what they get out of it.

[Bingo!]
---
I started Transcend PAC because the way out of this isn’t easy, but it is worth it. We are working towards a better tomorrow.
If that’s a mission you believe in, and you’re ready to transcend an era of politics built on one man’s fear, please chip in $5, $10, or whatever you’re able to give to Transcend PAC.

[We just did. Again. Mary Trump has contributed greatly to analyzing the history and motives of our first - and hopefully, only - traitorous president of the USA.]


Greg Sargent: DEATH KNELL: Trump Rages Wildly Over Losses - And Accidentally Reveals How MAGA Dies. (The New Republic, Politics; November 4, 2026)
MAGA's staying power has relied heavily on the political and media enablers who reinforce Trump's lies. After yesterday's election, that whole project will get a whole lot harder to pull off.
In the most-predictable outcome ever, Donald Trump blamed everyone but himself for the blue tsunami that flipped the Senate and House on Tuesday night. No one was spared:
- Fox News,
- the GOP candidates,
- his own consultants.
All of them, he fumed, brought about this epic catastrophe for his party.
But Trump's fury has proven illuminating - because the logical extension of his own claims is that the MAGA movement will almost certainly not be sustainable going forward, at least not in anything like its current form.
"I wasn't on the Ballot and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!", Trump seethed as the results came in. This statement is true in only one sense: The Trump coalition really didn't show up to the polls, and by his own accidental admission - since he's now a lame duck - it never will again.
The MAGA coalition basically disintegrated on Tuesday night. Democrats flipped at least five Senate seats in states Trump carried by double-digits, which could rise to seven if Democrats win in Alaska and Mississippi. Trump's 2024 gains among Latinos and young voters - which were central to claims that MAGA had become a multi-racial, multi-generational working-class realignment - evaporated. Indeed, exit polls show that:
- Democrats won Latinos and young voters nationally by extraordinarily lop-sided margins.
- Democrats almost reached parity with Republicans among non-college voters.
- Democrats increased their vote-share among working-class whites by 14 points relative to 2024.
- Democrats won white women, notably reversing Trump's 2024 victory among them.
Meanwhile, Democrats forged deep into MAGA country:
- Many Senate seats they flipped - Iowa, North and South Carolina, and possibly Alaska, where they're favored - are among the more-rural states in the country.
- Importantly, throw in Texas, and many of the biggest wins were in the South. Democrats recaptured places like Mahoning County in Ohio, the archetypal Obama-Trump county and the epicenter of Trump's capture of ancestral unionized working-class Democrats.
- En route to winning well over 250 House seats, Democrats flipped districts in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Appalachian North Carolina. The public rejection of Trump and his agenda was monumental and decisive.
Yet as the bad news rolled in, Trump raged at … Fox News.
- He insisted that Fox "bears responsibility for these losses" because it sometimes features the "Dumocrat opposition" on the air.
- He fumed at Fox for its history of publishing polls that displease him.
- He even called in to Fox to complain.
In all this, too, you can also see a deeper revelation of MAGA failure. Fox has functioned as a major dis-informational support system for Trump and the MAGA movement. As Matt Gertz of Media Matters details, Fox has:
- propagandized on behalf of his Iran war,
- sanitized his ethnic-cleansing campaign, and
- hidden his corruption and self-dealing from public view,
- among many other things.
Central to this has been the maintenance of plausible deniability. Fox does feature Democrats and does have a sterling polling operation. That's all fine, but it's also allowed Fox to obscure its role as a propaganda operation for Trump and his movement. The Fox-Trump alliance has in a sense operated as a bigger experiment in running totalitarian-style state propaganda on behalf of a dictatorial presidency.
This whole project failed spectacularly on Election Night. Trump's criticism of Fox is actually an attack on Fox for not doing enough to deceive its viewers. And that's true as far as it goes: Fox could not deceive them to the degree that Trump and MAGA needed it to. It could not sell them on the idea that the war was worth fighting - or on the notion that Trump's economy and presidency have constituted world-historical successes.
Every indication right now is that the constellation of policies loosely-described as "Trumpism" helped unleash this disaster on the GOP:
- Exit polls showed public opposition to his tariffs and his personal corruption alike to be broad and deep.
- All signs are that Trump's mass-deportation campaign helped drive away Latinos.
- Tariffs, white nationalism, and the freedom of Dear Leader to pillage the public to his heart's content are all key pillars of MAGA.
- Adam Gurri adds the essential point that this massive electoral rebuke was nothing less than a repudiation of the authoritarian consolidation at the core of the whole MAGA project. No amount of propaganda and lies from Fox could make any of it palatable. Nor will they be able to, going forward.
In this context, it's notable that Trump also privately raged at his own advisers over the losses. As The New York Times reports, Trump "vented his frustration at political aides and accused them of giving him bad information about polling in the lead-up to the elections."
What Trump really means by all this is that his MAGA agenda cannot fail. It can only be failed. Only the messengers for it - Fox, GOP candidates, his own consultants - can possibly be to blame if it faces national rejection. His presidency has deeply-alienated national majorities, but to Trump this simply cannot be so by definition.
The natural heir of MAGA is JD Vance. But as Jonathan V. Last writes, Vance's only hope of getting the 2028 GOP nomination is to keep Trump happy. If so, he can apparently only go so far in admitting to the Trump presidency's record of extraordinary failure in order to recalibrate. If Vance even edges in that direction, he very-likely cannot be MAGA's standard bearer. Note that Trump already fired a warning shot at Vance.
Yet as this election's thrashing suggests, the MAGA agenda cannot appeal to anything close to national majorities in its current form, either. Maybe someone out there can pick this lock. But if Trump's sound and fury signifies anything, it's that it's very hard to see where this movement goes from here, or what must happen for it to endure.
[MAGA won't be missed - except by tRUmPUtin and a few other enemies of the U.S.A. that now awaits our restoration.]
Jill Lawless and Rob Gillies: World Leaders Who Sparred With Trump Express Relief Mixed With Caution At Republican Election Rout. (more info, related articles; AP News; November 4, 2026)
LONDON/UK (AP) - World leaders who have sparred with the "America first" President Donald Trump greeted the rout of his Republican Party in yesterday's U.S. midterm elections with a measure of relief today, allowing themselves to hope for a less-combative U.S. foreign policy.
But that hope was seasoned with the expectation that this major American voters' rebuke would NOT necessarily:
- end the U.S. conflict with Iran, or
- change Trump's policies on tariffs, or
- improve his lukewarm-at-best support for Ukraine and America's European allies.
Progressive politicians cast the results as part of a trend of liberal comebacks around the world, following recent defeats for populists on the right in Hungary, Brazil and Serbia.
[Read ALL of this article, online!]
Eric McDaniel and Claudia Grisales: Democrats Win Full Control Of Congress, Ushering In A New Era Of Divided Government. (NPR Politics Podcast; November 4, 2026)
Democrats have cemented control of both chambers of Congress, according to an NPR analysis based on a tally of race calls by The Associated Press.
The twin victories in the House and Senate return the Democratic Party to full control of Congress for the first time since 2023 - and deepen the level of expected friction between President Trump and congressional Democrats in a new era of divided government.
After a largely-unrestrained start to his second term, Trump's final two years in the White House are now certain to be hampered by congressional investigations in two chambers and legislators hostile to his agenda.
The midterm campaign was defined by Americans' frustrations with the high cost of living and perceived public corruption. Those concerns were at the heart of Democratic campaign messaging, including in the seven Senate races that flipped from Republican control: North Carolina, South Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Kansas, Iowa and Maine. Democrats also easily held onto a Senate seat in Georgia, despite its swing-state status.
Hafiz Rashid: Democrats Win Enough Seats Nationwide To End Electoral College. (The New Republic; November 4, 2026)
Enough state legislatures and gubernatorial offices have flipped to pass the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. With Democratic victories in state legislatures and governorships across the country yesterday, the Electoral College could now be in jeopardy - even without a near-impossible Constitutional amendment. If passed by enough states, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact would effectively nullify the Electoral College and, with it, the possibility of a candidate being elected president without winning the popular vote. Since the compact was introduced in 2006, 19 states have passed it, agreeing to assign their electoral votes to whichever candidate wins the national popular vote. That amounts to 222 of the 270 electoral votes that a candidate needs to win the presidential election.
Yesterday, Democrats took control of state legislatures and governor-ships in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada, all states that haven't agreed to the compact. If all five vote to join, then the total number of electoral votes apportioned based on the national popular vote jumps to 283.
That all depends on whether Democrats in these states think that the compact is a priority. Democrats in Michigan failed to pass the compact when they held a trifecta from 2023 to 2024, and Nevada's Democratic governor vetoed the compact in 2019, saying that it would hurt the state’s role in presidential elections.
There are also potential Constitutional issues:
- In Article 2, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3, the Constitution says that states can appoint electors "in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct."
-
But in Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3, it also prohibits interstate compacts without the consent of Congress.
- The Democratic takeover of Congress would seemingly make this moot, and
- in theory, if the compact comes to a vote in the House and Senate, it wouldn't even need the president's signature.
- But Democrats still don't have a filibuster-proof majority of 60 votes in the Senate, and
- with their dwindling national popularity, Republicans would undoubtedly try to block nullifying the Electoral College. After all, four of the five presidents who have won the presidency while losing the popular vote were Republicans, including President Donald Trump in 2016.
[It would be good to get the president we voted for...]
Martin Pengelly and Andrew Perez: BREAKING: Dems Take Full Control Of Congress In Trump-GOP Disaster. (Zeteo; November 4, 2026)
Democrats have taken full control of the U.S. Congress in a massive repudiation of Donald Trump's authoritarian presidency and his gross mishandling of the economy.
Democratic Senate candidates surged to victory in Iowa, Kansas, Maine, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, and Texas – and could win more still. Dems are also on pace for a sizable House majority.
The blue wave that observers have projected for months, ended up being a blue tsunami last night. Democrats are expected to win a significant majority in the House of Representatives, and they've already flipped seven Senate seats held by Republicans.
For the first two years of Trump's second term, Republicans have held a governing trifecta, denying Democrats much opportunity to block their agenda or hold the president and his corrupt administration accountable. That's about to change: With control of the House and Senate, Democrats will be able launch formal investigations, and the president will no longer be able to ram through legislation.


"2026 Midterm Elections: Complete Guide"; U.S. Presidential Election News; October 29, 2026 and updating through the November 3rd Elections)
The 2026 midterm elections will determine control of Congress and elect governors and other officials across the country. Election Day is Tuesday, November 3, 2026.
Use this hub to follow the candidates, general-election matchups, polling, race ratings and state-by-state voting information. Election Central's guides will be updated through Election Day as candidate status, ballot information and race ratings change.
2026 election at a glance: All 435 U.S. House seats, 35 U.S. Senate contests and 36 governor races are on the ballot in 2026.


Steve Kornacki: The Races That Will Provide First "Real Tests" On Election Night (8-min. YouTube video; NBC News; November 3, 2026)
Voters are heading to the polls across the country today, in an election that will determine which party controls the U.S. House and Senate. NBC News' Steve Kornacki joins Meet the Press NOW to break down key battleground states and the races that could give the earliest indication of which way results are headed.
"He's down there..." CNN's Harry Enten Explains His Final Predictions & Trump's Ratings. (20-min. YouTube video; CNN-News18; November 3, 2026)
CNN chief data-analyst Harry Enten delivers his final data forecast for the 2026 U.S. Midterm Elections, examining the latest polling trends, election projections and political battlegrounds across the United States. Using polling averages, primary turnout trends and predictive modeling, the analysis explores the key factors shaping the election and the potential implications for Donald Trump and both political parties.
Prem Thakker: First Draft: What About Arab And Muslim Safety? Prem Reports On Election Day From Michigan, Where Republicans Have Led A Vicious Islamophobic Campaign Against Abdul El-Sayed. (Zeteo; November 3, 2026)
Good morning friends. Prem here, reporting on the ground from Michigan on a long-awaited 2026 Election Day – when we find out just how tired Americans are of Donald Trump's authoritarian presidency and Republican control in Washington.
In today's "First Draft", I bring you a story the corporate media has refused to touch this campaign season: We've seen the state obliterate free speech and unconditionally fund a genocidal government all under the flag of "Jewish safety". But what, if anything, is being done about Arab and Muslim safety?
[A fair question - even if he needs reminding about Israel's public warning about the consequences of a third attack upon an Israeli settlement.]
Molly Olmstead: Fox News Showed The Conservative Reaction To The Election In Real Time. Oof. (Slate; November 3, 2026)
It's been a little while since conservative commentators and influencers have had to deal with this much losing, and they are out of practice. They may have known that a potential blue wave was possible - even likely - but they seemed not to know how to process the thrashing.
On Fox News, the mood was somber. Host Dana Perino floated that perhaps Democrats would "defund the troops". Jesse Watters said, "I don't think we're going to get our $5,000 checks", referring to President Donald Trump's most-outlandish campaign promise. Sean Hannity blamed the war in Iran.
In the MAGA online swamp, influencers and conservative media figures processed the remarkably-poor performance in several ways, some of which have contradicted one another.
A few, particularly during the early part of the night, still tried to gloat where they could. In particular when Republicans won races they were expected to win, as in the Florida governor's race, some influencers bragged about fending off the worst scenarios. But soon the mood turned to doom and disbelief.
Fairly quickly, these accounts moved to looking for a villain. Few directly blamed Donald Trump. More felt confident that it was the faction of their party that they didn't like.
In many cases, that faction was the foreign-policy hawks, whom they blame for the war in Iran. "Great work, neocons", the personality Jack Posobiec wrote. "Take a big bow."
More politically-astute observers understood that the losses were about more than just the culture wars. "Wow, it turns out that 'actually, affordability isn't a big deal' wasn't a winning message", the Daily Wire's Matt Walsh wrote.
The president, for his part, seemed to process the evening through those awkward Fox News segments, and it is fair to say he didn’t like what he saw. In just a couple of hours, he posted about the network three times. "FoxNews Ratings are way down (27%!), because they're spending too much time covering the Trump Deranged Dumocrats!", he wrote on Truth Social at 7 p.m. "It's them, not me. My numbers are better than they have ever been."
NEW: "Your Time Is Running Out!" Letitia James Delivers Blunt Message to Trump. (13-min. YouTube video; The Financial Express/UK; November 3, 2026)
New York Attorney-General Letitia James delivers a forceful message targeting President Donald Trump, declaring that "the reckoning is coming."
In her latest remarks, James puts accountability and the rule of law at the center of the political debate as the 2026 U.S. mid-term elections approach. Her comments add to the on-going political confrontation between the New York attorney-general and Trump.
Rachel Maddow: The Rachel Maddow Show (33-min. YouTube video; MSNBC Breaking News; November 2, 2026)
The night before U.S. mid-term elections.
[Also see at 6PM ETZ, the night after...]
Brian Tyler Cohen: WHOA: FBI Agents Drop LEGAL BOMB On Trump! (19-min. YouTube video; Legal Breakdown; November 2, 2026)
Judge dismisses Trump case against FBI agents.
Psychology & Body Language: Trump STRUGGLES & GLITCHES Just Before Midterms. (12-min. YouTube video;
Dr. G Explains
; November 2, 2026)
With the 2026 midterm elections just hours away, President Donald Trump is making his final push before Election Day on November 3, and his latest public appearances are raising new questions about his speech, language, and behavior.
In this video
, clinical and forensic psychologist Dr. G examines:
- Trump's final three campaign rallies in Daytona Beach, Florida; Dubuque, Iowa; and Salina, Kansas, along with his
-
November 2 remarks at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington, D.C.
Throughout these appearances, Dr. G identifies:
- unusual speech patterns,
- language difficulties,
- disrupted verbal expression, and
- changes in behavior.
At the Reflecting Pool event, he also examines:
- a moment when Trump appears to briefly fall asleep while standing.
What can these observations tell us about the president's communication and behavior during the final days of the 2026 midterm campaign?
In this detailed behavioral analysis, Dr. G compares moments from Trump's final 2026 campaign rallies with his appearance in Washington, exploring the differences between ordinary political rhetoric, speech disruptions, and potentially involuntary behavior. The analysis focuses on what can actually be observed rather than assuming a medical diagnosis from video footage. As the country prepares for the 2026 election results, these final appearances provide an opportunity to examine how President Trump communicates under the demands of an intense national campaign.
David Pakman:
TERRIFYING Trump Rally Confirms He's OUT OF IT. (12-min. YouTube video; The David Pakman Show; November 2, 2026)
The day before, Trump rambles through an Iowa rally
, talking about boring football, a candidate's weight, protesters, and an invented story.
David Pakman: BREAKING: Turnout EXPLODES, DISASTER FOR TRUMP.
(8-min. YouTube video; The David Pakman Show; November 2, 2026) 
- Early voting passes 50-million ballots.
- Records fall in several states.
- Republicans grow nervous about midterm turnout.
John Bolton: Trump's MAGA Collapse Has "Already Begun". (17-min. YouTube video; The Trump Report; November 2, 2026)
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton joins Maddie Hale to discuss:
- Trump's Iran war blame-game,
- the threat of fresh strikes,
- growing Republican fears ahead of the midterms,
- MAGA's potential collapse, and
- Trump's third-term ambitions.
Mary L. Trump: Donald's Election-Security Scheme - Secret Hacks, Quiet Layoffs, And A Threat To Jail Election Officials. (Under The Radar; Substack; November 2, 2026)
Welcome to this week's episode of Under the Radar, where we take a look at what the Trump regime is doing behind everybody's backs while most of us are focused on all of the chaos and distractions it continues to create. Here's the thing, though. While we are being distracted, and while they are intentionally distracting us, they are continuing to make decisions in the background that are changing our lives in ways we are going to be dealing with for a very long time.
Tomorrow, November 3, 2026, Americans will vote in the midterm elections, at least those who have not voted already. As of my last check, 50-million Americans have already voted. But something is happening inside the federal government that deserves our attention before we get the results of these critically-important midterm elections.
On October 19, ProPublica published an investigation revealing that political appointees at the Department of Homeland Security had asked federal cybersecurity officials to acquire a voting machine secretly, attempt to hack it, and then send their findings to the White House. The agency they approached was the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA, whose responsibilities include helping states protect the very election systems the appointees wanted to examine.
According to two former administration officials interviewed by ProPublica, the political appointees also instructed CISA not to notify the voting-machine manufacturer if vulnerabilities were discovered, which is entirely contrary to the agency’s established practices. Career officials objected, and the request was ultimately abandoned.
But do we really think this is an isolated incident? One of the modus operandi of the Trump regime is to try to get away with something and then, when they fail, back off and find people who are willing to try again. In other words, do we seriously think the career officials who objected are going to keep their jobs for much longer? And do we seriously think they will not be replaced by political hacks who will do the bidding of the Trump regime?
[No, no and no. The Putin-backed Trump regime has repeatedly adapted Hitler's old tricks to new technology; others will have to stop it. Many, here AND in Russia, are working on that.]
Heather Cox Richardson: Intending to Steal (14-min. YouTube video; Letters from an American; November 1, 2026)
Trump intends to try to steal the 2026 midterm election:
- He is trying to boost his own popularity, sending e-mail messages extolling the efficiency of the Social Security Administration.
- His administration is, at the same time, using the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security to threaten local and state election officials.
- In Alaska, the administration has asked a judge to order election officials to separate all ballots that rank Daniel J. Sullivan, who shares a name with the Republican incumbent who is running for re-election.
- US District Judge Sharon Gleason has dismissed the lawsuit prohibiting the state from certifying any winner in Alaska other than the Republican incumbent. The administration will appeal her decision.
- Meanwhile, Democrats have filed a lawsuit over Alaska's apparent failure to open at least 18 early-voting locations.
- Trump held a lavish Halloween party at Mar-a-Lago, even as Americans are struggling under soaring oil and gas prices caused by Trump's war in Iran. At the party, Trump acknowledged that a Chinese spy targeted Nvidia's CEO to obtain information about the company's advanced AI chips. Trump chose not to do anything about this transfer.
- Republicans in charge of Alaska's state government are asking that the administration's lawsuit be rejected by the court, reiterating that states, and not the federal government, control elections.
NEW: "Toilets Great Again": How Norway Turned Trump's Insult Into A Viral Masterclass (4-min. YouTube video; Skyline on TimesXP; November 1, 2026)
After Trump's campaign-rally remarks criticized Norway, the Scandinavian nation's tourism board launched a viral campaign titled "Making Toilets Great Again" showcasing its scenic public restrooms.
In this video, TimesXP breaks down:
- Norway's viral toilet-tourism campaign,
- Trump's Michigan-speech context,
- humor diplomacy tactics, and
- 4 key lessons in soft-power communication.
[AND:
- the Comments are also fine!
- Several comments inform us that in English/UK, the slang term for fart is - wait for it - "trump"! It also can refer to the toilet itself, as in: "When you trump, take a dump on the trump."]
Paul Warburg: Ukraine Had An INCREDIBLE Night! (21-min. Youtube video; Geopolitics Impacting the United States;
October 31, 2026)
Ukraine just had one of their best nights of the entire war. They had successful strikes against many targets in Russia, including refineries, Iskander ballistic missile facilities, chemical factories, SU-34 fighter-bombers, and a whole lot more. I talk about the significance of each category, and why it matters so much in light of the U.S. mid-terms and the recent rhetoric of Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
[On Tuesday, may U.S. voters restore support for Ukraine, not FOR tRUmPUtin and his traitor crew!]
Ben Meiselas: BREAKING: Judge DISMISSES Trump's EPSTEIN LAWSUIT… (15-min. YouTube video; The MeidasTouch Podcast; October 31, 2026)
In a major First-Amendment ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of Florida has dismissed Donald Trump's lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, over its reporting on a letter attributed to Trump for Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday.
[His decision reads well; honest judges in Florida. Texas too, perhaps?]
Breaking News: Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Ranking Member, U.S. House Judiciary Committee; House Judiciary Dems Release New Epstein Report On Trump; MS Now, 13-min. YouTube video
; October 30, 2026)


Politico's Megan Messerly, on The Trump Report: Trump Abruptly Cancels Rallies, As Health Questions Grow And GOP Fears Mid-Term Bloodbath. (26-min. YouTube video
; October 30, 2026)
Politico's Megan Messerly joins Maddie Hale to discuss:
- Trump's cancelled rallies,
- growing Republican fears of a brutal midterm defeat, and
- how the Iran war, rising living costs and Canada tariffs could cost the GOP key seats.
Sarah Longwell visits Katie Couric: What Trump Voters Are Really Saying Behind Closed Doors (33-min. YouTube video; MS Now; October 30, 2026)
Heather Cox Richardson: Doomsday Prep, Trump's War Plan, And What We Can Do (15-min. YouTube video; October 30, 2026)
Heather Cox Richardson visits Scott Galloway: The GOP No Longer Exists And It Looks Like The 1850s. (63-min. YouTube video; The Prof G Pod; October 29, 2026)
Heather Cox Richardson, historian and author of the newsletter Letters from an American, joins Scott Galloway to discuss what the midterms could reveal about America's political future - and why she sees echoes of the 1850s in today's shifting coalitions. She explains:
- how concentrated wealth fuels political upheaval,
- why the backlash against billionaires could unite voters across party lines,
- and what Democrats would need to deliver if they win Congress.
Plus:
- the case for a new era of trust busting,
- Elon Musk's power, and
- why she's watching JD Vance beyond Election Day.
[Thinking ahead!]
Prof. David Cay Johnston: Trump Faces Mid-Term Clobbering As He Backflips On Canadian Tariffs To Save GOP; 28-min. YouTube video; The Trump Report (October 29, 2026)
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Cay Johnston joins Maddie Hale to discuss:
- Trump's looming mid-term troubles,
- his weakening grip on Republicans,
- a Canada tariff U-turn to save the GOP,
- concerns over Musk's restrictions on Ukraine's military communications
- and the Epstein scandal.
Heather Cox Richardson: Free And Fair Elections (15-min. YouTube video; October 29, 2026)
NEW: Sara Dorn and Alison Durkee: Trump's History With Jeffrey Epstein: Interviews With Trump Accuser Omitted From Files. (Forbes; February 10, 2026)
The FBI interviewed a woman four times who accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was a minor in the 1980s, but three of the four interviews are omitted from the Epstein files, according to new revelations made public this week.
NEW: Michael Popok:
Trump WEAKLY "Denies" Report Of His Sexual Misconduct/Abuse, As Another Dozen Women Come Forward! (13-min. YouTube video; Legal AF; The Intersection; October 27, 2026)
Now we know what Trump was hiding in the Epstein Files, as 11 women including Beatrice Keul have come forward, and Beatrice claims in new a new bombshell congressional report that she was raped by Trump in the 1990s at the Plaza Hotel. Popok has an interview with Ms. Keul, who main-stream media has ignored for too long.
[Hello, Michael Popok!]
Sharon Zhang: New Evidence Allegedly Ties Trump to 11 Sexual Assaults Related to Epstein. (Truthout; October 26, 2026)
A new report notes several patterns of conduct that Trump and Epstein shared in recruiting victims.
The House Judiciary Committee Democrats have released a trove of evidence regarding allegations of sexual assault, including a new rape allegation against President Donald Trump in relation to Jeffrey Epstein, that the lawmakers say has been deliberately covered up by the Department of Justice.
The 50-page report, released today, contains testimony from 11 women who either accuse Trump of rape or sexual assault or say that they had been offered to Trump for sex by Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, with most cases happening in the 1990s.
The accounts were pulled together through interviews conducted by the committee, as well as FBI records and the portion of the Epstein files that have been released; the evidence was cross-referenced for timelines and corroboration of testimony between alleged victims. In all, the evidence sharply contrasts Trump's claims that he was merely an acquaintance of Epstein, and instead paints a picture of Trump as a serial sexual assault perpetrator who collaborated closely with Epstein to find and traffic victims.
NEW: Chris Walker: New Report Indicates Trump-Linked Epstein Records Kept Out of DOJ Database. (TruthOut
; , but moved here with related info.)
Files featuring Trump's name have been removed from or kept out of the Epstein database from the very beginning, NPR reports.
Files relating to allegations of sexual abuse committed by President Donald Trump relating to Jeffrey Epstein, are being withheld or removed from the public database of files compiled by the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Some of these files are related to allegations that Trump sexually abused a minor. They include over 50 pages of an FBI interview with a woman who accused Trump of sexually abusing her when she was a minor decades ago.
According to reporting from NPR, the DOJ is withholding those files and others that feature Trump's name from the searchable database of the Epstein files.
Some files were removed from the database and put back online last week. However, others were taken out and have yet to be returned. Many others were never shared with the public to begin with, according to NPR's analysis of serial numbers on the files.
Files that were removed from the public database include a separate interview from a woman who testified in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's co-conspirator. Maxwell is currently seeking a clemency order from Trump.
Nolan Higdon's Gaslight Gazette: As Epstein Files Turn Into Partisan Circus, Institutional Power Protects Its Own. (TruthOut
; February 12, 2026, but moved here with related info.)
Even though Jeffrey Epstein is gone, the machinery that facilitated his crimes remains largely untouched.
Asked by NPR why the DOJ took files out of the database while others seem to be missing from it altogether, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson largely ignored the question and claimed, "Trump has done more for Epstein's victims than anyone before him."
Jackson also alleged that Trump, who used to be close friends with Epstein, has been "totally exonerated on anything relating to Epstein." However, Trump hasn't faced any criminal or civil charges emanating from the Epstein saga, meaning he has nothing to claim exoneration from as of yet.
Trump has politically benefited from the Epstein files. During his presidential campaign, he capitalized on conspiracy theories related to Epstein popular amongst his base, and told his followers he was open to making the files public.
Since returning to office, however, Trump has reneged on that promise. In fact, he has repeatedly claimed that the files are a political "hoax" against him
, and has tried to downplay their significance to the victims and the American people overall.
The president only relented on releasing the files in December, after it became clear that a bill requiring the release of the files would pass. Even after releasing files (the administration has only released a fraction), he has sought to push the issue to the side and attacked people for daring to want to discuss it further. "I think it's really time for the country to get on to something else", Trump told reporters earlier this month.

David Pakman: Is Trump Preparing To Simply WALK AWAY? (7-min. YouTube video; The David Pakman Show; November 6, 2026) 
Facing two years of hell, Trump may simply quit and walk away rather than serve out a term defined by investigations and losses.
rness Denhartog: Intel's $500-Billion Empire Is Collapsing - And Nobody Can Save It. (AI; 27-min. YouTube video; November 6, 2026)
[A search on "collapsing - and nobody can save it" detects an AI-like pattern.]
Jessica Piper and Lisa Kashinsky: How Abdul El-Sayed Actually Did With Jewish Voters. (Politico, Yahoo; November 5, 2026)
Yes, he ran behind. In an interview, the senator-elect acknowledged Israel was a source of disagreement, but said he's not changing his position.
El-Sayed faced blow-back from some Jewish Democrats during his campaign, particularly over his calls to end U.S. military support to Israel and his remarks after the synagogue attack that "Hurt people hurt people", for which he later apologized.
El-Sayed, who will be the first Muslim senator in U.S. history, told Politico two days ago that he hoped he could "earn support" from Jewish voters who hadn't backed him in this election.
"One of the big issues of disagreement that kept showing up when it came to the Jewish community was my position on Israel", El-Sayed said. "I'm not going to change my position, but …I intend to lead on all the issues that we agree on - whether it's the right to a union or the right to health care, clean air, clean water, or religious pluralism, and respect for the Constitution - and I hope that over time I can earn [their] support on those issues."
Disagreements over support for Israel and how the party should respond to rising anti-semitism are testing that voting bloc - both in Michigan and across the country.
Brett Meiselas: Elon Musk Crashes Out, Deletes Posts After Becoming Midterms' Biggest Loser. (MeidasTouch News, MSN; November 4, 2026)
Elon Musk spent a fortune trying to buy Republican victories in the 2026 midterms. Instead, he may have just purchased one of the most-expensive political humiliations in American history.
The world's richest man is having a rough Wednesday after voters delivered a sweeping rejection of the Republican Party, leaving Musk with:
- hundreds-of-millions of dollars in failed political investments,
- deleted social-media posts, and
- a newly-elected Democratic attorney-general in his adopted home state of Texas who has already expressed interest in investigating him.
According to a report highlighted by Wired, more than 99 cents of every traceable dollar Musk spent on races that have been decided went toward a losing candidate.
The scale of the defeat is staggering. One widely-circulated estimate puts Musk's midterm spending at $474-Million, including more than $150-Million in Texas alone.
And judging by his activity on X, the billionaire isn’t taking the results particularly well. Yesterday morning, Musk urged his followers to "Vote red today!" But today, that post was gone from his profile. What remained was a bizarre series of posts that seemed to capture a billionaire processing an electoral catastrophe in real time.
"Data centers in space looking pretty appealing right now", Musk posted.
Then came another awkward attempt at humor. "Guess my election-interfering space lasers didn't work this time", he wrote.
John Iadarola and Sharon Reed: Elon Musk CRUMBLES After Texas Scheme Collapses On Him. (6-min. YouTube video; The Damage Report; November 4, 2026)
Elon Musk puts out pathetic posts after his financial scheme to influence elections across the nation, and especially in Texas, collapses on him.
WASHINGTON, DC: Tech billionaire and Republican mega-donor Elon Musk was among the biggest losers of election night, after spending hundreds-of-$Millions to boost candidates that failed to win their races.
He doled out around $446-Million - the most a non-candidate has ever spent on an election, including over $200-Million on Texas-related efforts. Musk's preferred candidates across the country were swamped, losing almost everywhere, including Ken Paxton in the Texas Senate race and Vivek Ramaswamy in the Ohio gubernatorial race.
His plans for a build-out of data centers across Texas are especially in doubt after Democrat Gina Hinojosa won a surprise victory over incumbent Greg Abbott in the state’s gubernatorial race."
The Only Pastor Richer Than Elon Musk (AI; 20-min. YouTube video; Riches & Ruins; November 4, 2026)
Elon Musk is worth hundreds-of-$Billions. He builds rockets, electric cars, and satellite networks.
But on a quiet stretch of Texas land, one man built something Elon never needed: a private runway behind his church. He doesn't sell cars. He doesn't write code. He preaches. And from Lagos to Houston, preachers like him have turned Sunday offerings into jets, mansions, universities, and entire cities. Today, we count down ten of the richest men of God.
[IF it's true, Elon Musk must be taking notes.]
NEW: Elon Musk: "I Hope the AI Is Nice to Us." We Checked If He's Right. (10-min. YouTube video; Tech Shift Files; November 3, 2026)
In October 2026, Elon Musk sat down with his biographer Walter Isaacson and said the quiet part out loud: With a million times more digital intelligence than biological intelligence, he finds it unlikely that humans stay in control – "so I hope the AI is nice to us."
The man who co-founded OpenAI to slow AI down, now calls reality an "irony maximizer".
We take his words one by one and check them against what the AI labs have actually measured.
NEW:
John Johnston: Elon TRIED To Buy Immunity. Now Tech Elites Panic. (13-min. YouTube video; The John Johnston Lounge; November 2, 2026)
John Johnston (JJ) breaks down how Elon Musk and other tech billionaires, such as Peter Thiel, Chamath, and billionaire allies such as Jason Calacanis and Curtis Yarvin now seem to be panicking about potential government investigations into them and their companies, should the Democrats return to power.
NEW: Sarah Johnson
and Scott Harrison: Starbucks' $110-Billion Empire Is Collapsing - And Nobody Can Save It. (AI; 25-min. YouTube video; October 31, 2026)
Starbucks charges more for a latte than ever before, and fewer Americans are walking in to buy one. It hired one of the most-expensive rescue-CEOs in modern retail, and the line kept getting shorter. The strangest part is that the thing breaking this $110-Billion empire wasn't done to it. Starbucks built it on purpose, and made $Billions doing it.
Follow:
- the rise from a single Seattle bean shop to more than 40,000 stores,
- Howard Schultz's warning memo about becoming a commodity,
- the mobile ordering machine that made the café unnecessary,
- the union wave,
- the price backlash, and
- how Luckin Coffee beat Starbucks at its own game in China.
Donald Trump's School Records: The Letters And Missing Files (32-min. YouTube video; The Trump Family Files 2.0; October 25, 2026)
Donald Trump's school records are examined through the letters, interviews and surviving documents surrounding his education. This documentary follows his years at the New York Military Academy, Fordham University and the Wharton School, including the 2015 letter from Michael Cohen warning Fordham not to release his records.
What do the available documents show about Trump's grades, admissions and honors? Why were records moved or sealed, and what can the draft file, classmates, professors and family accounts actually establish? The video separates documented evidence from allegations about his SAT and medical deferment.
Jamie Davis:
Trump Intervenes In Louisiana As Dems Lead Early Vote For 3rd Day. (Jamie Davis; October 23, 2026)
When asked about their collapse in the Deep South, a GOP operative told Axios: "The wall has broken. The Enemy is in the fort. We're fighting hand to hand."
Now, Trump has taken to social media to tell Louisiana supporters they "must vote".
Why? Dems hold a narrow early-vote lead for the 3rd consecutive day, and Black turnout is almost exactly the same as for Obama '08.
In an interview yesterday, Congressman Troy Carter (D-LA) said it best: "Jamie Davis is in play against all odds."
To win we need what experts call Louisiana's "magic Democratic ratio": Black voters must make up at least 33% of the total electorate. Tuesday was 35%. Wednesday was 31%. Thursday 31%. We're diverging from the ratio.
Today it's recoverable, but with another day of falling behind, it may not be. Because "souls to the polls" GOTV events after Sunday church services have historically catalyzed Black turnout, MAGA has banned Sunday voting in Louisiana.
NEW: Elon Musk's Children May NEVER Inherit His Trillion-Dollar Fortune. Here's Why.
(17-min. YouTube video; Riches & Ruins; October 23, 2026)
Elon Musk is now worth more than one-trillion dollars, making him the richest person in history. He also has at least fourteen known children. Do the math, and you might think every one of those kids is now set to become a billionaire. But Musk has said publicly that handing his companies to his children would be a mistake.
And his biggest dreams, from Mars to artificial intelligence, may need every dollar he has. So who WILL actually end up with the largest fortune the world has ever seen?
NEW:
Sarah Johnson and Scott Harrison: Amazon's $2-Trillion Empire Is Collapsing - And Nobody Can Save It. (24-min. YouTube video; October 17, 2026)
This video explores how Amazon, despite being valued at over $2-Trillion dollars, is facing simultaneous challenges across its core pillars, including:
- massive corporate job cuts,
- the departure of its biggest delivery partner UPS,
- significant cloud infrastructure outages, and
- mounting antitrust lawsuits led by the FTC,
which together threaten the long-term sustainability of the tech and retail giant.


Fareed Zakaria: The World's Trust In America Is Collapsing. That Has Consequences. (11-min. YouTube video; Fareed's Take; CNN; October 26, 2026)
As global trust in the United States wavers under shifting foreign policies, traditional allies are forced to rethink their security dependence on Washington. From Elon Musk's clashes in India to Donald Trump's questioning of NATO and the U.S. nuclear umbrella, Fareed Zakaria examines how America's allies are preparing for a more self-reliant - and potentially more-dangerous - future.
Plus, Poland's foreign minister joins the program to discuss how Europe is taking the lead in funding Ukraine's defense and resisting Russia's on-going hybrid warfare.
NEW: Joseph Farah: SpaceX's $2-Trillion Bet Has A Physics Problem. (40-min. YouTube video; Astraveo; October 26, 2026)
Elon Musk says "Cooling is actually much easier in Space than it is on Earth", and a big part of SpaceX's roughly $2-Trillion IPO pitch rests on putting AI data centers in orbit.
So I went to the whiteboard to check. In this video I work through the physics of orbital data-centers using nothing more than high-school physics: how much solar power you can actually collect in space, where all the heat from the GPUs goes, and why the vacuum of space is a lot more like a thermos than a refrigerator.
We start with the case for space data centers (constant sunlight, no water use, no waiting on the power grid) and some practical problems that don't usually make it into the pitch, like the fact that you can't swap out a failed GPU in orbit. Then we figure out how much solar panel area it takes to run a single AI server rack, a gigawatt data center, and the terawatt of AI compute that Musk has talked about launching.
After that we get into cooling:
- why space being "cold" doesn't mean space is good at cooling things,
- how radiation compares to still air, fans, and water cooling,
- how big a radiator one rack needs using the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and
- how that stacks up against the radiators on the International Space Station.
The short version: the physics doesn't make orbital data centers impossible, but it makes them a lot harder and more-expensive than the pitch suggests.
NEW: Satchel Walton: Elon Musk Hopes His New Factory Will Help AI Supplant Life On Earth. The GOP's Biggest Donor Sounds Fine With Humans Dying Off - After We Get "Super Intelligence To The Stars". (Mother Jones; October 12, 2026)
[editing in progress...]


NEW: Matt Novak and Matt Novak: Elon Musk's 10 Worst Predictions And Broken Promises. "I Feel Very Confident Predicting Autonomous Robotaxis For Tesla Next Year", Musk Said - In 2019. (photos, videos, Comments; Gizmodo; April 15, 2024; out of its time-sequence, because it fits well with these adjacent articles.)


Robert Reich, Saturday Coffee Klatch: Trump's Circus Of Corruption (40-min. YouTube video; guests; Inequality Media Civic Action; October 17, 2026)
On this week's episode, I'm joined by Michael and W. Kamau Bell to discuss:
- the lightning-fast rise and fall of Trump's now-previous press secretary,
- his failed diesel deal with the devil (say that three times fast); and
- the newly-revealed sums billionaires and corporations have pledged to his ballroom vanity-project.
Grab a cup, pull up a chair, and join us for the Saturday Coffee Klatch.
- Can Elon Musk's staggering political spending save Republicans' mid-term chances?
- Will his fellow ultra-wealthy donors successfully stave off states' attempts to tax the rich?
- And are we in a new frontier of fascism after the chilling raid on Ilhan Omar's home?
Sophie Hurwitz: When Teslas Fly: The Regulatory Ramifications Of Elon Musk's Latest Publicity Stunt. (A picture of the Alef, which claims to be the "world's first flying car", conflicts of interest and other problems, a Modest Proposal; Mother Jones; October 17, 2026)
Tesla released videos on October 15 of a car that launched into the air, barrel-rolled over a lineup of cars and trucks, and landed on its wheels, apparently using thrusters and a fan system on the underside of the vehicle.
The car did not have a human driver, reportedly because Musk didn't want to "kill anyone". It's not clear how far or high it can fly, or whether it will ever be safe to operate. So maybe it's for the best that regular human consumers, for the moment, can't buy it: Musk said the car is scheduled for production in 2028 and the ability to purchase it will be "invite only".
If the flying Tesla Roadster does become available to the American buyer, there will be a host of issues to address:
- Flying cars are legal to register, inspect, and drive in both Minnesota and New Hampshire (live free or die!). The legality of such vehicles in the rest of the United States, however, remains in question.
- So too does who would regulate the cars. The Federal Aviation Administration, for one, has said that flying Teslas, unlike planes or helicopters, aren't its problem: "The Tesla vehicle does not meet the FAA's definition of an aircraft", the agency told Politico. A Department of Transportation official, meanwhile, told CBS it might not be that agency's job, either.
- Then, there's policing: a traditional police vehicle cannot follow a car that flies. An airplane could possibly "pull over" a flying car, but the jets normally sent after stray private planes usually cost a minimum of $15,000-per-hour to operate.
In true Musk fashion, this may all be a giant publicity stunt, like the time he claimed, in 2016, he would send humans to Mars by 2024. And it's not the first time one of his cars has run afoul of safety regulations: One study shows they are:
- 17 times more deadly than the infamously-combustible Ford Pinto, and are known to:
- rust quickly,
- lock drivers inside their cars,
- struggle in snowy conditions, and
- get stuck in the mud.
So a flying Tesla's regulatory contentiousness might not mean much to the world's richest man, who once said "If the rules are such that you can't make progress, then you have to fight the rules."
His massive political giving certainly reflects a man determined to have his way. Now the single biggest donor in the current election cycle, he has spent more than $366-million backing right-wing candidates so far. As my colleague Anna Merlan has reported, he may also be the midterms' biggest disinformation risk.
- The midterms' largest donor, then, is also a person who controls an enormous information source, one that he frequently uses to amplify politically-motivated lies and fake news - including tweeting about the possibility of "large-scale fraud" in elections.
- Musk's company SpaceX currently holds several lucrative federal contracts with the Defense Department, which could be probed if Democrats retake Congress. And House Republicans have repeatedly blocked efforts to subpoena Musk amid an ongoing Democrat-led inquiry into his conduct while working as a part of DOGE.
Non-flying versions of Musk's latest Tesla, for now, require a $250,000 deposit.
[A Modest Proposal: Give those anxious buyers government loans - and limit them to flying off-shore. Get The Money Out Of Politics!]
NEW: Katie Couric: Alex Gibney on the Myth of Elon Musk (64-min. YouTube video; Breaking News; October 16, 2026) 
Elon Musk is the world's richest man and one of the most powerful and polarizing figures on the planet. But how much of his carefully-cultivated image as a visionary genius is actually true? Oscar-winning film-maker Alex Gibney sits down with Katie to discuss his new documentary, "Musk", which takes a hard look at:
- the reality behind some of Musk's most celebrated accomplishments,
- his increasingly-consequential role in American politics,
- the enormous power he's accumulated along the way,
- troubling revelations about Tesla,
- Musk's relationship with Donald Trump, and
- the questions his extraordinary influence raises about money, power, and accountability.
NEW:
Katie Couric: Faith, Fear, And Fascism: Jennifer Welch On MAGA And The Bible Belt (61-min. YouTube video; I've Had It, Next Question; October 16, 2026)
The "I've Had It" ladies – Jennifer Welch and Angie “Pumps” Sullivan – have taken social media by storm. The two progressive women from Oklahoma who have, well, had it with the politics of today. Jennifer has written a new book called "Not Today, Fascists", all about her upbringing surrounded by conservative evangelicals and the connections she's made between the ultra-religious and the MAGA movement. Katie spoke with Jennifer about her new book, Jennifer’s hopes for the Democratic party, and about the latest moves from the Trump administration.
Emily Singer: How Badly Are The Midterms Going For The GOP? Let Us Count The Ways. (photos, links, Comments; Daily KOS; October 15, 2026)
With 19 days until Election Day, Republicans are in meltdown mode.
For the GOP, there is virtually no good news to point to ahead of the midterm elections
, with party operatives and candidates now saying that their only hope to avoid catastrophic losses is that polls are vastly over-stating Democrats.
Let's look at the news Republicans got this week, to paint a picture of the mess their party is in...
[It's full of data and history. I note the comparison to the U.S. Great Depression when, in 1935, citizens resoundingly voted Republicans OUT of power.]
NEW: Heather Cox Richardson: Trump's Special Interest in Russia (14-min. YouTube video; Letters From An American, Explainer, Politics Chat; October 13, 2026)
Everything that gets to any store travels with deisel.
The truckers use deisel, and all the farm equipment that we have around the country uses deisel. All the logging equipment uses deisel. All the fishermen use deisel. All the people who get bait fish for the fishermen use deisel...
Sylvia Hui: Suspected Plot At US-Run Air Base Almost Certainly Directed By Iran, UK Prime Minister Says At The Associated Press In London, January 24, 2024. (photos, links, more; AP News; AP Updated October 12, 2026)
LONDON (AP) - A suspected plot to attack a U.S.-run military air base in England was "almost certainly" directed by Iran's Revolutionary Guard, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham said today.
Burnham previously said there are strong indications Iran was linked to the apparent plan last month to attack the RAF Fairford air base, which has been used by American bombers to strike Iran in the ongoing war. Police have arrested seven men in the investigation into the alleged plot, but all suspects have been released on bail and no one has been charged so far.
Iran has denied involvement, although it has previously said that it considers any base used to attack its territory a legitimate target.
"I can confirm our assessment that it is highly likely to have been coordinated in Iran, almost certainly directed by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard", Burnham told lawmakers. "We will not tolerate these threats on our soil."
Scores of residents near the air base were evacuated from their homes on September 27, as armed police officers and army bomb-disposal experts swarmed the rural area.
Police later said they had found a quantity of an accelerant - gasoline - in three vans linked to the initial five suspects who were arrested on the scene, but no explosives.


NEW: Luke Harding: The Hidden History Of Trump's First Trip To Moscow [In 1987, courtesy of the KGB!] (quoting Trump, photos, extensive research; Politico; November 19, 2017)
Excerpted from Luke Harding's should-be-required-reading book Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, And How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win (as above, but more!; Penguin-Random House; published by Vintage on November 16, 2017)
[And posted here during tRUmPUtin's even-greater meddling, weeks in advance of mid-term elections in November 2026. See citation in Robert Reich's excellent article, below.]


Robert Reich: Trump And Vance's Islamophobic Targeting.
Violating Justice Department Rules, They Raided Her Apartment Today - Just 22 Days Before She Faces Re-Election. If Dems Regain Control Of The House, They Must Investigate This Abuse Of Power.
(photos, quotes, The Law, and detailed analysis; Substack; October 12, 2026)
I want to bring your attention to today's raid by federal agents on the Washington-area home of U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar - 22 days before she faces re-election to Minnesota's 5th Congressional District:
- The raid reportedly concerns Omar's immigration history, including allegations of fraud that she has repeatedly denied.
- Omar accuses the Trump regime of weaponizing law-enforcement against a political opponent: "Make no mistake: this is an attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law-enforcement. For ten years, Trump has targeted me with baseless lies and smear campaigns. This is just the latest escalation in his campaign of political intimidation. I will not be silenced."
- Months ago, Trump called Omar - a Somali-born Muslim who became a U.S. citizen and was elected to Congress in 2018 - "garbage". He said she shouldn't be allowed to be a congresswoman, and stood by as his supporters chanted to "send her back" to her native Somalia.
- This past weekend - before today's raid - Trump renewed his attacks on Omar. "She comes from Somalia", Trump said, where "they don't have a government, they don't have police, all they have is crime and squalor". He continued: "She comes into our country and she says 'my Constitution allows me'. She's talking about OUR Constitution. What they've done to Minnesota, these people from Somalia, should never be allowed."
- Let me remind you that this is the president of the United States mouthing this bigoted, racist, nationalistic filth.
- In this weekend's rant, Trump also stated that "JD Vance and our people are looking at it" - referring to Omar.
- Today, after the raid on her home, Trump said he has "always found [Omar] to be totally crooked" and called her "a terrible person".
- JD Vance has previously accused Omar of immigration fraud without providing any evidence. In March, Vance reiterated that claim, which he said he had discussed with White House senior aide Stephen Miller. "We actually think that Ilhan Omar definitely committed immigration fraud", Vance told a conservative podcaster. The next step, he said, was to figure out how to "build a case".
- In a democracy, the highest officials of one party do not "build cases" to pursue legislators from the opposing party. Nor do they investigate their political opponents within days of an election, in violation of explicit Department of Justice rules.
- The Department of Justice guidance for protecting election integrity explicitly states that the department should not engage in investigative measures that might "chill legitimate voting and campaign activities" or "interject an investigation itself into ongoing campaigns".
- The Justice Manual further states that federal prosecutors and agents "may never select the timing" of investigative steps, charges, or public statements for the purpose of affecting an election or giving an advantage or disadvantage to a candidate or political party.
- Election-year guidance dating back to at least 2008 has emphasized that "politics must play no role" in investigative or charging decisions and that prosecutors should exercise particular caution close to elections.
If Democrats regain control of the House, they must investigate this flagrant abuse of power by Trump, Vance, and the Department of Justice.
[Well said, Robert! Let us hope that it so shall be.
And hats off to many Comments, including this key one by HiloKaren:
"Ilhan Omar came to this country in 1995 at the age of 12, and became a naturalized citizen in 2000 at 17 years of age."
Which, in turn, reminds me of this:
"The Hidden History Of Trump's First Trip To Moscow"
- excerpted from Luke Harding's should-be-required-reading book,
"Collusion: Secret Meetings, Dirty Money, And How Russia Helped Donald Trump Win".]
Matthew Daly, Susie Blann and Elise Morton: Trump Says Ukraine Should Get A New President, As He Blames Zelenskyy For U.S. Diesel Prices. (photos, tRUmPUtin at his worst, exasperation; AP News; October 10, 2026)
Washington DC (AP) - President Donald Trump said today that it was time for Ukraine to get a new president, suggesting Volodymyr Zelenskyy has not done enough to end his country's war with Russia and blaming him for high diesel-fuel prices in the U.S. "I suggest they get a new leader who can make a deal, because he could have made many deals and for some reason he never does", Trump said.
Trump, who yesterday struck a deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin to buy diesel from Russia in an attempt to address high fuel prices ahead of the U.S. midterm elections, has been urging Zelenskyy for weeks to stop strikes on Russian energy infrastructure. He has also sought to blame record U.S. diesel prices on Ukraine - rather than the U.S.-led war in Iran, which has elevated world energy prices. "He wants to make problems for the world. He wants to make problems for our farmers, our ranchers, with diesel fuel", Trump said
, before departing for Tennessee where he was set to rally Republican voters.
Ukrainian And European Officials Today Reacted To Trump's Diesel Deal With Dismay, Saying It Will Help Pay For Russia's War Efforts:
- Diesel prices have skyrocketed due to a collision of events, including the difficulty of getting oil out of the Middle East since the start of the Iran war, which has raised the price of all oil products.
- An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted last month and published Oct. 1 found that Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of Iran, and blame HIM for higher prices.
- Trump also suggested that, if he had been U.S. president in 2022, "that war would have never started. There was no reason that war with Ukraine and Russia started. It started due to incompetence." Zelenskyy has "lost 30% of your country and you've had over a million people go between the two of them, over 2-million people killed. That's a war that should have never started. And I think it's time for Ukraine to get a new president", Trump said.
Independent Estimates Are That:
- about 20% of Ukraine's territory is under Russian control.
- British defense officials recently estimated that about half-a-million Russian soldiers have been killed in the war;
- There are no reliable recent estimates about how many Ukrainians have died.
20 People Killed In Russian Bombing In Ukraine Yesterday:
Trump's extraordinary intervention came after Russian strikes killed at least 20 people in Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia region, Ukrainian officials said yesterday. Three children were among those killed when Russian aerial bombs hit residential buildings in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine’s State Emergency Service said today. At least 18 people were wounded.
Russia and Ukraine are locked in a long-range aerial war while their armies remain largely deadlocked on the front line, more than 4-1/2 years since Moscow's full-scale invasion. Ukraine is struggling to counter escalating Russian bombardments that have killed more than 60 people over the past four days.
Anger In Kyiv At Trump's Deal With Putin:
"Today, Russia expressed its thanks for the lifting of sanctions on diesel exports by dropping five glide bombs on residential buildings in Zaporizhzhia", Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy
wrote yesterday on X. He said every additional billion dollars Russia earns from exports would help pay for:
- weapons components,
- drone upgrades,
- missile production and
- the recruitment of mercenaries, and that
- Moscow would only be ready to stop when its ability to fight diminished.
Zelenskyy said Ukraine was coordinating steps to counter the extra revenue Russia will receive, and that he had spoken to French President Emmanuel Macron about shoring up air defenses, warning of an increased risk of further missile strikes in the coming days.
Trump announced yesterday that:
- Russia will immediately supply more than 300,000 tons of diesel,
- followed by an additional 500,000 tons in November and
- 1-million tons "immediately thereafter".
- Russia will deliver an additional 3-million tons "within a short period of time" after that
, he wrote.
In Kyiv, people
(gathered at a memorial to fallen soldiers on Independence Square) Greeted The Deal With A Mix Of Anger And Resignation:
- "Trump has once again shown his true face", said Oleksandr Petrenko, 26. "He didn't care about the situation, the shelling or the destruction of our homes. All he's interested in is oil or the fuel prices and how much Americans have to pay."
- For Oksana Yakunina, a financial adviser from the central city of Kropyvnytskyi, the announcement "didn't really come as a surprise." "Trump has been working with Putin for a long time", she told The Associated Press.
European Allies Question US-Russia Deal:
Ukraine's European allies also expressed dismay at the deal, and said they stood by their commitment to sanctions:
- Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said Stockholm regretted the agreement, "as energy revenues are central to the Russian war chest", and noted that the European Union would adopt its most comprehensive sanctions package yet in two days, with 1,600 listings targeting Russia's military-industrial complex.
- The German government "remains committed to the sanctions imposed on Russia, and is working with its European partners on further sanctions", spokesperson Stefan Kornelius said, adding that support for Ukraine "remains unwavering".
- Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski questioned whether Russia could deliver at all. Citing his embassy's reports of fuel shortages even in Moscow, and "serious sources" saying Ukraine has damaged about half of Russia’s refining capacity, he asked on X: "So WHERE will the surpluses for export COME FROM?"
- Trump's announcement was in stark contrast to A SWEEPING RUSSIA-SANCTIONS LAW HE SIGNED LAST MONTH, that aimed at clamping down on the oil and gas revenues that fuel Russia's war against Ukraine.
- Trump announced the deal as his envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner met with Ukrainian officials in Miami yesterday to discuss a proposal TO END THE WAR.
- Speaking about yesterday's announcement, a senior Ukrainian official told AP that the Ukrainian side was not aware of the deal before the announcement. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity as he was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly, said today that the diesel deal announcement was not tied to anything under discussion in Florida. He confirmed the Ukrainian delegation had left Florida and were on their way back to Ukraine.
(Daly reported from Washington, and Morton reported from London. Associated Press journalists Bela Szandelszky in Kyiv, Ukraine, and Collin Binkley in Washington contributed to this report.
Follow the AP's coverage of the war in Ukraine at
<https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine>)
[Excellent coverage of tRUmPUtin's latest stunning, treasonous, self-serving setback to the USA, Ukraine and more.]
Adam Gramegna: Pete Hegseth's New Religious-Affairs Office Sparks A Legal Church-State Fight. Hegseth Said "The Real Battle Is Spiritual", Invoking Scripture And Mentions Of An "Almighty God" During A Major Speech This Week At Quantico.
(Military.com; October 2, 2026)
Here is a fact-based summary of the story contents:
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stood on stage this week in front of thousands of U.S. military personnel, quoting Bible scripture while attacking the "woke" and the "weirdos". His religiosity is now extending to all service members, prompting a new battle involving the government, free speech, and the Constitution.
The secretary on Sept. 30 at Quantico announced a new Pentagon Office of Religious Affairs. He justified the new endeavor in religious terms, telling the gathered attendees that the military was putting on "the full armor of God".
Hegseth quoted Psalm 33:12, explaining that "the real battle is spiritual". He told troops that, because fewer than 5% of service members identify as non-religious, 95% therefore recognize "an Almighty God".
According to Military Times, demographic profiles show that roughly 70% of service members identify as Christian, while about a quarter are listed as unknown or unclassified.
The office, created by a memorandum signed by Hegseth, will report directly to the defense secretary.
A director will head the office and serve as the senior adviser. The senior adviser role is an additional title given to the director, rather than an independent person leading the effort. It will be led by a senior adviser on religious affairs, though it presently remains unknown who that individual is or may be.
According to the memorandum, the office is tasked with:
- aligning religious-affairs policy,
- overseeing the Armed Forces Chaplains Board,
- representing the department to civilian religious endorsing organizations,
- and sponsoring research and tools to "support and assess spiritual fitness, spiritual readiness, and spiritual resilience".
- Within 90 days, the military services are to submit a report identifying unfunded and underfunded religious affairs needs, from chaplain programs to facilities.
- The memo also contains a safety net. It states that nothing in it "shall be construed to compel religious participation or to diminish the free-exercise rights of any service member, civilian employee, or family member of any faith or no faith".
- Military.com reached out to the Defense Department for comment on how the office will operate and guard against favoring one faith. No response was received prior to publication.
Lisa Needham: Very-Hackable Trump Administration Vows To "Secure" Elections. (Daily KOS
;Oh, thank goodness. If you've been worried about the upcoming election, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is here to make sure everything is all safe and secure, and he's gonna go all war-fighter to do it.
Cyberwar-fighter, that is.
Having actual troops at the polls is wildly against federal law, but Hegseth has nonetheless figured out a way for the military to intervene in our free and fair and safe elections, all part of President Donald Trump's quest to make sure those elections remain none of those things.
So Whiskey Pete is going to have the National Security Agency and military intelligence agencies "guard" our election systems against foreign interference.
Yeah, sure!
It isn't that the NSA and U.S. Cyber Command haven't helped secure elections previously - they've been doing so since election equipment was designated as critical infrastructure back in 2017. It's that the Trump administration cut the actual specialized defenses against election interference ages ago.
- It no longer funds security improvements for the states,
- or shares threat information on foreign actors.
- In the biggest blow to election security, the administration **gutted the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency** (CISA), which provided cybersecurity support **specifically for elections**.
Why? Because agencies like CISA fight actual election interference instead of
pretending that Trump won the 2020 election, and failing to pretend Trump won in 2020 is treason or something. As David Becker, who runs the Center for Election Innovation and Research, told the Associated Press, Hegseth announcing this big initiative just a few weeks out from Election Day "suggests this is just theater". He also pointed out that "If the administration was serious about assisting state and local election officials, it shouldn't have dismantled all of the federal government's election cybersecurity capacity and fired all their experts in early 2025".
Exactly.

Eric McDaniel: What To Know About The $810-Million In Spending Canceled By President Trump. (2-min. podcast; All Things Considered; September 28, 2026)
Democrats are blaming Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought for the canceled funds, accusing him of violating the separation of powers and undermining congressional authority.
Each year, Congress passes laws which allocate money to the federal government's various programs and agencies. President Trump, for the second year in a row, is refusing to send some of that money to the places that Congress says it has to go, setting off a fresh battle with lawmakers over who controls federal spending.
Of the $810-Million being withheld, $567-Million comes from programs that "provided services to refugees, asylees, and other non-citizens", according to a memo from the White House.
Emily Singer: Republicans Lie To Themselves As Polls Predict Mid-Term Devastation. (Daily KOS
; September 23, 2026)
With six weeks until Election Day, there's not much hope for Republicans.
- Gas prices are climbing thanks to the wars in Iran and Ukraine.
- Inflation is outpacing wage gains, pinching Americans' pocketbooks.
- President Donald Trump's approval has hit yet another new low.
- And polls show Republicans either losing or tied in states and districts that Trump won by wide margins in 2024.
All of that paints a grim picture for the GOP, with forecasters saying that the party is nearly guaranteed to lose their House majority and unlikely to keep the Senate.
But rather than try to prove otherwise, Republicans are delusionally clinging to past polling errors to convince themselves that things will turn out okay for them this time around.
"If there's movement by the second week of October, we'll know we're in good shape", GOP Rep. Mike Lawler of New York told Politico. "Republicans always outperform their polling."
Of course, Republicans don't always outperform their polling. Just look at the 2025 gubernatorial races, when polls vastly overstated the GOP's support. In New Jersey, polls showed Democrat Mikie Sherrill leading Republican Jack Ciatarelli by 6 points. Sherrill went on to win by 14 points. And in Virginia, polls had Democrat Abigail Spanberger leading Republican Winsome Sears by 11 points. Spanberger won by 15 points.
What's more, polls didn't overestimate Democrats in 2018 - the first midterm cycle under Trump.
In fact, an analysis from the now-defunct FiveThirtyEight found that polls overestimated Republicans in the 2018 midterms.
Even worse for Republicans is that, at this point in the 2018 cycle, the generic ballot was pretty stable. Today, the average has swung dramatically toward Democrats as Trump's popularity plummets and gas prices rise.
Dorothy Neufeld and Christina Kostandi: How Government Interest Costs Compare.
(chart, table; Visual Capitalist; September 22, 2026)
- Mexico has the OECD's highest interest burden, with 10.9% of government spending going toward net interest, narrowly ahead of the U.S. at 10.6%.
- Italy's 7.1% interest burden is roughly five times Germany's 1.4%, despite both being major euro-area economies.
- Four countries devote less than 1% of government spending to net interest: the Netherlands, Lithuania, Finland, and Estonia.
- Surprisingly, seven countries in the OECD data have negative net interest spending: Switzerland, Japan, Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark, South Korea, and Norway. In these countries, governments hold financial assets that generate interest income. When that income exceeds the interest paid on government debt, net interest spending turns negative. These countries are therefore excluded from the ranking.
- Debt alone doesn't tell the full story. What governments own, what they owe, and the rates they pay all shape the true interest burden.
[What, the U.S. is only the second-worst government? No, the U.S. comes in first, because its high interest burden applies to by far the greatest debt: US$1.23-Trillion, nearly TEN TIMES MORE than even the second-most debt-ridden country on the list. tRUmPUtin must be very proud.]
Robert Reich and Inequality Media Civic Action: Has Trump Lost It? Every Day He Gets Loonier. (6-min. YouTube video; Substack; September 21, 2026)
His antics are getting stranger and stranger:
- Designing an Arc-de-Trump so snipers can hide in it?
- Banning MSNOW, Politico, and CNN from the White House because he doesn't like their behavior?
- Refusing to disclose how many American service members have been killed in his war on Iran?

[Robert Reich's e-mailed version of this video is entered from this grotesque cartoon - which, sad to say, is all too fitting. View, and share. Work to separate tRUmPUtin's problems from the problems he - and his appointed co-disrupters - force upon all of us.]
Erin Burnett: Media Ban Backfires, Leaving Trump Silenced.
(9-min. YouTube video; CNN; September 21, 2026)
The Trump administration unveiled a new White House helipad on Monday, but Trump's decision to ban specific news outlets backfired during the ceremony. Because of the ban, the media organizations that make up the official press pool boycotted the event entirely. While some non-pool cameras captured the ribbon-cutting, the lack of pool audio technicians meant virtually none of the president's remarks could be heard.
0:00 - The ribbon-cutting event almost nobody heard
2:32 - What spurred Trump to enact the ban?
5:08 - What White House sources are saying
7:03 - The press's remarkable show of solidarity
David Muir: Major Outage Triggers Flight Chaos. (20-min. YouTube video; ABC World News Tonight
; September 21, 2026)
Gio Benitez reports on the massive outage for air traffic control caused by a blown circuit and cut fiber lines that paralyzed some of the nation's largest airports in the Northeast.
Pierre Thomas has details on the ICE shooting of a Venezuelan DoorDash driver following a traffic stop in Austin, Texas, igniting protests.
As the president travels to New York City to address world leaders at the UN General Assembly, Mary Bruce has the latest on the three news outlets now suing the Trump administration after he banned them from the White House.
00:00 - Intro
02:35 - Air traffic controllers unable to monitor planes after major outage.
05:35 - ICE shooting of DoorDash driver sets off protests.
07:43 - Trump in New York for UN, amid White House press ban.
15:17 - Flood watch for entire state of New Mexico.
17:07 - Helicopter crew killed in crash at scene of wildfire.
17:42 - Massive explosion shuts down Interstate in Texas.
18:00 - Searing hot NFL turf melts players' cleats.
NEW: Louisa Loveluck: Banished To Alien Lands: Trump's Secret Deportation Deals. (The Guardian/UK; September 21, 2026)
After a plane journey in shackles, an Iranian woman found herself in the middle of Africa in a country she did not know existed. She is one of thousands deported from the US on the back of shadowy deals made with dozens of countries. An in-depth investigation reveals the "show of force" costing American taxpayers $Millions.
Nika's story:
No one would tell the shackled detainees on-board the U.S. immigration plane where they were going. The officers in charge would taunt them when they asked, they said. It was only when the seat-back video screens finally showed a map that the 18 migrants worked it out. Their destination was the Central African Republic (CAR), a country few of them had even heard of.
Nika, a 32-year-old Iranian woman, recalled how the handcuffs dug into her wrists. She begged the officers to loosen them, but they did not. Other passengers had it worse, she said. Some of the men were restrained in black and yellow body wraps, as if mummified, after resisting orders to get on the plane.
Nika, who had fled Iran 18 months earlier after protesting against its regime, had imagined the U.S. as a place of sanctuary. Iran was already one of the most repressive countries in the world when she left, and its horrors had only deepened since then: security forces gunned down thousands of other demonstrators this year, then Donald Trump's administration launched the war there.
After more than a year locked up in a U.S. immigration detention centre, Nika (whose name the Guardian has changed to protect her family in Iran) was granted legal protections and freed on a judge's orders.
Within two weeks, the Department of Homeland Security had re-arrested her, and days later she was on the plane heading 7,000 miles east. "They never told me they were going to deport me [to] this country", she told the Guardian. "I don't know anything about Africa."
The Department of State WARNS U.S. CITIZENS NOT TO TRAVEL TO CAR because IT SAYS IT IS TOO DANGEROUS! Nika spends most of her days there under a form of self-imprisonment, too scared to venture out from her small bedroom as she waits for an answer to the question on which her life depends: Will she be sent back to Iran, and to a regime that could kill her?
[Under any sane and pro-U.S. President, Nika would have been protected as a pro-US hero, representing the people of Iran.]
Ken B. Morales: Watch: The New Supreme Court. (10-min. Youtube video by Elizabeth McCauley; ProPublica; September 21, 2026)
For likely the first time in modern history, the Supreme Court decided more cases in fast-tracked, secretive proceedings than in open court. We break down how a once-rare emergency process became the norm - and what it means for public trust.
[Bad Trump-Court news, very-well presented. Take ten minutes to view this video; then tell others to do the same!]
Robert Reich: This Week's Anniversary Of The Wall-Street Bailout: It Marked The Beginning Of The Public's Distrust Of Government And Big Business. (?-min. YouTube video; Substack; September 21, 2026)
I date the start of the American public's furious distrust of big government and big business to the Wall-Street Bailout of 2008. Millions of Americans lost their homes, their savings, and their jobs - while the bankers were bailed out and not a single Wall-Street executive went to jail for turning Wall Street into a giant gambling casino.
Here's the interview I did with Conan O'Brien at the time:
(YouTube: "This video is not available." ??)
You'll recall that the bailout of Wall Street brought on the Tea Party movement on the right and the Occupy movement on the left - both of which excoriated "corporate welfare" and "crony capitalism".
A few years later came Donald Trump on the right and Bernie Sanders on the left - both arguing against a system that, both charged, had enabled wealthy Americans and big corporations to rig it against average working Americans.
As we all now know, Trump was - and remains - a puppet of that wealthy corporate establishment.
[and of Putin, et al.]
U.S. Acknowledges For The First Time That It Has Deployed Weapons In Space. (The Associated Press; September 16, 2026)
WASHINGTON - The United States has confirmed for the first time that it has deployed weapons in space, a remarkable revelation after previous warnings about countries such as Russia possibly weaponizing a global frontier long-agreed in treaties to be used for only peaceful purposes.
Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said two days ago that the U.S. has fielded "on-orbit space-control weapons capable of defending the Joint Force against hostile adversary action." Meink did not detail:
- what the weapons are,
- how they work, or
- if they are targeting other objects in Space or on Earth.
The U.S. had warned two years ago that Russia was developing a new space-based, anti-satellite weapon, though the White House said the danger wasn't imminent at the time. But reports of the anti-satellite weapon reflected long-standing worries about space threats from Russia and China, given that much U.S. infrastructure is dependent on satellite communications. The U.S. has also previously demonstrated its own abilities to shoot down satellites from Earth.
In his remarks to the Air and Space Forces Association's Air, Space & Cyber Conference, Meink also said the Air Force was adding more autonomous systems to its capabilities and predicted the service would look "radically different" by 2032. For example, he foresaw one-way attack drones replacing artillery as the "primary killer". "We are increasing readiness against existing threats", he said.
The revelation comes as the Trump administration puts a growing focus on Space:
- In 2019, during his first term, Trump created the Space Force as a separate military branch.
- In his second term, he has announced the "Golden Dome" missile defense system, which includes plans to put U.S. weapons in space. Trump said last year that he expected the system would be "fully operational before the end of my term", which ends in January 2029, and have the capability of intercepting missiles "even if they are launched from space".
- Trump also has directed the Pentagon to pursue the space-based interceptors, in an executive order during the first week of his presidency. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that just the space-based components of the Golden Dome could cost as much as $542-Billion over the next 20 years.
The Biden administration announced in 2024 that Russia was developing a space-based nuclear weapon that could loiter in space for long durations, then release a burst that would take out satellites around it. That kicked off a renewed debate on the idea of weapons in space at the United Nations.
In April 2024, Russia vetoed a joint U.S.-Japanese resolution that would have called on all countries not to develop or deploy nuclear arms or other weapons of mass destruction in space - as banned under a 1967 international treaty that included the U.S. and Russia. That treaty also declared that outer space was a global commons that could be used for only peaceful purposes.
The Russian delegation called the resolution hypocritical and a double standard, and instead proposed a rival resolution to ban all weapons in space "for all time". It ultimately failed.
Russia had argued that the United States and its allies opposed a ban on all weapons in outer space because they planned to deploy weapons there.
NEW: Stephen Colbert: Stephen Colbert on the Emmys, His Wife Hating His Beard & Gifting Jimmy His Captain-America Shield. (21-min. YouTube video; Jimmy Kimmel Live; September 16, 2026)
Stephen Colbert talks about The Late Show winning seven Emmys, what he's doing with his suits from the show, Jimmy spilling wine on him at a wedding, wearing a tan suit to an event for President Obama, writing a new Lord of The Rings movie with his son, his son John calls to re-enact him getting pulled over in New Zealand, Stephen shaves off his beard, and Stephen has a very special gift for Jimmy.
Robert Reich: Trump's Stock Trading is Endangering Us All.
(4-min. YouTube video, "The Wolf Of Wall-Cheat"; Substack; September 16, 2026)
Since being back in office, Trump has made nearly 28,700 stock trades, according to yesterday's Bloomberg review of his disclosures. (During that same period, all members of the Senate and House together made about 22,200 stock trades.)
Trump's trades are endangering us all.
Please watch and share the attached 4-minute video, Inequality Media's "The Wolf Of Wall-Cheat"!
It's time to:
1. End the exemption of the president and vice president from conflicts-of-interest laws;
2. Require all federal officials, including members of Congress, to put their investments into qualified blind trusts; and
3. Prohibit all trading by all officials and members of Congress of individual shares of stock.
A president is supposed to govern for the benefit of the entire country - NOT for his own financial benefit.

***
PS: I'm pleased to report that no Democratic senator voted for the crypto bill yesterday, leaving Republicans far short of the 60-vote threshold required to proceed. (Several Republicans, including Senator Susan Collins of Maine and Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, also cast "no" votes.)
Made with AI: Seinfeld's Most Brilliant Unscripted Moments.
(33-min. YouTube video; Frasier Central; September 14, 2026)
Think you know everything about Seinfeld? Think again! While Larry David and Jerry Seinfeld wrote some of the sharpest television scripts in history, many of the show's most legendary, laugh-out-loud moments were completely unscripted accidents, impromptu physical comedy, and spur-of-the-moment ad-libs.  From Julia Louis-Dreyfus secretly choreographing Elaine's chaotic "Little Kicks" dance to Jerry breaking character during Lieutenant Bookman's library interrogation, we're counting down the wildest behind-the-scenes moments that were never supposed to happen!
Ben Parker and Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling (Ret.): Trump Has a Bigger Problem Than the Strait of Hormuz. (24-min. video; The Bulwark; September 11, 2026)
Ben Parker and Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling (Ret.)
break down the latest escalation across the Middle East, including an attack on Saudi Arabia's East-West Pipeline, a critical alternative route designed to move oil around the Strait of Hormuz. With the pipeline damaged and the Houthis taking control of key positions along the Red Sea, the region's major shipping routes are facing growing disruption.
The attacks threaten far more than oil. The Bab al-Mandab and Red Sea are critical routes for food, grain, packaged goods and cargo moving between the Gulf, Europe, Asia and Africa. Mark explains:
- why Iran and the Houthis appear to have the initiative,
- why the U.S. is increasingly responding, rather than setting the terms of the conflict,
- how Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and NATO could become entangled, as the war continues to expand.
- the Somali pirates are becoming active again, and
- shippers now face another threat - once they make it through the region's increasingly-dangerous choke points.
Greg Sargent, The Daily Blast:
Angry, Unglued Trump Accidentally Reveals His Contempt For MAGA Voters.
(24-min. podcast; The New Republic; September 9, 2026)
Donald Trump unleashed a barrage of angry, unhinged threats over the last few days:
- He posted a map of all of North America - including Canada and Mexico - under conquest by the United States.
- He angrily threatened to cut off all U.S. sales of Canadian aerospace company Bombardier, even though it employs many U.S. workers and its supply chains are deeply entangled in U.S. communities.
- He crossed out the "Mexico" in New Mexico and replaced it with "America".
- And he snarled that gas prices will drop below $2 after we "WIN" against Iran, even though he simply cannot get it to do his bidding right now.
In all these cases, Trump is threatening things that are never, ever going to happen. The calculation that his voters will be satisfied by this - even as he's failing them so badly across the board - reveals his seething contempt for them with great clarity.
We talked to Salon's Amanda Marcotte, who writes well about MAGA psychology. We discuss:
- why Trump genuinely thinks this stuff will sate MAGA,
- how this reveals his profoundly-dim view of his supporters,
- why it was a catastrophe that the media over-interpreted 2024,
- and what it means that the culture has moved well beyond Trump and MAGA.
[tRUmPUtin gets a well-earned beating. If only Congress would follow this lead!]
Trump Tailspins, As GOP Leaks Of Midterm Panic Take Humiliating Turn. (21-min. podcast; The New Republic; September 8, 2026)
Donald Trump's tail-spinning continues:
- Going into midterms, an CNN analysis finds that Trump has a lower approval rating than any of his predecessors in this millennium. That's worse than Joe Biden in 2022, Barack Obama in 2014 and 2010, and even George W. Bush in 2006.
- Meanwhile, Trump says he'll campaign heavily this Fall, but humiliatingly, Republicans are leaking to Politico that they don't want him anywhere near them on the trail.
- And The Washington Post reports that amid GOP fears of his toxicity, he's running ads about himself and how his super-PAC may hoard its funds. Why? Because his team fears its fund-raising ability may dry up after the mid-terms - meaning, they anticipate a big loss.
We talked to veteran political-handicapper Charlie Cook about:
- his new piece digging into the GOP "nightmare",
- why Trump's unpopularity may be historically unique, and
- why that's making conventional midterm patterns unusually bad for the GOP.
NEW: David Corn: Russia, Russia, Russia: Will Putin's Decade-Long War On U.S. Elections Hit The Midterms? Trump's Russia Denialism Has Left America Vulnerable. (Mother Jones, September+October 2026 Issue; September 1, 2026)
Russian meddling in the 2016 election was no anomaly, and Tulsi Gabbard's attempt to undermine and criminalize the intelligence community's 2017 conclusion was nothing but a con job. But the Trump gang's refusal to acknowledge what happened in the past is more than a lie; it is a clear and present danger.
Since Trump re-entered the White House, he and his aides, striving to wipe the Russia stain from his 2016 victory:
- have sought retribution against officials who investigated Putin's information warfare.
- Even worse, they have eviscerated the government's ability to counter it - or similar actions by other adversaries.
- FBI agents and intelligence officials involved in past inquiries into Russian interference were canned or forced out.
- The FBI's foreign-influence task force was dismantled,
- as was the DNI's Foreign Malign-Influence Center.
- Staffing at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which helps protect election systems, was slashed.
- Rubio, now Secretary of State, shut down the department office tracking foreign disinformation.
The Department of Justice and the intelligence services are now run by lackeys who've shown they are more dedicated to helping Trump rewrite history and preserve his power - perhaps even by undermining elections - than to national security. "It's astounding", former FBI counter-intelligence chief Frank Figliuzzi told NBC. "It's now a free-for-all for foreign intel services seeking influence."
November's elections present Putin another opportunity. "One hundred percent: The Russians will want to screw around", says a former top CIA official. Trump's administration is not only unprepared to counter any such assault - it appears unwilling. "Trump wants them to mess around in his favor", this official adds.
A past beneficiary of Putin skulduggery, Trump has unilaterally disarmed and, in a way, surrendered to Putin, placing his own interests over those of the nation.
(Adapted from How Russia Won: Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and the Fight for America (HarperCollins), which was published September 15, 2026.)
David KC: Whistle-Blower Claims Postal Service's Plan To Enact Trump's Mail-Voting Order Could "Derail" Midterms. (Daily KOS; September 1, 2026)
According to a new whistle-blower report received by Senator Richard Blumenthal, the United States Postal Service has been working for months to implement President Trump's executive order aimed at restricting mail-in voting, using "untested" technology that has been hastily developed. The whistle-blower claims that if implemented, the new USPS system has the potential to "derail" the midterm elections, as reported by NPR.
Although Trump's executive order is currently blocked by a court order as the case likely winds its way to the Supreme Court, USPS has been moving full-steam-ahead to develop a new online portal that would allow state election officials to submit mail-in voters' names and ballot envelope barcodes required by the now-blocked rule. But the whistle-blower claims that development of the system has been "rushed, risky and haphazard" and that testing of the system has been insufficient, thereby creating substantial risk of a "catastrophic failure" of the system that could "derail the midterm elections".
One example: an unusual "zero-percent failure policy" USPS has set for the process of verifying that the mail-in ballots states want to send out meet the requirements of its new rule. According to the whistle-blower, when mail-in ballots are submitted to USPS in large-volume batches, if any one ballot in the batch cannot be verified against the portal, all ballots in that batch will be rejected. For example, if a state election official brings a batch of 10,000 ballots to USPS, and USPS is unable to match just one of those ballots against the portal – because, for example, someone has recently changed their name after marriage or they've moved – then USPS would refuse to mail the remaining 9,999 ballots as well!
In a letter to Postmaster General David Steiner, Sen. Blumenthal urged Steiner to "abandon this ill-conceived, unconscionable plan and ensure that all Americans can exercise their constitutional right to vote, including by mail, without interference by USPS." Blumenthal said he found the whistle-blower report "mind-boggling" and claimed that USPS "has designed a system that is intended to fail". Blumenthal also chastised USPS for apparently continuing to work on the portal "despite numerous court orders enjoining it from doing so".
Blumenthal has demanded that USPS provide him with a long list of information by September 4 and a list of detailed records by September 8. We'll see how USPS responds.
[Big thanks to the government officials who ARE taking action! ALL government officials SHOULD work to assure that USPS immediately abandons this election-meddling, democracy-destroying project. But then, so should they have retired our malicious, criminal president tRUmPUtin - long before this stage in his huge destruction of our once-united states.]
Emily Singer: Trump's Iran War Escalates - Just In Time To Screw Republicans. (links; Daily Kos; August 31, 2026)
It’s Groundhog Day again, apparently, with the U.S. and Iran trading strikes on Sunday and into Monday (today), just as the boondoggle of a war that President Donald Trump started in the Middle East passes the six-month mark.
Trump then, as usual, threatened to escalate the war even further. On his Truth Social platform, he posted an AI-generated video of a major oil hub in Iran hypothetically being attacked, along with the text, "Kharg Island being blown to smithereens!!!" And he told Fox News today that "We're going to hit them hard" - a threat that no longer holds much weight, as Trump never follows through with his bluster.
The exchange of fire and threats of escalation once again caused oil prices to spike, which is expected to keep gasoline prices over $4 per gallon in most states—just as millions of Americans prepare to travel for the Labor Day Weekend.
That timing is an especially-large problem for the GOP. Labor Day marks the traditional final sprint to November's midterm elections.
In some states, absentee ballots will start hitting mailboxes this week. Candidates and campaigns are set to begin airing their television ad blitzes, which will harden voter sentiments and help determine the outcome of the November races.
Indeed, Republicans had hoped the war would be long over by now, allowing gas prices to come back down, so that they wouldn't face a voter blow-back.
Yet, months later, the war is still going on. Trump's assertion in June that Iran was decimated militarily has now fallen apart, with the adversarial nation continuing to launch strikes against U.S. military outposts and oil infrastructure in the region.
Democrats are already telegraphing how they will use the mess Trump created in Iran to convince voters to abandon the GOP.
"Trump's war with Iran is a debacle and he barely seems to care. He spends his days raving about his ballroom and alienating our allies with tantrums and stunts. At night he posts bizarre AI slop over and over again", Rep. Don Beyer, Democrat of Virginia, wrote in a post on X. He added, "Republicans who control Congress know this is wrong, and they have the power to stop this. But most of them lack the intestinal fortitude to do anything, so instead they're cowering under their desks."
Mike Nellis: MAJOR UPDATE: Trump Family Just Exposed The Truth About Donald's Decline. (12-min. Substack video; Endless Urgency; August 31, 2026)
This one is alarming.
We're talking about:
- Donald Trump's cognitive decline,
- his reported sleep habits,
- the people surrounding him, and
- why even voices on the Right are starting to publicly question whether he's fit to serve.
This isn't just about another bizarre Trump moment. It's about who has power, who's willing to challenge him, and what happens when the people around a president refuse to tell the American people the truth.
[00:01:07] Dr. John Gartner lays out his argument about malignant narcissism and why he believes Trump's behavior poses a serious danger.
[00:03:15] The conversation turns to Trump’s apparent cognitive decline - and why Republicans who reportedly express concerns privately aren't speaking up publicly.
[00:05:37] Lara Trump reveals Trump reportedly sleeps just three to four hours a night, raising bigger questions about his habits and ability to handle the presidency.
[00:08:30] We dig into Trump's late-night posting, the information being put in front of him, and what all of this says about how he's operating behind the scenes.
[00:10:01] Tucker Carlson draws a red line around nuclear weapons and argues that any president seriously considering a first strike should be removed from office.
There's a bigger story underneath all the daily chaos: whether Donald Trump is capable of doing this job - and whether the people around him would ever admit it if he weren't. When figures across the political spectrum start raising versions of the same concern, we need to pay attention.
Scott MacConomy, Heretic On The Hill: A National Prayer Service In DC Gets Golden Idol-ed. (Secular Coalition; May 26, 2026)
You may have missed it but Jesus showed up on the National Mall last week for "Rededicate 250: A National Jubilee of Prayer, Praise & Thanksgiving", a day-long event of Christian music and mostly evangelical Christian speakers. The stated goal was to rededicate the United States of America as "One Nation, Under God". House Speaker Mike Johnson took it upon himself to say they accomplished that goal there on the Mall on Sunday. No one really explained when America was officially dedicated as One Nation Under God the first time, or when or why that dedication had worn off.
As for Jesus, he came by our counter-protest, which was also on the Mall and featured an inflated Donald Trump golden calf. As a reminder, the golden calf was the idol the faithless Israelites created to worship while Moses was up in the mountains getting the Ten Commandments so they could be displayed in Texas school rooms a few thousand years later. Armed with a bullhorn and a few good jokes, Jesus spoke truth to power, meaning to our golden calf, and moved on down the Mall to the main event.
The Rededicate 250 event featured videos from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. President Trump was so invested in this event that his video was just a replay of a video he did several weeks earlier for a "people read every verse in the Bible" event. The President actually spent the afternoon playing golf at his course out in Virginia. The shepherd hit the links while his sheep, many in Trump attire, hit the Mall.
The Rededicate 250 event was part of the year-long celebration of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The general theme among the numerous speakers was to reinforce the idea that America was founded as a Christian nation. Even though no one wrote that down 250 years ago. We were happy to present the opposite view to people who dropped by the golden calf wondering what was going on.
Regular readers may have noticed that I'm a fan of historical events disproving the "founded as a Christian nation" theory. (See the Treaty of Tripoli.) Here is the latest example I ran across.
Ben Franklin was a noted deist, not a Christian. In 1787, after weeks of little progress on drafting the Constitution, Franklin suggested in a speech that the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention start opening their meetings with a prayer.
Maybe Franklin thought a prayer would motivate the Christians in the group to make some compromises and some progress. There was, however, not much support among this collection of the nation's founders for a prayer. In his notes at the bottom of the speech he wrote, "The Convention, except three or four persons, thought Prayers unnecessary."
So there you have it from the 55 most influential people in the new country who were setting up the new government: "An opening prayer? Nah, we're good."
[And that's a fact!]

Trump's Billionaire Ballroom:
Robert Reich: Next Move on Trump's Billionaire Ballroom:
A Proposal for the Next Democratic President.
(Substack; August 31, 2026)
When the Supreme Court doesn't want to decide on the legality of some issue, it often finds that a plaintiff "lacks standing" - that is, doesn't have sufficient interest in the issue to merit the Court's involvement.
Today, the five Trump-sympathizers on the Court allowed construction to continue on Trump's 90,000-square-foot luxury White House ballroom, which has been steadily rising to replace the White House's East Wing that Trump tore down last Fall.
The five said the preservationists who challenged the construction of the planned ballroom lacked standing to bring their lawsuit because they were not directly harmed by the project.
That lawsuit was brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, a nonprofit chartered by Congress to guard public buildings. If this organization (and its longtime member, Alison K. Hoagland, an architectural historian) doesn't have standing to complain about Trump's mayhem on the People's House, I can't imagine who would.
Congress might have standing, but the current lily-livered Republicans now in control of Congress would never seek to stop Trump's ballroom. They want to be invited to it.
I was interested that Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joined with the Court's three Democratic-appointed justices in dissent, saying the construction was "likely unlawful". He reasoned that because the White House is "an iconic American building whose symbolism and history are wrapped up in its architecture", it's important that "those responsible follow the rules in deciding what to tear down and what to build up at the People's House".
By the majority's pathetic logic, Trump could raze the entire White House and put up a Trump Tower in its place, or take down the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument and erect monuments to himself, and no one would have standing to complain.
But presumably the opposite logic also holds. If a future Democratic president wants to demolish Trump's ballroom, no one (other than, maybe Congress) would have standing to complain.
I think this is exactly what the next Democratic president should do, by the way. He or she should resurrect the People's House by obliterating Trump's ballroom as a symbol of the billionaire class that briefly ran Washington, and give away small chunks of its concrete and re-bar to average Americans - just as small chunks of the Berlin Wall were given away.
[I think SCOTUS just approved that. The Comments should be interesting!]
Jacqui Housden: "Wrecking-Ball Presidency" – Trump's White-House East-Wing Demolition Sparks Outcry. (MSN; October 22, 2025)
Donald Trump has revealed that the "existing structure" of the White House's historic East Wing will be torn down to make way for his new ballroom, despite previously saying the construction would "not interfere" with the building. "In order to do it properly, we had to take down the existing structure", Trump told reporters in the Oval Office today.
The move has sparked anger from Democrats.
- Hillary Clinton, who ran against Trump in 2016 and resided in the White House as First Lady for eight years, said on X: "It's not his house. It's your house. And he's destroying it".
- Gavin Newsom, the Governor of California and a prominent critic of Trump, said the demolition of the East Wing was "perfect symbolism. This is a wrecking-ball presidency".
Others expressed offence at the plans.
- Edward Lengel, who was Chief Historian of the White House Historical Association during Trump's first term, told CNN: "All of the founders would be disgusted."
- US Senator Angus King, an independent of Maine, said: "President Trump's desecration of the White House is an insult to the American people and a betrayal of his obligation to safeguard our history and heritage."
- The White House has dismissed criticism as "manufactured outrage".


With BIG HELP from SCOTUS, tRUmPUtin Shares Lake Ontario with Canada, AND MEXICO, AND MORE?

Alex Nguyen: Google's Obedience To Trump's "Lake America" Order Follows A Depressing Pattern. (links, photo; Mother Jones newsroom; August 30, 2026)
If you're a Google Maps user in the United States, you'll now see the name "Lake America" instead of "Lake Ontario", just days after President Donald Trump's executive order renaming the body of water amid his ongoing trade war with Canada.
In an announcement published last night (Saturday), Google explained that it "reflect[s] name changes in official government sources", in this case citing the US Geographic Names Information System.
According to Google, Maps users in Canada still see "Lake Ontario", while those outside the US and Canada will see both names: "Lake Ontario (Lake America)". "These updates follow our long-standing policy for bodies of water with names that vary from country to country", the announcement in part reads.
Also last night, Trump posted an AI-generated video on Truth Social, depicting himself kicking over a "Welcome to Lake Ontario" sign and placing a "Welcome to Lake America" sign in its place. His AI avatar then dances robotically to the tune of the Village People's "Y.M.C.A." Earlier yesterday, Trump shared an AI video of ducks sporting Trump's haircut, firing assault rifles to celebrate "Lake America".
Online reactions of outrage are widespread, but Google has long demonstrated little interest in opposing the Trump administration. The corporation follows a similar pattern to what it did when Trump renamed the Gulf of Mexico as the "Gulf of America" in a day-one executive order last January. The following month, Google announced the same split.
Google has also previously carried out the Trump administration's bidding in other ways, including eliminating DEI hiring goals last February while reviewing Trump executive orders unwinding DEI in the federal government, and - along with other tech giants like Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft - donating $1-Million to Trump's inauguration fund last year.
So maybe we all go back to using MapQuest again?
    "We're NOT changing it."
    --MapQuest <https://www.mapquest.com/>, August 27, 2026
[A small step toward the liberation of, uh, some of "America".]


Elizabeth Warren: DJTrump's Decision Tree (graphic; Bluestate; August 29, 2026)



New Evidence Of Trump's Denied Dealings With Jeffrey Epstein:

NEW: Jeffrey Epstein Case (LINKS to many Epstein articles and videos; ABC News; updated regularly)
Wajahat Ali and Ellie Leonard, The Left Hook: Jeffrey Epstein Met With Trump In 2016! Investigative Journalist Ellie Leonard Has Found Evidence Revealing Epstein Met With The Trump Team After The 2016 Election. Why The Lies And The Cover-Up? (46-min. Substack video; August 10, 2026) Investigative journalist Ellie Leonard joined The Left Hook to drop a massive bombshell! Jeffrey Epstein allegedly met with the Trump team after the 2016 election.
But Trump said he cut contact with Epstein in 2004 over a real estate dispute! He "barely knew" the pedophile who was once "his closest friend", right?
None of this adds up - unless, of course, you trust the evidence of your eyes, and realize we are witnessing the biggest political cover-up in modern history.
A cherry-on-top is Todd Blanche, Trump's personal attorney, receiving votes to become the nation's Attorney General - despite violating the Epstein Transparency Act.
Here's Ellie With Her Write-Up!:
"Here are the documents you need to verify that Epstein did indeed meet with Trump officials, and likely Donald Trump himself, on November 13, 2016 at Trump Tower, the same day Trump was picking high-level officials for his cabinet."
EFTA01620474 - SMS thread between USVI Governor Ken Mapp and an "unknown" recipient
, in which the recipient discusses meeting with Trump's team on 11/13/2016.
EFTA02669184 -
an email from Epstein to himself, which verifies he is the "unknown" recipient from the SMS with Ken Mapp.
EFTA01744330 -
an email between Epstein and a [REDACTED] recipient, in which they ask "Will you have a Cabinet position?" on September 25, 2016, and then on November 13, 2016 Epstein states again that he is at Trump Tower.
House_Oversight_030639 -
an un-redacted email that shows the recipient from the 9/25 and 11/13 emails was actually Linda Stone, a former VP at Microsoft and who served on the MIT Media Lab Advisory Council with Joi Ito, who is also mentioned in the email.
What was Trump doing on November 13, 2016?
<https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2016/11/13/visitors-swarm-trump-tower-as-president-elect-works-out-of-sight/>
For more great research and data, please subscribe to Rye Howard-Stone and check out his page:
<https://epstein-data.com/>
NEW: Prem Thakker: 8 Unanswered Questions About Jeffrey Epstein's Death (Zeteo; August 9, 2026)
It's been seven years since the highly-connected financier, pedophile and former friend of Donald Trump died in a jail cell, during Trump's first presidency. There are still questions about his death.
Seven years ago, Jeffrey Epstein - the shadowy financier and pedophile intimately linked to powerful people around the world, including Donald Trump - died in jail. He was found dead in his jail cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City, where he was awaiting trial for federal sex-trafficking charges.
Questions surrounding Epstein and his legacy have dogged Trump, particularly throughout his second presidency. Last year, due to significant public pressure, Congress passed a law mandating the Justice Department release its files related to Epstein. The Trump administration has been accused of slow-walking and covering up the release of the files, while members of its administration have refused to productively meet with Epstein's victims.
Epstein's death, which was ruled a suicide, would have possibly been the first suicide in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in more than 20 years. That and many other puzzling questions and facts have left millions wondering: Did Jeffrey Epstein really commit suicide?
The confluence of procedural failures and dubious events surrounding his death has done nothing to quell suspicion. Here are eight unanswered questions about Epstein's death...
[Yes, there's more...]
Jeffrey Epstein and Saint-Tropez: The American Financier's Other Hunting Ground In France. (Le Monde; August 8, 2026)
(Read the free link, as the article has a good deal of detail.)
Ah, after the Paris season, where would his prey go? St. Tropez on the French Riviera, of course.
How could the millionaire, who so loved to mix business networks, cultural circles and sexual prey, possibly have resisted Saint-Tropez? This haven of parties, luxury and business - a summertime hot-spot for the fashion and entertainment industries - has, since the 1960s, been the essential crossroads where the worlds that Epstein relished intersect. It is the seasonal meeting-place for fortunes both small and great, for the international jet set and all kinds of go-betweens, for established celebrities and aspiring starlets.
NEW: Peter Charalambous, Will Steakin, James Hill and Katherine Faulders: Timeline Of Trump And Epstein's Relationship, And What Trump Has Said About Their Falling Out. Trump Has Said He's Known Epstein Since The Late 1980s. (photos, 3-min. video; ABC News; July 31, 2025)
President Trump offers new details on fall-out with Jeffrey Epstein. Convicted sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers are requesting immunity or clemency for her, and say she will not testify to Congress without it.
As President Donald Trump gives new details about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, it's raising new questions about what he knew and when about the deceased financier and convicted sex offender.
The president continues to face backlash and questions over his administration's handling of files related to Epstein
, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking minor girls.
Trump has said he's known Epstein since the late 1980s but that they later fell out and hadn't spoken in 15 years at the time of Epstein's arrest in 2019.
Here's a detailed timeline of their relationship, and what Trump has said about the reason for their falling out:
November 1992: Video shows Trump with Epstein
, laughing and talking at Mar-a-Lago party.
1993:
Former Sports Illustrated swimsuit model Stacey Williams alleged that Trump groped her in front of Epstein when she visited Trump Tower. Trump denied the accusations after Williams came forward with her claims in October 2024.
December 1993: Photographs
obtained by CNN show Epstein attends Trump's wedding to Marla Maples.
1993-1997: Trump takes at least eight flights on Epstein's private jet
, according to flight logs released by the Department of Justice.
1997: Trump was photographed with Epstein at a Victoria's Secret "Angels" Party. Epstein was also photographed with Trump at Mar-a-Lago that year.
2000: Trump and Melania were photographed with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago
on February 12, 2000.
2000:
According to Social Security records submitted to the court during Virginia Giuffre's defamation case against Maxwell, Giuffre was employed at Mar-A-Lago Club LLC in 2000 and earned $1,866.50 during that calendar year. The duration and precise dates of her employment at Trump's club remained in dispute when the lawsuit settled in 2017. Giuffre accused Maxwell of recruiting her while she was working as a locker-room attendant at Mar-A-Lago in 2000 and bringing her to Epstein's home for a massage. She claims that she eventually became a "teen sex-slave" to Epstein, and a victim of sex-trafficking, beginning at age 17, at the hands of both Epstein and Maxwell. Maxwell denies the allegations.
October 2002: Trump tells New York Magazine that Epstein is a "terrific guy" and that they have known each other for 15 years.
"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side", Trump said.
2003: Trump allegedly sent Epstein a "bawdy" letter that was included in a book made for Epstein's 50th birthday
, the Wall Street Journal reported. Trump denies writing the letter, which he says does not exist and, earlier this month, following the report, sued the Journal for defamation seeking at least $10-Billion in damages. Dow Jones says it stands by the Journal's reporting.
2004: Trump and Epstein reportedly had a falling-out after a competition to purchase a Palm Beach mansion
called Maison de l'Amitie, according to the Washington Post.
2005: Police in Palm Beach begin investigating Epstein
, after a 14-year-old reports he molested her at his mansion.
2006: Epstein is indicted on one state felony charge of solicitation of prostitution.
2007: Trump allegedly banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein allegedly hit on another member's daughter
, according to the 2020 book "The Grifter's Club" by investigative reporter Sarah Blaskey. The White House has said in recent statements about Trump's previous relationship with Epstein that Trump kicked Epstein out of his club "for being a creep". "The fact is that The President kicked him out of his club for being a creep", White House communications director Steven Cheung has said.
2008: Epstein pleads guilty to state charges in Florida, including procuring a child for prostitution and solicitation of prostitution. The deal includes a non-prosecution agreement giving him immunity from possible federal charges. He is sentenced to 18 months in jail.
2015: Trump pushes the Epstein conspiracy connection claiming the involvement of former President Bill Clinton - on stage at CPAC
, months before announcing his 2016 campaign: "Nice guy. Got a lot of problems coming up in my opinion with the famous island. With Jeffrey Epstein." Clinton has denied any wrongdoing and has claimed he had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes.
February 2017: Trump nominates Alexander Acosta, who was the U.S. attorney who oversaw Epstein's 2008 plea deal, for Secretary of Labor.
2019: Epstein is arrested in New York on federal sex-trafficking charges on July 6, 2019. A month later, he is found dead by suicide in his jail cell on August 10, 2019.
July 9, 2019:
Trump says in the Oval Office that he hasn't spoken to Epstein in 15 years and that the two had a "falling out". He declines to say why they stopped talking. Trump said of Epstein at the time: "Well I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him … he was a fixture in Palm Beach. "I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you. I was not a fan of his."
July 12, 2019: Following Epstein's arrest, Acosta resigned as Secretary of Labor amid renewed criticism of his alleged mishandling of the Epstein case.
July 12, 2019: Trump said
on the White House South Lawn: "Yes. He and I did have a falling out a long time ago. The reason doesn't make any difference, frankly. But I haven't spoken to him in probably 15 years or more. I wasn't a big fan of Jeffrey Epstein, that I can tell you." He repeated that he "threw him out" of his Mar-a-Lago club, but didn't specify when.
July 2020: Maxwell is charged with federal crimes for helping recruit underage girls for Epstein and participating in the abuse herself.
July 2020: Trump says "I wish her well"
in response to reporter questions about Maxwell charges - allegations she denies.
August 2020: Trump doubles down when pressed about wishing Maxwell well
, saying in an interview: "Yeah, I wish her well…I'd wish you well. I'd wish a lot of people well. Good luck. Let them prove somebody was guilty."
December 2021: A jury convicts Maxwell of charges
including sex trafficking, transportation of a minor for sexual activity, and conspiracy. She was sentenced to 20 years in prison in June 2022.
July 28, 2025:
Trump said that his relationship with Epstein soured because Epstein poached some employees after he explicitly warned him not to do so. "But for years, I wouldn't talk to Jeffrey Epstein. I wouldn't talk because he did something that was inappropriate. He hired help, and I said, 'Don't ever do that again'. He stole people that worked for me. I said, 'Don't ever do that again'. He did it again. And I threw him out of the place persona non-grata. I threw him out, and that was it. I'm glad I did, if you want to know the truth", Trump said.
July 29, 2025:
Trump suggests he had a falling out with Epstein after he "stole" young women from the Mar-a-Lago spa, including Giuffre. "I don't know. I think she worked at the spa, I think so I think that was one of the people. Yeah, he stole her. And by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know. None whatsoever", Trump said.
[And when Trump says he's telling the truth, you've been warned.]

Trump plays "Let's Pretend" with the Kennedy Center:

Ellen Eberhardt: U.S. Government May Demolish Kennedy Center, "Due To Structural Death Spiral". (good photos, interesting MAGA-detector Comments thread; Dezeen; August 27, 2026)
In the ongoing battle over a renovation of the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC, the administration of US president Donald Trump has said it may have to demolish the Edward Durell Stone-designed building and replace it with an amphitheatre.
The document cites the centre's lack of financial revenue and its decaying structure as the reason for renovation, stating the institution has lost "tens-of-millions of dollars each and every year" and that it is in a "financial and structural death spiral".
It proposed an outdoor amphitheatre in its place if the efforts to renovate and rename the building are blocked.
"The Board recognises that President Trump's efforts and prestige provide the sole hope for the Center's financial survival, and structural renewal", the document continued.
The building was designed by American architect Edward Durell Stone in the 1960s and serves as a major cultural institution in the city. It was established and named through a governmental statute. It has been an object of debate since Trump replaced board members with his own selections in 2025 and had his name applied to the exterior.
Since then, his name has been applied to the building and removed by court order, and the administration has released renderings of its desired updates to the centre, which would require years of closures. These plans were blocked by the courts earlier this year.
This week, a judge will rule whether or not Trump can inscribe "Restored and Renovated by President Donald J Trump" on the building underneath the Kennedy Center word-mark.
Earlier this year, a slew of donors and high-profile artists pulled out of supporting the centre and in the midst of its legal battles, visitors have significantly dwindled, according to The New York Times. A coalition of architecture organisations, including the AIA and Docomomo US, also sued the administration over the proposed renovations earlier this year.
It is part of several building projects and proposals Trump has pursued "for Washington DC", such as re-lining the Reflecting Pool in a bright blue and the "Arc de Trump".
[The world is watching The Fool On The Hill, but that won't slow him down.]
Ben Dreith: AIA Sues Donald Trump Over Kennedy Center Renovation In UNPRECEDENTED COALITION. (Dezeen; March 23, 2026)
Eight plaintiffs submitted a lawsuit this morning in an attempt to pause proposed renovations to the John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington DC. The plaintiffs include:
- the American Institute of Architects (AIA),
- Docomomo US,
- the Cultural Landscape Foundation,
- the American Society of Landscape Architects,
- the Committee of 100 on the Federal City, DC Preservation League,
- the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and
- the Society of Architectural Historians.
According to the group of plaintiffs, the lawsuit represents one of the largest legal coalitions of preservation bodies in history.
"No plaintiff can remember an instance in which so many national and regional organisations have coalesced to defend a single historic building and its grounds, reflecting both the Kennedy Center's significance and the breadth of concern that the administration's approach could weaken long-standing federal protections for historic sites nation-wide", said the plaintiffs.
Named as defendants in the lawsuit are president Donald Trump in his capacity as chair of the Board of Trustees of the Kennedy Centre, the Smithsonian Institute, the National Capital Planning Commission, as well as other government organisations and officials.
"It's not about the president's tastes. It's about the rule of law."
The lawsuit contends that the administration must adhere to the processes in the National Historic Preservation Act and the National Environmental Protection Act before proceeding with planned renovations to the centre. Given this, the plaintiffs demand that proper review and authorisations by congressional officials should precede any renovations. The lawsuit, if successful, would halt work on the structure until such authorisations and associated public reviews are completed.

Ken Klippenstein: The Mitch Is Back. Senator Mitch McConnell, 84, Flubs Return. (photos, video; KenKlippenstein.com; September 17, 2026)
Mitch McConnell decided to show up to work this week, ending a 92-day absence that was one of the biggest middle fingers to Americans from an elected official that I can remember. Now God is responding in kind, casting McConnell as the villain in a sad sequel to The Mummy.
The wheelchair-bound McConnell was hospitalized on June 14. His office said only that he was "receiving excellent care," and for the next two weeks that's all we were told. Then on June 30 came the publication of a 911 call from his Washington home, in which a dispatcher reported a cardiac arrest and a medic radioed that CPR was in progress. Twelve days and a wave of public backlash later, McConnell's office finally put out a statement. He'd only suffered a fall, they claimed, releasing a proof-of-life photo.
It took all of two days before McConnell's first major gaffe. In Wednesday's Senate Agriculture Committee markup of the Farm Bill, a visibly-confused McConnell voted "no", joining the Democrats in opposing his own party's major legislation. The clerk was kind enough to call his name a second time. Senators and aides on either side of him leaned in, whispering corrections. McConnell reversed his vote with a hoarse "aye", which passed the bill out of committee 12–11. It was also the only word he'd said on camera since his disappearance.
[To see the video, click on this article's Subject line.]
The 84-year-old Kentucky Senator is in many ways the Godfather and final boss of the gerontocracy. Though many older members of Congress have finally decided to retire after enormous public pressure, as I've written about, McConnell holds on, clearly unable to fulfill his duties but also unwilling to resign. (And not just him: I can't remember the last member of Congress who resigned mid-term due to health reasons - despite the fact that six have died in office this term alone.)
If you want to know how he's getting away with this - amid an eye-popping 71% disapproval rate from Kentuckians in March, before his hospitalization - one big reason is that major media have been doing him a favor.
Here’s how The New York Times reported his first public appearance to the press: "'After two years-' McConnell began, correcting himself", the Times wrote: "two decades - of dodging your questions, I wasn't sure how many of you would be here today." Ha-ha. What the Times story didn't mention was that McConnell's staff barred media from recording video of McConnell's remarks. Nor that McConnell spoke "slowly and with some difficulty", according to The Guardian.
The funniest part of the Times article is where they recount how McConnell "seemed to freeze while speaking in public" - episodes that were caught on camera, in which he clearly froze. Imagine the headline: "Twin Towers Seemed to Fall."
The Mitch is back. The Office of the Attending Physician, Congress's concierge medical service, paid McConnell's office a visit yesterday, according to video posted by independent journalist Desirée Townsend (who broke news of the 911 cardiac-arrest call in the first place, forcing Washington media to address the scandal). Why was a doctor needed? Who knows. McConnell’s office won't say.
Willow Abbott: "Trump's Oval-Office Announcement Today Shocked Everyone!" (19-min. YouTube video; Bill Clinton w/AI; August 27, 2026)
(Made with AI - Sounds or visuals were altered or fully generated. Learn more.)
President Trump shocked everyone with an Oval-Office announcement renaming Lake Ontario to "Lake America" effective immediately
- the second international waterway he's targeted after the Gulf of Mexico. This comes as:
- US-Canada trade talks collapsed,
- 50% tariffs hit $20-Billion in Canadian goods, and
- Canada announced dollar-for-dollar retaliatory tariffs starting September 8th, on over 700 American products including steel, dairy, and farm equipment.
Bill Clinton breaks down what this means for American families, jobs, and the future of the most-important trading relationship in the World.
Brett Wilkins: SCOTUS Lifts An Injunction On Trump's Mailed-Ballot Rules, But Hurdles Remain; The Supreme Court's Ruling Will NOT Be The Final Word On The President's Executive Order. (Common Dreams; August 25, 2026)
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to proceed with sweeping new restrictions on mail-in voting, removing a major legal obstacle just weeks before states begin sending ballots for the 2026 mid-term elections and prompting two of the high court's liberal justices to warn that the ruling will sow "chaos and uncertainty'.
Contrary to social-media posts from supporters of President Donald Trump, the court's right-wing majority did NOT rule in Trump v. California that the president's March executive order directing several federal agencies to change how elections are administered is constitutional. Instead, the justices concluded in the 6-3 unsigned order that the states challenging the order had not demonstrated sufficient standing to sue at this stage and stayed a lower-court injunction blocking its implementation.
Madison McVan: New Court Filings Reveal More Details Of The Surveillance Of Anti-ICE Protesters.
(TruthOut;
August 25, 2026)
The Documents Underscore The Feds' Use Of Undercover Agents And Electronic Surveillance.
A court filing this morning in the federal case against 15 anti-ICE protesters contained more than 200 pages of undercover agents' notes and photos from the Department of Homeland Security's widespread surveillance operation during Operation Metro Surge.
The documents reveal new information about groups and events targeted by the agents - and contain dozens of photos of cars of people who trailed immigration agents in their cars.
The documents further underscore the feds' use of intelligence tactics - including the use of undercover agents and electronic surveillance - as a frustrated Trump administration sought to tamp down the widespread resistance to the immigration crackdown, which wound up ensnaring many legal residents and led to the killings of two Americans.
Katie Phang: Trump SPIRALS And THREATENS Defamation Suit Over BOMBSHELL Report!?!
(16-min. YouTube video; MeidasTouch; August 22, 2026)
Thin-skinned Convicted Felon Donald Trump threatens to sue for defamation every time his little feelings get hurt. This time, he is going after the Center for American Progress because he didn't like a report showing that deployments of the National Guard to cities did not decrease violent crime. Katie Phang has the latest in the escalating fight over the truth and why Trump's latest legal lackey keeps taking a beating.

Anthony Picciano: Rosie O'Donnell Skewers Donald Trump With Song On Jimmy Kimmel Live. (3-min. YouTube video "Donny Boy" w/lyrics; Tony's Thoughts, a CUNY Academic Commons site; August 22, 2026)
Rosie O'Donnell signed off from guest-hosting "Jimmy Kimmel Live" two days ago, by thanking "everyone who's been watching this week, especially the hungry, hungry hypocrite in the White House". A few of her quotes:
"It's kind of weird to think he spent more nights with me this week than Melania."
"Most of all, I'd like to thank Jimmy Kimmel for inviting me to do this and for reminding everyone that we have the right to free speech in this country, whether Orange Voldemort likes it or not."
O'Donnell concluded with a new version (see video) of "Donny Boy", dedicated to a "very special boy" (Trump):
(to the tune of "Danny Boy")
"Poor Donny boy, your polls, your polls are falling.
   Your reflecting pool is green as Mountain Dew.
 Your wig's a mess, your ballroom is appalling,
   And with Iran, you've bit off more than you can chew."
"Measles are back, inflation is a-swelling;
   You post all night, you're sleeping while you work.
 And what's with all this useless crap you're selling?
   Hey, sweetie pie, you're driving us berserk."
"But there's a way to end this drama.
   It's time to use that stable-genius brain.
 Since we all know you'll never be Obama,
   Why not resign, and make this country great again?"
[Bravo! The above has accurate lyrics. Below, a longer video clip, but with AI-translation-grade approximate lyrics.]
Rosie O'Donnell: Rosie O'Donnell Sings a Song for Donald Trump. (9-min. YouTube video; Jimmy Kimmel Live; August 20, 2026)
Rosie O'Donnell says goodbye on her final night as guest host, and talks about:
- going back to Ireland,
- wanting to become the next Golden Bachelorette,
- her crush Sydney James Harcourt being on the show,
- COVID cases surging in almost every state right now,
- our fate being in the hands of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,
- receiving an email from Barbra Streisand, and she closes out her week at the show with:
- a song for a very special boy.
[Don't miss "Donny Boy"! (to the tune of 'Danny Boy'):
"Poor Donny boy, your polls, your polls are falling..."
(tRUmPUtin didn't miss it, and "his" ABC has banned it.)]

NEW: Niccolo Conte and Christina Kostandi: Ranked: The Countries Using The Most Energy Per Person. (chart, table; Visual Capitalist; August 17, 2026)
This graphic ranks the top 40 countries by total energy supply per person in 2025, using data from the Energy Institute's Statistical Review of World Energy 2026.
- Iceland tops the world with 745 gigajoules (GJ) of energy supplied per person in 2025, nearly triple the U.S. figure of 270 GJ.
- Small, energy-intensive economies lead the ranking: Iceland, Qatar (717 GJ), and Singapore (628 GJ) all sit far above the world's biggest economies.
- China (115 GJ) uses more energy per person than the UK (90 GJ) and Italy (94 GJ), both of which miss the top 40 entirely.
A country's energy use per person is shaped by its climate, industrial base, transportation needs, and overall economic structure.
Total energy supply measures all the energy entering an economy, including fuel for industry, power generation, and transport, before conversion losses. It reflects economy-wide energy use rather than household consumption or an individual's personal energy footprint.
Judge Judy Sheindlin: Entitled CEO's Son Laughs In Court. Judge Judy Shuts Him Down IN SECONDS. (36-min. YouTube video; Insight Democracy and Inside Democracy
; August 12, 2026)
An entitled CEO's son walks into court laughing, convinced his family's money and influence will protect him. But Judge Judy isn't impressed - and within seconds, her brutal response wipes the smile right off his face and leaves the courtroom stunned.
[NOT Trump; Just A Close Match.
Based upon truth, BUT then DISTORTED to make it APPEAR fake? Or, ONLY a fictional/AI story?
FWIW, Snopes comments re the same story - except with a different judge, and with son Max as daughter Madison: Judge Caprio Delivers A Rare Sentence In A Case Involving A CEO's Daughter.
Ah, the wonders/worries of AI!]   
Ryan J. Foley: ICE Will Release Body-Camera Video ONLY When Seen In The Agency's "Best Interests", Policy Says. (AP News
; August 7, 2026)
After years of delays, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said its field officers nationwide will have body-worn cameras by the end of September. The roll-out comes after recent fatal shootings by officers enforcing President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown have intensified pressure for accountability that the cameras could provide.
But the agency's body-worn camera policy could mean taxpayers who are pitching in tens-of-millions of dollars to pay for the cameras may be kept in the dark about some high-profile confrontations, at least in their immediate aftermath.
The policy says ICE will promptly release video of shootings and other encounters in which its agents cause death or serious injury, ONLY after determining "it is in the best interests of the agency" to do so. That gives its director discretion to release recordings that reflect well on the agency's image while working to keep others secret, experts on body camera policies said.
[So, when WOULD it reflect well on an inept agency that shoots citizens on the streets to, uh, BE HONEST? Trump dictates yet-another new national policy imported from the Mafia.]
Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz, Court of History: Trump SPIRALS As The REALITY Of His UNPOPULARITY Finally HITS HIM!!! (Legal AF; 35-min. YouTube video; August 9, 2026)
Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz discuss:
- Donald Trump's denial of his historic unpopularity,
- his views of past unpopular presidents, and
- how he really stacks up against them.
Mike Nellis: Andrew Tate Just THREATENED The Trump Family… (11-min. video; Endless Urgency; August 7, 2026)
What happens when political power collides with people who think loyalty buys immunity? In this episode, I dig into the Tate brothers' latest threat against Donald Trump, why MAGA's manosphere allies are suddenly panicking, and why this entire story could be much bigger than it looks.
[00:01:07] The warning issued to Trump from Andrew Tate's lawyers and what they could be threatening to reveal about Trump-world.
[00:03:15] Why the Tate brothers believed aligning themselves with Trump would protect them - and why that strategy may be falling apart.
[00:05:33] The pressure campaign against Trump's Justice Department, the shrinking influence of the Tate brand, and what it says about political loyalty.
[00:07:00] An astonishing look at the reality of Tate's support movement, and a conversation about the loneliness and manipulation fueling extremist online communities.
[00:09:04] We connect the dots on why this extradition fight could become a serious political problem for Trump, his allies, and anyone tied to the Tates.
This episode unpacks the intersection of power, influence, and accountability at a moment when the stakes keep getting higher. We explore the political calculations, the international implications, and the broader pattern of transactional relationships surrounding Donald Trump and the figures orbiting his movement.
[That's a busy 11-minute video!]
Mary L. Trump: Church And State: In Conversation with Chris Line and Mark Dann from the Freedom from Religion Foundation/FFRF (transcript; The Good In Us; August 5, 2026)
Mary Trump: I joined host Chris Line of Free Thought TV and Mark Dann to talk about my recent appearance at the Reason Reception, hosted by the Congressional Freethought Caucus. We also discussed some really incredible meetings I had with members of Congress who are part of the Congressional Freethought Caucus. It was a fascinating conversation, and we even got to see clips from some of the speakers who addressed the reception. I hope you enjoy it.
[The U.S. Constitution's "Separation of Church and State", revisited. 'Bout time!]
NEW: Mike Nellis: Trump COLLAPSES In Texas As MAGA PANICS! (2 videos=15 min.; Endless Urgency; August 3, 2026)
The panic inside MAGA is getting a whole lot louder - and for the first time in a long time, it might actually be justified.
CNN's Harry Enten just laid out why Texas isn't following the old playbook anymore, and the numbers are hard to ignore:
- James Talarico is leading in multiple high-quality polls,
- Independent voters are breaking hard against Republicans, and
- Suddenly, the state Republicans always assumed was untouchable is looking like the biggest battleground in the country.
If TEXAS FLIPS, it doesn't just change one Senate seat. IT CHANGES EVERYTHING!       
Lisa Needham: Icky "Limited-Edition" Passport Featuring Trump's Face Goes National. (photo; many comments; Daily KOS; August 3, 2026)
Ugh. Apparently MAGA chuds across the country have shown enough interest in traveling abroad with a sullen picture of Dear Leader adorning their passport that the State Department is issuing 250,000 more and making them available nationwide.
Yes, starting Aug. 8, your xenophobic uncle who has never had a passport and likely will never set foot outside of the red state he lives in can go to a very-special "250th-Anniversary commemorative passport application event" in 19 states and get a passport that features a glowering picture of President Donald Trump.
Look, at least the fact that these things are going to be dispensed on particular days, and MAGA chuds need appointments to get them, means that you can just avoid your local passport office on those days, but the whole thing still sucks.
How clear is it that this really is just a ploy to make Trump feel special? The White House list of the "important events" this "patriotic" passport will remind you of is NOT about America or its history as such. The Trump passport, it seems, is not intended to remind you of the founders signing the Declaration of Independence, which also appears in this very-special version, but instead just the low-rent crappy events Trump wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on this summer.
Heather Cox Richardson: Always A Lie (7-min. podcast; Letters from an American; August 2, 2026)
In a classic Friday-night news dump, the Department of Justice last night moved to dismiss the criminal charges against David Hearn, the U.S. Olympian the Justice Department indicted for vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The filing says that damage to the reflecting pool in June 2026 was the result of flawed installation by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings (AIC), and the rush to complete the project prior to events associated with the America 250 celebration in the week surrounding Independence Day 2026.
President Donald J. Trump:
- announced in April that he was planning to renovate the Reflecting Pool, and
- on May 7th said it would take a week and cost about $1.8-Million.
- By May 8th, the cost had jumped to $13.1-Million, with the contract awarded on a no-bid basis.
- When the pool reopened on June 6th, Trump declared it a triumph, writing on social media, "Thank you, President Trump."
- But the day after the reservoir filled with water, algae began to bloom in it. A spokesperson for the Interior Department said, "The algae were residual and a normal part of the process of refilling the pool. President Donald J. Trump is an expert builder who has fixed the Reflecting Pool for good, unlike the failed and extremely-costly attempt by Obama and Biden."
- By June 16th, crews from the National Park Service were pouring hydrogen peroxide into the water to kill the algae that had turned the pool bright green, even as Trump insisted the pool was perfect.
- By Thursday, June 18th, the new blue epoxy at the bottom of the pool was peeling off and floating in the vivid green pool.
- David Fahrenthold reported in the New York Times that the National Park Service contracted not only the coating and painting of the pool under a no-bid contract - the price tag had jumped to at least $14.2-Million - but also an additional $1.7-Million contract for a water-purification system. That no-bid contract went to a firm called Greenwater Services, whose ultimate owner is the J.J. Cafaro Investment Trust, led by Trump donor John J. Cafaro, whose wife chaired the 2017 International Red Cross Ball at Mar-a-Lago and who lives near Mar-a-Lago at a mansion that is listed as the water-treatment company's address in Florida corporate records.
- On June 19th, U.S. Park Police officers arrested 67-year-old David Hearn, a former Olympic canoe racer who had stopped by the pool on a 52-mile bike ride and reached into the water to feel what the detached material felt like, for destruction of public property. "I didn't vandalize anything", Hearn told David J. Lynch and Aaron Schaefer of the Washington Post. "I didn't destroy or break or peel anything. By the time I realized what was going on, I was being put in handcuffs."
- That night, Trump blamed "radical-left lunatics, most likely Democrats, who have spent their lives trying to ruin our country, for some real problems with vandalism at the beautiful Reflecting Pool."
- By the next day, he was blaming multiple individuals "for vandalizing our nation's magnificent Reflecting Pool. Who would do such a thing? These are very serious crimes having to do with the destruction of national monuments. Years in jail. Work will begin immediately on its repair."
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz commented:
- "They found an imaginary problem,
- said only they could fix it,
- didn't listen to experts,
- hired buddies who grifted $Millions,
- failed miserably,
- bragged how great it went.
- The entire Trump presidency, in a nutshell!"
[What a good analysis! The online article adds more.]
James Chater: Trump Says He Is Cancelling Strikes On Iran Subject To "Rapidly" Making Deal.
(BBC News; August 1, 2026)
Donald Trump says he has cancelled strikes against Iran, provided a deal was struck "rapidly" with the country.
In a post on Truth Social, the US president wrote that he had decided to "cancel the attack, subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL" - which would include the immediate opening of the Strait of Hormuz and an end to "Iran's nuclear threat".
Trump said the decision had been taken alongside Israel. The announcement came amid US-media reports that Washington might have been planning new, intense strikes on Iran over the weekend.
Iran has not yet responded to Trump's announcement.
The US has blockaded Iranian ports and bombed Iranian sites, while Iran has fired missiles and drones at US assets in countries across the Middle East and targeted shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for global oil shipping.
NEW: David Pakman and Hilary Shae: Pathologist Reveals Trump's Worst Symptoms. (18-min. Youtube video; David Pakman Show; July 30, 2026)
Hilary Shae
, a licensed and certified speech-language pathologist with 12 years of experience, joins us to discuss Donald Trump's communication decline.
[She's GOOD! Most of us suffer some of this decline with age, but a PRESIDENT with this MUCH decline, this QUICKLY and with official DENIAL of the problems, is very-bad news.]
Mike Nellis: Where's Mitch? (Endless Urgency; July 28, 2026)
Mitch McConnell has been missing for forty-five days, and it sure seems like almost nobody in Washington actually cares.
Republican senators are fleeing down hallways from content creators asking them the simplest possible questions: "Where’s your coworker? Do you think we should have term limits?" The whole thing is an embarrassing indictment of how Washington works right now.
They know the American people are angry about this. But they also know the American people are busy - drinking bad news from a fire hose, barely able to keep their own lives together - so they figure they can get away with it. And in the two-tiered system of government and justice we've built, they're right. They can.
- McConnell's family knows they don't have to be honest with the American people about his health, because nothing will come of it, even if people are mad.
- His staff know they can be complicit in a cover-up - lie, and keep insisting he's coming back to work - when most of us believe he's probably never coming back.
- His colleagues know the voters won't punish them for it, and they want to stay in office as long as humanly possible.
I mean, how many of these Republican senators out there right now opposing age limits are doing it only because they see themselves serving well into their nineties? The way Chuck Grassley does?
And the media knows they can keep getting invited to the parties without ever having to ask the hard questions.
Meanwhile, the voters are left holding the bag. Right now the people of Kentucky have half the representation in the United States Senate that they're owed - at a moment when the president is a fascist asshole waging an illegal war and wrecking our economy. Don't you think the people of Kentucky deserve equal representation with every other state? I sure as hell do. Even knowing they'd probably elect somebody I fundamentally disagree with on almost everything. Because fundamentally, this is a good-government issue.
This is exactly why we need a full-scale overhaul of how we run our government and our elections:
- We need term limits.
- We need age limits.
- We need radical transparency of financial records, so we can weed out corruption.
- We need radical transparency of health records, so we know whether our elected officials are physically and mentally up for the job.
- We need to overturn Citizens United.
- We need to disclose which influencers are being paid by which campaigns - because it's getting harder and harder to figure out who isn't on somebody’s payroll.
- We need to root out foreign money in our elections.
- We need to ban super PACs.
- There is so much that we need to do.
But here's the bottom line. If you're angry about this obvious, blatant cover-up of Mitch McConnell's health - if you don't believe the story they're telling, and I certainly don't; I think the man is probably dead, or at the very least incapable of doing the job of a United States senator - then understand this: it only happens because we live in a country where there is no accountability for the rich and the powerful:
- If you know the right person,
- if you have enough money,
- if you can put a little money in Donald Trump's back pocket,
you can get away with anything.
All these people know they're going to get away with it. They know we'll be mad, and they know we'll move on to the next thing we're mad about. And I’m still sitting here wondering who the hell paid off Brett Kavanaugh's credit-card debt and bought his baseball tickets - because I never got an answer for that, and I'd still like one.
So get angry. Hold onto that anger - but turn it into something productive.
- Get out into your community.
- Take care of your family.
- Go run for office. We need good people to run, and we need a lot of them, because the truth is a lot of us are going to run, and a lot of us are going to lose. But it'd be good if a few of us won. Maybe then we can make the system a little bit better and actually fix this.
Don't let them win. And don't give in to complacency.
[Right on! Let's keep this article where we can find it later!]
Mike Nellis and Jessiah Eberlin: BREAKING: McConnell's Team SCRAMBLES With New Photo And Statement. (25-min. video; ENDLESS URGENCY/Substack; July 27, 2026)
We had to dive into one of the strangest political stories unfolding right now: Mitch McConnell's prolonged disappearance from public view, and the questions that just keep piling up. We talked about:
- what we actually know,
- what we don't know,
- why transparency matters, and
- how this story says something much bigger about accountability in Washington.
 We also got into:
- Trump's attacks on the Press,
- the White House Correspondents' Dinner, and
- why so many of our political institutions feel completely disconnected from the people they're supposed to serve.
[Listen up, America!]
Markos Malitz/Daily Kos and comedian Janesh Ran: "Room Temp" Episode 1
(38-min. video; Thursdays, weekly on YouTube; July 23, 2026)
[This new show plans to take a left-of-center look at:
- the absurdities of our political system,
- the process, the politicians and the way policy is made,
- and poke fun at it, because it is patently absurd.]           
Heather Cox Richardson: tRUmPUtin's Embrace Of Fascism (Letters From An American; July 22, 2026)
"The Republican Party's new favorite talking point is calling Democrats communists", Representative Jim McGovern (D-MA) said yesterday on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.
"Really? Communists? Did we accidentally step into a time machine?"
"I get it", he said. "They don't want to talk about the real issues, the bread and butter issues. They don't want to talk about affordability. I guess my question is, is Joe McCarthy back from the dead? Because it sounds like that's who wrote all the garbage coming from Republicans, about communism. These guys, they dust off the same, tired, old talking points, every time they're backed into a corner. Every time a new poll comes out saying that your economic agenda sucks, what they do is they change the subject. They try to divert attention. It is pathetic.
"But fine. They…want to play that game, let's play that game. Let’s talk about the Republican Party:
- A party that worships one man above the Constitution in a cult of personality.
- A party that demonizes immigrants and says they poison the blood of our country.
- A party that calls the free press the enemy of the people and sics the Justice Department on journalists who they don’t like.
- A party that says their political opponents are internal enemies and calls them, "the enemy within".
- A party that is okay with invading our allies, including other democracies,
- A party that punishes their political opponents,
- A party that has deployed troops on our own streets, that wants to use the American military on the American people.
- A party that believes any unhinged lie, fantasy, and conspiracy theory as long as it comes from one man.
- A party that tries to lock up members of Congress for exercising their free speech rights.
- And a party that has tried to violently overthrow the results of a free and fair election in the United States of America. A party that, in fact, pardoned everyone who invaded this building on January 6, 2021, and tried to throw out the votes of millions of Americans because the president couldn't accept that he lost."
[That's a great new quote from a great U.S. Rep. from Massachusetts. Read on, as Heather quotes others - and history - on Fascism then and now!]
Mary L. Trump: Donald Denying The Affordability Crisis. (Trump Trolls Trump; July 20, 2026)
Welcome back to Trump Trolls Trump, the weekly reminder that the most effective response to authoritarian absurdity is not fear. It is ridicule.
We are now 544 days into Uncle Donald's second occupation of the Oval Office. Somehow, January of 2025 already feels like several geological eras ago, and yet here we are, looking back on Week 78 of a presidency that continues to redefine incompetence in increasingly creative ways.
As it turns out, we did not need to spend two full days watching Todd Blanche's confirmation hearing to understand why he should never be Attorney General of the United States. Republican Senator John Kennedy managed to distill the entire problem into a single question. This is what Senator John Kennedy asked: "Are you and President Trump friends?"
Blanche responded: "I'm his lawyer. Was his lawyer."
That should have ended the conversation.

Todd Blanche accidentally admitted exactly what everyone already knew, but what he could never publicly acknowledge. He is not an independent public servant. He is Donald's lawyer. Or, as he awkwardly corrected himself, Donald's former lawyer. Either way, it is an extraordinary admission from somebody seeking to become the nation's chief law enforcement officer.
That brings us, naturally, to Donald himself. Donald spent part of the week in Pennsylvania attending a summit on defense and weapons production. At least, that was supposedly the reason he was there. Before long, his attention wandered toward something he clearly considers far more important than national security: The midterm elections. More specifically, Donald wanted voters to remember a brand-new word he believes perfectly captures the Democratic Party. Not affordability, because according to Donald, that is apparently a fake word.
This is what Donald said: "I had my first news conference the day after I took office and they said, Affordability. Affordability. That's a fake word that they use. They cause the affordability problem. It's called high prices. They came up with this word. They’re good at coming up with words, but we came up with a good word too. They're Democrats. Dumb. You take the B out. Most people don’t know that dumb is a B, okay? But the U replaces the E and you have a Dumocrat. And I just don't understand because their policy is so dumb, what they've done to this country and what they will do to the country. If we don't win the midterms or win the election, everything that I'm talking about, you can just write it off."
There is a lot to unpack there.
First, the only person who apparently did not know that the word "dumb" ends with the letter B, is the person attempting to explain it.
Second, Donald accidentally revealed what this election is really about for him. When he warns that everything can simply be "written off" if Republicans lose the midterms, what he is really saying is that accountability might finally catch up with him. Donald understands perfectly well what losing congressional protection could mean. It could mean investigations. It could mean consequences. It could mean that he, along with several members of his family and administration, may finally have to answer for what they have done. That possibility appears to terrify him far more than inflation ever could.
Donald, of course, quickly moved on to another subject he understands even less than economics: Physics.
To be fair, narrowing down the subjects Donald fails to understand has become increasingly difficult. We could spend hours discussing water pressure, shower heads, windmills supposedly murdering whales, or any number of other long-standing obsessions. This week, however, Donald returned to one of his favorites: Magnets.
Nobody has spent more time proving they do not understand magnets than Donald Trump:
- Sometimes magnets are dangerous.
- Sometimes they do not work.
- Sometimes they stop working because they get wet.
- Sometimes they are the key to unimaginable wealth.
The rules change from sentence to sentence.
Donald: "The elevators are no good, sir. They're lifted up by magnets. So here's my deal. I said, when Caterpillar tractor (and I watch more tractors than any human being on earth) rip earth, rip rock, right through a rock - it's all hydraulic. So I said, when Caterpillar goes into the business of using magnets to lift up their little blades, and when they go away from hydraulic, I'll tell you what, I'm going to do something. I'm going to start using magnets, but we don't want to use them. So we're not letting any... Pete, we're not letting any more ships be built with the ridiculous... And the same thing with the magnetic elevators. We want them to be made hydraulic, which it can be hit by lightning. It can be hit by anything. When a little water touches the magnets, it doesn't work anymore. You're in the Atlantic Ocean with waves at a 60-feet high and the Pacific Ocean with waves at a 70-feet high. And they're talking about magnets. It makes you want to get sick." [Sic.]
Personally, I would think sixty- or seventy-foot waves would make most people sick long before magnets entered the conversation. I also remain completely unclear about which elevators Donald believes are suspended by magnets somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
What continues to amaze me is not simply that Donald says things like this. It is that tens-of-millions of people still listen to him as though any of it makes sense. There are weeks when it feels impossible for him to become more ridiculous, more uninformed, or more detached from reality. Then he opens his mouth.
As though the first explanation were not bewildering enough, Donald somehow managed to contradict himself only moments later.
Donald: "I hope you're going to do magnets. Somebody out there, I hope you're all brilliant people. Magnets. Do magnets. Okay. I’ll tell you how to make money. Do magnets. You're doing a lot of great stuff. Do magnets because one thing we don't have, but we're getting close, but do magnets so... I hope John Gray is listening to me so he can give him a couple of bucks and go into the magnet business. I guarantee it's going to be a success. It's one thing we don't, for some reason, it's not complex, not hard."
Only Donald could spend several minutes insisting magnets are a catastrophic engineering failure, before pivoting seamlessly into investment advice about the magnet industry:
- Hydraulics are good.
- Magnets are terrible.
- Actually, magnets are the future.
- Invest in magnets.
- Avoid magnets.
All within the span of a single press conference.
It almost feels as though making sense has become optional inside the Trump regime. Then again, perhaps consistency has never really been the point. Donald has spent his entire public life saying whatever serves him in the moment, regardless of whether it contradicts something he said thirty seconds earlier.
- Logic is irrelevant.
- Facts are negotiable.
- Reality is simply another obstacle to be ignored.

[There's more, and it makes the same damning points. Well done, Mary Trump!]
Robert Reich: He Can't Resist!
(photo; Substack; July 20, 2026)
This photo is worth a thousand words.
Here’s you-know-who trying, as ever, to be the center of attention today, even though it was supposed to be about celebrating those who deserved it.
Congratulations, Spain - along with apologies for our Malignant Narcissist-in-Chief.
Shannon Bond, Jenna McLaughlin, Audrey Nguyen: In Prime-time Speech, Trump Doesn't Provide Evidence For Illegal Voting. (includes the 27-min. White-House video; NPR, Breaking News; updated July 16, 2026)
President Trump, who for years has sown doubt about the security of American elections, raised claims today that the country's voting systems are vulnerable to being "rigged and stolen", without providing new evidence of a single fraudulent vote cast in any election.
In a 25-minute prime-time address from the White House's East Room that included many baseless claims, Trump said he was declassifying intelligence documents that he said reveal "shocking vulnerabilities in our election infrastructure." Those include allegations of:
- Chinese efforts to influence American elections,
- concerns over voting-machine security, and that
- non-citizens are found on certain states' voter rolls.
However, many of the documents the White House posted online during the speech did not appear to fully support sweeping claims that the president made.
"Tonight, Americans heard the president once again repeat claims about our elections that have been investigated for years and repeatedly rejected", Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement. "The greatest danger to our elections right now is:
- false narratives seized upon here at home as a pretext to convince Americans their elections cannot be trusted
- or worse, to justify unprecedented federal intervention in elections that the Constitution entrusts to the states."
[tRUmPUtin continues to cheat, to lie, to sow doubt, to divide, and to otherwise undermine the USA in service to his sponsor-in-chief.
The rest of the online article goes into details - with links to more - regarding specific items in tRUmPUtin's long and deceitful list. Read it; remember it; share it; FIX IT!]
Brian Tyler Cohen: Trump's Prime-time Speech Wasn't Just A Warning, But A Lesson. His Performance Might Have Been A Snooze, But It Should Serve A Wake-up Call To Step Up The Fight To Save Democracy. (BTC, July 17, 2026)
It’s not worth rehashing Trump's prime-time speech, a jumble of reheated conspiracy theories so far from newsworthy that multiple networks declined to air the event live. (Worth flagging, though, that Trump went off on those networks for doing so, musing in real time that they should lose their broadcast licenses.)
The point of the whole charade was, of course, to create a pretext for Trump to eventually declare (read: invent) extraordinary powers granting himself control over our elections ahead of midterms. He likely views this move as a necessary first step to ultimately shoehorn through sweeping changes that Republicans have thus far been unsuccessful at implementing. Every Big Lie starts as a little one.
Rather than trying to turn the tide (by, you know, governing), Trump is opting to rig the rules the game. On the one hand, it's a damning indictment of our politics that we've gotten to this point. On the other hand, it's a pathetic act of cowardice that betrays the president's abject weakness. That's not to say we shouldn't take him seriously; if nothing else, the speech showed that Trump will stop at nothing to wield power, even power that he doesn't have, to get what he wants.
What we saw last night should be a blinking red light for Democrats to continue to fight this anti-democratic MAGA movement on every front. But it should also serve as a lesson for Democrats to recognize the opponent we're contending with. Trump will stop at nothing to win. We have to see this mentality, take it seriously, and mirror it - not for self-enrichment or vanity projects, but to deliver for Americans.
- Enough blind deference to our norms and traditions and institutions.
- Enough symbolic victories and messaging votes.
- It's time to wield power like we mean it.
- It's time to wield power to secure meaningful, lasting wins.
- It's time to wield power like democracy is at risk - because it is.
The midterms might still be just over the horizon, but the fight for the future of the republic is already underway.


Jeremy Kohler and Doug Bock Clark: FBI Has Looked At Using Questionable AI Tech To Review Signatures On Seized Mail-In Ballots.
(10-min. podcast; ProPublica; July 15, 2026)
As part of President Trump's continued push to discredit the results of the 2020 election, his administration has considered using AI technology to scrutinize tens-of-thousands of ballots seized in Fulton County, Georgia, ProPublica has learned.
Ken Klippenstein: Lindsey Graham's Death And Iran; Diva Down As FBI Grabs Spotlight. (Substack; July 12, 2026)
RIP. Senator Lindsey Graham died last night at age 71, ending a three-decade career as a member of Congress that started in 1995.
Washington is shocked. But 71 is roughly the life expectancy for a man in South Carolina, the state he represented.
Graham becomes the sixth "senior" member of Congress to die in office this term alone (assuming Mitch McConnell isn't already dead), the other five listed below. But fear not: 78-year-old 13-term congressman Joe Wilson is reportedly interested in running for Graham’s seat.
- Rep. David Scott (D‑GA) died at age 80 on April 22, 2026;
- Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva (D‑AZ) died at age 77 on March 13, 2025;
- Rep. Gerry Connolly (D‑VA), age 75 on May 21, 2025;
- Rep. Sylvester Turner (D‑TX) died at age 70 on March 4, 2025;
- Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R‑CA), died at age 65 on January 6, 2026.
One might think this would prompt a debate about gerontocracy, but the FBI wants you instead to worry about national security. "The FBI is assisting local authorities and has made every necessary resource available", Director Kash Patel said in a statement after Graham's death. Patel's strange intervention has prompted the conspiracy-minded to go wild.
The FBI under Kash Patel seems to take its orders directly from the White House, which wants to turn everything - from Graham's death to public protest to journalism - into some kind of sprawling threat to the country.
National security
might not be good at forecasting events or winning wars or making us safer, but it is very good at manufacturing threats that confuse and disempower people and, perhaps worst of all, forego discussion of more important issues.
Like, say, gerontocracy.

NEW: U.S. Coast Guard Claims
Clearwater's Banners Are Political, Forces Pete Seeger's Hudson-River Sloop Out Of Independence-Day Tall-Ships Parade:

Nicole Jao: Vessel Forced Out Of New York Ship Parade Over "Politically-Charged" Banners. (Reuters; July 4, 2026, updated July 9, 2026 - "This July 4 story has been corrected to say that Sail4th 250 was one of the events associated with Freedom 250, not organized by Freedom 250, in paragraph 8.")
The U.S. Coast Guard said "politically charged" messages led to the ​removal of an environmental group's vessel from a fleet of sailing ships ‌gathered in New York today to celebrate the country's 250th anniversary.
A ship owned by the Hudson River Sloop Clearwater environmental organization was forced out of the Sail4th 250 parade in ​New York Harbor, the Coast Guard said in a statement emailed to ​Reuters.
The ship had banners that read, "Save the Clean Water Act" and "Indigenous ⁠Rights, Racial Justice, Climate Solutions".
Participants in the event had agreed to refrain from displaying political or politically-charged messages or statements
, according to the Coast Guard, which said it enforced the agreement on behalf of Sail4th. "The owner of the sloop Clearwater was contacted and requested to remove the message being displayed or be removed from the parade of sail", ​the Coast Guard said. "They declined to remove it."
Jen Benson, director of advocacy ​and communications at Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, disputed the claim. She said the Coast Guard did ‌NOT ⁠ask for the messages to be taken down, but requested the ship leave the sailing route or risk arrest. "We don't think that advocating for clean water is a politically-charged message", Benson said. "People on all sides of the aisle, and no ​sides at all, have ​been fighting in ⁠the United States for clean water in different ways."
Sail4th 250 was one of the events associated with Freedom 250, a ​group created by the Trump administration to plan celebrations for ​the country's ⁠250th anniversary. More than 40 tall ships from 20 foreign countries participated, traveling through New York Harbor from near Sandy Hook, New Jersey, up to the George Washington Bridge.
⁠Hudson ​River Sloop Clearwater's website says the group's mission is ​to "protect the Hudson River by stewarding an inter-generational community of river advocates through education, advocacy, sailing, and ​music."
[So, this IS about tRUmPUtin's continuing schemes to turn Americans against each other - this time, by redefining 'clean-water advocacy' into 'turning Americans against each other'. His familiar (and deplorable) pattern.]
Clearwater Executive Director David Toman and Captain Rory Kane: Update About The U.S. Coast Guard's Removal Of Pete Seeger's Hudson-River Sloop Clearwater From Sail4th 250's Parade Of Sail. (Clearwater; July 4, 2026)
Raising awareness has been as much a part of Clearwater's history as raising the sails. This year, during the July 4th Parade of Sail (along New York City's section of the Hudson River), Clearwater displayed banners reading, "Save the Clean Water Act" and "Indigenous Rights, Racial Justice, Climate Solutions".
Over an hour into the parade, two U.S. Coast Guard vessels came alongside and instructed us to leave the parade route and exit the security zone. At first, we believed there had been a misunderstanding. Captain Rory Kane spoke directly with Coast Guard personnel from vessel to vessel to ask the reason for our removal. He was informed Clearwater was being removed because of our banners.
We were never offered the opportunity to remove the banners and continue participating in the parade. Instead, we were escorted south of the Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge.
While we strongly disagreed with the decision, our responsibility was clear. The safety of the 29 passengers, 19 crew members and volunteers came first, as always. We complied with the Coast Guard's directions, and then we did what Clearwater has always done. We sang. We talked about the Hudson River. We hauled our seine net and taught about the fish of New York Harbor. Even from Gravesend Bay, the day remained true to our mission and values.
We have not received an explanation directly from the event
organizers. Neither the participation agreement nor the Captain's Handbook prohibited these banners, and we were never given the option to remove them and continue participating.

Since 1969, we have raised our sails in support of clean water, environmental stewardship, and a more-just world. We do not see those values as political; we see them as fundamental.
[Why does this appear to be one more TRUMPed-up charge against Democracy and the USA? See Kamala Harris, below!]
Nora Mishanec: Sloop Clearwater Ejected From America250 Parade After Displaying Banners Supporting Indigenous Rights, Climate Action. (Albany Times-Union news article, accessed via Yahoo! News;
A sailboat operated by the non-profit Hudson River Sloop Clearwater was removed from a parade of tall ships making their way to New York Harbor today after flying banners in support of Indigenous rights and climate action, the non-profit said.
Officials on two U.S. Coast Guard boats forced the Clearwater vessel to exit the Sail4th 250 Parade of Ships as they sailed toward the harbor around 10:30 a.m., said David Toman, the environmental non-profit's executive director. The non-profit was one of more than 40 tall ships from around the world selected to take part in the America250 celebration in New York City.
"My first assumption was they were erroneously thinking we were not part of the parade, because there were lots of spectator vessels", Toman said in an interview from the sailboat's deck this afternoon. "They gave no explanation for why."
According to Toman, the sailboat's 19-person crew was later told by Coast Guard officials that their removal was due to several banners flying on the sailboat's mast, including one that read, "Save The Clean-Water Act" and another that said, "Indigenous Rights, Racial Justice, Climate Solutions".
The ejection came as a shock, he said, because the group had "been in agreement for months" with Sail4th 250 organizers to participate in the maritime parade. The Beacon-based sailboat had been tasked with escorting a vessel from Portugal.
Coast Guard spokesperson Sydney Phoenix said the non-profit violated agreed-upon rules established by Sail4th prior to the event. "One of those conditions was to not display political or politically-charged messages/statements", Phoenix said, noting that Clearwater "declined to remove" the banners after they were contacted by organizers with a request to "remove the message being displayed or be removed from the parade of sail."
Toman said the non-profit was not aware that it was in violation of any rules. The parade organizers "were aware we fly banners", he said, noting that the non-profit had agreed ahead of time not to fly "certain flags."
Representatives for the Coast Guard and Sail4th 250 did not respond to questions about the group's account or why the boat was removed from the procession.


A Prior V.P. Notes Unacceptable Republican Vote-Robbing:

NEW: Kamala Harris: Two Months Ago, The Supreme Court Gutted The Voting-Rights Act. We Need To Keep Talking About Voting Rights. The News Cycle Has Moved On, But We Will Not. (Kamala Harris' Substack; July 10, 2026)
For sixty years, Section 2 provided a protection against maps drawn to dilute the political power of Black and brown voters. The Court struck it down, and their decision in Louisiana v. Callais is a five-alarm fire:
- Within hours of the ruling, Louisiana's governor declared an "emergency" and suspended the state's May primary so the legislature could redraw its map.
- That same day, Florida passed a new redistricting bill.
- Soon after, Tennessee eliminated the sole majority-minority House district in the state.
- And Alabama moved to reinstate the very map a federal court had previously struck down.
It is not just seats in Congress that are being targeted by these redistricting efforts. Nearly 200 State legislative seats across ten Southern states are at risk of being redrawn out of existence, most of which are currently held by Black lawmakers.
This is not a series of coincidences. These actions are part of an agenda that conservatives set in place decades ago - to steal power from the people and cling to it for generations. It is a coordinated effort by Republican legislators to hand-pick their voters and try to silence the voices of Black and brown Americans, especially in the South.
The news cycle has moved on since the decision on April 29, but we cannot. Today, we have to focus on where the fight is heading:
- in the short-term in 2026,
- in the medium-term in the states, and
- in the long-term, in how we make the bold changes required to ensure the power is with the people.
[Read the online article, where Kamala Harris expands on specific and necessary steps "to ensure the power is with the people".]
Former U.S. Vice-President and Presidential Candidate, Kamala Harris: Reflecting (July 3, 2026)
As we approach the 250th anniversary of the birth of this nation on the Fourth of July, I am taking a moment to reflect.
Donald Trump's invasive corruption has bloomed across Washington, D.C. while Americans across the country feel the consequences. So I am reflecting on how we will rebuild from the debris left over from this administration without any sense of nostalgia.
Things are hard right now. They are probably going to get worse before they get better.
But let me be clear: We cannot let Donald Trump, or any collection of individuals who hold power in this moment, determine who we are.
We love our country - and when you love something, you fight for it. So while Donald Trump, the self-proclaimed "Dictator on Day One", tries to distract us this weekend from his failure to make life better for you and your family, we must remain focused. Together, we must continue to fight for the ideals of our nation just like our founders did 250 years ago.
[Thank you, Vice President Harris from a far-better administration!]
NEW: Maya Yang: Trump Reportedly Called Norwegian Minister "Out Of The Blue" To Ask About Nobel Prize. (The Guardian; August 14, 2025)
The U.S. president told Norway's finance minister he wants the Nobel peace prize, according to the Norwegian press.


Detailed Analysis Of Trump's First-Term Lies ("Bottomless Pinocchio" lists):
[ For much more, have your web browser search for "washington post +bottomless pinocchio +trump".
"Current", because it's important and newly-posted to these pages.]

NEW: Four Years Of Trump Falsehoods (5-min. video, links to more; Fact Checker, Washington Post; January 23, 2021)
The Fact Checker counted a total of 30,573 false or misleading claims made by President Trump during his [first] White House tenure. Here's what we learned.
[What ALL OF US learned, except for Trump's most-radical supporters!]
NEW: Glenn Kessler, Meg Kelly, Salvador Rizzo, Leslie Shapiro and Leo Dominguez: A Term Of Untruths: The Longer Trump Was President, The More Frequently He Made False Or Misleading Claims. (Fact Checker, Washington Post; January 23, 2021)
The Washington Post Fact Checker started tracking President Donald Trump's false or misleading claims as a first-100-days project - but in response to reader requests, continued to add to the database through his entire [first] term.
By the time Trump left office, he had accumulated 30,573 untruths during his presidency - averaging about 21 erroneous claims a day.
Trump made about 6 false or misleading claims a day in his first year as president, 16 a day in his second year, 22 a day in his third year - and 39 a day in his final year.
(Explore the Fact Checker's database of false claims made by President Trump while in office.)
Put another way, it took Trump 27 months to reach 10,000 false or misleading claims and another 14 months to reach 20,000. He then exceeded the 30,000 mark less than 5 months later.
Scroll the timeline below to see how the president's daily false statements added up to a tsunami of untruths that kept rising during his presidency.
NEW: In Four Years, President Trump Made 30,573 False Or Misleading Claims. (graphs, most-repeated claims, etc.; Fact Checker, Washington Post; updated January 20, 2021)
The Fact Checker's database of the false or misleading claims made by President Trump while in office.
NEW: Meet the Bottomless Pinocchio! (2-min. video, links; Fact Checker, Washington Post; December 10, 2018)
President Trump's false and misleading claims that have been repeated more than 20 times led us to create a new Pinocchio rating.
NEW: Daniel Dale: Donald Trump Voters: We Like The President's Lies! (The Toronto Star: March 26, 2017)
Donald Trump supporters in hardscrabble Ohio have finally figured out that he is lying - a lot. The truth is, they don't care.



How Did Elon Musk Make His Money? (Oxfam America; June 12, 2026)
The world's first $Trillionaire used:
- a rigged tax code,
- government support, and
- unchecked political influence
to extract and protect his own wealth.
Elon Musk is now the world's first trillionaire. After SpaceX launched its initial public offering (IPO), the net worth of the world's richest man has finally crossed over a previously-unthinkable threshold.
But how exactly did he make his money? Musk's fortune is not simply the result of one man's entrepreneurship and hard work.
In reality, its foundation rests on;
- a U.S. tax code rigged in favor of the ultra-wealthy,
- a financial system that socialized the risks of his ventures while privatizing their long-term gains, and
- political access.
"Elon Musk's rise to trillionaire status marks a new pinnacle of oligarchy and is a dark day for democracy", said Nabil Ahmed, senior director of Economic Justice at Oxfam America.
Oxfam, the global organization that fights inequality to end poverty and injustice, has warned about the rise in billionaire wealth for more than a decade. So we're going to paint a picture of some of the ways Elon Musk made his money. [Click above, to continue reading this article.]
Brian Tyler Cohen: The Dam Is Breaking On Democrats Embracing Supreme-Court Expansion.
A slew of decisions that are terrible for democracy might have lit a fire under some of the most powerful Democrats. I got them to say that they'll do something about it. (97-min. YouTube video; June 30, 2026)
This was the week the Supreme Court broke. The cracks were showing for a long time, but after the latest run of mind-blowing rulings, including:
- giving Trump sweeping authority to fire regulators,
- teeing up the deportation of thousands of people back to war-ravaged countries, and
- all but obliterating campaign-spending rules,
the court has completely abandoned its purpose, a commitment above all to the Constitution.

The takeaway here: This is all the proof we need that Supreme Court expansion is beyond necessary. The fact that you have three to four justices (depending on how you read Kavanaugh’s flaccid argument) on the record saying that the Constitution does not apply in the case of upholding birthright citizenship should be a flashing red light to anyone watching. Birthright citizenship - which is affirmed in the plain text of the Constitution - barely survived this session. And I'd venture to guess that what's left of our voting rights will have an even slimmer chance of making it out of the 2027 session alive.
As far as this court is concerned, we're no longer in a position to "hope for the best", to watch and wait for things to turn out alright. We have to act.
Interestingly, this came up in a conversation with Governor Gavin Newsom about my new book, "The Day After", on his podcast. Newsom and I have disagreed about Supreme Court expansion. But in a discussion about my book, which is literally a blueprint for how Democrats should wield power in a post-Trump world, I got Newsom to agree with me for the first time on how to wield it: "I'm with you. I'm done winning arguments, we gotta win."
If and when Democrats retake control of the government (already a Herculean feat unto itself) and manage to pass progressive legislation (another Herculean feat), all of it will be rendered completely moot by a court that's guaranteed to strike down everything that doesn't comport with its political ideology. We have to decide if we want to win symbolic victories and simply get caught trying, or if we actually want to make permanent, meaningful change. If it's the latter, then inherently, that requires us to expand the Court.
Michael Cornelison: Democracy Is Failing. (Substack; June 30, 2026)
An article in Foreign Affairs explains the problem, but offers no realistic solution.
[Mike proposes one. Save, savor, and share!]
Below are some excerpts from that article in Foreign Affairs:
Any attempt to repair democracy - while leaving elections at its center - is bound to fail because elections create a professional political class that is unsuited to genuine democratic rule. As she puts it, members of this group, "whatever their personal, individual qualities", cannot create "assemblies capable of either fully-democratic representation or smart, optimally-beneficial legislation". One reason is that elections select for a particular type: those who seek power and are prone to be corrupted by it. These are, as Landemore writes, "alpha types, the charismatic, the daring, the entitled, the arrogant, even those with no shame whatsoever, and sometimes even the downright psychopathic."
    …
In the United States, the party primary system is an obvious source of dysfunction. Turnout in primary elections - when parties choose their candidates for a general election - is extremely low, sometimes only 20% of eligible voters, and those who participate tend to be more ideologically-extreme than the public as a whole. This system gives politicians powerful incentives to appeal to partisan minorities rather than broad coalitions of voters.
    …
    In the United States, years of gerrymandering have helped ensure that at least 80% of seats in the House of Representatives are firmly in the hands of one party, encouraging politicians to cater to intense partisan minorities.
This gives me an opening for my favorite recipe to fix our broken democracy (USA edition). We do not need to eliminate elections or replace self-serving politicians with citizens committees (as elaborated in the above article). We need only to make a relatively-small adjustment in the system to remove the largest corrupting factor. Getting this done may not be too difficult.
For members of Congress and state legislatures, the main (or only) goal is to remain in office; i.e., win elections. That requires collecting lots of political money for the next election campaign. The main sources of political money: PACs that pool money for business and political interests, and very wealthy persons who can afford to donate large sums (in PACs, anonymously). The secret deals the politicians make are mostly the opposite of what is really needed by the nation and the people. Because so many voters are ignorant, disinterested, or gullible, this system works well - for politicians, corporations, and the very rich. This is the core problem of our democracy. It thoroughly pollutes both the election process and the lawmaking process. There is a remarkably-simple solution that could replace our fake democracy with a real one: long single terms of office.
Why would this be an improvement? Single terms may not have much effect on the corrupt politics of getting elected, but once in office, a politician could focus on something other than their next campaign and the necessary political money. Some might actually work to improve the welfare of the people. Some may even become honest enough to speak the truth about difficult social and economic problems, instead of lies and platitudes designed for mass appeal and low controversy.
I suppose that some politicians, once elected, would still take money to influence legislation, or simply go on vacation for their entire term. Therefore an effective system to throw the bums out is also needed: recall elections can do the job, especially if they are easy to initiate.
The two-year term for the House of Representatives is especially destructive - House members are in permanent campaign mode.
Long single terms (e.g. 10 years) would effectively remove life-long professional politicians. 10 years is not a career. The candidates would tend toward those who have already gone down a normal career path, e.g. workers, professionals, academics …
The Constitution made this mess and needs fixing. Fixing the Constitution is hard, but the magnitude and clarity of the problem should be enough to make it politically possible. A strong President would be needed to lead the charge. Most current politicians would likely fight this idea, so give them a break by making them free of the new law, but not their successors in office. After a few legislative terms, the system would start to heal. This seems realistically possible.
Have you noticed which (R) politicians are speaking out against our corrupt and incompetent president? It is those who do not plan to run for re-election, and no longer need the political money system managed by their party. This is an indication of how our politics could change with single terms of office - it would help politicians be more courageous and less corrupt.
Political parties are the 2nd-most-corrupting factor, but that is for another day.
[Bravo, Mike! Also, a perfect topic for the upcoming U.S. Independence-Day celebrations!
Note: Mike Cornelison is a fine friend, and creates the fine (Free, Open-Source Software) Fotocx application that we use and love.]
NEW: Sheri Berman: A Democracy Safe For The World; How To Fix A Broken System. (Foreign Affairs; July/August 2026; published June 23, 2026)

Robert Reich: The End Of Independent Agencies - The Supreme-Court Majority Throws Out The New Deal And Much More. (Substack; June 29, 2026)
As the nation prepares to mark the 250th-anniversary of our independence from a king, the Supreme Court and our current president are doing everything possible to resurrect a king in America.
Of all the things the framers of the Constitution worried about, their biggest worry was that a president would become as powerful as a king. Which is why they created Congress and the judiciary - to check and constrain him.
TODAY'S RULING overturns the basic idea
- part of the fabric of our government for well over a century - that Congress has the power to create independent agencies.
...
We're now in America's Second Gilded Age, when new robber barons (think Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and Larry and David Ellison) are running much of the economy and corrupting our politics. Unfortunately, we now have a president and a Supreme Court, three of whose members he appointed, who are in their pockets.
Hence, today's Supreme Court ruling that a president can utterly disregard the will of Congress and install his own hacks in all independent regulatory agencies (with the odd exception of the Federal Reserve Board).
[Read it, ALL of it! Share it, and discuss it! The sooner we rid America of these new Robber Barons - enemies of the People, and of our Founders - the better!]

Amanda Castro: E. Jean Carroll Hails SCOTUS Victory Over Trump: "Win Is For Every Woman!" (Newsweek; June 29, 2026)
President Donald Trump unleashed a blistering response to the Supreme Court on Monday, after it refused to intervene in his bid to overturn a jury's finding that he sexually abused and defamed E. Jean Carroll, leaving intact a $5-Million civil judgment.
The president accused the justices of declining to review a "Fake Case" and called the ruling an "Injustice" driven by political "Weaponization" and "Lawfare". The brief, unexplained order arrives as the court issues some of its most consequential end‑of‑term decisions, many of which are central to Trump's legal and political agenda.
Meanwhile, Carroll posted on Substack shortly after the ruling, celebrating the outcome and describing the Supreme Court's decision as a victory.
The move effectively ends Trump's attempt to erase the first federal verdict against him as he continues to face mounting legal exposure. The decision means Carroll's victory stands - and it signals that a second, far-larger defamation award could soon follow the same path to the Supreme Court.
David McAfee: Congressman Pinpoints Alarming Election Comment Trump Made "Out Loud": "Becomes A Crime". (2-min. podcast; Raw Story; June 27, 2026)
Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.) warned this week that President Donald Trump has openly acknowledged directing federal prosecutors to investigate elections whose results he dislikes - a statement the congressman argued the president made plainly and even boasted about.
"Trump just told the country, out loud, that he picks up the phone and orders federal prosecutors to investigate elections when he does not like how the vote is going", Levin wrote, adding that the president "bragged about it twice this week."
Greg Sargent, The Daily Blast: Angry Trump Seethes At Media As Fox Drops Truly-Humiliating Poll Data. (23-min. podcast; The New Republic; June 24, 2026)
Donald Trump's anger at the media over his Iran fiasco is mounting:
- He snapped at a reporter for noting that Americans might not support spending $80-Billion more on the war (as the Pentagon has requested), given widespread economic distress. Trump dubiously claimed the public would gladly support this.
- Then, at a rally, Trump seethed at the media for not being worshipful of his handling of the Iran talks.
- He also nonsensically suggested he's solved the nuclear issue entirely.
- Trump also tweeted angrily that the media is belittling his glorious triumph.
He's under immense pressure to show results: In a devastating segment, a Fox News anchor pointed to a new poll showing Trump's approval on the economy at 33%. Then the anchor said, "This is lower than Joe Biden was at his absolute-worst point ever." In this, Fox hit him with the ultimate humiliation.
We talked to international-relations expert Nicholas Grossman. We discuss his new piece explaining:
- why time is not on Trump's side in these talks,
- how all this is breaking up the Trump coalition in new ways, and
- what a disaster it could prove for J.D. Vance's coming presidential run.
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: MAGA Spirals After Pro-Israel Politics Loses Big-Time In NY Election. (The New Republic; June 24, 2026)
New York's Democratic Party is ushering in a brand-new era of politics - and that's freaking out Republicans.
Allies of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani swept the region's Democratic House primaries yesterday evening, the latest example of liberal-minded voters shifting their preferences.
And after Brad Lander, Darializa Avila Chevalier, and Claire Valdez won - all of whom have been vocal critics of Israel's genocide in Gaza - the biggest loser seemed to be MAGA world, which was left befuddled and irate that voters had turned away from candidates espousing the historically pro-Israel party line.
Appearing on Fox News, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller complained that "the Democrat Party has abandoned [centrism] and instead adopted this radical, revolutionary, and in many cases, violent ideology that wants to tear America down, and destroy everything that we know and love, from top to bottom."
Miller further used the trio's massive win yesterday to urge Democrats to vote MAGA in the midterm elections, claiming that progressive politics - which he said involved hating America, God, family, and gender - would be the country's "death knell".
Far-right influencer Laura Loomer was similarly disgusted by the political development, insisting that the Big Apple's mayor is an Islamic militant and that Donald Trump needs to do something about it. "I remember when Trump, who I love, said Mamdani isn't a jihadi. I was shocked", Loomer wrote on X late yesterday, reacting to the race. "Mamdani IS a jihadi and this growing threat of Islamic jihad and pro-Islamic terror candidates getting elected in America is a national crisis. It needs to be addressed by the Trump administration. Tonight should prove it to everyone."
Meghan McCain, a conservative TV personality and daughter of former Arizona Senator John McCain, also added her two cents, writing directly to Jewish Americans via social media. “To my beautiful Jewish friends in America. We love you. You are not alone. We are just as freaked out as you are and see with clear eyes exactly what is happening", McCain wrote.
Lander, one of the three Mamdani-backed candidates who cruised to victory Tuesday night, is Jewish.
Mary Clare Jalonick, Steven Sloan, Joey Cappelletti and Lisa Mascaro: Trump Berates Senate Republicans Over Iran War Vote After Calling Off Bill Signing. (AP News; June 24, 2026)
President Donald Trump said he had a "really great meeting" with Senate Republicans today, after a tense GOP luncheon and his abrupt cancellation of a bipartisan housing bill signing - the latest signs of friction with congressional Republicans.
President Donald Trump berated Senate Republicans face-to-face today for allowing a vote to block his war in Iran, further escalating a feud that has diverted GOP efforts to focus on election-year affordability issues and brought much of the chamber's business to a halt.
Invited by Florida Sen. Rick Scott to speak at a GOP luncheon in the Capitol, Trump had signaled ahead of time that he would use the closed-door meeting to push senators to pass his proof-of-citizenship voting bill. But the conversation was more focused on yesterday's vote to approve the war-powers resolution, a mostly-symbolic measure that allows Congress to rebuke the administration’s military actions. The House passed its own version of the resolution earlier this month.
Trump had particular words for the four Republican senators who voted with Democrats on the measure - Republicans Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana - after calling them "losers" on social media.
Most Republicans stayed quiet. But Cassidy, who lost re-election in his primary last month after Trump endorsed an opponent, stood up and defended his vote. "I stood and said, 'You have not told the American people what's going on'", Cassidy told reporters after the meeting. "This was supposed to last four weeks; it's lasted four months. Our original objectives have not been achieved."
Trump repeatedly told Cassidy to sit down, according to a person familiar with the private meeting who was not authorized to discuss it. At one point, the president called the senator a "lunatic".
Publicly, Trump said afterward that they had "a really-great meeting". But he hinted at the discord. "We like everyone in the room", Trump told reporters on his way out. "I don't like a few people, but that's OK."
The luncheon capped weeks of friction between Trump and Senate Republicans and added a new layer of frustration as yesterday’s vote was the first time the Senate had adopted a war powers resolution on the Iran war. Trump made clear he was in no mood to compromise before it even started, calling off a scheduled signing ceremony on a housing bill that passed both chambers overwhelmingly this week and that GOP lawmakers were touting as an election-year achievement.
Heather Cox Richardson: Trump Continues Frantically To Insist That The Problems With The Reflecting Pool Are The Acts Of Vandals. The Reflecting Pool Is Not The Only Thing That's Falling Apart. (Letters From An American, Substack; June 24, 2026)
As Rachel Kahn of The New Republic reported, Trump insisted on Saturday that the pool had "worked perfectly"
- before vandals attacked, putting "a 250-foot-long gash into the beautiful facade of what took so much work."
- By Monday, the "gash" was 300 feet.
- By yesterday it was 350 feet, according to Trump.
- There is, of course, no evidence of any such sabotage (and there are cameras on the Reflecting Pool).
Trump's stories have gotten more and more elaborate, about how vandals:
- used "a very-sharp knife or razors",
- "probably in the dark of night",
- then added "chemicals".
- He warned there could be a "10-year prison sentence for the destruction, or even the attempted destruction, of such things".
- Asked for evidence, he claimed "we have pictures".
- He told reporter Ed O'Keefe of CBS News: "At the right time you'll see it. You'll see it in court. You'll see it in court, but all you have to do is call the Parks Department, call the Department of Interior.”
- Tonight the Interior Department began to place fencing around the Reflecting Pool.
The Reflecting Pool is not the only thing that's falling apart:
- This morning, Trump announced that "Iran has fully and completely agreed to highest level Nuclear inspections long in the future (Infinity!!!).... If they did not agree to this, there would be no further negotiations!"
- Iran disagreed, saying it had made "no new commitments" on nuclear inspections although it would continue to work with the IAEA, the United Nations' nuclear-watchdog agency, as it has for years under a system less-stringent than the one that operated under the JCPOA.
- Today, after a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that only 23% of Americans thought the Iran war had made the U.S. stronger, the Senate passed a war-powers resolution requiring Trump to get congressional approval to continue military actions against Iran.
- Four Republicans joined all Democrats but one to pass the measure. The House passed the measure earlier this month.
- It is unclear if Trump will honor the resolution, but its passage shows growing discontent with the president.
"Trump's historic blunder in Iran will go down in the history books as one of the worst foreign-policy forays America has ever made, or any country has ever made", Senate minority-leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said today. "The American people have seen skyrocketing gas prices, soaring costs, and tragically, the loss of 13 service members and the wounding of hundreds more - and meanwhile, Iran took Trump to the cleaners."
Holly Baxter of The Independent noted that when Trump is stressed out, he throws a campaign-style rally in front of a friendly crowd. Today, after a poll from the American Research Group showed that 66% of Americans disapprove of his job performance while only 30% approve, he went to a factory in Pennsylvania to bolster his confidence. He did his usual greatest hits, claiming he won by a landslide in 2024 and calling Democrats communists. He even made it clearer than ever that he thought people applying for political asylum in the United States had been released from "mental institutions". He flitted from subject to subject and after an hour and a half, audience enthusiasm seemed under control.
William Kristol of The Bulwark noted today that a "sense of impending mortality seems to be making our president even more unhinged than ever". But, Kristol noted, there are "young men with a lean-and-hungry look in positions of authority and power in the executive branch who are committed to making his dream of power without limits a reality." Those lean-and-hungry men include Bill Pulte, now acting director of national intelligence, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin, FBI director Kash Patel, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought, and acting attorney general Todd Blanche. And, of course, Vice President J.D. Vance, who is next in line should Trump become unable to perform the duties of the office of the presidency.
As Trump crumbles, it appears there is in the administration a drive to create unlimited power in the executive branch that will survive no matter who is in charge. That drive includes silencing political opponents while rewarding loyalists.
Oleksandra Bashchenko: Kremlin Signals Readiness For Negotiations With Ukraine. Moscow Recalled The Meeting In Alaska And Accused The U.S. (RBC-Ukraine; June 23, 2026)
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has started talking about resuming negotiations with Ukraine, according to Russian media. "Russia is ready to resume negotiations with Ukraine from the point where they were stopped", Lavrov said.
He also stated that the negotiations in Alaska could have been designed to "buy time" to arm the Ukrainian army.
Lavrov added that the EU is "pouring" money and weapons into Ukraine.
Lavrov also did not spare criticism of the United States. He accused the Trump administration of tightening sanctions, and that all statements after the Alaska talks were forgotten. "Besides the continuation of all Biden-era sanctions, a considerable package of sanctions by the Trump administration against Russia has already been adopted", he said.
Vladyslava Kovalenko: French President Emmanuel Macron Says Trump Was Ready To "Give Up Ukraine" To Putin In Alaska. How Did European Diplomacy Save Ukraine From Partition? (RBC-Ukraine; June 20, 2026)
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin were planning a large-scale division of Ukrainian territory. This took place during a meeting between the two leaders in Anchorage, Alaska, according to France 2.
In August 2025, a fateful document was nearly signed at the U.S. military base in Anchorage. The agreement reportedly envisaged the transfer of Ukrainian territories to Russia, with the Kremlin set to receive even land it did not control at the time, Macron said. "What did Trump see when he arrived at the Anchorage summit? He thought Ukraine was going to lose, so he wanted to strike a quick peace deal."
According to the French president, the situation was saved by decisive European intervention. In mid-August 2025, a special delegation urgently flew to the United States. European leaders issued an ultimatum, calling the deal impossible.
Diplomats explained to the White House the real situation on the ground. Ukraine continued to fight despite all pessimistic predictions.
The French president stressed: "We tried, and since then so much has happened. This path is above all and mostly a victory of the Ukrainians in their capacity and reliability. President Trump saw that everything he was being told - that Ukrainians would lose, that they would not make it through the winter - was false."
Today, the American leader's position is fundamentally different, the French president said. The resilience of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and society forced Trump to reassess his views. Instead of plans for capitulation, respect has emerged, Macron believes.
Trump acknowledged that earlier assessments were wrong. Ukrainians proved their reliability in practice, which changed the geopolitical landscape. According to Macron, Trump now views Ukraine with deep respect: "Now he sees courageous, innovative people whom he respects."
The latest round of trilateral negotiations between Ukraine, Russia, and the United States took place on February 17–18, 2026, in Geneva. The next meeting was scheduled for March 5 in Abu Dhabi, but it was postponed, after which no new date was set.
After threats of massive strikes on Ukraine, Moscow suddenly began talking about the advantages of diplomacy. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that Russia prefers to achieve its goals through negotiations rather than force.
Meanwhile, tensions between Kyiv and Minsk are rising. The Kremlin reacted to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s ultimatum to Lukashenko. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov called it incitement to continue the war.
Mary Trump: My Uncle Is A Weak Man. (Dr. William L. Bainbridge's Post, Hold the Line PAC and Transcend PAC; June 16, 2026)
This is Mary Trump. You may know me as the author of "Too Much and Never Enough", or as someone who has spent years sounding the alarm about my uncle, Donald.
Here's what I need you to understand about my uncle: Donald is a weak man.
That might seem like an odd thing to say about somebody who holds such a powerful position, but that's exactly the danger. Every day, as Donald deteriorates - psychologically, emotionally, and cognitively - he grows more desperate, increasing the risk to the rest of us.
Strong people:
- do not rig the system in their favor.
- They don't silence critics.
- They don't seek to control the institutions designed to hold them accountable.
Donald does all of those things - because he has to, and he knows it. His behavior isn't evidence of strength - it's evidence of its absence.
The comprehensiveness with which Donald and the complicit Republican party are attempting to dismantle our institutions and take away our rights, in service to maintaining their hold on power and self-enrichment, should also make clear what is at stake.
Under Donald's so-called leadership, the Republicans in Congress have stood by while:
- our nation's alliances have become strained;
- illegal wars have been started; and
- our institutions have been weakened and, in some cases, dismantled entirely.
[She is as good as he is bad!]
Robert Reich: The Truth about Trump's Iran Deal: It's a total failure. (Substack; June 18, 2026)
We don't know the details of Trump's so-called "agreement" with Iran, but from what we do know of it, only one conclusion can be drawn:
Compared to where America and the Middle East were when Trump began this war on February 28, it's a terrible defeat.
Also see:
Robert Reich, Richard Gephardt and Tim Wirth:
Warning: Trump's Rolling Coup Is Already Underway! And, What Must Be Done To Stop It. (Substack; June 11, 2026)
Friends, I received the following from Richard Gephardt, who represented Missouri in the United States House from 1977 to 2005 and served as House Democratic Leader from 1989 to 2003, and Tim Wirth, who served in the U.S. House and Senate from Colorado from 1975 to 2003 and as the first U.S. Secretary of State for Global Affairs.
I have worked with both and know them quite well. Neither is an alarmist, but they did want me to help spread this alarm. Hence, I'm sharing with you what they wrote to me. (Research is from Keep Our Republic, a nonpartisan NGO focused on fair elections.)

***
Between us we have served for seven decades, mostly in elected federal office, through Watergate, the post-Vietnam anti-war demonstrations, years of civil-rights marches, Iran-Contra, debates over voting rights, the post-9/11 surveillance debates, two impeachments. We are writing today because we are watching something different from any of these, and because most Americans, including most of our friends in both parties, do not see the big picture.
Many may recognize and be concerned about individual actions or decisions taken by the administration, but few have taken a step back and connected the dots. The "rolling coup" is much more than one development, one decision or a single day.
On September 25, 2025, President [Trump] signed a directive called a National Presidential Security Memorandum known as NPSM-7 (titled "Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence").
Its language designates as targets of federal counter-terrorism authorities, Americans whose sponsors are labeled "anti-American", "anti-capitalist", "anti-Christian" or "hostile to traditional American views on family, religion and morality."

No statute authorizes the federal government to treat protected political speech as terrorism; NPSM-7 does it anyway. It tasked the FBI, the IRS and the Treasury Department with tracking the funding sources and supporters of organizations suspected of directly or indirectly facilitating political unrest, with no reference to the First Amendment.
Soon thereafter, the FBI organized a Joint Mission Center, drawing hundreds of personnel from ten federal agencies to identify and prosecute the targets of NPSM-7. The Director of the FBI, Kash Patel, subsequently testified [that there was] a 300%-increase in domestic-terrorism investigations. Former Attorney General Pam Bondi testified that thousands of U.S. citizens and non-governmental organizations are now on a secret watch list tied to the Joint Mission Center.
Concurrently the Justice Department has opened grand-jury investigations and indictments aimed at officials of previous administrations including former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey.
The President's Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, has publicly described political opposition as a "fifth column", and Trump himself amplified this by declaring "Arrest them all. Prosecute them all. Incarcerate them all… But first, Barack Obama."
On May 6, 2026, the administration's Senior Director for Counterterrorism, Sebastian Gorka, released a new National Counterterrorism Strategy that names "violent left-wing extremists", "anti-fascists", and certain religious minorities as principal threats to the United States.
Bondi provided a Department of Justice operational order that included a five-year plan for retroactive mining of data files and plea interrogations, along with the requirement that financial donors be named. The Joint Mission Center uses its $12.5-Billion budget to do the targeting. The President's lead lawyers in the Office of Legal Counsel have preauthorized the use of domestic force.
Meanwhile, the administration has appropriated $45-Billion for construction of new ICE detention facilities, a 265%-increase over previous years and more than four times the entire budget of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Tom Homan, the President's "border czar" has overseen the proposal for the acquisition of over 100,000 detention beds above the current capacity of 70,000, with contracts for permanent mega-centers whose scale far exceeds anything an immigration-processing operation would require. These are undoubtedly prisons for political prisoners - even as a 1974 federal law prohibits the detention of American citizens without an act of Congress.
In the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, U.S. forces have killed more than 200 people designated as "narcoterrorists" across nearly sixty strikes on small boats - without indictment, trial or judicial review. The commander of U.S. Northern Command has said publicly he would "definitely" execute lawful orders to apply this same authority on American soil.
The White House has declined to rule out using lethal force against U.S. citizens designated as members of domestic terrorist organizations, while Trump has fired most of the Department of Defense officials responsible for overseeing the legality of military operations.
Trump is seeking yet more funding for what appears to be his private army of ICE and Border Patrol agents, to be deployed in numerous target states, at airports and at urban polling places in the states he lost in the 2024 election, where he has now begun to seize voter roles and ballots.
[There's more; click to read it. But America, isn't this far more than enough?]
Faiz Siddiqui and Shira Ovide: Elon Musk Becomes The First Trillionaire, After SpaceX Surges Out Of The Gate. (Washington Post; June 12, 2026)
Investors flocked to the company after its block-buster market debut, lifting Musk's net worth above $1-Trillion and into the record books.
Critics see a new concentration of power around Musk.
Fatma Tanis: In His Book, A Self-Described USAID "Whistleblower" Talks About The Agency And Ebola. (NPR/Global Health; June 8, 2026)
Nicholas Enrich worked for the United States Agency for International Development (AID) under four administrations, and was dismissed after leaking memos detailing plans to shut it down. He writes about the end of USAID - and his role in the response to a 2025 Ebola outbreak - in his new book, "Into The Woodchipper: A Whistleblower's Account Of How The Trump Administration Shredded USAID" (Simon & Schuster).
In March 2025, Nicholas Enrich was the top U.S. official for global health when two major events were happening at the same time:
- The Trump administration was dismantling USAID, and
- an Ebola outbreak was spreading in Uganda.
It was Enrich's job to manage the U.S. response. He says he was stymied at every turn. "I was told by one of the political appointees, who was the head of the Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance, that Ebola is a scam", Enrich says.
A year later, as the worst Ebola outbreak in more than a decade spreads in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Enrich has published a timely book with a title drawn from Elon Musk's plans for the premier U.S. foreign aid agency: "Into the Woodchipper: A Whistleblower's Account of How the Trump Administration Shredded USAID".

Energy-Efficiency Programs, in Massachusetts and beyond:

RSVP For Online "Offshore Wind Energy" Program. (NWF and others, 7-8PM EDT on "Global Wind Day" - this Wednesday, June 10; posted June 7, 2026)
Join the National Wildlife Federation's and our partners' Offshore Wind Energy Program, to celebrate the progress we've made building offshore wind responsibly, despite the serious political headwinds. You'll hear from experts about the successful projects operating in the Northeast, the economic benefits and opportunities for good-paying jobs in the American-made supply chain, and why offshore wind is so important for protecting wildlife and communities from the threats of climate change.
The presentation will feature a screening of National Wildlife Federation's film, "Coast to Coast", exploring the important ideas that are shaping the responsible development of offshore wind in the U.S.
"People Over Utility Profits" Rallies on "Global Wind Day" - this Wednesday, June 10. (Mass Power Forward and other groups will host at least 4 rallies in Massachusetts; posted June 7, 2026)
New England utility companies mis-use customer payments to kill important climate-control projects.
[See this good "Neversource" protest banner!]
Frederick Hewett: The Department Of The Interior CANCELED FOUR Wind-Farm Leases. The Particulars Are Problematic. (WBUR.org; June 2, 2026)
Sweeping aside more than a decade of diligent legislative and administrative efforts by coastal states to establish offshore-wind markets, the Department of the Interior (DOI), through closed-door negotiations, canceled the leases for four large wind farms this spring. The Trump administration agreed to reimburse the developers $Billions in taxpayer money and represented the deals as reinvestments in fossil fuels.
The administration has the authority to change energy policy, but the manner in which it exercises that authority matters. From New England to the Mid-Atlantic - and, more recently, the West Coast - states have labored for years to develop offshore-wind markets, respecting transparency, accountability and federal administrative requirements. In sharp contrast, the administration's abrupt settlements with the wind developers fall far short of democratic standards.
[Folks, we're talking about TRUmPUtin aborting a best-bet for limiting Global Warming (and thus insuring the predictable deaths of BILLIONS of people and MORE animals!), so his wealthy fossil-fuel-polluter cronies can stop that threat to the gross profits they will need so their families can survive said Global Warming - while greatly-reducing the risk of pesky voters competing for "their" entitled graft (unpaid taxes, etc.), food hoarding (Global Warming will only leave enough food supply for 1/4 of the global population), mass murder (at least, of the other 3/4) and more...]
NEW: Miriam Wasser: How A Massachusetts Energy-Efficiency Program Became So Politicized. (WBUR/News; June 1, 2026)
Call it the age of the rate-payer revolt. As gas and electric bills soared over the last year-and-a-half, people across Massachusetts have been looking for someone, or something, to blame.
There are several reasons utility bills have become so expensive, including:
- cold winter weather,
- rising natural gas prices and
- a bonanza of pricey infrastructure spending.
But by early 2025, climate critics and beleaguered ratepayers coalesced around a different culprit: Mass Save, the state's energy-efficiency program. That idea quickly took off online. The cost of the program had also gone up, and the role it played in increasing bills was a narrative with a lot of staying power.
Mass Save is perhaps best known for distributing millions of LED light-bulbs. Since its creation in 2008, the utility-run initiative has also helped thousands of households to:
- add insulation,
- install new windows
and
- buy energy-efficient appliances, such as heat pumps.

While far from perfect, supporters say the program has been a big success. It's become a model for initiatives elsewhere in the country, and environmental advocates consider it one of the state's strongest tools for climate change.
Also in 2025, utility regulators told gas companies to make Mass Save a stand-alone item on customers' bills. The "energy efficiency" surcharge had long been visible on electric bills, but on gas bills, it had been lumped into the catch-all "distribution adjustment" charge.
While the department said the change would "provide more transparency for all gas customers on the components that make up their bills," it also drew more attention to what people were paying for the program.
"It's an example of the unintended consequences of transparency", said Sen. Mike Barrett, co-chair of the legislative committee that oversees utilities. "Whatever you stick up on the marquee is going to get attention in bad times."
If gas and electric bills had a line item for utility profits, he added, people might be having a very-different conversation about the drivers of high energy bills.
[Is this just my imagination? "Sure, energy efficiency may save us from our people-caused, looming global-warming disaster. But that will hurt our petroleum profits, so we've warned TrumPutin and friendly politicians that they'd better oppose it."]
NEW: Miriam Wasser: What To Know About Mass.' New Electricity Rates For Heat-Pump Users.
(WBUR/News; October 20, 2025)
Installing heat pumps, which use electricity to heat and cool air, is a key part of Massachusetts' plan to get homes off of fossil fuels. Using an electric heat pump in Massachusetts is about to become more affordable.
Beginning in November, the state's three big electric utilities - Eversource, National Grid and Unitil - will offer cheaper electric rates during the coldest months of the year for households that use a heat pump.
If you got your heat pump through the Mass Save program in the last couple of years, you almost certainly qualify - in the future, you may even be automatically enrolled. If you didn't get your heat pump through Mass Save, or you got it before 2019, signing up will take a little more work.
The new seasonal rate is meant to encourage more customers to switch to heat pumps, which are a cornerstone of Massachusetts' plan to tackle climate emissions. By 2030, the state aims to have 500,000 heat pumps installed. For context - just over 90,000 homes in the state had a heat pump as of last year.
With the winter heating season right around the corner, here's what you need to know about the rates and how to sign up.
[We did, and we're glad - for us, and for Earth's descendants!]


Jack Hobbs: Trump Concert Series Collapses Into Chaos, As MAGA Rep Begs Artists To Sign Up. (TheMirror; June 1, 2026)
Tennessee Congressman Tim Burchett is attempting to revive Freedom 250's "Great American State Fair" after it suffered a humiliating setback when several acts dropped out.
Country superstar Martina McBride announced that she would be leaving the event, stating, "What we were told is, in fact, not what is happening."
Trump took issue with all the cancellations and commented that he would headline the festival. "I understand Artists are getting 'the yips' having to do with their performance on Wednesday, so I am thinking about bringing the Number One Attraction anywhere in the World", he wrote on Truth Social. "The man who gets much larger audiences than Elvis in his prime, and he does so without a guitar, the man who loves our Country more than anyone else, and the man who some say is the Greatest President in History (THE GOAT!), DONALD J. TRUMP."
[Why stop there? "Greatest Liar", "Most Crooked President", "Most Harmful President to His Country", "Pretender to The Throne"... ]
Joshua Boak: Trump Is Facing A New Inflation Warning From The Bond Market, Adding To His Midterm Challenges. (Associated Press; June 1, 2026)
The world is getting more uptight about lending money to President Donald Trump's government - causing interest rates to climb in ways that are:
- worsening affordability pressures,
- hampering economic growth, and
- creating a new risk for Republicans in November's midterm elections.

The energy price spike triggered by the Iran war has seeped into the price of bonds that help fund the U.S. government. Interest rates on a 10-year U.S. Treasury note are topping 4.44%, up from 3.95% before the war started at the end of February. Average mortgage rates have climbed to their highest levels in nine months, while auto sales are slumping.
The challenge is global in scale; interest rates have risen for multiple countries as the world has been adjusting to:
- the prospect of higher inflation,
- mounting questions about the sustainability of government debt, and
- a dramatic surge in investment in artificial intelligence.
John Timmer: Proposed New U.S. Funding Rules: We Can Cancel Any Grant At Any Time. (Ars Technica; May 29, 2026)
Peer review now optional; political staff would screen grants for forbidden topics.
The result is a horror show for U.S. science research:
- Not only is peer review made a secondary consideration, but
- the new rules would allow any federal agency to cancel any grant at any time, based on the vague assertion that it isn't in the "national interest".
- The document would also ban any grants on a number of culture-war topics,
- limit international collaborations, and
- block spending on things like publishing papers and attending conferences.
It is, in short, a recipe for how the government can finish the job of crippling American science.
Jon Brodkin: Trump FCC Warns All Broadcasters To Follow Orders Or Be Punished Like ABC. ABC Says Early Renewal For All Stations Is Unprecedented, Has No Legitimate Purpose. (Ars Techica; May 29, 2026)
The eight broadcast-TV stations owned by ABC filed applications for early license renewals under protest yesterday, accusing the Federal Communications Commission of trying to suppress speech as part of "an unprecedented attack on a single company's entire portfolio of broadcast licenses". FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has repeatedly threatened to revoke broadcast licenses from President Trump's least-favorite networks. He recently ordered the Disney-owned ABC to file early license-renewal applications for all of its TV stations over allegations that its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices violate anti-discrimination rules.
"The only plausible reason to issue the Order is to punish the Station for speech the government does not like", ABC said in its filings. The FCC is "using the license-renewal process to punish a broadcaster for its editorial choices" in "an extraordinary demonstration of power and coercion directed at disfavored editorial voices", it said.
ABC said the order it received "sends a clear warning to every broadcaster in America". If that warning wasn't clear enough, the FCC yesterday issued a public notice to "remind" all broadcasters of "their public-interest obligations". The public notice was issued on the same day as the deadline the FCC set for ABC to submit its early license-renewal applications, and urged all broadcasters to "review and modify their operations to ensure compliance".
Warning that other broadcasters could face threats to their licenses, the public notice said the FCC "will not hesitate to exercise its statutory authority to ensure that broadcasters either fulfill their public interest obligation or provide the privilege of being a broadcast licensee to someone that will fulfill that duty". The FCC said it may order early license reviews or other punitive measures when it "finds that a broadcaster has failed to serve the public interest". The notice said broadcasters have an "obligation to offer programming responsive to the needs and interests of the local communities they are licensed to serve".
[Hmm. Will the FCC bar Trump from TV, for "failing to serve the public interest"?]
Jennifer Sinco Kelleher: New Hawaii Law Targets Corporate Influence In Politics After Citizens-United Ruling. (Associated Press; May 14, 2026)
Hawaii's Democratic governor today signed into law a bill that uses a novel approach to reduce the influence of corporations and hard-to-track "dark-money" groups that have been able to spend unlimited amounts on politics since a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
The law, which takes effect July 1, 2027, redefines corporations in a way that precludes spending on elections. A volunteer group in Montana is gathering signatures in hopes of putting a similar issue to voters in November.
The high court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission struck down a ban on corporate and union election spending as long as they don't donate directly to any campaigns. The case stemmed from Citizens United, a conservative group, wanting to run TV commercials promoting its anti-Hillary Clinton movie when she was running for president in 2008.
The ruling has benefited Democrats and Republicans. The campaign-finance watchdog group OpenSecrets tracked more than $4-Billion in outside political spending in the 2024 federal elections - almost 12 times as much as in 2008.
Some of that came from dark-money groups that aren't required to disclose donors, and the Brennan Center for Justice tallied a record $1.9-Billion in that type of spending in 2024. Dark money has also played a part in some state-level races.
Greg Sargent, The Daily Blast: "Trump's Sunsetting Visibly Worsens As MAGA Cult Cracks Up." (22-min. Podcast (May 12; The New Republic, May 13, 2026)
As Trump's mental decline accelerates in plain sight, Virginia Heffernan (the author of a piece on the tortured psychology of MAGA) explains how Trump's chief sycophants are becoming akin to an "end-stage cult".
[Now hear this (podcast)!]
Edith Olmsted: "Trump Accuses Obama Of Treason, In Unhinged Crashout About Black People." (The New Republic, May 12, 2026)
A disturbing trend emerged in President Donald Trump's latest Truth Social tirade. Trump posted more than 55 times in just three hours last night, unloading a ton of conspiracy theory content targeting former President Barack Obama, peppered with videos of Black people causing mayhem.
Trump's onslaught began by claiming that Obama had attempted a coup, and boosting a call to "arrest Obama the traitor." He then posted months-old coverage of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's claims that the Obama administration had pushed the "lie" that Russian President Vladimir Putin preferred Trump over Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, which was something Putin has openly admitted.
As Trump continued to post, his allegations got increasingly outlandish. The president shared posts claiming that Obama made $120-Million from Obamacare and accusing Obama of “the most heinous crimes committed in American history", including wire-tapping Trump Tower. Other posts mentioned figures such as Senator Mark Kelly, Clinton and Jack Smith, but Obama's name appeared over and over again.
Perry Bacon, Foul Not Fair: "The Week Where Republicans May Have Stolen The Midterms." (The New Republic, May 12, 2026)
In five days last week, Republicans gained maybe 10 seats in Congress. And not a single citizen voted.
Republican state legislators, governors, state supreme court justices, and U.S. Supreme Court justices have combined over the last week to effectively hand up to 10 U.S. House seats to the GOP. That's not just bad for the Democrats, although it most definitely is that. It's bad for democracy. This can't be accepted as normal.
Early last week, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed into law a gerrymander so that Republicans could win as many as four additional seats. Three days later, Tennessee Republicans seized on the U.S. Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais ruling to eliminate the lone majority-Black congressional district in the state. On Friday, four Virginia state Supreme Court justices, three appointed by the state's legislature when both houses were controlled by Republicans, invalidated a ballot measure that could have resulted in four additional seats for Democrats through redistricting. Later that day, Louisiana Republicans, also taking advantage of Callais, presented new maps that will almost certainly result in the defeat of one Democratic member of Congress there. Five days; 10 seats; zero votes from members of the public.
Adding immediate context only makes it worse. Florida voters approved a ballot measure in 2010 that explicitly bans partisan gerrymandering. The all-Republican Florida Supreme Court is almost certainly going to let the redistricting stand anyway. In contrast, a clear majority of voters in Virginia, more than 1.6-million people in total, backed the redistricting that four judges wiped away. Voting had already started in Louisiana but has now been suspended. The South, a region with a long history of discriminating against Black Americans, is now rushing to eject from Congress Black members elected by Black citizens.
Then broaden the picture further:
- We have an authoritarian president who ignores laws and core democratic values.
- He knows that the party in the White House often loses a ton of House seats.
- He knows that trend is particularly likely to continue if the president is unpopular, as Trump is now.
- And he knows that a Democratic House might force him to actually follow the law.
So instead of taking steps to become more popular or accepting defeat, he ordered Republican officials to start gerrymandering districts to ensure a party totally under his thumb keeps control of the House. And the plan is working. Republicans have won themselves on net from six to eight additional seats in these gerrymandering fights.
A lot of nonpartisan analysts and even a few Democrats are trying to downplay these redistricting gains by Republicans. Some argue that Trump is so unpopular that Democrats will still win the House. Others even claim that the redistricting will result in Democrats winning more seats than they would have otherwise because Republicans have spread out their voters too much.
Perhaps. But some estimates suggest that the Democrats will need to win the national popular vote by at least four percentage points to carry the House. That's a lot. Remember that Trump's 2024 victory, which was covered by many pundits as some dramatic shift in American politics, was by 1.5-percent over Kamala Harris. It would be terrible if Republicans lost the popular vote 48 percent to 52 percent but remained in control of the House. Or if Republicans won 226 seats or below - meaning their majority was retained only because of the Trump-ordered redistricting.
[How very TrumPutin of him!]
Matt Ford: Trump Thinks The Supreme Court Works For Him. Despite Their Handing Him An Endless Array Of Political Wins Over The Past Few Years, The President Still Believes His Nominees Haven't Shown Sufficient Loyalty. (The New Republic, May 12, 2026)
Trump's social-media rants these days are so frequent and so voluminous that it is rarely worth paying them any specific attention. But his Mother's Day post about the Supreme Court is a notable exception. The president gave a surprisingly frank assessment of his view of the Supreme Court - and how he expects personal loyalty from the justices that he appoints to it.
In the lengthy post, Trump criticized two members of the high court for voting in Trump v. Learning Resources, the case that nixed his purported ability to impose hundreds-of-billions of dollars in tariffs under a Cold War–era emergency-powers law. The Supreme Court held 6–3 that Trump had exceeded the powers laid out in the statute.
"I 'Love' Justice Neil Gorsuch! He's a really smart and good man, but he voted against me, and our Country, on Tariffs, a devastating move", Trump wrote. "How do I reconcile this? So bad, and hurtful to our Country. I have, likewise, always liked and respected Amy Coney Barrett, but the same thing with her. They were appointed by me, and yet have hurt our Country so badly!"
It would be hard to find a better example than this of Trump's thinking that the justices that he nominated to the high court should be personally loyal to him. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, his third appointee to date, was among the dissenters. There were six justices in the Learning Resources majority; four of them did not warrant a mention here. Trump did not even bother to criticize Chief Justice John Roberts, who actually wrote the opinion.
Malcolm Ferguson: "Trump Admin Sued For Diverting $100-Million In Taxpayer Funds. The Trump Administration Refuses To Answer Questions About 'Freedom 250'". (The New Republic, May 12, 2026)
A watchdog group is suing the Trump administration for allegedly using the president's "Freedom 250" organization as a vehicle to divert funds to his vanity projects without congressional approval.
On Tuesday, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), filed a lawsuit against the Department of the Interior in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, following unanswered Freedom of Information Act requests filed back in February for records regarding the public funds being used for "Freedom 250" - the organization overseeing everything from setting up the Grand Prix around the National Mall to Trump's independence arch. The Department of the Interior never responded to the requests, and now PEER's lawsuit claims that our money is being used with "with no transparency, no accountability, and no guardrails."
"America's 250th-anniversary celebration is supposed to be an occasion for strengthening public trust in our democratic institutions, not eroding it", PEER's executive director, Tim Whitehouse, said in a statement yesterday. "In contrast, Freedom 250 is a privately-managed slush fund.… It epitomizes what is wrong with politics today."
PEER alleges that the Trump administration is using Freedom 250 to:
- redirect $100-Million in taxpayer funds from America 250 without congressional approval,
- mix private funding and public taxpayer money without oversight,
- sell "access to President Trump" for up to $2.5-Million,
- solicit foreign donations, and more.
- PEER also accuses the DOI of pressuring workers to use "Freedom 250" branding in their official email sign-offs, which could violate the Hatch Act.
Malcolm Ferguson: "Trump, 79, Falls Asleep Seconds After Speaking in White House Event." (The New Republic; May 11, 2026)
President Trump has once again appeared to doze off on camera in the middle of a White House event, this time, just seconds after he spoke.
Trump was joined by Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Oz, Republican Senator Katie Britt, philanthropist and maternal health advocate Olivia Walton, principal deputy assistant secretary for health Dr. Dorothy Fink, and others at the White House this morning to announce the "Moms.gov" website, a new tactic in the Trump administration's campaign to convince American women to have more babies.
It was the president's first public event of the day, beginning at 11 AM, and he appeared to doze off - with his eyes fully closed - multiple times while the people behind him spoke. It is becoming a regular occurrence for the president to take a little nap during an event, the most recent instance being just last week.
This isn't some late-night Situation Room meeting or some three-hour Cabinet meeting. This is the president's first scheduled event of the day. Even if he's not completely asleep, he certainly is not fully present. Capable presidents don't fall asleep at 11:30 AM.
Phillips P. OBrien, Weekend Update #184: "A Most Revealing Parade. Also: Are We About To See Trump's Greatest Public Humiliation?; Ukrainian Long-Range Strikes Improve." (photos; Substack, May 10, 2026)
In the end, Putin's great Victory Day Parade [V-E Day, celebrating the end of WW-II for Europe and Russia] went ahead yesterday without a Ukrainian attack. That being said, it really was not "great" in any way. Far from being a showcase of Russian might, what the parade really revealed was Russian weakness and Putin's fears about what he cannot control. It not being attacked, in some ways revealed more than had the Ukrainians tried to disrupt the event. In the end, it might have been better for Putin had the parade not been held at all.
Otherwise, there are two other stories that help us understand the parade situation, one that has been going on this whole week and one that is developing as this update is being written. The one developing is that Putin seems to be on the cusp of humiliating Trump (once again) in the most public way. After having promised to free 1,000 Ukrainian prisoners to protect his parade, Putin now seems to be backtracking. Remember, Trump boasted loudly and publicly about this swap.
Finally, this week revealed why Putin was so paranoid about his parade. Ukrainian long-range strikes are growing in effectiveness. They pulled off a number of impressive long-range strikes against high-value targets. It was a message that obviously is sinking in to the Kremlin.
[Also see "Ukraine Hits Russian Kalibr-Missile Warship, Deep in the Caspian Sea" on May 7, below.]
"Russia Breaks US-Backed Pledge, Attempts To De-Rail Prisoner Swap. Negotiations On The Prisoner Exchange Are Likely To Continue." (links; RBC-Ukraine, May 9, 2026)
Russia tries to complicate the prisoner-swap process scheduled as part of a three-day ceasefire with Ukraine. However, this could constitute a violation of agreements with the United States, says a source in the Ukrainian government: "They understand how important prisoner exchanges are for Ukrainians, so they always try to complicate them. But in this case, there was a conversation mediated by the United States; so responsibility now also lies with the United States, which must be able to guarantee what was agreed upon."
Cory Doctorow: "Trump's Fruitless Search For A Goreable Ox" (Pluralistic.net, May 9, 2026)
You can keep billionaires happy, or you can fight the cost-of-living crisis - but not both. The oligarchs' wealth bonanza *caused* the cost-of-living crisis. Oligarchs' pleasure causes our suffering, so alleviating our suffering will reduce their pleasure.
Robert Reich: "Viewer Beware! What We Can Do To Stop And Reverse Trump's Takeover Of The Media." (Substack, May 7, 2026)
Our media is controlled by just a handful of billionaires and their corporations. And Trump is making it worse.
Trump's FCC just approved a massive merger that would let one huge media company control what over 80% of American households see. One of these merging companies, called Nexstar, tried to silence late-night host Jimmy Kimmel.
Trump's FCC also cleared the way for billionaire Larry Ellison and his son, David, to buy Paramount - which includes CBS News. The Ellisons are huge Trump boosters.
Vlad Litnarovych: "Ukraine Hits Russian Kalibr-Missile Warship, Deep In The Caspian Sea."
(photos; United24, May 7, 2026)
Ukrainian forces struck a Russian small missile warship near the naval base in Kaspiysk, Dagestan, during overnight operations, according to the Ukrainian General Staff.
The targeted vessel was identified as a Project 22800 Karakurt-class missile ship - a platform capable of launching Kalibr cruise missiles frequently used by Russia in strikes against Ukraine. Ukrainian military officials said the extent of the damage is still being assessed.
The strike marked one of the latest Ukrainian long-range attacks against Russian military infrastructure far from the front line, extending all the way to the Caspian Sea region.
[Also see "How Ukraine Broke Russia's Black Sea Fleet - Ship by Ship, Strike by Strike", April 17, 2026.]
NEW: Donald Trump: The 45th And 47th President And His Administration (ProPublica; May 7, 2026)
News and investigations about President Donald Trump and his administration, his business interests and the impact of his policies as the 45th and 47th President of the United States.
[This includes a series of prior articles.]
NEW: Abrahm Lustgarten: Event With Links To Oil Industry Teaches Judges "Healthy Skepticism" Of Climate Science. (13-min. podcast; ProPublica; May 2, 2026)
As congressional Republicans accuse climate scholars and lawyers of colluding to influence the judiciary, a symposium hosted by a center funded by the fossil-fuel industry "educates judges" about free-market views of climate science.
Brian Tyler Cohen: I Was In DC During The Shooting. Here's The Perverse Irony: Trump Wanted To Create A Post-Truth World. Now It's Coming Back To Bite Him. (Substack, April 27, 2026)
As I reconcile my lived experience with my existence online, what's become a source of debate is the legitimacy of the crisis. Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Tiktok are all awash with accusations that the shooting was staged as a pretext for Trump to gin up support for his ballroom. (I'll get to that in a moment.) Now, I don't know the truth, nor am I in a position to opine. But I found this notable because Trump has been on a decade-long mission to obliterate the very concept of truth. And he did it.
There's a perverse irony to the fact that Trump's greatest success is the complete destruction of our shared objective reality. He loves to brag about his wins, when they're all clearly failures (crowd sizes, tariffs, the "hottest" economy, the 2020 election). He would tell his supporters that up is down and black is white, if it would somehow redound to his financial or political benefit. As far as Trump is concerned, the "truth" does not exist.
The shooting happened near a room full of journalists, many of whom immediately picked up their phones and began reporting. They called law enforcement to try to verify facts, they went live and started filming. They didn't hesitate to do their jobs, which is to report the truth - in this instance, as it was happening. And still, the sentiment online and of people around the country the next day is one of disbelief and rampant conspiracy theories. Trump wanted to create a world where the truth didn't exist, so he could fill that void with his own (more-convenient) version of reality. Years later, the trust that once used to bind us is now so obliterated that the knee-jerk reaction to an assassination attempt of him is to distrust everything about it.
The hotel where the White House Correspondents Dinner is hosted is known as the "Hinckley Hilton". 45 years ago, John Hinckley Jr. attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan right outside, wounding three people. One of them was press secretary James Brady, who suffered permanent brain damage and ultimately died from his injuries. When the Brady law passed nearly a decade later, it established background checks for gun owners.
There's been no such discussion in the aftermath of this shooting. Nothing on gun safety or mental health, not a word about political violence. Instead, what we got was a sales pitch for - you guessed it - Trump's ballroom. A $400-Million "solution" for gun violence.
Well, gun violence against the president. But shootings happen every day in this country, and no one else has a $400-Million ballroom to fall back on. Americans get shot in classrooms, concerts, church, malls, temples - and yet nothing changes. A collective shrug by the people who have the power to do something about it.
So no, a ballroom is not a solution. It's a band-aid - one intended to protect a very-small and very-privileged group of people. An apt microcosm for Trump's America: fixes for the privileged elites, while the rest of the country is left out in the cold.
Vlad Litnarovych, News Writer: "How Ukraine Broke Russia's Black-Sea Fleet - Ship By Ship, Strike By Strike."
(United24; April 17, 2026)
Ukraine has achieved what seemed improbable even in military theory: without a conventional navy, it has systematically eroded the offensive power of a far-stronger maritime power - in waters long treated as its own backyard.
According to Ukraine's Defense Ministry, by early 2026, roughly 30% of Russia's Black Sea Fleet had been destroyed or seriously damaged - the result of a relentless campaign of missiles, drones, mines, and deep strikes that turned the Black and Azov seas into high-risk zones for any Russian warship.
[Look ahead to "Ukraine Hits Russian Kalibr Missile Warship Deep In The Caspian Sea", on May 7, 2026.]
NEW: David Corn, Our Land: Tucker Carlson's Biggest Conspiracy Theory Yet. It Only Involves Donald Trump, Neocons, Israel, Satan, And Nuclear Weapons. (Mother Jones; April 15, 2026)
Tucker Carlson sometimes speaks plainly. Sometimes he speaks in code. When he broke with Donald Trump over the Iran war last week, he did both.
The day after Easter, during a monologue on his internet show, Carlson assailed Trump for defiling "the holiest day in Christian life" with a rabid social-media post:
- that threatened to bomb power plants and bridges (civilian targets) if Tehran did not open "the Fuckin' Strait" and
- that mocked Islam.
An outraged Carlson expressed many of the obvious criticisms:
- He proclaimed that Trump had "shattered" a "uniquely joyful and peaceful moment for Christians", and that
- Trump's "vile" vow to conduct "a war crime" was "unacceptable…under moral law".
- He accused Trump of receiving a thrill by threatening such violence.
- He called the post "evil" and declared, "No decent person mocks other people's religion… No president should mock Islam… This is a mockery of Christianity."
- He also slammed Christian leaders - most notably evangelist Paula White, the director of the White House Faith Office - for daring to compare Trump to Jesus. "Did Jesus command the disciples to go out and kill people?", he sharply asked.
This was a harsh critique that people on the Right and Left, Democrats, Republicans and Independents and folks of all faiths or none could share. Here was Carlson as a Christian peacenik anti-interventionist.
But there was something else going on in that 44-minute-long rant. Carlson opened with the fact that during his second inauguration, Trump did not place his hand on the Bible when he swore his oath to defend the Constitution. "That should have been a clue that we need to pause and think about: What IS this?", Carlson remarked. He suggested that Trump "didn't put his hand on the Bible because he affirmatively rejects what's inside that book, and what's inside that book are limits on human behavior". Trump, he said, was not accepting a basic premise of the Old and New Testament: "You are not God, and you cannot assume his powers."
Hmmm. Who might recoil at the Bible, who might be repulsed by the supposed Word of God? Carlson did not answer that. But when railing against Trump's social-media post as the work of "evil", he noted, "God creates, and Satan destroys." It seemed he was associating Trump with Beelzebub. And he wondered aloud where Trump's threats against Iran and the current stalemate will lead. He answered his own question: "Nuclear weapons… You wipe out a country of 92-million… You could have a global nuclear war… All things being equal, that's where we're heading."
Carlson was casting Trump as a Satan-adjacent, Bible-hating, evil force slouching toward nuclear Armageddon.
And there's more...
[When Carlson said (above), "No decent person mocks other people's religion…", let's also note that:
- no decent person mocks non-religious persons, either
- and worse, does not mock America's Founding Fathers, by revising those Founding Fathers' Declaration Of Independence with "one nation under God" - thereby reversing our Founding Fathers' clear Separation of Religion and State.]
NEW: Greg Sargent and David Rothkopf: Best of the Daily Blast: Trump Blurts Out Damning War Admission as GOP Panics: "What the Hell?" (27-min. podcast; Daily Blast; April 3, 2026; repeated September 7, 2026)
During Donald Trump's speech on Iran this week, he revealed too much. In a line that sounded partly ad-libbed, he declared that the Strait of Hormuz "will open up naturally. It will just open up naturally". This should be read as a straight-up admission that Trump has no idea how to fix the colossal mess he's made, and that he's just washing his hands of it entirely. That's utterly damning.
Meanwhile, Politico reports that Republicans privately fear the speech did nothing to help them politically; as one put it: "What the hell did he just say?" Those things are related: The worse this war gets, the more it will hurt Republicans in the midterms.
We talk to foreign policy writer and podcaster David Rothkopf, author of a good piece about the speech. We discuss:
- Trump's implicit admission of failure,
- the deeper reasons this is developing into such a fiasco,
- why it's a trap for Republicans, and
- what the post-Trump Democratic Party should look like.
Robert Reich: The Catastrophe Of Trump's War And Its Mounting Costs. (Substack; March 26, 2026)
As we near the end of the fourth week of Trump's war with no end in sight, I want to make sure you are aware of what he said today, and its implications.
After Tehran dismissed his 15-point ceasefire plan, Trump claimed today that Iran is "begging to make a deal" and that he wasn't the one pushing for negotiations.
Robert Reich: The REAL Reason Trump Is Trapped In Iran - And Why American Consumers Are Up Shit's Creek.
(Substack; March 20, 2026)
Yesterday, Trump said that he'd do whatever is necessary to ease the oil crisis. He also assured America that the crisis "will be over soon".
Bullshit.
The problem isn't just that Iran has blocked the Strait of Hormuz. It's also that…
Simon Tisdall: Here's The News From Iran – Donald Trump Is Making America Lose Wars Again.
Humiliating Failure Now Looms, As Symbolically Damaging To U.S. Global Standing And National Self-Esteem As Afghanistan Or Iraq. (The Guardian, March 15, 2026)
Donald Trump menaces the world. He's global public enemy number one. He's steadily losing the illegal war with Iran he started but cannot stop. His violence-addicted Israeli sidekick, Benjamin Netanyahu, is terrorising Lebanon. And ordinary people everywhere, their security threatened, face a huge economic bill for his reckless folly.
Add Trump's war-making to his daily:
- debasing of democracy,
- appeasing of Russia,
- punitive tariffs,
- climate crisis denial and
- flouting of international law,
and it's clear this White House travesty has gone on long enough. Americans must put their house in order, and act decisively to restrain someone who endangers us all.
Trump is a man without a plan. He hasn't the foggiest what to do next in Iran, deluding himself that he is in control of events. The more the U.S. and Israel batter Tehran and other cities, the more defiant is the odious, unvanquished Islamic regime. U.S. regional bases and Gulf Arab partners are sustaining significant damage from retaliatory strikes.
[Why yes, there IS more...]


Joseph Cox: The Removed DOGE Deposition Videos Have Already Been Backed Up Across The Internet. (links!; 404 Media, March 14, 2026)
Yesterday, a judge ordered those who uploaded the videos to YouTube to remove them. By today, a backup of the videos was available online as a torrent and on the Internet Archive.
Joseph Cox: We Watched 6 Hours Of DOGE-Bro Testimony. Here's What They Had To Say For Themselves. (3-min. YouTube video; 404 Media, March 13, 2026)
Over the course of a six-hour-long-or-so deposition, Justin Fox, a former-investment-banker-turned-DOGE-bro:
- refused to define what he believes counts as DEI;   
- admitted he used ChatGPT to scan government contracts for terms such as "Black" and "homosexual" but not "White" or "Caucasian";
- and said that one of the grants he helped slash was "not for the benefit of humankind" - before walking that claim back.
I watched all of Fox's deposition from start to finish. The terse exchanges, the circular arguments, the pregnant pauses, all of it. The videos, available publicly on YouTube, were released as part of a lawsuit by the Modern Language Association, American Council of Learned Societies, and American Historical Association. They provide fascinating, and perhaps horrifying, insight into the thinking of someone inside DOGE. Even with Fox's inability to answer seemingly easy questions, the responses are still illustrative of the recklessness and ham-fisted nature of a group of young, inexperienced people who caused massive damage across the U.S. government, leading to negative consequences outside of it. DOGE as an organization has been linked to 300,000 deaths due to its cuts and multiple significant data breaches. All the while, DOGE did not actually reduce the government's deficit.
Jayar Jackson: MAGA In CHAOS, As DOGE Deposition Reveals STOLEN Data Scheme.
(13-min. YouTube video; WatchlistTYT, March 12, 2026)
Elon Musk's DOGE team thought they could quietly move Social Security data through Signal chats and private servers, but
- a whistle-blower,
- a court filing and
- a trail of voter-roll investigations
are now exposing how the Trump administration's operation may have crossed the line from "waste and fraud" talking points into something far more dangerous.


Michael Cornelison: Steve Witkoff: Stupid Or Traitorous?
(Substack, March 12, 2026)
Steve Witkoff, Trump's ambassador for everything (Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Gaza, Iran-USA-Arabs) has long been a mystery to me. Who is this guy? Lately, this has become more clear.
Witkoff (and his accomplice Jared Kushner), have gotten a lot of money from the Arab Gulf states, and plan on making lots more money from rebuilding Gaza. Now something else has come to light.
Multiple news outfits are reporting that Russia has been giving targeting information to Iran, causing U.S. military assets in the Gulf region to get blown up. Iran's Foreign Minister admitted this is happening, and called Russia a "strategic partner". Trump officials, when asked, did not seem to care.
In a TV interview, Witkoff was asked about Trump's talks with Russian officials regarding the intelligence-sharing. His response: "I can tell you that on the call with POTUS, the Russians said they have NOT been sharing. That's what they said. We can take them at their word." (NOT emphasis added.) So, Witkoff trusts the Russians, and Iran's Foreign Minister was lying?
What is it with Witkoff? Probably he is loyal to Putin, but stupidity cannot be ruled out. Recall, also, that he negotiated a "peace plan" for Ukraine that amounted to a list of Putin's demands. That plan was thrown out and replaced with a more-balanced plan - that still calls for Ukraine to give up more territory than the Russians have conquered.
Glenn Kirschner: Staggering Revelations In The Epstein Files! All The "King's" Men: Trump's Lackeys And Their Disservice To America. (15-min. YouTube video; March 11, 2026)
We just got one heck of an Epstein-files update. We know that state law enforcement authorities in New Mexico are now investigating Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro ranch. That is the scene of allegations of horrific crimes by Epstein, Maxwell, and others, and it's good that the New Mexico law-enforcement authorities are investigating.
But the obvious question is: Why wasn't the Zorro ranch searched by law-enforcement authorities:
- when they searched Epstein's home in New York,
- when they searched his home in Florida,
- when they searched his home on his infamous island?
Well, we now know the answer to that question: Donald Trump's Department of Justice told the New Mexico law enforcement authorities to halt their investigation!
This video takes on this dramatic and deeply-troubling new revelation.
Emily Singer: Trump Says He Can End The Iran War Whenever He Wants. So Why Hasn't He?
(cartoon by Jack Ohman; Daily Kos, March 11, 2026)
In a sign he's clearly worried about the negative economic and political consequences of the ill-advised war he started in Iran, President Donald Trump called up yet another reporter today to insist that everything is going great. He also said that he will end the conflict "soon" because there is "practically nothing left to target".
"Little this and that ... Any time I want it to end, it will end"
, Trump told Axios' Barak Ravid in a five-minute phone conversation.
Trump's ridiculous claim that he can simply decide when the war against Iran will stop is patently absurd. Iran is not a rational actor. It doesn't care about the suffering of its people, nor about preserving the non-existent relationships it has with other western nations. So long as it has munitions and the ability to cripple the global economy by choking off the Strait of Hormuz - a waterway critical to the global oil supply - it has no incentives to stop.
Bill Clinton*: "Most People Have No Idea What's About To Happen, After A Week Of Hormuz Being Closed."
(24-min. Somvati Rana/YouTube AI podcast, March 10, 2026)
*- [DISCLAIMER: SOMVATI RANA is an independent, fan-made channel not affiliated with Bill Clinton, his campaign, or any political organization. The videos are inspired by public speeches and verified news for educational and analytical purposes only.]
"Strait of Hormuz closed, oil prices surge, Iran war 2026 - what happens next?" In this video, Bill Clinton shares his political perspective on the biggest oil-supply disruption in history. After U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on Iran killed Supreme Leader Khamenei:
- Iran shut down the Strait of Hormuz, sending
- Brent crude past $110-per-barrel and
- gas prices soaring to $3.47-per-gallon in just one week.
Clinton breaks down:
- the leadership failures,
- the insurance-driven shipping shutdown nobody planned for,
- the collapse of Iraqi oil production,
- Iranian strikes on Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, and
- why this crisis threatens not just your wallet,
- but American democracy itself.
From war-powers violations to fractured alliances to the real risk of $150 oil, this is the analysis that mainstream media won't give you. Whether you support or oppose this war, the consequences affect every single American.
[Well-said, by one of America's good Presidents! Also, let's not turn on Israel, just because its president is much like our president.]
Emily Singer: Trump's War Spikes Gas Prices - And Gets Iran A Worse Leader. (cartoon by Mike Luckovich; Daily Kos, March 9, 2026)
- Seven American service members are dead,
- dozens of Iranian children were murdered by a U.S. missile strike,
- oil is raining from the skies to poison the air for thousands of people living in Iran following an Israeli missile strike,
- and oil and gas prices worldwide are surging, as
- the war has led to the blockade of a critical waterway used to transport oil.
But hey, at least we have a new Iranian leader who is in some ways worse than the murderous oppressor whom the United States killed a little over a week ago!
Indeed, Iran announced yesterday that it replaced Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei with his son Mojtaba Khamenei. The 56-year-old religious cleric lost his mother, wife, and a son, as well as his father, to U.S. strikes.
Given his relative youth, Iran's new supreme leader could have many years left to reign over the nation with an iron fist. That means we:
- spent $Billions,
- lost American lives, and
- potentially decimated the global economy, only to
- put in someone who may in fact be more extreme than the previous guy, who brutally oppressed both dissenters and women.
Heather Cox Richardson: Iran War & Cowboy Individualism
(6-min. video summary; YouTube, March 8, 2026)
Heather Cox Richardson highlights the Trump administration's "cartoonish" approach to the Iran war, rooted in "cowboy individualism", and its severe real-world consequences.
- From campaign merch at dignified transfers
- to submarine attacks on unarmed vessels,
- the true cost of this conflict is becoming painfully clear.
Watch the full summary video to understand the historical context and unfolding crisis!
NEW: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse: "There Is A Cover-Up Afoot": Sen. Whitehouse Unravels Disturbing Trump, Epstein, And Russia Ties. (47-min. YouTube video, March 5, 2026) Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) takes to the Senate Floor to recap the mountain of circumstantial evidence laid bare by courageous survivors and journalists connecting Trump, Epstein, and Russia.
Mahbod Seraji: This Is Not A Regime-Change War. Iran Is Being Pushed Toward State Collapse. The U.S. And Israel Have Killed Ayatollah Khamenei, But They Seem To Have No Plan For What Comes Next.
(Truthout, March 3, 2026)
The U.S.-Israeli bombing campaign against Iran has already sparked regional war, and threatens to reshape West Asia for years to come. The military strikes began on February 28, killing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and several of his top officials.
Now, several days into the war, the rationale has not been clearly articulated; U.S. lawmakers and officials have offered up different, often competing explanations for the initial attack and end goals.
Yet the massive American military buildup in the region in the weeks before the attack made it evident that something significant was coming, even as negotiations between Iranian and American officials continued, and even as the Omani foreign minister declared the night before the initial strike that an agreement was within reach.
Despite Khamenei's death, President Trump has said the strikes will continue. To what end?
-
If Iran's nuclear facilities and capabilities were already obliterated during last year's U.S. strikes, as Trump has long claimed, what is now the objective?
- The elimination of remaining leaders
, as U.S. forces attempted in Iraq?
- The dismantling of the Revolutionary Guard?
- The state's total collapse?
Those objectives presume that the Islamic Republic is a pyramid resting on a single figure. It is not.
- Iran's regular army, the Artesh, numbers roughly 375,000 personnel. The Revolutionary Guard - Iran's military, political, and economic powerhouse - counts approximately 125,000 or more. The Basij, Iran's voluntary paramilitary organization, maintains around 90,000 active members and can mobilize 450,000. By some estimates, nearly one-million individuals serve in or alongside the state's security structure. As of this writing, the regime has not collapsed, and these forces remain intact.
- In an eight-minute video released at the beginning of the bombing campaign, President Trump urged Iran's army, police, Revolutionary Guard, and Basij to lay down their arms and called on citizens to take control of their government. That appeal assumes a rapid implosion of the state's coercive machinery. But institutions of that scale do not dissolve because they are told to. Hundreds-of-thousands of armed men do not disarm overnight and hand the country to foreign powers or spontaneous civic committees.
- If the expectation is that bombing will accelerate internal democratic change, recent events suggest otherwise. Iran was already under severe strain. A banking crisis and sharp currency devaluation triggered nation-wide protests that began at the end of 2025, involving everyone from students and workers to bazaar merchants. Security forces responded with brutal force. Human-rights groups reported thousands of civilian casualties; authorities reported losses among their own ranks. The protests had begun to re-emerge when the bombs fell.
- Airstrikes do not create space for civic mobilization. They drive people indoors. When foreign aircraft strike cities, citizens do not gather in public squares demanding reform. They seek shelter. Within 24 hours of the start of the military strikes, hundreds of Iranians were reportedly killed, including students at a girls' school in Hormozgan Province. Whatever fragile momentum for internal change existed has now been interrupted by war.
- Following from the confusion about Trump's plan for this war, another question quickly follows: If the current leadership collapses, who governs?
- There is no unified opposition inside Iran with institutional capacity to assume control. The Islamic Republic's opponents are fragmented: reformists, republicans, labor activists, student networks, ethnic movements, and monarchists often disagree not only on leadership but on the structure of a future state. The current government has also spent decades repressing any of these forces that could come as a reasonable threat to its power, suffocating space for democratic debate.
- Among the most visible figures in exile is Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's former shah. A segment of the Iranian diaspora regards him as a transitional leader and speaks as though his succession is self-evident. On social media and satellite networks, some supporters already frame him as the natural heir to a post-Islamic Republic Iran.
- But diaspora visibility is not the same as governing legitimacy inside the country. Reza Pahlavi commands no formal political party within Iran, no known alliance with senior military officers, and no organized structure capable of securing ministries, borders, or public order in a moment of upheaval. His father and grandfather ruled through authoritarian control, and for many Iranians, especially those who experienced imprisonment, censorship, or repression under the monarchy, that history remains unresolved.
Restoration of the Pahlavi regime overlooks the institutions that still exist: the Revolutionary Guard, regional power brokers, clerical networks, provincial patronage systems, and armed groups unwilling to surrender authority to a figure whose base of support is largely external.
Even prominent American officials appear unconvinced. Donald Trump has suggested that Reza Pahlavi lacks the necessary support and capacity to lead Iran. "He seems very nice, but I don't know how he'd play within his own country", Trump told Reuters in January. "I don't know whether or not his country would accept his leadership, and certainly if they would, that would be fine with me." Of the monarchists, one anonymous U.S. official told Politico, "They scare me."
- Leadership in a country of more than 90-million people does not materialize through wish or nostalgia. It requires institutional alignment, territorial control, and internal legitimacy, none of which can be assumed from exile.
- Iran's internal complexity deepens the uncertainty about "What now?". Although Persians form a majority of Iran's population, the country includes substantial Azeri, Kurdish, Baluch, Arab, and Turkic populations. These communities are deeply-integrated into national life, yet historical grievances and regional tensions persist. It's important to remember that grievances against centralized state power in Iran long predate 1979. Ethnic and regional minorities often faced cultural and political marginalization under the Pahlavi monarchy, including denial of national rights and suppression of uprisings in outlying provinces. These long-standing issues helped fuel broader discontent that contributed to the revolution. Efforts at "nation-building" under the Shah also involved policies aimed at linguistic and cultural homogenization, which many non-Persian communities experienced as exclusionary and repressive. In stable times, such tensions are contained by a functioning center. In unstable times, they resurface quickly.
- In the northwest, Azeri communities share linguistic and cultural ties with the Republic of Azerbaijan.
- In the southeast, Sistan and Baluchistan endured decades of insurgency and state neglect.
- In the southwest, Khuzestan holds much of Iran's oil and contains a significant Arab population with a history of separatist sentiment.
- Kurdish regions are connected to broader Kurdish movements across Iraq, Turkey, and Syria.
A prolonged vacuum in Tehran would not produce orderly transition. It would invite regional intervention, militia mobilization, and competing territorial claims. Fragmentation would not be theoretical. It would be violent.
History offers sobering examples:
-
The disintegration of Yugoslavia led to ethnic war and Balkanization.
- The 2003 invasion of Iraq unleashed sectarian conflict that reshaped the state.
- NATO's intervention in Libya preceded years of militia competition.
- Afghanistan's 20-year war ended with the return of the Taliban.
Iran is not identical to those cases. But the belief that sustained bombing can engineer stable democracy has repeatedly been disproven.
War does not operate with surgical precision. It does not remove one figure and install another:
- It shifts power to those most capable of wielding force.
- It weakens civil society faster than it builds alternatives.
- It deepens grievances that last generations.
Removing leadership is not the same as constructing governance.

- The price of this ambiguity around the future will not be paid primarily by generals or politicians. It will be paid by students in Shiraz, factory workers in Isfahan, merchants in Tabriz, families in Mashhad - by people who have already endured sanctions, repression, and economic collapse.
- Iran is more than its rulers. It is a layered society held together by history and shared memory. Remove the center without a viable replacement and you do not create democracy. You create a vacuum. And in this region, vacuums rarely remain empty. They fill with militaries, militias, foreign proxies, and wars that often outlive the people who start them.
If the architects of this attack have a plan for the morning after, they have not shared it. If they believe the story ends with the fall of one man, history suggests otherwise.
February 28 may not mark the end of a regime. It may mark the beginning of a far-more-dangerous uncertainty - the destabilization of a nation.
[Long, but one from which to learn.]
Andy Sullivan and Richard Cowan: Bill Clinton To Lawmakers Investigating Epstein: "I Saw Nothing."
(2-min. video; Reuters, February 27, 2026)
Summary:
- Clinton says he would have turned Epstein in, had he seen evidence of crimes.
- Democrats accuse Justice Department of cover-up, say Trump must testify.
- Clinton flew on Epstein's plane several times in the early 2000s.
- First time a former president has been compelled to testify to Congress.

Richard Cowan and Ryan Patrick Jones: Hillary Clinton Tells Congressional Panel She Has No Information On Epstein. (3-min. video; Reuters, February 26, 2026)
Summary:
- Hillary Clinton denies meeting Epstein or visiting his properties.
- Accuses GOP panel of deflecting from Trump's Epstein ties.
- Democrats question missing Epstein-related files from DOJ.

Barak Ravid: Israel Bombs The Council Choosing Iran's Next Supreme Leader, Official Says. (Axiom, February 3, 2026)
The Israeli Air Force today struck the building housing Iran's Council of Experts in the holy city of Qom in an attempt to disrupt the process of appointing a new supreme leader, an Israeli defense official said.
Why It Matters: The Council of Experts is the body within the Iranian regime with the authority to appoint a new supreme leader. The clerics on the council vote on a short list of candidates being drafted by a smaller secret committee.
Driving The News:
The Israeli defense official said the strike took place while votes were being counted.
- It isn't clear how many of the council's 88 members were in the building at the time, or the extent of the damage.
- "We wanted to prevent them from picking a new supreme leader", the official said.
Barak Ravid: Earthquake In The Gulf: Iran War Expands To A Dozen Countries In 72 Hours.
(Axios, March 2, 2026)
Just 72 hours after the U.S. and Israel began bombing Iran:
- the war has consumed nearly the entire Middle East,
- reached the gates of Europe, and
- raised new fears of attacks on American soil.
Why It Matters: The sheer geographic scope of the war is staggering:
- directly involving at least 11 countries,
- disrupting the global flow of oil and gas, and
- rattling markets worldwide.
President Trump said today that Operation Epic Fury is designed to last four to five weeks. In that window, the conflict has significant room to expand further.
The Big Picture: The Middle East had barely caught its breath.
After two years of war across Israel, Gaza, Lebanon and Yemen, a U.S.-brokered ceasefire last October had only brought relative quiet to the region.
Now comes another earthquake - and by early measures, a far larger one.
Driving The News: Iran had warned prior to the war that any attack on its soil would trigger retaliation not just against Israel, but against U.S. bases across the Gulf and in Iraq.
- In the opening hours of the war, Iran launched waves of ballistic missiles and drones at Israel, the UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar.
- Iran also struck the Kurdish region of Iraq, which it views as closely-aligned with the U.S. and Israel. Pro-Iranian militias attacked U.S. bases in Iraq, and their supporters attempted to storm the U.S.-Embassy compound in Baghdad.
- On the second day, Iran expanded its strikes to Saudi Arabia and Oman - the country that had been instrumental in brokering nuclear negotiations between Tehran and the Trump administration.
- Today, debris from two Iranian drones struck an Aramco oil refinery in Saudi Arabia - the first such attack since 2019.
- Qatar - another key mediator between Tehran and Washington - said it downed two Iranian fighter jets and condemned the "reckless and irresponsible" targeting of its territory.
The Other Side: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and other officials have insisted that Iran is not at war with the region - only targeting Israel and U.S. military bases.
- But Iranian drones and missiles have struck numerous civilian targets across the Gulf, including tourist areas of Dubai.

- That gap between Iran's stated position and its actions is pushing several regional countries to consider joining the war and retaliating directly against Iran, Arab sources tell Axios.
Between The Lines: Iran has also moved to strangle commercial shipping in the Gulf, attempting to close the Strait of Hormuz by vowing to set fire to any ship that passes through.
- The U.S. has sunk several Iranian naval vessels and
- insists oil supplies remain stable, despite
- 20% of global crude shipments passing through Hormuz.
- The attacks have significantly-curtailed exports, and Qatar's suspension of liquefied natural gas production sent energy markets sharply-higher Monday.
Zoom In: Last night, Hezbollah entered the war - launching missiles and drones at Israel and opening a new front on the Lebanon border.
- Israel responded with massive airstrikes across Lebanon, including in Beirut, killing several senior Hezbollah commanders.
- Hezbollah's decision to join the fighting had been one of the key unknowns for U.S. and Israeli intelligence. Though badly degraded by years of Israeli strikes, the group remains Iran's most-powerful proxy.
- So far, its attacks have been limited and largely-intercepted by Israeli air defenses - leaving Israeli officials questioning why the group chose to enter the war without full force.
- "Everyone in Hezbollah is a target now", one Israeli defense official warned.
- In a remarkable development, the Lebanese Cabinet voted today to ban all Hezbollah military activity on Lebanon's soil. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam called on the group to immediately surrender its weapons.
The Intrigue: Over the past 24 hours, drones struck the British Royal Air Force base at Akrotiri in Cyprus - dragging Europe into the conflict for the first time.
- Cypriot press reported that all indications suggest the drones were launched from Lebanon by Hezbollah, linking the attack directly to the group's entry into the war.
- Cyprus - which currently holds the EU's rotating presidency - postponed a planned ministerial summit in the wake of the attack.
- Greece announced it is sending two frigates and two fighter jets to help defend the island.
Zoom Out: The three major European powers - the U.K., France and Germany - have signaled they could get actively involved in the conflict.
- In a joint statement, their leaders said they would "take steps to defend our interests and those of our allies in the region, potentially through enabling necessary and proportionate defensive action to destroy Iran's capability to fire missiles and drones at their source."
- The first concrete step came from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who announced he would allow the U.S. to use British air bases in the region to launch strikes against Iranian missile and drone storage depots and launchers. A source with knowledge of the process said this could include British bases in the U.K., Cyprus, or Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.
What To Watch: The Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen have not yet entered the war, but have signaled they are preparing to do so.
The Bottom Line: The war is already being felt back in the American homeland.
- The FBI and DHS placed counter-terrorism teams on high alert and a DHS bulletin warned of a "heightened-threat environment" - flagging potential terror plots and cyberattacks by pro-Iranian hacktivists.
- The U.S. Capitol announced heightened security measures today.
- In Austin Texas, a mass shooting is being investigated as potential terrorism linked to the conflict.
Ken Klippenstein: Why We Struck Iran - The Machine That All But Made The Decision Itself.
(Substack; March 2, 2026)
We attacked Iran because the target was simply too tempting to pass up, military sources tell me.
No consideration was given to the what, the so what or the then what, I’m also told. The "high-value targets" were just too valuable: the Ayatollah, the Chief-of-Staff of the Army, the Minister of Defense - at least 40 senior officials in total were killed.
Trump "approved" what was all-but-impossible not to approve. The president is captive to an intelligence machine built over decades, that now produces kill packages so clean and seductive that it practically runs itself.

As the Pentagon bluntly put it, "a large-scale U.S. strike cut off the head of the snake", summarizing its view of a crisp decapitation operation.
Trump gets away with all of this by pretending we're not actually at war - a falsehood with which Congress is happy to play along. Asked if the U.S. is at war with Iran, Sen. Lindsey Graham told Meet the Press: "I don’t know if this is technically a war." Absurd as that sounds, Democratic leaders are adopting the same framing. Sen. Chuck Schumer says the strikes are "risking wider conflict", as if this isn't already that; Rep. Hakeem Jeffries says the operation has "brought us to the brink of a possible war", as if this isn't already war.
If killing a 36-year-long head of state and his deputies isn’t war, what is?
The United States IS at war with Iran, pure and simple. We have been for decades:
- We supported Iraq in its war against Iran.
- We've conducted special operations inside Iran.
- We've shot at Iranian coastal installations.
- We've sunk Iranian ships.
- We've undertaken constant covert operations in the shadows, from actual sabotage to planting cyber viruses.
- We shot down an Iranian civilian airliner.
- We attacked targets on land.
- We conducted thousands of strikes against Iranian proxies in multiple countries from Yemen to Lebanon.
- We’ve labeled the country "part of the Axis of Evil".
- We killed Quds Force head Qasem Soleimani in an aerial assassination.
- We bombed Iranian nuclear-related sites.
- We've thwarted Iranian attacks on Israel and others, maintained a tripwire ground force in Kuwait, and hardened installations in the region. [True, but when did defending allies become bad?]
From Jimmy Carter to Donald Trump, through Republican and Democratic administrations, the United States has:
- frozen countless billions in Iranian assets;
- sanctioned Iranian companies;
- cut off Iran from the world banking system;
- banned Iranian oil imports and exports; and
- penalized non-U.S. companies investing in the country.
- We have designated the nation, Iranian organizations, and Iranian individuals as state sponsors of terrorism and foreign terrorist organizations.
Add to this history that today, the American military machine continues to do its thing. In two-and-a-half decades of war since 9/11, it has perfected the ability to find and destroy a target, ANY target. I've previously written about the fundamental change that has occurred in the nature of warfare in the practice of decapitation. As we see here in the latest, the U.S. and Israel carried out an opening blow that killed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and dozens of other Iranian leaders.
That military feat itself is the "reason" we are where we are. Pure and simple, meticulous intelligence work identified the routines and locations of the Ayatollah and others in Iran's national-security apparatus; when a set of meetings on Saturday morning were pin-pointed, the tight-as-a-rubber-band machine snapped into action.
"Calling this 'starting a war' is a Democratic talking-point", Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said today, adding: "This is the elimination of a threat that has existed since 1979."
Because we were already at war with Iran and have been for decades, those in charge didn't think they had to ask permission (or even if they did, that they had time to do so). The target is hot, red hot, and we need to strike now to gain the maximum advantage, the briefers say. Yes, there are intelligence and diplomatic people who fret about the consequences, but like the wusses in Congress, they are brushed aside because "This is an opportunity we can't pass up."
That's how it's been explained to me.
[And that's while AI is only partially in charge...]
Robert Reich: Sunday Thought: Trump's Real Reason For War (Substack; March 1, 2026)
Trump and Netanyahu's attack on Iran is premised on a gossamer web of assumptions and inferences. Trump says Iran:
- has enough nuclear material to build a bomb within days,
- will soon have long-range missiles capable of hitting the United States, and
- plans an attack.
But he has offered NO evidence. Most experts say he's wrong.
Here's the real reason for this war. Trump wants it to divert Americans' attention from everything that's gone to shit on his watch:
- the economy,
- ICE's cruel raids and murders,
- the crisis in public health as exemplified by the measles epidemic,
- our loss of friends and allies around the world,
- his boundless corruption, and
- his increasing unpopularity as shown in plummeting polls.
- Oh, and there are the Epstein files, rapidly closing in on the man whose history of sexual assaults and braggadocio [AND his criminal actions to hide the evidence] make his complicity highly likely.
[Indeed. And there's more, such as:
-
evading Congressional Checks-and-Balances,
- this past week's right-wing take-over of most of the main U.S. media AND a big chunk of Internet services,
- further diminishing of Free Speech at home and abroad,
- except for TrumPutin's own, increasingly-awful mis-use of Free Speech, and
- his revenge on the ethical AI company that objects to
- mis-use of its AI (Claude) by our military and ICE
- to squelch Free Speech,
- to wage wars (including this week's new war),
- to steal elections
- and to take vast wealth from We, The People for himself and his outrageously-wealthy cronies.
NEW: How Iran's Leader Was Killed. (14-min. YouTube video; fern.tv; March 2, 2026)
[Excellent coverage w/4K video, history and details of the first strike.]
Harrison Mann: I Was A U.S. Intelligence Analyst. Israel And The U.S. Are Lying To You About Iran. (Zeteo, March 1, 2026)
President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have launched their most-dangerous war yet, but the pretenses underpinning it are weaker than ever. You're already being bombarded by lies from the White House, the Capitol, and TV commentators.
Here are seven truths behind the half-hearted arguments meant to manufacture consent for a war you never asked for:
[We share the ONE of seven that can be viewed without a paid subscription.]
1. This War Won't Keep Americans Safe.
Trump says he launched this war to "defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime". He apparently expects us to forget he used this lie the last time he bombed Iran. What was true in June still is true now:
- There's no evidence the Iranian government is on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon (despite Netanyahu's claims to the contrary for the past 30 years),
- the Iranian military does not have weapons that can strike the U.S. (despite Trump's claim to the contrary) – a fact confirmed by my old employer, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and
– Iran's leaders had no intention of pre-emptively attacking U.S. forces in the Middle East.
The Trump administration's pained justification that Iran planned to fire missiles "preemptively, but if not, if not simultaneous, against with any actions against them", is beyond dubious given that the Iranian government watched U.S. forces posturing to attack for weeks and did not, in fact, launch a pre-emptive strike against them (and "simultaneous" is an exceptionally-creative way to say "firing missiles after we start attacking them").
If Iran really represented an immediate threat to the American people, why has Trump been telegraphing this attack since mid-January? What is true is that the Iranian government's missiles, drones, and proxies can strike U.S. forces in the region, which is exactly what started happening yesterday after U.S. planes started bombing Iran. Anyone who actually wanted to keep U.S. forces safe could simply move them out of the region and out-of-range of Tehran's capabilities – or, even easier – just avoid starting a war of choice with them in the first place.
Associated Press/Jon Gambrell, Melanie Lidman, Josh Boak and Eric Tucker: Iran's Supreme Leader Killed In Major Attack By U.S. And Israel. (AP News, February 28, 2026)
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in a major attack by Israel and the United States, Iranian state media confirmed, throwing the future of the Islamic Republic into doubt and raising the risk of regional instability.
President Donald Trump announced the death hours earlier, saying it gave Iranians their "greatest chance" to "take back" their country.
State media reported that the 86-year-old was killed in an airstrike targeting his compound in downtown Tehran. Satellite photos from Airbus showed that the site was heavily bombed.    
Associated Press/Brian Melley: What To Know About The New US-Israel Attacks On Iran (AP News, February 28, 2026)
The U.S. and Israel attacked Iran today in a massive operation that President Donald Trump said:
- killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
while
- targeting military capabilities and
- aiming to stop Tehran from creating a nuclear weapon.
There was no comment on Khamenei by Tehran, while Trump urged Iranians to seize the moment and "take over".
In counterattacks, Iran fired drones and missiles at Israel and aimed strikes at U.S. military installations in Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar. Exchanges of fire continued into the night. Iranian state media, citing the Red Crescent, this evening said at least 201 people had been killed and more than 700 injured.
Ali Larijani, the secretary of Iran's National Security Council, said Israel and America will "regret their actions".
The strikes came two days after the latest U.S.-Iran talks, as Trump pressured Tehran for a deal to constrain its nuclear program and built up a fleet of warships in the region. Iran's theocracy also has struggled with growing dissent following nation-wide protests that began over the economy but turned into anti-government ones.
The U.S. military said it was looking into reports of civilians killed in Iran in today's strikes. At least 115 people were reported killed and dozens wounded at a girls' school in the south, the local governor told Iranian state TV.
World leaders reacted with caution, and the U.N. Security Council met in an urgent session.
NEW: Herb Scribner: 6 Ways Trump Escalated Military Force In His Second Term. (Axios, February 27, 2026)
President Trump hasn't been shy about deploying the U.S. military during his second term.
Why It Matters: Despite promoting himself as a "president of peace", he's deployed the U.S. military in multiple American cities and across the globe, striking Iran and others, raiding Venezuela and striking suspected drug boats in the Caribbean.

- Trump's military actions may take another turn soon, with the possibility of war with Iran on the horizon.
Driving The News: The U.S. evacuated its embassy staff in Israel today, signaling that a joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran could be imminent, Axios' Barak Ravid writes.
- There are many reasons why the U.S. may hit Iran again, including the damaging Israeli and U.S. strikes last year - a major escalation in Trump's use of military force.
What They're Saying: "Under President Trump, America is respected again, and our military has restored its reputation as the strongest and most powerful on the planet. All of the President's actions have made our country safer and the world more stable", White House spokesperson Anna Kelly tells Axios.
Read more below about where Trump has sent the military.
Iran Strikes Last Year: The U.S. joined the 12-day war between Israel and Iran in June 2025 by taking out Iran's underground nuclear facilities, which led to historic escalation in the Middle East. Trump said at the time that the strikes were a "spectacular military success" and claimed Iran's key uranium enrichment sites "have been completely and totally obliterated." The attack on Iranian nuclear facilities led to widespread backlash from Congress, with many arguing Trump needed congressional authorization for such a use of military force.
Nigeria On Christmas: Trump announced, on Christmas day, that the U.S. military "launched a powerful and deadly strike against ISIS." U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) said the strikes were in Sokoto State. "May God Bless our Military, and MERRY CHRISTMAS to all, including the dead Terrorists, of which there will be many more if their slaughter of Christians continues", Trump wrote on social media at the time. Trump had previously warned about potential U.S. military action in Nigeria, pointing to violent attacks against both Christians and Muslims.
"Drug-Boat" Strikes In The Caribbean: U.S. military forces started battering ships and alleged "drug boats" with lethal airstrikes, in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific in late 2025. Many officials said the campaign aimed to curb the flow of drugs.
- The strikes then shifted toward pursuing oil and later seizing tankers as a part of a move against Venezuela.
- Some congressional backlash followed, with lawmakers calling for transparency and posing legal questions about Trump's authority.
Venezuela Raid In January: Trump sent 150 aircraft into the skies in a stunning raid on former Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro's fortified compound. The raid up-ended the Venezuelan government.
- Soon after, President Trump teased using military action against other countries across the world.
(Note: The U.S. military used Anthropic's Claude AI model during that operation, which has now led to a high-profile standoff between Anthropic and the Pentagon over military use.)
Aircraft Carriers To Iran: Trump recently sent two aircraft carriers to the region outside Iran, building speculation that another strike may happen. The U.S. sent the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier and its strike group to the Middle East in February. The Ford joined the USS Abraham Lincoln and its strike group in January.
Military In U.S. Cities: Trump has deployed National Guard troops in D.C. and temporarily in Los Angeles and New Orleans amid his immigration-crackdown and law-enforcement surge. He also pushed for troops in Chicago and Portland, among other cities, but faced legal challenges that seemed to disrupt his plans.
What We're Watching: The president has threatened to use the Insurrection Act - a rarely-invoked power that lets him put soldiers on American streets. No president has used it since 1992.
[I'm watching that gross mis-use of Artificial Intelligence (AI).]
Stephanie Liechtenstein: U.N. Nuclear Watchdog Says It's Unable To Verify Whether Iran Has Suspended All Uranium Enrichment. (AP News, February 27, 2026)
Iran has not allowed the United Nations nuclear agency access to its nuclear facilities, bombed by Israel and the United States during a 12-day war in June, according to a confidential report by the watchdog circulated to member states and seen today by The Associated Press.
The report from the International Atomic Energy Agency stressed that it "cannot verify whether Iran has suspended all enrichment-related activities", or the "size of Iran's uranium stockpile at the affected nuclear facilities".
Iran has four declared enrichment facilities, but the report warned that because of the lack of access, the IAEA "cannot provide any information on the current size, composition or whereabouts of the stockpile of enriched uranium in Iran".
The report stressed that the "loss of continuity of knowledge ... needs to be addressed with the utmost urgency".
Iran has long insisted its program is peaceful, but the IAEA and Western nations say Tehran had an organized nuclear-weapons program up until 2003. The U.S. is seeking a deal to limit Iran's nuclear program and ensure it does not develop nuclear weapons.
Associated Press/Ben Finley and Jamie Stengle: Scouting America Will Alter Policies To Maintain Support From U.S. Military: Pentagon (ABC News, February 27, 2026)
Scouting America will alter several policies at the urging of the Pentagon, including a requirement that members use "biological sex at birth and not gender identity", Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced today.
Some of the changes mirror what the organization suggested to the Defense Department in January, which included:
- discontinuing its Citizenship in Society merit badge,
- introducing a Military Service merit badge, and
- waiving registration fees for the children of military personnel.
Under Hegseth, the Pentagon has taken aim at the military's partnership with Scouting America, decrying its historic rebrand in 2024 from the Boy Scouts and other changes in recent years that he sees as part of "woke culture" efforts that he wants to root out.
Hegseth said in a video posted on X that the Pentagon will cease its support of Scouting America if it fails to comply. "We hope that doesn't happen, but it could", Hegseth said. "Ideally I believe the Boy Scouts should go back to being the Boy Scouts as originally founded, a group that develops boys into men. Maybe someday."
Scouting America, which is based in Irving, Texas, didn’t immediately comment. The organization began allowing gay youth in 2013, ended a blanket ban on gay adult leaders in 2015 and announced in 2017 that it would accept transgender students. It began accepting girls as Cub Scouts as of 2018 and into the flagship Boy Scout program - renamed Scouts BSA - in 2019. As of May 2024, more than 6,000 girls had earned the coveted Eagle Scout rank.
The Pentagon said in a statement earlier this month that it was reviewing its relationship with Scouting America, claiming it had "lost its way" in many ways and calling the organization's diversity, equity and inclusion efforts "unacceptable". Emily Pickering: University Professor And Nobel Laureate Richard Axel, CC '67, To Step Down As Zuckerman Institute Co-Director, Following Epstein Ties. (Columbia Spectator, February 24, 2026)
University Professor and Nobel laureate Richard Axel, CC '67, will step down from his role as co-director of the Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute - after Spectator revealed earlier this month that he maintained an 11-year friendship with convicted sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The Office of Public Affairs announced Axel's resignation in a statement today. Axel, who co-founded the Zuckerman Institute, will retain his role as a University Professor and continue research in his lab.
"What has emerged about Epstein's appalling conduct, the harm that he has caused to so many people, makes my association with him all the more painful and inexcusable", Axel wrote.
Axel corresponded with Epstein from at least 2010 - two years after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor - until five months before Epstein's 2019 suicide in prison, though Axel had spoken favorably of Epstein as early as 2007. His close relationship with Epstein was revealed in the Department of Justice's Jan. 30 trove of unsealed files. Mortimer Zuckerman, namesake of the neuroscience institute, also corresponded with Epstein after his conviction, according to the files.
Axel and his wife, Cornelia Bargmann, were repeatedly invited to Epstein's private island in 2011. Epstein used his island, located in the U.S. Virgin Islands, as a base for his child-sex-trafficking operation. In one instance, Epstein, through his personal assistant, offered to buy Axel and Bargmann's flights with his credit card. At least one set of tickets were voided two days before the flight was set to occur, according to records previously obtained by Spectator. A University spokesperson wrote in a previous statement to Spectator that Axel and his wife never visited the island.
"My past association with Jeffrey Epstein was a serious error in judgment, which I deeply regret", Axel said in a statement alongside his resignation. "I apologize for compromising the trust of my friends, students, and colleagues. I recognize the problems this has caused, and I will work to restore this trust."
Axel will also step down from his position as an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute
, which will continue to fund members of Axel's lab "to allow completion of their current research", according to an updated version of the statement.
"The University has seen no evidence that Dr. Axel violated any University policy or the law", the statement reads. "However, Dr. Axel made clear that in light of this past association, and the continued fall-out from the release of DOJ files, he felt it appropriate to relinquish his position as co-director", the statement continues, adding that the University "agrees with this decision, while at the same time recognizing his extraordinary contributions."
Camille Gijs and Hans Joachim Von Der Burchard: EU Loses Patience Following Trump's Latest Tariff Threat. European Commission Demands "Full Clarity" On Washington's Plans, As A Top EU Trade Lawmaker Calls To Delay A Key Vote On EU-US Trade Deal. The Delay Will Have To Garner Support Among The EU's Political Groups During An Extraordinary Meeting Set For Monday (Tomorrow) Afternoon. (podcast; Politico, February 22, 2026)
BRUSSELS: "The European Commission requests full clarity on the steps the United States intends to take following the recent Supreme Court ruling on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)", the Commission said in a strongly-worded statement issued after Trump announced yesterday that he wants to impose a new global tariff rate of 15%. "The current situation is not conducive to delivering 'fair, balanced, and mutually-beneficial' transatlantic trade and investment".
EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič spoke with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick yesterday (Saturday), as the EU grapples with the uncertainty of whether its trade agreement (struck in Scotland last summer) still applies in light of Trump's latest tariff threats.
The quickly-evolving situation pushed a senior EU trade lawmaker to urge the European Parliament to postpone a vote on legislation implementing the EU's side of its transatlantic trade deal. Trump's imposition of a 15% global tariff following Friday's high-court defeat is "a clear breach of the deal we had agreed", Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's trade committee, told Politico today. "I will therefore propose that we suspend ratification of the agreement for the time being."
Lange said he could not rule out "renegotiating the agreement". The German Social Democrat earlier today decried "pure tariff chaos from the US administration", in a social-media post on X. "No one can make sense of it anymore - only open questions and growing uncertainty for the EU and other US trading partners. The terms of the Turnberry Agreement and the legal basis on which it was built have changed", Lange said in the post. "Do new tariffs based on Section 122 not constitute a breach of the deal? Regardless, no one knows whether the U.S. will adhere to it - or even be able to", he added in his post. "At our extra meeting tomorrow, I will therefore propose to the EP's negotiating team putting legislative work on hold until we have a proper legal assessment and clear commitments from the US side".
The Greens, via their lead lawmaker on the file Anna Cavazzini, said: "The vote on the Turnberry Agreement in the European Parliament should be paused until we have clarity. It was clear that Trump's tariffs were illegal under international law. Now we also have confirmation that they were also illegal under U.S. law."   
[Click above for more - and stay tuned!]
Trump Hikes Global Tariffs To 15% Following Supreme Court Ruling. Trump "Just Announced A NEW 15% TAX On The American People. He Does Not Care About You", Said Gov. Gavin Newsom. (Common Dreams, February 21, 2026)
Shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ruled against President Donald Trump's use of emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs, the Republican announced plans for a 10% global import tax under another law. By today, he'd hiked it to 15%.
In a 6-3 decision penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, the high court found that "nothing" in the text of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "enables the president to unilaterally impose tariffs". Trump responded by not only lashing out at the justices, but also invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 for a 10% global tariff beginning February 24.
Then, in a Truth Social post this morning, Trump said: "Based on a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on tariffs issued yesterday (after MANY months of contemplation) by the United States Supreme Court, please let this statement serve to represent that I, as President of the United States of America, will be, effective immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been 'ripping' the U.S. off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully-allowed, and legally-tested, 15% level. During the next short number of months, the Trump Administration will determine and issue the new and legally-permissible Tariffs, which will continue our extraordinarily successful process of Making America Great Again GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter."
Last week, Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), ranking member of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, released a report laying out how Trump's economic policies, particularly the tariffs, "are making life unaffordable for millions of American small businesses, their workers, and their customers."
Markey held a virtual press conference with Massachusetts small business owners celebrating yesterday's Supreme Court ruling. The senator said that "for the last year, Trump has created Pain on Main with an affordability crisis plaguing communities across the country. At the heart of it are Trump's tariff taxes. The Supreme Court did what was right and struck down these illegal tariffs. Trump said the small businesses who brought this case hate our country. He's wrong. Small businesses ARE our country", Markey continued. "I will keep fighting until every cent illegally collected from small businesses, consumers, and families in Massachusetts and across the country has been returned."
[More presidential baloney from our baloney president - plus a proper response by OUR Senator Markey. Click above to read a few more of the many official criticisms...]
Chris Walker: Trump Attacks Justices As "Unpatriotic And Disloyal" After Tariffs Ruling. Allowing The Tariffs To Stand Would Be A "Transformative Expansion" Of Unchecked Presidential Powers, The Court Ruled. (Truthout, February 20, 2026)
The United States Supreme Court today ruled that most tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on nearly every country in the world were done so illegally. The decision upholds a lower-court ruling that found the tariffs to be unconstitutional, and thus, unenforceable.
In a 6-3 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts, who penned the majority opinion, explained that the court disagreed with the Trump administration's view that the executive branch could impose tariffs at will, without congressional approval, by determining they were warranted through so-called "national emergencies". The main law that the administration cited in its defense of the tariffs, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), does not include the word "tariff" in it, let alone confer the power for presidents to issue tariffs or other taxes unilaterally.
"The President asserts the independent power to impose tariffs on imports from any country, of any product, at any rate, for any amount of time", Roberts wrote. "But the wording of IEEPA "cannot bear such weight".
The majority also noted that the powers of imposing "taxes, duties, imposts, and excises" rest within Congress's powers, not the president's.
[Right on!]


Becky Ferreira: At The World's Largest General Science Meeting, "Surviving Trump" Is The Topic. (podcast; The Abstract, 404 Media; February 21, 2026)
"This is really a turning point and we're in a historical transition at present."
Welcome back to the Abstract! This week, we have a very special edition of the newsletter packed with everything I saw and heard at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting, held in Phoenix from February 12 to 14.
Founded in 1848, AAAS is the world's largest general scientific society, with over 120,000 members. It operates with the mission of advancing "science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all people", according to its website. It's also the publisher of Science, a leading collection of journals that have graced this newsletter many times.
The over-arching theme this year was the damage inflicted on the U.S. science sector by the Trump administration and how to best respond to it. Since Trump returned to office, his team has:
- terminated or frozen 7,800 research grants,
- laid off 25,000 scientists and personnel from research agencies, and
- proposed budget cuts of 35% to federal science funding, amounting to $32-Billion, according to Nature.
It's a crucial issue goal for American science leadership, that also is reverberating through the global scientific community. But experts at the meeting highlighted the bright spots in the darkness, as the world learns to respond to the new normal.
Without further ado, here are the highlights from the meeting.
[Every article within this article promises to be fascinating.]


The Daily Blast/Greg Sargent: Trump Erupts in Angry Panic Over 2026, as Polls Take Truly Brutal Turn. (17-min.  podcast: New Republic, February 19, 2026)
As new polls look dire for the GOP, a data analyst dives deep into the numbers, explaining how Trump's twin failures on the economy and immigration are creating unusual opportunities for Dems.
Donald Trump has the midterms on his mind. A few days ago, he erupted in a wild tirade on Truth Social, raging about voter fraud and voter ID while urging Republicans to make them central in the elections. He's now pinned this rant to the top of his feed. Over the last 24 hours, he's been on a tear, elevating half a dozen other tweets on these topics. By "warning" that Republicans must centralize voter fraud, he's actually telling them to engage in mass voter-suppression or perish.
Trump has good reason to panic: One new poll has his approval at 38%. Another survey puts Democrats ahead in the House ballot match-up by six points. And polling averages find Trump's approval on immigration, his "good" issue, at abysmal lows.
We talked to Lakshya Jain, head of political data for The Argument. He explains why:
- the numbers are even worse for Trump if you dig into the details, particularly on the economy,
- why it's so unusual that Trump is tanking on two GOP issues, the economy and immigration,
- and why that is creating unexpected opportunities for Democrats.
Listen to this episode here. A transcript is here.
Michael Cornelison: Understanding Trump, With Michael Wolff: Behaviors And Implications (Substack, February 16, 2026)
I just finished viewing two podcasts from Michael Wolff's online YouTube series, "Inside Trump's Head". Michael Wolff also has written two books about Trump, mostly critical. He is no fan of Trump. Despite this, Trump sometimes calls Wolff on the telephone, an attempt to influence him or pretend he is a friend. Wolff's observations of Trump are based on his own interactions and those of others who are willing to discuss their interactions with Trump. Wolff details Trump's behaviors, without asking why he behaves as he does. I have listed below a summary of Wolff's observations (at least how I understood them). Following this, I speculate about what lies behind Trump's behavior.
[Insightful, and it correlates well with Trump's sick public record. Is it a coincidence, that this was posted on Presidents president's resident's Day in the USA?]
Travis Gettys: Melania's Real Home Revealed By Trump Biographer, As She Distances From President. (49-min. video; RawStory, February 13, 2026)
Author Michael Wolfe has concluded that first lady Melania Trump isn't living in Florida or Washington, D.C., but is instead pursuing personal business opportunities away from her husband.
The writer told The Daily Beast's "Inside Trump's Head" podcast that the 55-year-old's relationship with President Donald Trump is “remote at best", and he has discovered, while trying to serve her with a lawsuit, that she most likely lives in New York City.

ICE Deports Babson College Student "Home" To Honduras:


NEW: Michael Casey: U.S. Apologizes For Mistake In Deporting Massachusetts College Student, But Defends Her Removal. (1-min. AP video; Associated Press, January 14, 2026)
The Trump administration apologized in court for a "mistake" in the deportation of a Massachusetts college student who was detained trying to fly home to surprise her family for Thanksgiving, but still argued the error should not affect her case.
Any Lucia Lopez Belloza, a 19-year-old Babson College freshman, was detained at Boston's airport on Nov. 20 and flown to Honduras two days later. Her removal came despite an emergency court order on Nov. 21, directing the government to keep her in Massachusetts or elsewhere in the United States for at least 72 hours.
Lopez Belloza, whose family emigrated from Honduras to the U.S. in 2014, is currently staying with grandparents and studying remotely. She is not detained and was recently visiting an aunt in El Salvador.
NEW: Holly Ramer: College Freshman Is Deported Flying Home For Thanksgiving Surprise, Despite Court Order. (Associated Press, November 28, 2025)
A college freshman - trying to fly from Boston to Texas to surprise her family for Thanksgiving - was instead deported to Honduras in violation of a court order, according to her attorney.
Any Lucia Lopez Belloza, 19, had already passed through security at Boston Logan International Airport on Nov. 20 when she was told there was an issue with her boarding pass, said attorney Todd Pomerleau. The Babson College student was then detained by immigration officials and within two days, sent to Texas and then Honduras, the country she left at age 7. "She's absolutely heartbroken", Pomerleau said. "Her college dream has just been shattered."
According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, an immigration judge ordered Lopez Belloza deported in 2015. Pomerleau said she wasn't aware of any removal order, however, and the only record he's found indicates her case was closed in 2017. "They're holding her responsible for something they claim happened a decade ago, that she’s completely unaware of, and they're not showing any of the proof", the lawyer said.
The day after Lopez Belloza was arrested, a federal judge issued an emergency order prohibiting the government from moving her out of Massachusetts or the United States for at least 72 hours.
ICE did not respond to an email Friday from The Associated Press, seeking comment about violating that order. Babson College also did not respond to an email seeking comment.
Lopez Belloza, who is staying with her grandparents in Honduras, told The Boston Globe she had been looking forward to telling her parents and younger sisters about her first semester studying business. "That was my dream", she said. "I'm losing everything."

NEW: Sara Dorn and Alison Durkee: Trump's History With Jeffrey Epstein: Interviews With Trump Accuser Omitted From Files. (Forbes; February 10, 2026)
The FBI interviewed a woman four times who accused President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was a minor in the 1980s, but three of the four interviews are omitted from the Epstein files, according to new revelations made public this week.
Wajahat Ali and Caleb Ecarma: Epstein's Silicon Valley Connections Lead to the Trump White House. (55-min. Substack video; The Left Hook, February 7, 2026)
Billionaires partied with Epstein, indulged in his criminal and perverse appetites, and shared his racist, destructive ideology that sought to destabilize the world order to escape accountability.
Wajahat Ali, with Brian J. Karem and Kim Kelly: BEZOS and Billionaires MURDER The Free Press. (69-min. YouTube video; The Left Hook; Febuary 5, 2025)
Jeff Bezos is worth nearly $250-Billion, yet under his ownership The Washington Post is being gutted.
From Bezos to Elon Musk and Larry Ellison, billionaires aligned with authoritarian politics are consolidating media power and attacking the free press.
On The Left Hook, Brian J. Karem, former White House correspondent, and Kim Kelly, labor journalist, explain how this coordinated media takeover threatens democracy itself.
Anand Giridharadas: It's So Much Bigger Than Epstein. What The Epstein Files Really Reveal. (The.Ink, February 2, 2026)
Today, with renewed attention on the Jeffrey Epstein files after Friday's release of millions-more records, we can finally bring you the full text, un-paywalled, of my November essay for The New York Times on what I learned by reading the first trove in its entirety. And, above, for the first time, an audio version, read by me.
As journalists comb through the Epstein emails, surfacing the name of one fawning luminary after another, there is a collective whisper of "How could they?" How could such eminent people, belonging to such prestigious institutions, succumb to this?
A close read of the thousands of messages makes it less surprising. When Jeffrey Epstein, a financier turned convicted sex offender, needed friends to rehabilitate him, he knew where to turn: a power elite practiced at disregarding pain.
At the dark heart of this story is a sex criminal and his victims - and his enmeshment with President Trump. But it is also a tale about a powerful social network in which some, depending on what they knew, were perhaps able to look away because they had learned to look away from so much other abuse and suffering:
- the financial meltdowns some in the network helped trigger,
- the misbegotten wars some in the network pushed,
- the overdose crisis some of them enabled,
- the monopolies they defended,
- the inequality they turbocharged,
- the housing crisis they milked,
- the technologies they failed to protect people against.
John Timmer: Court Orders Restart Of All U.S. Offshore-Wind Construction. Trump Admin's "It's Classified" Ploy Put On Hold In Five Different Cases.
(Ars Tecnica, February 2, 2026)
The Trump administration is no fan of renewable energy, but it reserves special ire for wind-power. Trump himself has repeatedly made false statements about the cost of wind-power, its use around the world, and its environmental impacts. That animosity was paired with an executive order that blocked all permitting for off-shore wind and some land-based projects, an order that has since been thrown out by a court that ruled it arbitrary and capricious.
Not content to block all future developments, the administration has also gone after the five offshore-wind projects currently under construction. After temporarily blocking two of them for reasons that were never fully elaborated, the Department of the Interior settled on a single justification for blocking turbine installation: a "classified national-security risk".
The response to that late-December announcement has been uniform: The companies building each of the projects sued the administration. As of Monday, every single one of them has achieved the same result: a temporary injunction that allows them to continue construction. This, despite the fact that the suits were filed in three different courts and heard by four different judges.
Based on reporting elsewhere, some of the judges viewed the classified report that was used to justify the order to halt construction, but they didn't find it persuasive. In one case, the judge noted that the government wasn't acting as if the security risks were real. The threat supposedly comes from the operation of the wind turbines, but the Department of the Interior's order blocked construction while allowing any completed hardware to operate.
"If the government's concern is the operation of these facilities, allowing the ongoing operation of the 44 turbines, while prohibiting the repair of the existing turbines and the completion of the 18 additional turbines, is irrational", Judge Brian E. Murphy said. That once again raises the possibility that the order halting construction will ultimately be held to be arbitrary and capricious.
For now, however, the courts are largely offering the wind projects relief because the ruling was issued without any warning or communication from the government and would clearly inflict substantial harm on the companies building them. The injunction blocks the government's hold on construction until a final ruling is issued. The government can still appeal the decision before that point, but the consistency among these rulings suggests it will likely fail.
Several of these projects are near completion and are likely to be done before any government appeal can be heard.
David Corn: The Return Of A Dangerous Trump Conspiracy Theory (Mother Jones, Our Land, January 31, 2026)
My fellow citizens, I'm here to report to you that your president is bonkers.       
Okay, many of you know that. Donald Trump has repeatedly demonstrated his connection to reality is tenuous. But to his credit (if we must):
- His ability to create and live in a distortion field free of facts has worked out quite well for him.
- His malignant narcissism had been good for his career.
- His other pathologies have helped him win the immense power he needs to compensate for his paranoia, profound insecurity, and cognitive decline.
Still, every once in a while, we are presented with a reminder of how truly bananas the most powerful man in the world is. That happened this week.
"Dangerous Question": Trump's Quip At The Premiere Of "Melania" - A High-Budget Documentary, Executive-Produced By The First Lady. (New Delhi TV News, January 30, 2026)
US President Donald Trump, his wife Melania Trump and other top members of his administration were at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to attend the premiere of "Melania".
The documentary has been financed at a whopping $75-Million by Amazon MGM Studios. At first, Amazon MGM Studios paid $40-Million to license the project and a related docu-series scheduled for release later this year on Amazon Prime Video. The first lady is one of the producers of the documentary, which talks about the 20 days leading up to Trump's 2025 inauguration as well as the family's return to the White House.
Besides this, the studio coughed up another $35-Million to promote and distribute "Melania", which is being made available across 25 territories outside North America, Reuters reported. Promotional ads are expected to be seen in various places, including London's Piccadilly Circus. Jeff Bezos, Amazon's chairman, contributed to Trump's inaugural fund earlier this year.
Directed by Brett Ratner, the documentary offers rare access to the private life of the first lady, who has kept a low public profile during Trump's second term in office. The trailer for "Melania" starts on Inauguration Day in January last year and highlights her role as an adviser to the U.S. President, including the moment where she encourages her husband to emphasize "peacemaker and unifier" [!] in his inaugural address.
Among the top Trump-administration officials who attended the premiere were Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
The documentary is being screened in about 1,700 theaters in the U.S. and Canada today.
David Corn: Nuremberg. (2-min. YouTube preview video; Mother Jones, Our Land, January 27, 2026)
[Also see: "Nuremberg" (2025 film); Wikipedia, updated January 31, 2026]
Nuremberg.
It's far too appropriate a time to watch a movie about the Nazi war-crime trials. Eighty years later, we're still trying to figure out what turns humans into monsters and an entire society into a genocidal culture of hate and evil. As the movie notes, the trials - the first time nations had assembled to prosecute former government officials for plotting and waging aggressive war and for crimes against humanity - set an important precedent for the international order. That was the intention of Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson (Michael Shannon), who led the prosecution. In the film, he is a noble warrior for justice who must use his wiles to persuade the Truman administration and the Brits, Soviets, and French to mount these proceedings. Half of the movie is his heroic tale of striving to establish a legal framework for Never Again.
The emotional guts of the movie is the lesser-known story of Douglas Kelley, an Army psychiatrist assigned to examine the personalities and assess the mental statuses of the captured Nazi officials set to go on trial - most notably Hermann Goring, the Reichsmarschall and the most senior of Hitler's henchmen to be captured. This was the challenge for director and scriptwriter James Vanderbilt: How to depict Goring not merely as a one-dimensional diabolical evil-doer - but as a person who's worth getting to know, yet deserves no sympathy. Russell Crowe took on the task of portraying Hitler's top aide as both an engaging and repulsive man. And Rami Malek as Kelley is almost a stand-in for Vanderbilt, as he attempts to get close to Goring without falling for his charm and intelligence. Goring claims he did not know about the camps and was only a military man honorably serving his government. And Kelley develops a complex and fraught bond with Goring, as he tries to understand the German and the other Nazi prisoners - to gather material for a book that Kelley assumes will earn him fame and fortune.
The film is mostly accurate, though full of the usual dramatic license. As could be expected, at a key point, the Jackson and Kelley narratives intersect to benefit the forces of good and righteousness. But what fascinates the most is Goring. How does the son of a middling diplomat and the godson of a wealthy Jewish physician and businessman become such a fanatic and a critical part of one of history's largest mass-murder machines? (The godson of a Jew is an interesting backstory.) And how do he and his fellow Nazi prisoners process what the Reich wrought?
"Nuremberg" delivers no answers to the questions we are compelled to ponder about: the Holocaust, the men responsible for it, and the descent of an entire nation into murderous authoritarianism. How does evil triumph? But Vanderbilt raises all this without being heavy-handed. These are topics that deserve constant attention, even if we cannot resolve them.
At Nuremberg, such questions were applied to the most enormous of sins. But they're also relevant for what we see at home and abroad these days:
- The lust for power,
- The demonization of marginalized communities,
- The weaponization of hate and bigotry,
- The widespread use of propaganda,
- The tribalization and cultification of politics, and
- the love of violence.
Who embraces this? Who falls prey to it? "Nuremberg" reminds us that we can never stop asking.
Outcry In Italy, As U.S. Says ICE Agents Will Join Olympics Delegation (5-min. podcast; New York Times, January 29, 2026)
The Italian government said it had requested clarification from American diplomats, after D.H.S. said that ICE agents would help secure the U.S. Olympic delegation next week in northern Italy.
[And not just the ice-skaters..]
Sophie Hurwitz: The Trump EPA Ended The "Green New Scam". A Year Later, Communities Are Still Paying The Price. (Grist, January 22, 2026)
Across the country, communities that lost grants have responded in a variety of ways - suing the government, searching for other funds, or simply moving on.
Lisa Needham: Republicans Vow They'll Stop Trump's Greenland Crusade - LOL.
(Daily KOS, January 20, 2026)
In the dead of Scandinavian winter, a bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers has trundled off to Denmark to say that, no, you totally should not listen to President Donald Trump about how he wants to invade Greenland, and it's all going to be totally fine - trust us.
Of course, the big, declining toddler-president's desire to eat Greenland just because he can has been kicking around for a while now, but things got especially dicey Thursday after Vice President J.D. Vance hosted a meeting between Denmark and the White House.
Seth Meyers: Trump Gets Nobel Peace Prize from Venezuela's María Corina Machado. (13-min. YouTube video; Late Night, January 20, 2026)
Seth addresses Trump signing an executive order to protect Army-Navy football games from competing broadcasts and more in his monologue, before taking a closer look at Trump sending a message to Norway about the Nobel Peace Prize and threatening to invade Greenland.
Robert Reich: Office Hours: What Should We Do About The Fascist Now Loose Upon America And The World? We're Now In A Far More Dangerous And Violent Stage Of Trump's Regime. What Should Be Done To Stop It?
(Substack, January 14, 2026)
Trump's reign of error and terror is spinning out of control:
- Minneapolis becoming a war zone.
- Americans murdered in the street.
- The Justice Department declaring the shooter innocent.
- Investigators quitting.
- Oligarchs contributing to the shooter's defense fund.
- The FBI investigating the victim's wife.
- Meanwhile, a criminal indictment of the head of the Federal Reserve because he won't cut interest rates.
- Investigations of Democratic senators.
- Trump and Hegseth committing war crimes.
- Trump claiming to be president of Venezuela.
- Trump deciding which companies will get access to its oil.
- Setting up slush funds in other countries to take the spoils.
- Threatening imminent war on Iran.
- Refusing to turn over the Epstein files, even though Congress demanded them.
From Minneapolis to Caracas, from Chicago to Greenland, from Washington, D.C., to Tehran, Trump's lawless violence - and his threats of even-more violence - are increasing. The civil liberties of Americans are ever-more endangered. His flouting of Congress and defiance of international law are growing.
What can and should be done?
[We should be done with tRUmPutin!]
Ken Klippenstein: U.S. Freezes Visas To 75 Countries. Read The Leaked Diplomatic Cable. (Substack, January 14, 2026)
In the latest sign of the sheer scale of the administration's war on immigration, the State Department has moved to pause all immigrant-visa issuances for applicants from 75 different countries, according to a U.S. diplomatic cable leaked to me. That's over one-third of the total number of countries in existence (193)!
Effective January 21, the directive was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio earlier today. Citing the Immigration and Nationality Act, the order claims concerns over immigrants being "financially self-sufficient" as the supposed reason for the freeze.
"President Trump has made clear that immigrants must be financially self-sufficient to protect public benefits for American citizens", the cable reads. "Applicants from these countries are at a high risk for becoming a public charge and recourse to local, state, and federal government resources in the United States."
[Since Trumputin has taken away more public benefits - including our democracy and so many of its capable administrators - than do immigrants, why not fix that problem first?]
Robert Reich: Trump's Ass-Backward "affordability" Agenda?
Here's A REAL Affordability Agenda!
(3-min. summary YouTube video; Substack, January 13, 2026)
The latest gauge on inflation, released this morning, showed prices increasing 2.7% in December compared with the same period a year ago. Food prices were up 3.1%. (Reminder: Trump was elected on two issues: bringing prices down, especially food, and avoiding foreign entanglements.)
Today, Trump traveled to Detroit to deliver an address to the Detroit Economic Club. It was about "affordability" and he filled it with lies, such as:
- Americans aren't paying for his tariffs. (Of course they are!)
- Inflation is "way, way down". (It's about the same as it was when he took office.)
- He insisted that "affordability" is a "fake word by Democrats"
.
Unfortunately for Trump, "affordability" has become even more politically potent than immigration or crime. And in his first year at the helm, he's made America less affordable.
He's also been putting forward some ass-backward ideas for "bringing down prices" that will actually increase them. His biggest:
- Fire the current chair of the Federal Reserve Board,
- Install a chair who'll lower interest rates, and
- Thereby, in Trump's addled brain, "bring down" the costs of borrowing to buy homes and cars.
(In his speech today, he called Fed chair Jerome Powell, a "jerk".) Trump's decision to open up a criminal investigation of Powell is a bizarre escalation of his pressure-campaign against the central bank to cut interest rates. And it's truly ass-backwards. Without an independent Fed committed to using interest rates to fight inflation, everyone who buys or sells or invests will have to assume the risk of runaway prices in the future. The result is a risk "premium" that makes everything more expensive instead of more affordable.
---
What should be done to make America more affordable? Ten common-sense initiatives:
1. Get rid of Trump's tariffs. Trump's blanket, unpredictable, on-again-off-again, gigantic and then sometimes-modest tariffs have caused prices to jump on just about everything. That's because tariffs are import taxes that are paid by the companies that do the importing - and by their consumers. Tariffs can be a tool to create American jobs, but only if they're used in a targeted and responsible way. "Targeted" and "responsible" are two adjectives that no one uses in describing Trump's tariffs. The first step to make life more affordable for the average American is to get rid of them.
2. Bust up monopolies. Trump's overriding goal is to boost share prices. He doesn't seem to understand that most Americans aren't directly affected by share prices: Over 90% of the value of shares held by Americans is held by the richest 10%; over half by the richest 1%. In pursuit of high share prices, Trump has essentially given up on anti-trust enforcement. Big corporations are now merging and buying up potential competitors at a rapid rate. But this means less competition, and less competition results in higher prices. It's another ass-backward approach to affordability. Trump's overriding goal of high share prices collides with what should be the real goal: keeping prices low.
A real Affordability Agenda would bust up big corporations that dominate their industries, and prohibit price gouging.
3. Fight for stronger unions. Trump hates unions, and has done everything he can do to weaken the National Labor Relations Board and the Labor Department. He's given free rein to corporate union-busting. Here again, Trump's goal of high share prices and corporate profitability is at direct odds with the needs of average workers for higher wages, which are necessary if the goods and services they require are to become more affordable to them. Workers need more bargaining power to get higher wages. Unions do that. A real affordability agenda therefore would make it easier for workers to start or join them.
4. Raise the national minimum wage. For the same reason Trump believes unions and higher wages are bad for the economy - that is, his definition of the economy, which is the stock market - he's been dead set against raising the national minimum wage. But the federal minimum wage has been stuck at a measly $7.25 since 2009. Raise the damn wage! And raise it even higher for employees of big corporations that pay their top executives hundreds of times more than their workers.
5. Pass Medicare For All. Trump has been trying to destroy the Affordable Care Act because it was passed under his predecessor, Barack Obama. His latest gambit has been to block any extension of the subsidies that Americans need to be able to afford health insurance under the ACA. (The fight over this issue resulted in the longest government shutdown in history.) Without those subsidies, the typical American will be paying 30% to 100% more for health insurance this year than last - which is already driving many people out of the ACA marketplace and forcing them to live without health insurance at all.
Extending ACA subsidies is necessary but not sufficient. A real affordability agenda would make Medicare available to all Americans. This will bring down health-care costs for everyone, because Medicare is cheaper and more efficient than for-profit health insurance.
6. Make housing more affordable. Last Wednesday, Trump called for a ban on institutional investors buying single-family housing. I suppose it's nice that he's finally gotten around to this, but I'll believe it when he actually signs the legislation.
A real affordability agenda would:
- Ban Wall Street firms from buying up housing,
- Crack down on corporate landlords that collude to jack up rent prices,
- Get rid of zoning laws that make it harder to build homes, and
- Increase funding to boost the construction of housing in cities that need it most.
7. Make child care and elder care more affordable. The costs of child care take a third of the incomes of parents with young children, on average. The costs of elder care can be even higher for working people with elderly parents. Both are essential for working families. An affordability agenda would include a universal child-care program for parents and boost funding for caregivers of aging parents.
8. Give Americans paid leave. Here again, the goal of fat corporate profits and high share prices collides with what American workers need. Trump consistently opts for the former and argues that the nation "can't afford" paid family leave.
Baloney! We're the richest country in the world. Every other advanced nation provides paid leave. Working Americans need it. We should provide it, too.
9. Stop Big Finance from siphoning off people's incomes. Trump has deregulated big banks and allowed them to charge up to 30% interest on credit cards. (The banks love it because credit cards provide them with four times the return of any other line of business.) Trump has gotten rid of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which stopped other sleazy financial practices. And he's allowed more consolidation of big financial institutions, which means even less competition, higher prices, and shadier deals. (His Justice Department recently approved the merger of Capital One and Discover, which will pile even more debt on low-income consumers.) The captains of Wall Street have never had it so good. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon made $770-Million last year. But average working people are being shafted.
A real affordability agenda would:
- Cap credit-card interest rates at 5%,
- Stop the banks from charging late fees on unsuspecting consumers (Trump's OMB director, Russ Vought, withdrew the late fee rule in April), and
- Bust up the biggest banks, whose market power is allowing them to charge absurdly-high interest rates on all borrowing.
10. Raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans and corporations. Besides tariffs, Trump's economic policy has cut taxes mainly on wealthy individuals and big corporations. He's imbibed the "trickle-down" Kool-Aid that assumes tax cuts at the top make everyone better off.
The reality - as we've learned since Trump's first tax cut mostly benefiting the wealthy and big corporations (as we should have learned from Ronald Reagan's and George W. Bush's trickle-down tax cuts also mainly benefiting the rich and big corporations) - is that nothing trickles down. Trickle-down economics is a cruel sham. The cumulative effects of all these tax cuts has been to make America's rich far richer (now owning a record share of the nation's wealth) and big corporations far more profitable (corporate profits are also near record levels), while dramatically enlarging the national debt.
And what do we get with a bigger debt? More inflation, which makes everything less affordable. Again, Trump has it ass-backward. It's time we ended the trickle-down hoax once and for all. Besides, it's only fair that the super-rich pay more in taxes so that the rest of America can afford what Americans need: housing, health care, child care and elder care. And by the way, even after paying more in taxes, the rich will still be richer than they've ever been, and giant corporations will still be exceedingly profitable. These 10 steps are crucial for making America affordable again. Don't fall for Trump's ass-backward agenda, which will only make the rich richer and big corporations more profitable. You and I and everyone who wants to lower the cost of living for Americans should back the real affordability agenda.
[Robert Reich beat me to it: "Please share this with any Democrat or independent (hell, share it with any Republican) interested in running for office and improving Americans' standard of living.]
Deepa Shivaram: Trump's Economic Speech Veers Off-Topic As He Takes Aim At Biden And Powell.
(NPR News, updated January 13, 2026)
Yesterday at the Detroit Economic Club, President Trump gave a grievance-laden speech that touched on what he labeled "a resurgent American economy" - but meandered into many different topics including criticism of former President Joe Biden, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, Minnesota's Somali population and Minneapolis protesters.
"We have quickly gone from the worst numbers on record to the best and strongest numbers and an economy that is far ahead", Trump said from the Detroit Economic Club.
The speech, which comes amid polling showing his handling of the economy at a historic low, lasted just more than an hour. He touted plans to crack down on fraud, freeze federal payments to states with sanctuary cities and cap credit card fees at 10% for a year. He also teased further proposals to come on health care and housing.
"It's unfair", Trump said in Detroit on credit card interest rates. "The rates are too high to provide further relief to hardworking Americans."
But Trump spent much of his time blaming Biden for inflation rates and criticized the fed chair, Powell, whom the Justice Department is targeting in a new investigation. Trump told NBC News on Sunday he had nothing to do with the probe, but he has been criticizing Powell for months for not lowering interest rates and has been threatening to fire him.
In his remarks, Trump referred to Powell as "that jerk" and said he would "be gone soon".
Michigan was Trump's first domestic trip since a slew of international news – capturing Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro; threatening military action against Iran after rising protests; threatening to seize Greenland; trying to move forward in the Gaza peace deal; ongoing negotiations to end the Russia-Ukraine war – has been the president's main focus for weeks.
But in the U.S., even a majority of the president's own supporters remain increasingly concerned about high costs and affordability. It's an issue that was critical for Democrats' successes in the 2025 elections in Virginia and New Jersey and expected to remain top of mind for midterm elections later this year.
Last month, Trump's approval rating on the economy hit a new low of 36%, according to a NPR/PBS/Marist poll. The poll showed voters feel like they are struggling to make ends meet and are most concerned about high costs.
The president previously addressed his economic agenda in an Oval Office speech and said his administration was "making progress" on lowering costs but "it's not done yet".
Julie Tsirkin: Trump Threatened GOP Senators Who Voted To Allow Congress To Vote On The War Powers Resolution, In "Angry" Calls. (NBC News, Jan. 11, 2026)
On January 8, hours after the Senate voted to advance the War Powers Resolution rebuking the White House's current and future actions in Venezuela, President Donald Trump placed "angry" calls to some of the five Republicans who crossed the aisle, according to people with knowledge of the calls. Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Todd Young (R-Ind.), voted with Democrats to require the administration to get congressional approval for future military action in Venezuela.
Thursday's vote was a procedural motion; it advances the legislation to a full Senate vote that will require a simple majority.
Soon after the vote, Trump threatened each senator with primary challenges, vowing to unseat them, the people said. Two people describe the calls as "direct but cordial". But in at least Collins' case, Trump sharply criticized her and raised his voice, according to a person familiar with the exchange. Collins, a six-term senator who is up for re-election this year, hasn't formally announced her political plans.
On Truth Social after Thursday's vote, Trump said that all five senators "should never be elected to office again". "This Vote greatly hampers American Self Defense and National Security, impeding the President's Authority as Commander in Chief", he wrote. "In any event, and despite their 'stupidity', the War Powers Act is Unconstitutional, totally violating Article II of the Constitution, as all Presidents, and their Departments of Justice, have determined before me."
NBC News spoke to some of the senators in the group, including Hawley and Paul, who praised Trump. "I love the president. I think he's doing a great job", Hawley said, who forecast that he could change his vote when the Senate takes up final passage this week.
The White House hasn't responded to a request for comment and hasn't confirmed the calls.
[The original subject said, "who voted for". WORSE, they only voted to ALLOW CONGRESS TO VOTE for it! Trump continues to play Dictator, ignoring our Constitution's checks and balances. The fact that ONLY five GOP Senators acted FOR the Constitution, Congress and WE, THE PEOPLE speaks volumes.]
Jimmy Kimmel Live: Rachel Maddow On Trump Being Extremely Unpopular, ICE Shooting In Minneapolis & Peaceful Protests. (12-min. YouTube video; The Jimmy Kimmel Show, January 9, 2026)
Rachel talks about Jimmy's parents being fans, the Trump presidency not offering much to people right now, his unpopularity, the positive things that come from peaceful protests, the woman who was shot and killed by ICE in Minneapolis, getting her start in morning radio, attending Dick Cheney's funeral, and her podcast Burn Order.
Zolan Kanno-Youngs: We Pressed Trump On His Conclusion About The ICE Shooting. Here's What He Said. The Exchange Was A Glimpse Into The President's Reflexive Defense Of His Federal Crackdown On Immigration.
(1-min. video; New York Times, January 8, 2026)
During an interview with The New York Times, President Trump said that a woman who was shot by federal agents in Minnesota "behaved horribly" and ran an agent over. Analysis by The New York Times showed the motorist was driving away from - not toward - a federal officer when he opened fire.
Brian Tyler Cohen with Mark Elias: Democracy Watch episode 446:
Justice Department Issues "BOMBSHELL" Epstein Announcement! (14-min. YouTube video; YouTube, January 7, 2026)
Justice Department reveals it's released LESS THAN 1% of Epstein files!
David Corn: The Erasure Of January 6 - Five Years Later, MAGA-World Is Still Engaging In Its Orwellian Rewriting Of History.
(photos, links - including to the Trump-stalled 255-page December 17th deposition by Jack Smith, about the Trump-suppressed report analyzing January 6, 2021's Trump-inspired and Trump-enabled MAGA attack on our U.S. Capitol in an attempt to overturn the 2020 election; Mother Jones, January 6, 2026)
[This is an important article; if you don't have time to read it all now, you can skip down to its last 3 paragraphs by searching for three dashes (---). After you have read it all, you might read the finally-available 255-page official Justice Dept.-ordered deposition - and save YOUR copy of it for sharing with (and BY) current and future friends and relatives.]
In 1984, George Orwell observed that a fascist state relies upon its ability to control - or obliterate - memory. As Winston Smith, the ill-fated protagonist, ponders the Party's ability to manipulate reality and history, Orwell writes, "Everything faded into mist. The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth." Another passage in the novel describes the Party's relentless effort to construct the dominant narrative: "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right."
Sound familiar? It's been five years since a mob of thousands of Donald Trump supporters - which included Christian nationalists, white supremacists, neo-Nazis, Confederate flag wavers, militia members, and other extremists - assaulted the U.S. Capitol to try to halt the peaceful transfer of power from an outgoing president to an incoming president. The basic facts are well-established:
- Trump refused to accept legitimate election results.
- He falsely claimed he had won the 2020 contest and spread baseless lies and conspiracy theories about the election.
- He spent weeks scheming to overturn the election and remain in power.
- Promoting these falsehoods, he incited that insurrectionist attack on Congress in which more than 140 law-enforcement officers were injured.
- While the melee was occurring, he abandoned his duty to defend the Constitution and waited 187 minutes before calling on his brown-shirts to leave the Capitol.This is all undeniable. Yet Trump and his cult refuse to accept these fundamentals. Like the Party in Orwell's dystopia:
- Trump and the Republicans have sought to rewrite history and erase the stain of Trump's profound betrayal of America.
- He pardoned the violent marauders, and
- his henchmen in charge of the FBI and Justice Department have fired agents and prosecutors who participated in the investigation and prosecution of these thugs.
- And Trump's MAGA legions mounted a disinformation campaign that advanced various conspiracy theories ("The FBI did it! Antifa did it!") to absolve Trump and his thugs.
- More important, an entire political party and tens-of-millions of American voters memory-holed Trump's war on American democracy and his embrace of political violence. What is perhaps the gravest transgression ever committed by a U.S. president has been air-brushed out of the picture and the perp allowed (by a majority of voters) to return to the scene of the crime. This is one of the most worrisome turns in American history. If our democracy cannot protect itself from such peril and repel such a dangerous threat, can it survive?
Trump's triumph over reality was made clear this past week. On New Year's Eve - one of the deadest times for the news cycle - the Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee released the closed-doors testimony it had received before two weeks from Jack Smith, the special counsel who led the investigations that indicted Trump for conspiring to overturn the 2020 election and for allegedly swiping highly-sensitive White House documents. Both cases ended after Trump won the election in November. (Under Justice Department policy, a sitting president cannot be prosecuted for federal crimes.)
Smith insisted on a public appearance, apparently knowing he had the goods on Trump. The Republicans said no, and questioned him in a private session - all the better for controlling the narrative. The fact that they made public the transcript on a holiday night tells you what you need to know about who got the best of whom.
Smith, as you know, has been repeatedly denounced by Trump as "a lunatic who waged witch hunts and investigated hoaxes generated by his fellow Deep Staters, the Democrats, and the media". And Republicans hauled Smith in as part of their never-ending crusade to find (or concoct) evidence to bolster Trump's paranoid fantasies and conspiracy theories - and to buttress their hyperbolic charge that Trump and Republicans have been the victims of what they call the "weaponization of government".
The 255-page transcript is an important document that every citizen should read. (I know, I'm being fanciful.) Smith ran circles around the GOP committee members and their staff. "Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power", Smith said at the start. He added, "Our investigation also developed powerful evidence that showed that President Trump willfully retained highly-classified documents after he left office in January of 2021, storing them at his social club, including in a ballroom and a bathroom. He then repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents."
Smith patiently explained how Trump's (alleged) crime related to January 6: "January 6th was an attack on the structure of our democracy in which over 140 heroic law-enforcement officers were assaulted. Over 160 individuals later pled guilty to assaulting police that day. Exploiting that violence, President Trump and his associates tried to call Members of Congress in furtherance of their criminal scheme, urging them to further delay certification of the 2020 election."
This is an accusation that sums up Trump's perfidy: He tried to take advantage of this spasm of cop-beating violence to illegally remain in office. That foul deed should have disqualified Trump from ever holding any position of authority. Yet…
A key exchange occurred when a Republican staffer (whose name is redacted in the transcript) asked, "The President's statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud, those certainly are statements that are protected by the First Amendment, correct?" This has been a central contention of the Trump cult: You cannot prosecute Trump for stating his opinion that the election was rigged against him. But Smith fired back: "Absolutely not. If [these false statements] are made to target a lawful government function and they are made with knowing falsity, no, they are not." Statements made to promote a fraud are not protected by the First Amendment.
Later on in his testimony, Smith remarked that the elections case against Trump was much like an "affinity fraud" - that's when, he said, "you try to gain someone's trust, get them to trust you as a general matter, and then you rip them off, you defraud them." Trump, he told the committee, “had people…who had built up trust in him, including people in his own party, and he preyed on that." And once again, Smith reiterated, fraud is not covered by the First Amendment.
This Republican staffer took another shot at it and said, "There's a long history of candidates speaking out about they believe there's been fraud [in an election]…I think you would agree that those types of statements are sort of at the core of the First Amendment rights of a Presidential candidate, right?"
Not at all, Smith replied: "There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case. As we said in the indictment, he was free to say that he thought he won the election. He was even free to say falsely that he won the election. But what he was not free to do was violate federal law and use knowingly-false statements about election fraud to target a lawful government function. That he was not allowed to do. And that differentiates this case from any past history."
The Republicans kept trying to mount a theoretical defense for Trump. This staffer pointed out that during the hullabaloo over the 2020 election, Trump was receiving information on supposed election fraud from Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark, and Sidney Powell, and he asked, wasn't Trump just "regurgitating what these people have told him?"
Smith had a sharp retort: "No. And, in fact, one of the strengths of our case and why we felt we had such strong proof is all witnesses were not going to be political enemies of the President. They were going to be political allies. We had numerous witnesses who would say, 'I voted for President Trump. I campaigned for President Trump. I wanted him to win.' The speaker of the house in Arizona. The speaker of the house in Michigan. We had an elector in Pennsylvania, who is a former Congressman who was going to be an elector for President Trump, who said that what they were trying to do was an attempt to overthrow the government - and illegal. Our case was built on, frankly, Republicans who put their allegiance to the country before the party."
Call 911. There was a murder in this Capitol Hill office, as Smith decimated the various lines of defense Trump's handmaids hurled at him. He forcibly denied Trump's indictments were political acts or that his office had been "weaponized". In an exchange with Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), he explained the importance of his investigation:
Jayapal: "What happens if there is election interference and the people who are responsible for that are not held accountable?"
Smith: "It becomes the new norm, and that becomes how we conduct elections."
Jayapal: "And so the toll on our democracy, if you had to describe that, what would that be?"
Smith: "Catastrophic!"
The Smith transcript generated headlines…for a day. Like most everything else in our information hypersphere, this story did not have much staying power. Trump's attempt to blow up the constitutional order has become old news. Ho-hum. He got away with this allegedly criminal act because he won the election. His pardons of the violent criminals who attacked hundreds of cops is just one item on a long list of outrages that quickly come and go. Many Americans, it seems, couldn't hold on to a clear memory of January 6 for even a few years - or couldn't be bothered to.
A high-profile public appearance in which Smith vigorously presented the case against Trump might not at this point change the overall public perception of Trump's attempted power grab and the violent raid he triggered. But that would have drawn more attention and served the truth. Which is why Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the chair of the committee, and his fellow Republicans made damn sure that did not happen.
---
Today is the fifth anniversary of January 6 - a shameful day in American history. And in the last election, the nation - or about half of its voters - welcomed back into the house the arsonist who tried to burn it down. The past 10 years have sadly showed us that a wannabe authoritarian in the United States can succeed in denying reality and wiping away history. Trump did that with the Russian attack on the 2016 election, which he aided and abetted by echoing Vladimir Putin's false claims that Moscow had not intervened and by insisting ad nauseum that it was a hoax. And he has done the same with January 6, hailing it a "day of love" and "a beautiful day" and calling the rioters "great patriots".
This demonstrates how susceptible people can be to what the Party did in "1984": Erase the past (even the most recent past) and then erase the erasure.
Trump is back in the White House, pushing his agenda of authoritarianism far beyond what he could only dream of during his first term. Future historians - if there is history in the future - will wonder about much in this era. But what might puzzle them the most is how the man who nearly annihilated our constitutional republic was able to worm his way back into the presidency. Gore Vidal once referred to the nation as the "United States of Amnesia". On this dark anniversary, it's good to remember that Trump is in power today because there's been too much forgetting.
[In addition to Trumputin-and-friends belittling and stifling this Justice Department report as described, it's now obvious that Trumputin-and-friends already had secret knowledge of his very-diverting attack on Venezuela, only two nights after they released their redacted version.]
NEW: Thom Hartmann: This Brutal Doctrine Explains What Trump's Done To America - And What's Coming Next. (Raw Story, January 6, 2026)
When Donald Trump and the buffoons who surround him invaded Venezuela and captured Nicolás Maduro, they broke with almost a century of American-led respect for the international rule of law and, instead, nakedly embraced the Putin Doctrine.
There was a brief, shining moment when Russia was a democracy. I visited there at the time. Starting with Mikhail Gorbachev and lasting about a decade, Russia embraced the ideals of the European Enlightenment, which itself was inspired by the North American colonists' contact with Native American tribes who had been practicing democracy for millennia.
Then Vladimir Putin came along, began suing media outlets and large law firms into bankruptcy so his oligarch buddies could take them over, packed the courts and rigged the elections, and finally outlawed dissent, calling dissenters "the enemy within" and "domestic terrorists".
ALSO READ: "Destined To Repeat": J6 documentary's stark warning as America tries to forget.
Instead of power flowing from the people up, it began to flow from Putin down, turning the Russian democracy into an autocracy, functionally a dictatorship with the patina of democracy because they still have elections.
Putin, via an oligarch named Oleg Deripaska, gave a man named Paul Manafort $10-Million in 2005 to install a Putin-friendly president (Viktor Yanukovych) in Ukraine as the first step to essentially turning that country into a vassal state, the way they'd already done with Belarus, Chechnya, Georgia, Transnistria, Syria, and Kazakhstan.
When, in 2014, the Ukrainian people threw out Yanukovych and voted for democracy, Putin invaded and seized Crimea, one of the most-strategically-important parts of the country (and where my daughter went to college), a preface to his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine proper.
With this was born the Putin Doctrine:
1. Russia's policy decisions, both foreign and domestic, are dictated by Putin's whims, not by the will of parliament (the Duma), or what's best for the country or its people. He protects and enriches his family and friends while punishing his enemies.
2. The rule of law internationally is irrelevant to the new Russian state; instead, "might makes right". If another country has something you want, or you don't like the way it's being run, just invade, or send millions of bots and internet trolls via social media to disrupt its society and politics (see: Brexit and Trump 2016).
3. The world is now multipolar, with the “great powers” of Russia, China, and the United States having final say in political and military activity in their regions regardless of objections from local governments. Russia will control Eurasia and eventually all of Europe; China will control Asia and eventually Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea; and the US will be the ultimate power in the Americas, both North, South, and Central.
Manafort, meanwhile, came back to America and ran Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign for "free", while shuttling insider political information for Russian intelligence to exploit with social-media trolls and paid podcasters.
While there have been times in America's past when we've flirted with this sort of world-view, it's never been made official US policy. Even when we've attacked other resource-rich countries, we've at least provided an excuse grounded in "making the world safe and advancing democracy".
That's because the United States, both internationally and domestically, used to stand for the principles of the European Enlightenment.
They included the idea that:
- democracy was the natural state of humanity, ordained by what Thomas Jefferson called "Nature's God";
- that power would be diffused across three co-equal government branches; and
- that the public good would take precedence over the desires of the president's or politicians' friends.
The Putin doctrine - fully adopted by Trump and his lickspittles with his media lawsuits, the invasion of Venezuela, and his National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7) that identifies Democrats and anti-ICE protestors as potential domestic terrorists - tears all that down.
Trump's adoption of the Putin Doctrine ignores our history of democracy at home and the promotion of democracy abroad, saying instead that whoever has the stronger military rules the region. It abandons the "rules-based order" that the United Nations proclaimed in the 1950s - which has prevented another world war for 81 years - and says instead that, if you can successfully capture the head of a foreign state (no matter how good or bad he or she may be), you should simply go ahead and do it.
Adolf Hitler was following his own version of the Putin Doctrine when he invaded Czechoslovakia and then Poland, kicking off World War II. The oligarchs of the Old South were following it when their Confederate Army commenced the bombardment of Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina, on April 12, 1861. And now Trump has made America officially embrace it.
Our Founders never envisaged a future where an entire political party would be captured by a small group of oligarchs, politically-led by a demagogue, who would then abandon the ideals expressed in the Declaration and the Constitution.
As Dan Sisson and I document in "The American Revolution of 1800: How Jefferson Rescued Democracy from Tyranny and Faction", America's Founders considered the demagogue part of the equation, but thought Congress and the Courts would protect the nation; they never imagined that six corrupt Supreme Court justices would rewrite the Constitution to give a president immunity for all crimes committed in the Oval Office, after making legalized political bribery the official policy of the country.
As Christopher Armitage points out, about the only government institutions that are trying to preserve democracy in America now are the Blue states. And they have considerable power, because Trump can't pardon state-based prosecutions even when they're against officials in his own federal government.
Now that the Trump regime:
- has seized almost-complete control of the GOP,
- has its friends in charge of most of our major media and law firms,
- has corrupted our federal justice system,
- has deployed masked secret police across the country, and
- is challenging voters' rights at multiple levels,
America needs the Blue states to get more coordinated, to push back against MAGA's Putin-like behaviors in Red states.
Each of us who lives in a Blue state has an obligation to reach out to our state's politicians and demand that they stand up to this corrupt, illegitimate regime. As Armitage notes, we must push them to:
- Prosecute federal officials who commit assault, kidnapping, or civil-rights violations in your state.
- Build public revenue streams that don't depend on federal funding.
- Expand state safety nets to catch the people federal cuts will drop.
- Demonstrate what good governance looks like.
The differences between the quality of life in oligarch-run Red states and Democratic-run Blue states have become so conspicuous that it's amazing they're not more-widely known:
- Blue states account for about 71% of America’s GDP, whereas Trump-supporting Red states only produce 29% of our income and wealth.
- The median family income in Blue states is $74,243. In Red states it's $63,553. Individual states highlight the disparity: New Jersey's median income is $89,703, while Mississippi's is $49,111.
- Counties that voted for Biden in 2020 are better educated, with 36% of their population having some college education compared to Trump's counties at 25%.
- Residents of Blue states live 2.2 years longer, on average, than residents of Red states.
Republican/oligarch-controlled Red states, almost across the board, have higher rates of:
- Spousal abuse
- Obesity
- Smoking
- Teen pregnancy
- Sexually-transmitted diseases
- Abortion (at least before Dobbs; now it would be "forced births")
- Bankruptcies and poverty
- Homicide and suicide
- Infant mortality
- Maternal mortality
- Forcible rape
- Robbery and aggravated assault
- Dropouts from high school
- Divorce
- Contaminated air and water
- Opiate addiction and deaths
- Unskilled workers
- Parasitic infections
- Income and wealth inequality
- Covid deaths and unvaccinated people
- Federal subsidies to states (“Red State Welfare”)
- People on welfare
- Child poverty
- Homelessness
- Spousal murder
- Unemployment
- Deaths from auto accidents
- People living on disability
- Gun deaths
America stands at a crossroads, as the Trump regime moves us closer every day to replacing our democracy altogether with a Russia-like federal autocracy.
There's no Abraham Lincoln in charge of our government, so it falls to us and our Blue states to enforce the rule of law, stand up for democracy, and show the skeptics and "dark-enlightenment" billionaire Tech Bros that the will of the people still matters here.
That doesn't require waiting for the election this Fall or in 2028; it just needs the governors and administrations of the Blue states to stand up against Trump's embrace of the Putin Doctrine and preserve what's left of our democratic traditions.

Ballotpedia has a good site at <https://ballotpedia.org/States#State_governments>, where you can drill down to the contact information for your state's elected officials to let them know you want them to push back hard.
Good luck: The fate and future of the American Experiment may well rest in your hands.
[Well said! And that's why we call him tRUmPUtin.]

Robert Davis/Raw Story: Republicans Officially Rebuke Trump's Efforts To Change Kennedy Center's Name. (MSN News, January 5, 2026)
Republicans put one of President Donald Trump's most significant goals on ice today, by refusing to change the John F. Kennedy Center's name officially.
Trump has been trying for months to rebrand the Kennedy Center as the "Trump-Kennedy Center", a move that has caused a swarm of musicians to boycott the acclaimed concert hall. He has affixed his name to the building's exterior, although officially changing the name requires an act of Congress because the center was created by federal law.
Republicans had a chance to make that change in the most recent appropriations bill for the Department of the Interior, which has some say in the center's operations. However, Republicans rebuffed Trump by leaving out any provisions that would officially change the name, Matt Rice, Washington correspondent for The New York Sun, reported today. The move happened at a time when Trump's base had fractured over several recent scandals.
NEW: D. Earl Stevens: America's Most Dangerous Enemy Sits At Its Very Heart. (Raw Story; January 5, 2026)
The only United States President in history to violently attack his own country and attempt a coup to stay in power, was always going to be a threat to illegally attack other countries like Venezuela, and destabilize the entire world.
This was the greatest fear when Donald J. Trump was recklessly re-elected in 2024, by a slim majority of voters in a battered country that is split apart at the seams and gasping for air.
Trump, of course, promised these people he'd fix 90% of our problems on Day One, and has instead doubled and tripled them, while officially becoming the most dangerous problem the United States has ever had to grapple with.
He is a madman with:
- the most powerful military in the world under his fat little thumb,
- a blank check from a Republican Congress which has surrendered its powers,
- and a bought-off conservative Supreme Court that has lost its honor.
[And that's just the beginning!]
The Trump Report/Fergus Macphee, with Scott Lucas: It's Time To Take Trump's Global Threats Seriously. (35-min. video; Times Radio, January 5, 2026)
Professor of International Politics Scott Lucas tells Times Radio's Fergus Macphee why interim Venezuelan leader Delcy Rodriguez, and Donald Trump's threat towards her matter. They also discuss whether the U.S. President's ambitions will stop with Venezuela, and how other world leaders could respond.
The Associated Press: Holocaust-Survivor Eva Schloss, The Step-Sister Of Anne Frank, Dies At 96. (photo, podcast, links; NPR News, January 5, 2026)
LONDON - Auschwitz survivor Eva Schloss, the step-sister of teenage-diarist Anne Frank and a tireless educator about the horrors of the Holocaust, has died. She was 96.
The Anne Frank Trust UK, of which Schloss was honorary president, said she died Saturday in London, where she lived.
Britain's King Charles III said he was "privileged and proud" to have known Schloss, who co-founded the charitable trust to help young people challenge prejudice. "The horrors that she endured as a young woman are impossible to comprehend and yet she devoted the rest of her life to overcoming hatred and prejudice, promoting kindness, courage, understanding and resilience through her tireless work for the Anne Frank Trust UK and for Holocaust education across the world", the king said.
[May her - and her step-sister's - good work live on, and help to civilize our troubled "civilization".]

Trump Attacks Venezuela:
U.N. Warns That U.S. Strikes in Venezuela May Violate International Law, Risk Wider Instability. | AC1G (8-min. YouTube video; DRM News, January 5, 2026)
UN Under-Secretary-General Rosemary DiCarlo warned the UN Security Council that U.S. strikes in Venezuela and the capture of Nicolás Maduro risk violating international law and destabilising the region. Speaking on behalf of Secretary-General António Guterres, she urged respect for the UN Charter and a peaceful democratic path forward.
Jeffrey Sachs Blasts U.S. Power Grab Over Venezuela and Maduro Capture, at Historic U.N. Meeting. | AC1G  (9-min. YouTube video; DRM News, January 5, 2026)
Economist and UN-adviser Jeffrey Sachs delivered blistering remarks at an emergency UN Security Council meeting, condemning U.S. strikes on Venezuela and the capture of Nicolás Maduro and his wife. Sachs warned of U.S. "hegemonic power grabs", urging the Council to defend the UN Charter and international law.
Jaclyn Diaz and Jasmine Garsd: Maduro And Wife Plead Not Guilty To Narco-Terrorism Charges. (photos, podcast; NPR Breaking News, updated January 5, 2026)
Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro and his wife, politician and attorney Cilia Flores, made their first court appearance at a federal court in New York City this (Monday) afternoon, when they both pleaded not guilty to all charges.
Maduro is facing charges of narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine-importation conspiracy and weapons charges. Flores and other senior Venezuelan officials, including Maduro's son, are also facing charges.
U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein is overseeing the proceedings. Monday's hearing lasted less than an hour, with both Maduro and Flores submitting their pleas.
It's one of the first times the now-former head of the Venezuelan state has been seen publicly since the U.S. attacked Caracas, captured Maduro and his wife, and brought them to the U.S. over the weekend to face charges.
Maduro greeted people in the courtroom with "Happy New Year" as he entered. During the proceedings, he introduced himself as the president of Venezuela as well as a prisoner of war. Flores introduced herself as first lady of Venezuela. Her right eye appeared swollen and her forehead was bandaged in what may be injuries sustained during the U.S. military operation. Maduro's defense requested X-rays and medical attention for what they said may be a broken or bruised rib, which they say was sustained during the military operation.
A heckler stood up in court to say, "You will pay in the name of the Venezuelan people." Maduro turned to face him and responded, "I am a man of God."
Outside the courtroom, crowds gathered and emotions were high. Protesters played drums and sang the Venezuelan national anthem. Some who opposed the Trump administration's actions demanded the U.S. release Maduro. Others decried harsh conditions for Venezuelans under Maduro.
Maduro and Flores were captured in their Caracas compound in a surprise U.S. military operation Saturday. The same day, the U.S. Justice Department released a 25-page indictment that accuses Maduro and his allies of importing thousands of tons of cocaine into the U.S. with protection from Venezuelan law enforcement. It alleges Maduro provided drug traffickers with diplomatic passports and partnered with drug cartels to send cocaine to the U.S. via points in the Caribbean and Central America. The indictment claims Maduro began drug trafficking into the U.S. as early as 1999.
In a post on X this past weekend, Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote that Maduro and his wife "will soon face the full wrath of American justice on American soil in American courts."
Maduro is being represented by Barry J. Pollack, a leading trial attorney in the U.S. whose high-profile clients include Julian Assange and Enron executives. Pollack didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Flores is being defended by Mark Donnelly, a Houston-based attorney who specializes in white-collar criminal defense. In a statement sent to NPR Donnelly said, "Our client is in good spirits. We look forward to reviewing and challenging the evidence the government has. While we would love to present our side now, we will wait to do so in court at the appropriate time. The first lady is aware that there is a long road ahead and is prepared."
The next court date is March 17th. If convicted, Maduro and his wife could face life in prison.
Brian Tyler Cohen, with Pod Save The World co-hosts (served on President Obama's ??) Tommy Vietor and Ben Rhodes: No Lie episode 301: Trump Dealt BAD NEWS After Venezuela Invasion. (47-min. YouTube video; YouTube, January 4, 2026)
Trump plunges the United States into a new regime-change war in Venezuela to start off the new year.
[Another excellent analysis of Trump's craziest and most-risky escalation yet. Are Congressional Republicans about to stop supporting Trumputin and his cronies?]
NEW: David Feldman: Trump Says He'll Run Venezuela. Here's Why He's NUTS! (61-min. YouTube video; The Mop-Up, January 4, 2026)
Pod Save The World: Breaking: Trump Invades Venezuela. (51-min. podcast; Crooked.com, January 3, 2026)
Gabriel Rubin: U.S. Raid On Venezuela Threatens New Global Ruptures. (Reuters, updated January 3, 2026)
The United States has long waged deadly interventions among its neighbors in the Western Hemisphere. Its latest, this morning's shock raid on Venezuela and the seizure of autocratic ruler Nicolás Maduro, is particularly brash. The country is already in a state of near-collapse, its economic output falling by roughly 70% since 2013. Yet the Trump administration's move to decapitate its leadership risks further worsening a crisis that has already displaced 8-million refugees, perhaps magnifying it by destabilizing ally Cuba. It is an ominous harbinger of further jockeying by global superpowers, promising yet more conflict.
Annie Paul: Ricardo (@Ric_RTP): PETRODOLLARS? The Capture Of Venezuela. (repost from X (eX-Twitter); January 3, 2026)
- Annie says: This seems to me the most-plausible explanation for the U.S. interference in Venezuela…what a way to enter 2026. SMH.
- Ricardo (@Ric_RTP) is the author of this important article.
- D&J thank Ricardo for the article, and Annie for re-posting it to a trusted site on Substack. And now, the start of the article:
PETRODOLLARS? The Capture Of Venezuela.
The real reason the U.S. is invading Venezuela goes back to a deal Henry Kissinger made with Saudi Arabia in 1974. And I'm going to explain why this is actually about the SURVIVAL of the U.S. dollar itself. Not drugs. Not terrorism. Not "democracy". This is about the petrodollar system that has kept America the dominant economic power for 50 years. And Venezuela just threatened to end it.
Here's what really just happened:
Venezuela has 303-billion barrels of proven oil reserves. The largest on Earth. More than Saudi Arabia. 20% of the entire World's oil.
But here's the part that matters:
Venezuela was actively selling that oil in Chinese yuan. Not dollars. In 2018, Venezuela announced it would "free itself from the dollar". They started accepting yuan, euros, rubles, anything BUT dollars for oil. They were petitioning to join BRICS. They were building direct payment channels with China that bypass SWIFT entirely. And they were sitting on enough oil to fund de-dollarization for decades.
Why does this matter?
Because the entire American financial system is built on one thing: the petrodollar.
[Read the rest of Ricardo's important article - at Annie's website (above)!]
PBS News Weekend: Maduro Captured. (first 13-min. of 27-min. YouTube video; PBS.org, January 3, 2026)
Trump says the U.S. will indefinitely run the country of Venezuela after the military's capture of Nicolás Maduro. Some Venezuelans celebrate the U.S. operation, while others worry about what comes next.
[Others? Many Venezuelans and others must be doing both!]
David Frum Show/Bonus Episode: Anne Applebaum: How Is Trump Planning to "Run" Venezuela? (29-min. YouTube video; MS Now, January 3, 2026)
David Frum is joined by The Atlantic's Anne Applebaum to react to the news of the American raid and capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Heather Cox Richardson: How The U.S. Taking Out Maduro Matters To The World. (33-min. YouTube video; HCR YouTube, January 3, 2026)     
Rachel Maddow: Her Early Reaction To President Donald Trump's Strike On Venezuela And Capture Of Venezuelan President Maduro. (16-min. YouTube video; MS Now, January 3, 2026)
Philip Wegmann: Trump's Venezuela Gamble And America's Shifting National-Security Strategy. (RealClear Politics, January 3, 2026)
President Donald Trump has embarked on his own regime-change mission. And this time the United States intends to keep the oil.
American Special Operations Forces captured Nicolás Maduro in a daring raid, nabbing the Venezuelan leader from his bed early this (Saturday) morning before sending him north aboard the USS Iwo Jima to New York, where he will face criminal charges related to an alleged narco-terrorism conspiracy. The leftist strongman had ruled the South American state for more than a decade.
Now Trump will take over. "We're going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition", he told reporters during a Mar-a-Lago press conference, deputizing Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to manage in the interim as "a team".
Though long a critic of the foreign entanglements that defined the presidencies of his Republican predecessors, Trump insisted he could do regime change right. "We'll run it properly. We'll run it professionally", he said. "We'll have the greatest oil companies in the world going in."
Trump will not, however, clean house. He claimed Delcy Rodríguez, a Maduro loyalist and the current Venezuelan vice president, was already willing to work with the United States to remake the country. He said it would be "very tough" for opposition leader María Corina Machado to assume power.
Just hours after perhaps the most-consequential decision of his tenure, the once-ostensibly-isolationist president was suddenly and remarkably open-ended in his commitment to rebuild a nation thousands of miles away from his own. Of a potential American occupation force, Trump said, "We are not afraid of boots on the ground."
While Attorney General Pam Bondi characterized the operation as "an arrest with military support", Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie wondered how that legal characterization applied to Trump’s promise to take over and run the country. That question will soon be litigated on Capitol Hill, though Democrats don't have the numbers, nor Republicans the appetite, to check the White House.
Trump has offered different condemnations of Maduro at different times. He first condemned him as being complicit in the drug trade that brought "poison" to American shores, then reproached the authoritarian as a puppet of foreign adversaries, before finally flaying his regime for the nationalization of American oil producers in the region.
Perhaps a combination of those irritants has inspired Trump's latest foreign-policy evolution. Once averse to intervention, he now welcomes the opportunity to rebuild a regime immediately after he removed its leadership. He remains consistent on at least one count. After criticizing the Bush administration for not turning a profit in the War on Terror, Trump seems hell-bent on avoiding that same mistake. He said that U.S. energy companies would rebuild the nation as they return to Venezuela and seek new revenue streams. Any costs incurred would quickly be deferred by the new oil revenue, or what the president described as "the money coming out of the ground".
Even if the newly-announced nation-building mission may be something of a flashback to the invasion and occupation of Iraq, Trump did not echo language of the War on Terror. He spoke for nearly an hour [taking dishonest jabs at others and often repeating himself - after arriving a half-hour late, and dozing while others spoke]. Not once did the president, or his assembled people, say the word "democracy".
Trump's Public Announcement Of His Overnight Sneak-Attack On Venezuela (93-min. YouTube video, but first 34-min. is an empty podium; PBS News, January 3, 2026)


NEW: Alex Brandon and Bilal Hussein/Associated Press: Trump Vows To "Rescue" Iran's Protesters. Iran Warns The U.S. To Stay Out Of it. (NPR News, January 2, 2026)
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - U.S. President Donald Trump and top Iranian officials exchanged dueling threats today as widening protests swept across parts of the Islamic Republic, further escalating tensions between the countries after America bombed Iranian nuclear sites in June.
At least seven people have been killed so far in violence surrounding the demonstrations, which were sparked in part by the collapse of Iran's rial currency but have increasingly seen crowds chanting anti-government slogans.
The protests, now in their sixth day, have become the biggest in Iran since 2022, when the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini in police custody triggered nationwide demonstrations. However, the demonstrations have yet to be countrywide and have not been as intense as those surrounding the death of Amini - who was detained over not wearing her hijab, or headscarf, to the liking of authorities.
Trump initially wrote on his Truth Social platform, warning Iran that if it "violently kills peaceful protesters", the United States "will come to their rescue". "We are locked and loaded and ready to go", Trump wrote, without elaborating.
Shortly after, Ali Larijani, a former parliament speaker who serves as the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, alleged on the social-platform X that Israel and the U.S. were stoking the demonstrations. He offered no evidence to support the allegation, which Iranian officials have repeatedly made during years of protests sweeping the country. "Trump should know that intervention by the U.S. in the domestic problem corresponds to chaos in the entire region and the destruction of the U.S. interests", Larijani wrote on X - which the Iranian government blocks. "The people of the U.S. should know that Trump began the adventurism. They should take care of their own soldiers."
Georgism (Wikipedia; posted here January 2, 2026)
"Free trade, free land, free men!" Georgism, in modern times also called Geoism, and known historically as the single-tax movement, is an economic ideology holding that persons should own the value that they produce themselves, while the economic rent derived from land - including from all natural resources, the commons, and urban locations - should belong equally to all members of society. Developed from the writings of American economist and social reformer Henry George, the Georgist paradigm seeks solutions to social and ecological problems based on principles of land rights and public finance that attempt to integrate economic efficiency with social justice.


Emma Lazarus, Author Of "The New Colossus" (original manuscript, images, links; Wikipedia, posted here January 2, 2026)
Emma Lazarus
(July 22, 1849 – November 19, 1887) was an American author of poetry, prose, and translations, as well as an activist for Jewish and Georgist causes. She is remembered for writing the sonnet "The New Colossus", which was inspired by the Statue of Liberty, in 1883. Its lines appear inscribed on a bronze plaque, installed in 1903, on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty. Lazarus was involved in aiding refugees to New York who had fled anti-semitic pogroms in eastern Europe, and she saw a way to express her empathy for those refugees in terms of the statue.
Heather Cox Richardson: U.S. Immigration, Ellis Island, The Statue Of Liberty And More...
(Letters from an American, January 1, 2026)
On January 1, 1892, seventeen-year-old Annie Moore walked down the gangway from the steamship Nevada with her two brothers Anthony, eleven, and Philip, nine, and into history as the first person processed through the newly-opened Ellis Island Immigrant Station. The establishment of a federal facility for processing immigrants had been a long time coming. Between 1892 and 1954, when Ellis Island closed, more than 12-million immigrants would come through the facility on their journey to the United States.
Immigrants arrived at Ellis Island after a two-week journey from Europe. After entering New York Harbor, they sailed by the Statue of Liberty on Liberty Island, dedicated just six years before the facility at Ellis Island opened. A gift to the people of the United States from the people of France, Lady Liberty stood on a broken chain-and-shackle that symbolized the abolition of slavery in the U.S., and held up a torch to the newcomers. She held a tablet that represented the law. It was engraved with "July IV MDCCLXXVI" - July 4, 1776, the date of the Declaration of Independence.
In 1965, Ellis Island became part of the Statue of Liberty National Monument, formalizing its connection to Lady Liberty and to the poem inscribed cast and mounted inside the base of the statue in 1903. Emma Lazarus turned away from the old "Colossus of Rhodes" - the giant statue of the Greek sun-god Helios that stood at the entrance to the harbor of the Island of Rhodes and was one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World - to offer the world "The New Colossus", a woman, Lady Liberty, the "Mother of Exiles":
---
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
  With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
  The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
  I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
---
[Much more online, describing what so many immigrants experienced (with major support from Abraham Lincoln and HIS Republican Party) on their first day(s) in America.]


NEW: David Pakman Show: Psychologist DROPS HAMMER: "I Think Trump Had A Stroke." (19-min. YouTube video; Substack, January 1, 2026)
Dr. John Gartner, former assistant professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and founder of Duty to Warn, joins us to discuss signs of cognitive decline in Donald Trump's second term.
Ken Klippenstein: This Insane Post Foreshadows The Year To Come: Why 2026 Is A Year For The Big, Bold And Brazen. (images; Substack, January 1, 2026)
On New Year's Eve
, the Department of Homeland Security's X account posted an illustration of a 1960s car parked on an idyllic beach. The caption (I'm not making this up) is "America After 100-Million Deportations".
A casual reference to the forcible removal of over a quarter of the country (coming from the official account of a cabinet-level department of the U.S. government!) is, of course, insane. But there's a message behind the madness, as I quickly realized after looking up some of the latest polling on DHS.
It turns out that DHS's vision of an imagined past resonates with quite a few people. Recent polling from Gallup finds that the Department is the only federal agency to see a significant increase in its job rating in 2025.
But here's the kicker: Gallup also found a huge increase in Americans' support for immigration (including among Republicans). So what explains the support for DHS but not its vision of mass deportation?
Vision
is the keyword here. People are sick of the realistic and the reasonable, because look at where it got us: houses you can't afford to buy and healthcare you can't afford to use. A mass immigration bringing back a 1960s-era country isn't really what Americans want; it's the boldness of the idea that appeals to people. They want political leaders to think big. And what's bigger than 100-million?
President Trump seems very aware of this, having taken up the occasion of the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence as an opportunity to impose his vision of where the country goes from here, with his typical penchant for grandiosity. He said in his New Year’s address: "2026 will be a celebration of America like no other, honoring our nation and all of its glory … Working with states, companies, and organizations across the country, we will renew the patriotism, pride, and pioneering spirit of America, and lay the groundwork for the next 250 years of independence and freedom."
[Democracy, tolerance, honesty and fairness are conspicuously absent.]
Trump senses people's appetite for vision and is eager to provide his own. Others in his administration are, too.
Another DHS post yesterday declared, "We will not live like this anymore" over a meme titled, "AMERICA IN 2025". It's a play on the old expectations vs. reality meme. The post says "what we expected" above an image of Jetsons-style hover cars and a rocket-powered Bass-Pro-Shop pyramid zooming through a futuristic cityscape (lol); "what we got", it then says, is an image of urban decay in Minneapolis and a misspelled sign for a "Quality Learing [sic] Center" - a reference to a government-funded child-care center in Minneapolis that has become a fixation for MAGA in recent days.
Trump's war on immigration obviously isn't going to get us any kind of utopian future (much as I'd like to ride the Bass-Pro-Shop spacecraft). But it's important to recognize that these memes speak to a bone-deep hatred people have for the realistic, reasonable, moderate center that Washington is so enamored with. The insanity is the point.
But for anyone not looking forward to this Bass-Pro-Shop, anti-immigration future, 2026 has already produced another vision rebelling against the moderate middle. Today, Zohran Mamdani was sworn in as the Mayor of New York City. As he took office, he laid his hand on a Quran - something I never thought I'd see. Bringing together an inclusive coalition around a vision of a "rent freeze" widely-mocked as unworkable and unrealistic by the punditocracy, Mamdani is a symbol of the people's yearning for the impossible. It remains to be seen if Mamdani will take on the greatest cause of our political stagnation - the national security state and its own vision of a society besieged by lurking threats - given his decision to avoid the issue entirely. He may come to see that the public is now ready for a big change here, too.
[There's more in this thoughtful article about absurd political promises.]
Mary Trump: Trump's Desperate Neediness Laid Bare. (8-min. YouTube video; Mary Trump Media, January 1, 2026)
Why Trump's craving for fake praise reveals the damage, desperation, and danger at the core of his authoritarian behavior.
NEW: Regina Davis Moss: With "Trump Babies" Remark, Republican Strategy Is Revealed. President Donald Trump's Administration Will Stop At Nothing To Ensure The Political Dominance Of White People In This Country. (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 31, 2025)
This opinion piece argues that:
- A remark by Dr. Mehmet Oz about "Trump babies" reveals a Republican strategy to ensure White political dominance. (During an Oval Office press conference on November 6, 2005 announcing the lowering of fertility-drug costs, the former talk-show host and heart-surgeon–turned–Trump's-administrator for the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said: "We've dropped [the price of] infertility drugs to make lots of Trump babies, I'm hoping by the midterms.")
- This strategy includes voter suppression, undermining reproductive justice, and incentivizing births among "traditional families".
- The article flags a demographic shift: the non-White population is projected to become the majority in the U.S. by 2045.
- Policies - like gutting Medicaid and social safety nets - disproportionately affect the ability of women of color to have children.
[Starting wars (say, in Venezuela three days after this article) and disproportionately driving young adults of color to enlist could also align with this analysis. On January 3, Trumputin also appears to have personally loaned the U.S. Armed Forces (and Venezuela!) to his oil-company cronies - and omitted mention of (while accelerating!) Global Climate Change.]
NEW: Francesca Ebel: As Russia's War Grinds On, Its Society Is Fraying. (Washington Post, December 30, 2025)
The Kremlin presents the country as strong, united and on an inevitable path to victory. But as peace negotiations drag on, Russian society is deteriorating.
Robert Reich: Sunday Thought: The Reckoning. (Robert Reich, December 28, 2025)
Sometimes a nation needs a nightmare before it can fully awaken to long-simmering crises.
Martin Luther King Jr. mobilized the nation against racial injustice by making sure almost everyone in the United States saw its horrors - on the nightly news, watching peaceful Black people getting clubbed and arrested for exercising their rights. Were it not for that painful national exposure to racist brutality, we wouldn't have gotten the Civil Rights Act or the Voting Rights Act.
Something similar happened in the first years of the 20th Century, when muck-raking journalists revealed the monopolies, corruption, and public-be-damned arrogance of the robber barons. Were it not for that painful national exposure, we wouldn't have gotten the reforms of the Progressive Era.
A similar dynamic is playing out as Americans witness the nightmare of Trump's neo-fascism: its mindless cruelty, blatant attempts to silence critics, wanton destruction of much of our government, open racism and misogyny.
Trump has revealed himself in ways his first-term handlers wouldn't allow:
- a sociopath who posts AI cartoons showing himself shitting on millions of Americans who marched against him.
- A malignant narcissist unable to respond to the tragic killings of Rob and Michele Reiner without making it all about himself.
- A chronic liar who says prices are dropping, when everyone knows they're rising.
As Americans see all this, outrage has been growing. We are beginning to mobilize - not all of us, of course, but the great majority:
- Record numbers of us marched on October 18, No Kings Day.
- Democratic candidates have won just about every recent special election and mayoral and gubernatorial contest - and a remarkable number of down-ballot races in bright-red states and cities.
- MAGA is coming apart.
- Trump's polls are tanking.
We are organizing and mobilizing with a resolve I have not seen in my lifetime.
America had to come to this point. We couldn’t go on as we were, even under Democratic presidents. For 40 years, a narrow economic elite has been siphoning off ever more wealth and power.
[There's more - in this excellent article (pin its cartoon to the wall!), and in the year to come!]
George Conway: Trump Explodes As Canada Redirects Aluminum Exports Away From The U.S. (20-min. YouTube video; Conway Media, December 24, 2025)
Canada's unexpected move to send its aluminum shipments to Europe has ignited a strong reaction from Donald Trump, raising fresh questions about trade loyalties and economic strategy. This shift signals growing tensions in North-American trade relations, and highlights how global alliances are rapidly changing.
In this video, we break down:
- why Canada made this decision,
- how it impacts the U.S. economy, and
- what it could mean for future trade negotiations.
Stay tuned for the:
- political fallout,
- economic consequences, and
- what comes next,
in this escalating trade story.
Suzanne Nuyen: New Epstein Files Mention Trump. (13-min. podcast; NPR, Up First newsletter, December 24, 2025)
The Justice Department yesterday released about 30,000 pages of new documents, including flight logs, memos and letters, related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The files contain hundreds of references to President Trump.
It's well-established that Epstein was well-connected and knew many influential figures, including Trump and former president Bill Clinton, NPR's Sarah McCammon tells Up First. She emphasizes that Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing, but notes that the documents continue to highlight the relationship between Trump and Epstein, raising questions about how much Trump knew about Epstein's activities.
Thomas L. Knapp: "Big Balls" Was Just the Beginning. (source is Vittoria Elliott/WIRED; Rational Review News Digest, December 23, 2025)
"Since the beginning of the Trump administration, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency/DOGE, the brainchild of billionaire Elon Musk, has gone through several iterations, leading periodically to claims - most recently from the director of the Office of Personnel Management - that the group doesn't exist, or has vanished altogether.
But DOGE isn't dead. Many of its original members are in full-time roles at various government agencies …. Even if DOGE doesn't survive another year, or until the U.S. semi-quincentennial - its original expiration date, per the executive order establishing it - the organization's larger project will continue. DOGE from its inception was used for two things, both of which have continued apace:
- the destruction of the administrative state, and
- the wholesale consolidation of data,
in service of concentrating power in the executive branch.
It is a pattern that experts say could spill over beyond the Trump administration."
[Also see, "Big Balls" No Longer Works for the U.S. Government. (Reader-Supported News/RPN, June 25, 2025), below.]
NEW: Anastasia Tsioulcas: It Was Called The Kennedy Center, But 3 Different Presidents Shaped It. Now, Trump Adds His Own Name To It. (2-min. podcast, photos, videos, etc.; NPR, All Things Considered, December 19, 2025)
Yesterday, the Kennedy Center's name was changed to The Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts. By this morning, workers were already changing signs on the building itself, although some lawmakers said that the name can't be changed legally without Congressional approval.
Though the arts venue is now closely-associated with President Kennedy, it was three American presidents, including Kennedy, who envisioned a national cultural center – and what it would mean to the United States.
[And none of them were named Trump.]
The Eisenhower Administration
In 1955, President Dwight D. Eisenhower first pursued building what he called an "artistic mecca" in Washington, D.C., and created a commission to create what was then known as the National Cultural Center.
Three years later, Congress passed an act to build the new venue with the stated purpose of presenting classical and contemporary music, opera, drama, dance, and poetry from the United States and across the world. Congress also mandated the center to offer public programs, including educational offerings and programs specifically for children and older adults.
The Kennedy Administration
A November 1962 fundraiser for the center during the Kennedy administration featured stars including conductor Leonard Bernstein, comedian Danny Kaye, poet Robert Frost, singers Marian Anderson and Harry Belafonte, ballerina Maria Tallchief, pianist Van Cliburn – and a 7-year-old cellist named Yo-Yo Ma and his sister, 11-year-old pianist Yeou-Cheng Ma.
In his introduction to their performance, Bernstein specifically celebrated the siblings as new immigrants to the United States, whom he hailed as the latest in a long stream of "foreign artists and scientists and thinkers who have come not only to visit us, but often to join us as Americans, to become citizens of what to some has historically been the land of opportunity and to others, the land of freedom."
At that event, Kennedy said this: "As a great democratic society, we have a special responsibility to the arts - for art is the great democrat, calling forth creative genius from every sector of society, disregarding race or religion or wealth or color. The mere accumulation of wealth and power is available to the dictator and the democrat alike; what freedom alone can bring is the liberation of the human mind and spirit which finds its greatest flowering in the free society."
Kennedy and his wife Jacqueline were known for championing the arts at the White House. The president understood the free expression of creativity as an essential soft power, especially during the Cold War, as part of a larger race to excellence that encompassed science, technology, and education – particularly in opposition to what was then the Soviet Union.
The Johnson Administration
Philip Kennicott, the Pulitzer Prize-winning art and architecture critic for The Washington Post, said the ideas behind the Kennedy Center found their fullest expression under Kennedy's successor, President Lyndon B. Johnson.
"Johnson in the Great Society basically compares the arts to other fundamental needs", Kennicott said. "He says something like, 'It shouldn't be the case that Americans live so far from the hospital. They can't get the health care they need. And it should be the same way for the arts.' Kennedy creates the intellectual fervor and idea of the arts as essential to American culture. Johnson then makes it much more about a kind of popular access and participation at all levels."
Ever since, Kennicott said, the space has existed in a certain tension between being a palace of the arts and a publicly accessible, popular venue. It is a grand structure on the banks of the Potomac River, located at a distance from the city's center, and decked out in red and gold inside. At the same time, Kennicott observed: "It's also open. You can go there without a ticket. You can wander in and hear a free concert. And they have always worked very hard at the Kennedy Center to be sure that there's a reason for people to think of it as belonging to them collectively, even if they're not an operagoer or a symphony ticket subscriber."
[And they want to rename its Opera House for Melania Trump...]
Deborah Mary Sophia and Timothy Gardner: Trump Media Bets On Fusion Energy With $6-Billion TAE Deal. (Reuters, December 18, 2025)
Summary:
- Deal adds fusion power to Trump family's diverse ventures.
- Trump Media to be holding company housing both firms' divisions.
- To start building world's first utility-scale fusion power plant in 2026.
- Fusion-industry reps recently met with U.S. Energy Dept. reps. U.S. President Donald Trump is getting into the fusion power business through a $6-Billion merger of his social-media firm with Google-backed TAE Technologies, announced just days after industry leaders met with U.S. Energy Department representatives to urge federal funding. The all-stock deal announced today is an ambitious bet on the power boom spurred by artificial-intelligence data-centers, and adds to the Trump family's growing roster of diverse ventures from cryptocurrency to real-estate holdings and mobile services.
After his return to office this year, Trump's close relatives have pursued ventures leveraging his political power and policy shifts. The Trump family has, for instance, amassed $Billions in crypto-related wealth as Trump throws his support behind digital financial assets. Greater support from the federal government could potentially boost the value of this investment, as well. The news put a charge into shares of the money-losing Trump Media today, sending them up 35%. The stock, popular with retail traders, had lost more than 70% of its value over the last 12 months following a big surge during the 2024 campaign. "At face value, this is a Barbenheimer mashup. Trump Media gets a dramatic new growth story tied to the AI power crunch and data-center (hyper-scaler) electricity demand, while TAE gets a fast lane to being publicly traded via an all-stock merger valued above $6-Billion", said Michael Ashley Schulman, partner and chief investment officer at Running Point Capital Advisors.
Jack Cocchiarella: OMG! Trump CAUGHT Admitting COLLAPSE After DISASTER Speech! (14-min. YouTube video; Jack Cocchiarella show, December 18, 2025)
After a news introduction by Lawrence O'Donnell, political commentator Jack Cocchiarella reacts to Donald Trump exposing his own collapse.
[As TrumPutin (a.k.a. tRUmp) continues to dismantle the USA, he also dismantles MAGA and what little is left of himself.]
Rachel Maddow: Trump Loses On Public-Health Leadership, As States Leave His "Flock Of Quacks" Behind. (10-min. video; MS NOW, December 16, 2025)
As Donald Trump fills the leadership roles of the U.S. public-health system with quacks and kooks, sane states are taking it upon themselves to employ actual experts with real public-health administration experience to make sure the public has credible guidance - even if that guidance is not coming from the federal government.
Dr. Debra Houry, former CDC official and new senior medical adviser to the California Department of Health
, talks with Rachel Maddow about this new shift in public-health authority as Donald Trump and his clown show are simply ignored.
[A sad second prize; but, as TrumPutin (a.k.a. tRUmp) continues to dismantle the USA and Congress continues to stand by, others ARE taking steps to undo some of his once-inconceivable damage.]
Court Filing Offers More Details About Trump's White House Ballroom. (1-min. video; ABC News, December 16, 2025)
The Trump administration reveals new details about the White House ballroom construction ahead of the first hearing in the lawsuit to stop the project.
Amy Goodman, DemocracyNow!: Journalist Reveals FBI Is Offering a "Bounty" for Reporting "Anti-Trump Thought". A leaked DOJ memo directs the FBI to review records from the past five years, says Ken Klippenstein. (47-min. Truthout video; Truthout, December 8, 2025)
A leaked memo by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Justice Department and FBI to compile a list of groups that may be labeled “domestic terrorism” organizations, based on political views related to immigration, gender and U.S. policy. The memo was obtained by independent investigative journalist Ken Klippenstein, who joins us to discuss how it expands on President Donald Trump's NSPM-7 directive following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, which ordered a national strategy to investigate and disrupt groups the administration claims could incite political violence. Bondi's effort targets "not just the left", but "anyone who isn't a Trump supporter", says Klippenstein of the sweeping order, which identifies targets as:
- entities expressing "opposition to law and immigration enforcement",
- support for "mass migration and open borders",
- "radical gender ideology", or
- "views described as anti-American, anti-capitalist or anti-Christian", as well as
- "hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality".
People who report extremists may be financially rewarded, and the FBI is reviewing records from the past five years, as well as the present.
[Traitors, defining traitors. "They labelled him a traitor, themselves the traitor crew, but his soul goes marching on!"]       
NEW: Chris Walker: After Failing to Win Nobel Peace Prize, Trump Is Awarded FIFA's Newly-Created "Peace Prize". Fédération Internationale de Football Association's President Gianni Infantino Described Trump As His "Close Friend" During The Award Ceremony. (Truthout, December 8, 2025)
On December 5th, FIFA President Gianni Infantino awarded President Donald Trump the first-ever "FIFA Peace Prize - Football Unites The World", an award that was created just weeks after Trump failed to win the Nobel Peace Prize. Infantino described Trump as his "close friend" during the ceremony at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., which took place during the FIFA World Cup draw.
For several weeks after the award was announced in early November, commentators have speculated that the award was a sham and would be going to Trump, given his friendship with Infantino and his visible dismay at having lost the Nobel Peace Prize.
According to the international soccer organization's website, the FIFA peace prize is granted to "individuals who, through their unwavering commitment and their special actions, have helped to unite people all over the world in peace and consequently deserve a special and unique recognition."
[Also, because TrumPutin assumed control of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in February, and offered "his friend" inappropriate free use of it (Washington Post, November 13, 2025). Well, other than the fabricated "peace prize" for himself; friends trading favors, at the public's expense.]
That [special-favor, consolation-prize] award came the same week that the U.S. Institute of Peace added Trump's name to the outside of their building, which now reads, "Donald Trump United States Institute of Peace".
Trump has frequently asserted that he is deserving of a peace prize, claiming that he has helped end multiple wars and military conflicts around the world. In reality, fact-checkers have noted that although Trump has had a hand in numerous temporary ceasefires, he has not "ended wars" or "created lasting peace" as he's claimed.
But there are many reasons why Trump may be un-deserving of a peace award. [Examples, which] likely amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity. And Trump has often encouraged violence against dissident voices, including by stating at his political rallies that he wouldn't "mind so much" if someone shot members of the press, or labeling Democratic lawmakers as "seditious" and threatening "death" as punishment.
FIFA presenting a "peace prize" is a questionable endeavor on its own, given the organization's willingness to overlook human-rights abuses in order to advance its own interests. For example, the organization has selected Saudi Arabia to host the 2034 World Cup, despite that country's documented history of human-rights violations, use of child-labor, and dangerous working conditions for foreign laborers, among other concerns.
[But, "Trump friends" DO "overlook abuses (human rights, political bribes, replacing government administrators and even Supreme Court judges with 'Trump friends') in order to advance their own interests".
And TrumPutin also is a traitor, a crook, a liar, and a great threat to our democracy. No wonder, that he is his own best friend!]
Julia Jacobs: Six Memorable Moments From The "Trump Kennedy Center" Honors. (6-min. podcast; New York Times, December 8, 2025)
During his first term, President Trump broke with precedent and steered clear of the Kennedy Center Honors, after some of the artists being celebrated criticized him.
This year's Honors were essentially the Trump Show.
Mr. Trump, who took over the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts at the start of his second term, hosted the ceremony last night (CBS will broadcast it later this month). He took an unusually-direct role in choosing the honorees.
Here are six memorable moments from the weekend of Honors-related events:
1. The president made a winking mention of a "Trump Kennedy Center".
In extolling some of the changes that he was making at the arts center, Mr. Trump feigned a slip-up, referring to "the Trump Kennedy Center - I mean, Kennedy Center". The friendly audience in the opera house erupted in laughter and applause. "I'm sorry!", the president said, holding up his hands and not looking very sorry. It wasn't the first time that the president had - perhaps half-jokingly - slipped into his remarks a new name for the decades-old cultural institution, which he took over after purging Democrats from its traditionally-bipartisan board of directors, installing himself as chairman, and replacing its longtime president with a loyalist.
2. Mr. Trump compared himself to Johnny Carson.
Mr. Trump had late-night talk show hosts on his mind. When he first took the stage, he suggested that he would try to "act like Johnny Carson". "We miss Johnny, don't we?", he said, before launching into what he described as "the most-exciting evening of this kind in a long, long time in our country."
Mr. Trump brought up one of his favorite targets: the late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, who Mr. Trump has repeatedly said should be fired from his post.
On Saturday, during a ceremony in the Oval Office in which he bestowed the honorees with medallions, Trump said: "I've watched some of the people to host - Jimmy Kimmel was horrible". (Mr. Kimmel has not hosted the Kennedy Center Honors, although he has hosted other awards shows, including last year's Academy Awards, which Mr. Trump criticized at the time. And Mr. Kimmel was one of the comedians who paid tribute to David Letterman at the honors in 2012.) Mr. Trump added, "If I can't beat out Jimmy Kimmel in terms of talent, then I don't think I should be president".
3. The president still loves "Phantom".
A pop-culture obsessive, Mr. Trump was not shy about appearing like a fan. Especially when it came to Mr. Crawford, who originated the title role in "Phantom of the Opera" in London in the 1980s. "I don't want to say how many times I've seen you in 'Phantom'", Mr. Trump told Mr. Crawford at a dinner at the State Department on Saturday. At the gala yesterday, Mr. Trump and Mr. Crawford watched from the presidential box as two singers, David Phelps and Laura Osnes, performed the musical's title song.
4. This time, the artists did not criticize Mr. Trump.
During his first term, some of the artists who were given honors at the Kennedy Center - including Norman Lear, the television producer, and Carmen de Lavallade, the dancer and choreographer - criticized Mr. Trump and said they would not attend a reception at the White House. Mr. Trump and the first lady, Melania Trump, announced that they would not participate in the honors "to allow the honorees to celebrate without any political distraction".
This time, artists and presenters either praised Mr. Trump effusively or sought to distance themselves from the politics of it all. Kelsey Grammer, who was chosen to speak at the honors in praise of Mr. Crawford, told Fox News on Saturday that Mr. Trump was "one of the greatest presidents we've ever had".
Gene Simmons of Kiss applauded the idea of having the president host the program and, in a conversation with reporters on the red carpet, even praised his plans to build a White House ballroom. "I believe the ballroom that's being built, which is going to be twice as big, that is exactly what we need - a face-lift", he said. "Have you ever been to Versailles? The American house of the people is shameful."
Mr. Trump appeared to wonder from the stage if some in the audience wouldn't be so effusive. In previewing performances by the country musicians Vince Gill, Garth Brooks and Brooks & Dunn, Mr. Trump told the guests: "They probably don't like me very much. But all I know is they're big, right? We want bigness. We don't care if they like Trump - we want bigness, right?" Garth Brooks performed at President Biden's inauguration in 2021, calling the appearance a "statement of unity" and "not a political statement".
5. As host, Mr. Trump roasted his audience.
An awards show audience is liable to become subject to some good-natured ribbing, even when it contains members of Mr. Trump’s cabinet, Kennedy Center donors and board members, corporate executives, conservative media personalities and Washington aides. "So many people I know in this audience, some good, some bad", Mr. Trump said midway through the show. "Some I really love and respect. Some I truly hate. But they're having a good time."
And when he spoke about the "persistence" of artists in his opening remarks, Mr. Trump landed more jabs. "I can say that with a lot of the members of our audience - I know so many of you, and you are persistent", he said. "Many of you are miserable, horrible people. But you are persistent, you never give up. Sometimes I wish you'd give up, but you don't."
6. The president joked about a new role next year.
With the president exerting more influence over the performing arts center, a reporter on the red carpet suggested another idea: What about Mr. Trump as an honoree? "That’s an interesting one, I haven't thought of that", the president replied, with a glimmer in his eye. "Yeah, I think I'm going to nominate myself for next year."
According To The U.S. National Park Service Website, Martin Luther King Jr. Day And Juneteenth Are No Longer Listed As Free-Admission Days. This Marks A Shift For Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Which Has Been A Free-Admission Day For Years. (National Park Service, December 6, 2025)
Changes are coming to the National Park Service's free-admission days next year, impacting when visitors can enter without paying.
According to the National Park Service website, Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth are no longer listed as free-admission days. This marks a shift for Martin Luther King Jr. Day, which has been a free-admission day for years.
In place of these days, new additions have been made. September 17, Constitution Day, and June 14, Flag Day - which is also President Donald Trump's birthday - are now among the days with waived admission fees.
Juneteenth, which commemorates the end of slavery, was only added as a free-admission day last year.
Officials noted that these free admissions will apply solely to U.S. citizens and residents.
Mike Nellis: Trump's Corrupt Pardons Are a Middle Finger to Every American. Why Cuellar's Pardon Is Different. (Endless Urgency, December 5, 2025)
I don't think there's anything angering me more right now than the corruption of the Trump administration - and the sheer brazenness of these daily deluges of pardons. Trump has already issued over 1,600 pardons. Joe Biden? Just 80. With Trump, it's literally one or two people, every day.
I want to zero in on one pardon in particular - though honestly, I could go off on dozens - and that's the pardon this week of Democratic Congressman Henry Cuellar of Texas. This one really, deeply pisses me off - because I have no idea what Trump got out of it.
I've seen some Dem influencers try to frame it like Trump's playing 4D chess - pardoning a Democrat to divide us, make us fight each other. I don't buy that for a second. Trump's not some Machiavellian genius - that's giving him 'way too much credit. It also completely glosses over the fact that Cuellar was facing trial for taking $600,000 in bribes from an oil and gas company. That's not some minor slip-up. That's serious.
Some folks have said the case against Cuellar was flimsy. Maybe. I don't know. But that's what a trial is for. Let the process play out. Let a jury decide. And I think it's important for Democrats - especially when it's one of our own - to say that out loud.
Because I don't know why Trump did this. Maybe money moved behind the scenes. Maybe there was a political angle. Maybe he just did it to screw with us. But whatever the reason, he did it - and now you've got people out here saying, "Well, look, Trump pardons Democrats, too! That's bipartisan!"
I don't give a damn what party you're in - if you're accused of a crime, you should go through the process. Same with the Epstein files. I don't care if Democrats are in there - release it all. Let the public see what the rich and powerful are doing behind closed doors. Because corruption is everywhere. It's unchecked, and it's metastasizing.
Issuing pardons without any meaningful review or explanation is extremely dangerous, because it signals that normal legal safeguards no longer apply. This kind of unchecked power reinforces the reality that we are already living under increasingly authoritarian conditions - and the more leaders get away with it, the deeper that governance style entrenches itself.
Democrats have to be willing to call that out. If we want to be taken seriously on corruption - which, by the way, should be one of the defining issues of 2026 and 2028 - we've got to own it. We've got to take on insider trading in Congress. We've got to deal with the rot inside our own house. No more ignoring it because it's inconvenient or uncomfortable.
One of the reasons Trump thrives, is because people believe the whole damn system is corrupt. That everyone's just in it for themselves. And you know what? That belief helps him. People say, "At least Trump's honest about it."
They're not wrong to feel disillusioned. And a lot of Democratic strategists know that corruption is a message that breaks through. It's a way to talk about who's winning and who's losing in Trump's America. It ties directly to issues people care about: affordability, healthcare, security, fairness. That's where we can connect.
Same goes for Epstein. The Trump administration has become a full-blown protection racket for billionaires and their well-connected buddies. And we've got to name that. But we've also got to name it when it's happening in our own damn party. No more looking the other way. Maybe Cuellar's innocent. I honestly don't know. But he never got his day in court. And that matters.
Here's my final thought: What kind of message does this send to the people at the FBI and DOJ who are actually trying to do their jobs - trying to take down bribery schemes, political corruption, drug traffickers, sexual predators? How demoralizing it must be, when Trump turns around and pardons the very people they spent years building a case against!
I think the pardon power, as it exists, needs to go. It was meant to be a fail-safe - a check on the system, when it gets something wrong. Instead, it's now the most-blatant form of institutional corruption we have.
We've got to keep calling it out. If we're serious about winning elections - about building a country where accountability and responsibility actually mean something - then this can't slide. Because this is why a third of Americans don't vote. They see a rigged game. A system where the rich and well-connected protect each other, and everyone else gets screwed.
We can't let it happen again. Not with the pardons. Not with Epstein. Not with any of it. We've got to keep the pressure on - even when it's hard, even when it's messy, even when it's one of our own.
[YES.]
Senate Votes To Prioritize Oil Over Arctic Conservation.
(Defenders Of Wildlife; December 4, 2025)
The United States Senate today approved resolutions under the Congressional Review Act to overturn previous Biden administration protections for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, clearing the way for expanded oil and gas drilling. The rollback is an all-out attack on public lands, Indigenous communities and wildlife in America's Arctic. Following the House's decision to nullify these policies, both chambers have also voted to remove protections from the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. 
"Once again, oil and gas development is taking precedence over science-based solutions for conserving wildlife and mitigating climate change. In these instances, the use of the CRA accomplishes nothing meaningful and instead harms iconic species such as polar bears, caribou, wolves and migratory birds", said Robert Dewey, vice president of government relations at Defenders of Wildlife. "In addition to threatening wildlife, severe regulatory disruption in Alaska is the inevitable result of targeted rollbacks in one of America's most-ecologically-critical regions."
Phil McKenna, Inside Climate News: Rare Win For Renewable Energy: Trump Admin Funds Geothermal-Network Expansion. A First-In-The-Nation Heating-And-Cooling Network In Massachusetts Is Set To Double In Size. (Ars Technica, December 3, 2025)
The US Department of Energy has approved an $8.6-Million grant that will allow the nation’s first utility-led geothermal heating and cooling network to double in size.
Gas-and-electric utility Eversource Energy completed the first phase of its geothermal network in Framingham, Massachusetts in 2024. Eversource is a co-recipient of the award along with the city of Framingham and HEET, a Boston-based nonprofit that focuses on geothermal energy and is the lead recipient of the funding.
Geothermal networks are widely considered among the most energy-efficient ways to heat and cool buildings. The federal money will allow Eversource to add approximately 140 new customers to the Framingham network and fund research to monitor the system's performance.
The federal funding was first announced in December 2024 under the Biden administration. However, the contract between HEET and the Department of Energy was not finalized until September 30 - and was just announced today. The agreement, which allows construction to move forward, comes as the Trump administration is clawing back billions of dollars in clean energy funding, including hundreds of millions of dollars in Massachusetts.
[Translation: TrumPutin blocked this existing funding commitment until September, when it suited his purposes to permit it - perhaps to divert attention from his total blocking of such funds until  now, perhaps because he sees a way to profit from it.]
Deadline White House, Nicolle Wallace: Rachel Maddow: "He Must Resign!", On Pete Hegseth Shifting Blame For Caribbean Boat Strikes After Backlash. (9-min. YouTube video; MS NOW; December 2, 2025)
Rachel Maddow, Host of The Rachel Maddow Show joins Nicolle Wallace on Deadline White House with:
- reaction to the Trump White House and Defense Secretary pivoting blame on the boat strikes conducted in the Caribbean, and
- what it means for the American military, with a cabinet secretary appearing to throw anybody in the United States military under the bus in order to escape accountability.
The Rachel Maddow Show, with Rep. Adam Smith: Possible War Crime Puts Trump's "Illegal Orders" Freak-Out In New Context. (10-min. YouTube video; MS Now; December 2, 2025) Rachel Maddow relays the details of a new Washington Post report that Donald Trump's secretary of defense, former weekend cable-news host Pete Hegseth, gave orders to kill everyone on board a boat he accused of running drugs to the United States, which meant finishing off the survivors of an initial strike that destroyed the boat - the literal text-book definition of an illegal order.
Rep. Adam Smith, ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee joins to discuss a new, bipartisan push to investigate Hegseth's orders.
Alexander Willis: "This Is Truly Insane": Trump Stuns With Eye-Popping Multi-Million-Dollar Purchase(s). (RawStory;
November 25, 2025)
Buried within a mountain of financial disclosures made public recently, is a potentially multi-million-dollar purchase made by President Donald Trump between August and October, a purchase that has left some critics stunned by its lack of news coverage.
"In a normal administration, this would be a huge scandal", wrote journalist and political commentator Molly Jong-Fast in a social media post today on X.
The purchase was, according to a report today from The New York Times, for between $1-Million and $5-Million worth of corporate debt of the technology company Intel. The disclosure was published amid the Trump administration's decision to secure a more than $11-Billion stake in the company, making the U.S. government hold 10% of the company's stock.
"This is truly insane", wrote journalist Ryan Grim in a social media post on X today, responding to the news.
Intel is not the only company Trump has personally invested in. Last week, reporting showed that Trump had also purchased as much as $6-Million in corporate bonds for the weapons manufacturer Boeing, a purchase made close to the company being awarded a $877-Million contract from the Defense Department.
Back in September, Trump also purchased between $500,000 and $1-Million worth of Boeing bonds. Since January, Trump has purchased, at a minimum, $185-Million worth of bonds.
These personal investments of the president continue to run in tandem with the Trump administration's unprecedented purchases of company stocks and bonds, which officials say "are being carried out in the interest of national security".
"It is an unusual new strategy that has already committed more than $10-Billion in taxpayer funds and shows little sign of slowing", wrote the Times reporter Ana Swanson in a report today. "The government's growing portfolio of corporate ownership involves minority stakes, or the option to take them in the future, in at least nine companies involved in steel, minerals, nuclear energy, and semiconductors, a New York Times analysis found. The deals were all struck in the past six months, with the bulk made in October and November."

Swinging Back Toward Democracy


Rick Wilson: Trump SHUTS DOWN His Entire Schedule As Chaos ERUPTS Nationwide! (14-min. YouTube video; America's Hope; November 27, 2025)
(For decades, Rick Wilson worked as a Republican strategist, but his outspoken criticism of Trump and Trumpism made him a leading figure in the anti-Trump Republican movement.)
All hell is breaking loose inside Donald Trump's White House. What's left of it, anyway. And Trump isn't even in the building because he knows exactly what's happening back in D.C.
The whole operation is cratering: Marjorie Taylor Green's resignation, the wave of threatened resignations behind her, the whispers about firing Cash Patel, Pam Bondi, Christy Gnome, Pete Hegseth. Take your pick from the loyalty roulette.
MAGA isn't just fractured. It's an open civil war and every day it gets a little messier for him. Which is why - at the exact moment Trump is finally taking the heat he's earned for the cognitive slide, the exhaustion, the short days, the obvious decline - he's pulling the emergency lever he always pulls: Cancel everything and hide.
That's where we are. That's how desperate it's gotten.
[One more reason to be thankful, on this Thanksgiving Day.]
Jennifer Welch: Trump's RUSSIAN COVER-UP Exposed by LEAKED Audio! JD Vance in HOT WATER! (17-min. YouTube video; IHIP News, November 26, 2025)
Trump and his cronies were caught in an obvious lie, and are trying to cover for the Kremlin.
[TrumPutin, at his putinest!]
Wajahat Ali and Lev Parnas: How Trump And The GOP Are Aligning With Putin And Betraying Our Allies. Putin Continues Playing Trump, As Steve Witkoff Is Being Sent To Affirm A "Peace Plan" Engineered In Moscow That Will Abandon Ukraine And US Allies. (40-min. YouTube video; The Left Hook, November 26, 2025)
With the rise of Trumpism and the mainstreaming of the global criminal syndicate, we've witnessed a violent insurrection, extortion, the rise of stochastic terrorism, and the unethical funding of the AI and Crypto boom.
Now, we're seeing the money laundering of dirty foreign policy in real time.
Earlier today, Bloomberg published the audio transcript of a 5-minute phone call between Trump envoy Steve Witkoff and Yuri Ushakov, a senior foreign policy adviser to Putin, in which he consulted Russians in October on how to flatter and win-over Trump. Again, Witkoff serves in the Trump Administration, which, if you've forgotten by now, is supposed to serve the best interests of the United States of America. Last week, the US presented Ukraine with a 28-point plan that seemed to have come straight from Russia, courtesy of Witkoff, who, coincidentally, has now been directed by Trump to meet Putin in Moscow.
It all comes full circle, beginning and ending with Russia, with corrupt middlemen willing to sell out democracy, human rights, and our allies to serve their financial and ideological interests.
All of this is par for the course, according to former Trump fixer Lev Parnas, who engaged in similar shady backdoor deals while helping Trump during the first Administration. Parnas has long warned to keep an eye on Witkoff, who, like Jared Kushner before him, has also secured $1.5-Billion from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.
All of the worst people in the world are drinking all of our milkshakes, and Ukraine and Eastern Europe are just their first step. Venezuela and its massive oil reserves are next, as teased out in Project 2025. Trump's extra-judicial murders of fishermen aren't just a wag-the-dog distraction from his flailing presidency, but part and parcel of a larger global plan to depose Maduro with a Trump-Putin friendly leader who is "open for business".
Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessen revealed the plot last week on Fox News: "Capital expenditure is always followed by job growth. The peace deals - we are seeing a peace dividend from that. And I think there's a very good chance that if something happens with Russia, Ukraine, if something happens down in Venezuela, that we could really see oil prices go down even more."
Lev joined me today to discuss the breaking news and how it corresponds to what his sources have been telling him regarding Putin's long game and Trump's capitulation to the world's worst authoritarians and oligarchs.
Jimmy Kimmel: Trump Hurls Insults and Pardons Turkeys. Hegseth Threatens Senator Kelly. RFK Junior Jr.'s Love Poems. (15-min. YouTube video; Jimmy Kimmel Live, November 25, 2025)
The White House is ready for Thanksgiving:
- Trump spent some time pardoning two turkeys, while bragging and ranting about his political enemies.
- The day after Thanksgiving is known to plumbers as Brown Friday.
- Hegseth opens investigation into Senator Mark Kelly, over the video reminding service members that they're not required to obey illegal orders.
- We chat with RFK Junior Jr. about his love poems.
- Since Trump seems to think that gas costs $2 a gallon, we're asking that if you see a sign that actually says that, please take a picture and post it with #Gassolini.
Thom Hartmann: Trump Broke The Law With This Horrible Threat - And It Will Be His Doom. (RawStory; November 25, 2025)
I've been feeling something unusual these past few weeks: optimism. Not naïve optimism or the kind that ignores danger, but the real optimism that arrives when you see people waking up, standing up, and refusing to bow before a lawless president who believes rules are for suckers and the Constitution is a mere suggestion rather than the foundation of our republic.
We're now governed by a man who treats legal limits as personal insults. Donald Trump doesn't just violate our nation's norms and laws; like every wannabe third-world tin-pot dictator before him, he despises the idea that any law can constrain him at all.
Trump and the spineless sycophants in his administration have rejected the entire idea of a rules-based society. He and his lickspittles are:
- turning the presidency into a throne,
- trying to transform you and me into its subjects, and
- painting as enemies anyone who insists soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen (and others in government) should follow the law.
Under Trump's neo-fascist worldview, the only "legal" act is obedience, while defiance of his whims and illegal orders is a crime. We saw this when Trump lashed out at lawmakers who reminded our military that their sworn oath is to the Constitution and not to him personally. He posted a rant about those six CIA and military veterans/lawmakers and wrote "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!", in response to their message that both history and law - including military law - require soldiers to refuse illegal orders. Then he reposted a message calling for them to be hanged.
That wasn't a rhetorical flourish: it was Trump's declaration of war on the rule of law, something so essential that it's the basis of every democracy and civilized society in history throughout the world. Instead of respecting American ideals, he's sounding more like his "good friend", the murderous dictator of Saudi Arabia (who's given Trump's family $Billions, with more $Billions on their way).
You'd think that after the My Lai massacre, the horrors committed at Abu Ghraib, and the Nuremberg trials, Americans - and Trump and those around him - would have gotten the message, but over at the Fox propaganda channel and on other right-wing media they're actually defending this obscene behavior.
It's also criminal behavior: 18 U.S. Code § 610 makes it a crime for any federal official - including the president - to use their authority to intimidate, threaten, or punish citizens for their political expression, voting behavior, or dissent. Threatening members of Congress with execution for following the law is an extreme, textbook violation.
Meanwhile, the country is learning how this un-American philosophy plays out on the ground. In cities like Charlotte, Portland, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc., masked, anonymous, secret-police-style federal agents descend without warning, kicking in doors and smashing car windows, arresting U.S. citizens, stealing people's possessions, invading trusted community spaces, shuttering businesses, and sending tens-of-thousands of students home in fear. This isn't border enforcement or public safety. It's warfare against due process and America itself. It's gotten so bad that Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and her peers are getting death and bomb threats.
Our nation’s Founders warned us that America's greatest threats to liberty would come not from abroad, but from leaders who'd try to turn our legal system and military against us. James Madison said the means used against foreign dangers, too-easily become instruments of tyranny at home. That warning wasn't theoretical: it was aimed directly at moments like this.
Yet we're also seeing something the Founders hoped for, something that echoed their heroic efforts against King George III: average Americans refusing to be cowed. People are:
- documenting abuses,
- flooding the streets in peaceful protest,
- forming rapid-response networks,
- hauling the government into court, again and again.
Ordinary citizens are doing the job Congress has been too afraid, too compromised, or too divided to do. It's the most patriotic thing happening in America today.
Which is why Trump's response to lawful dissent has been so horrific: He's demanding Saudi-style executions. He wasn't being metaphorical: he demanded actual executions (although he later pretended to walk it back). That's the language of a dictator. It's the purest expression of Trump's governing philosophy: if the law gets in his way he simply ignores it.
This isn't merely corruption. It's not even ordinary authoritarianism. It's a direct repudiation of the entire American experiment. Defiance of courts and the law is a poison that says the only legitimate authority is the will of the leader, and Trump's entire presidency has featured a non-stop campaign to replace the rule of law with the rule of Trump:
- He enriched himself in office (he's made $Billions off his position in just 10 months).
- He wielded the government as a tool of reprisal.
- He attacked judges.
- He extorted foreign governments.
- He stole government property
- and lied about it to federal investigators.
- He's using public office to reward loyalists and punish critics.
- He now presides over masked, unaccountable paramilitary raids that terrorize American communities.
The Constitution offers a clear remedy for a president who behaves like this. Impeachment isn't a political act: it's a constitutional obligation when a president becomes a danger to the Republic. And Trump crossed that line long ago. The only way to restore the rule of law is for Congress to begin impeachment proceedings immediately. Half measures are complicity. Silence is complicity. Delay is complicity.
But impeachment alone isn't enough. There must also be criminal prosecution of Trump and his co-conspirators. Real prosecution, by real prosecutors, following real evidence, for real crimes.
And while we're at it, DOGE deserves a pretty-good looking at, too. And what happened to all those government investigations of billionaire donors' companies?
Trump and those doing his bidding must face justice. His children who participated must face it. His bagmen and loyalists who broke laws to carry out his will must face it. A nation can’t heal if high office becomes a shield from justice. Equality before the law is the foundation of any functioning democracy. If we abandon that principle now, we abandon the Republic itself.
I believe we're at or very near a turning point:
- People are rising up.
- Communities are resisting.
- Judges are pushing back.
- Journalists are exposing what the administration wants hidden.
- The illusion of Trump's invincibility is cracking.
- Billionaires who believed he could terrorize the country into submission on their behalf, are discovering that Americans refuse to bow.
This country was built by people who rejected kings. It can survive this counterfeit king, too. But only if we act. Only if we insist that the Constitution still has meaning. Only if we refuse to let a lawless president redefine the rule of law as disloyalty.
Trump has declared war on the American Way. The only acceptable response is the full force of our constitutional system:
- impeachment,
- prosecution, and
- the unrelenting assertion that no man, no family, and no political movement is above the law.
I realize the political reality is that Mike Johnson won't allow such a vote in the House, and the Senate is now controlled by Republicans so timid and cowed by Trump that a GOP senator who's a physician is afraid to criticize Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
But we're only 12-months away from an election that could sweep both bodies, and we must lay the foundation now for that. That means;
- waking up as many people as possible (share this newsletter and others!),
- engaging with groups
like Indivisible, and
- supporting litigators and progressive Democrats.
We can do this. We just need resolve, passion, and to begin the hard work of reclaiming the American Way and the American Dream - as Democrats did in the 1930s and the 1960s, and both parties did to oust Nixon and imprison his cronies in the 1970s.
[So well said, that we posted it in full!]
The Best People, with Nicolle Wallace and Heather Cox Richardson: Americans Are Saying "Hell No!" To Trump Fascism - And It's Working. (50-min. YouTube video; MS NOW, November 25, 2025)
Heather Cox Richardson sees a significant realignment happening in our democracy right now. And the return of human agency. She joins Nicolle Wallace for a wide-ranging conversation on "The Best People". Cox Richardson highlights the growing conflict between the citizenry and an executive branch that shows a bent toward aristocracy over democracy, but sees progress happening right now. "Listen, there's two ways we could go. We could embrace fascism fully, which is absolutely the direction that this government is going. Or we could do what Americans before us have done and say, "hell, no!" And it certainly feels to me like that's the direction we're going.
Heather says:
- the reclaiming of Democracy is the work of everyday people and
- it's happening now in new and unseen communities,
- but cautions: "It's a process, not an instant fix".
She talks about:
- the need for an FDR moment,
- what we can learn from Abraham Lincoln's rise, and
- why Senate Republicans went underground like "a bunch of freaking moles".
You'll also see Heather turn the tables and interview Nicolle!
Jennifer Welch: MAGA Politicians HATE Trump!! MASSIVE MAGA Resignations INCOMING!? (11-min. YouTube video; IHIP News, November 25, 2025)
The Trump administration is such a national embarrassment, Republican politicians are trying to find the exit.
Jennifer Welch and Angie "Pumps" Sullivan: LEAKED Plan PROVES Trump Is OWNED By Russia! What Does The KREMLIN Have On Trump? (17-min. YouTube video; IHIP News, November 24, 2025)
Leaked Trump "peace plan" was clearly written by the Russian government and is sending MAGA into panic mode.
[TrumPutin won't like this video. Memorize and share.]
Heather Cox Richardson: A Judge Today Dismissed The Indictments Of Former Federal Bureau Of Investigation Director James Comey And New York Attorney General Letitia James, Ruling That President Donald J. Trump's Revenge Action Overstepped His Authority. Trump Plans To Appeal Immediately. (Letters from an American, November 24, 2025)
U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie of South Carolina today dismissed the indictments of former Federal Bureau of Investigation director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, ruling that President Donald J. Trump's appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia was invalid.
Trump had demanded the indictment of the two.
When he was FBI director, Comey had refused to drop an investigation into Trump's then–national security advisor Mike Flynn, who had lied to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian operative before Trump took office. James had successfully sued Trump, several of his children, and the Trump Organization for fraud, and when the interim U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia, Erik Seibert, said there was not enough evidence to indict them, Trump forced him out of office and replaced him with Halligan, a former insurance lawyer and Trump aide.
Within days, Halligan obtained a grand jury indictment for Comey, charging him with lying to Congress, and another for James, charging her with alleged mortgage fraud. As David Kurtz points out in Talking Points Memo, the indictments were widely understood to be targeted prosecutions of those Trump considered enemies.
By law, after a Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney leaves the job, the attorney general can appoint an interim U.S. attorney for 120 days. If the position still has not been filled, the right to make another interim appointment goes to the district court, which has sole authority over the position until the Senate confirms a president's nominee. This provision prevents a president from making an end run around the Senate's duty to advise and consent by making consecutive 120-day appointments.
The Trump administration attempted to thwart this law. Trump appointed Seibert the interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia on January 21, and as the 120-day deadline approached, he nominated Seibert for the position. The district judges voted unanimously to keep Siebert on as the interim U.S. attorney as his nomination proceeded. But then Siebert declined to prosecute Comey and James, and Trump forced him out, pushing Attorney General Pam Bondi to put Halligan into his place as a new interim appointment.
Today, Currie found that Halligan's appointment violated not only the law, but also the appointment clause of the U.S. Constitution, which requires the president to obtain the "advice and consent of the Senate" for such appointments. That unlawful appointment means that all of Halligan's actions undertaken as a U.S. attorney are invalid. Because she was the only prosecutor to sign off on the Comey and James prosecutions, they, too, are invalid.
After the judge's decision, Comey posted a video saying that while the case mattered to him personally, "it matters most because a message has to be sent that the president of the United States cannot use the Department of Justice to target his political enemies. I don't care what your politics are. You have to see that as fundamentally un-American and a threat to the rule of law that keeps all of us free." He called for Americans to "stand up and show the fools who would frighten us, who would divide us, that we're made of stronger stuff, that we believe in the rule of law, that we believe in the importance of doing things BY the law."
Attorney General Bondi said the government will "be taking all available legal action, including an immediate appeal". Shut down by the courts, Trump is turning to military justice to enforce his will.
[There's more - but with TrumPutin, it's all of the same pattern.]
Robert Davis: Ex-GOP Analyst Rick Wilson Issues Dire Warning About Trump After Midterm: "He Is Planning A Siege." (RawStory, November 23, 2025)
President Donald Trump appears to be staring down lame-duck status as the 2026 midterm election approaches:
- The president's overall-approval rating was at 40% today (The Economist), down 16 points from when he took office.
- Similarly, Americans have largely soured on Trump's domestic and economic policies.
- Republicans also handed Trump a stern rejection by overwhelmingly supporting legislation to force the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files (despite the administration's attempts to pressure people to vote against the bill.
But according to one ex-GOP analyst, that doesn't mean Trump's administration will be any less dangerous, even IF the GOP gets the thrashing as experts expect. Rick Wilson, a co-founder of The Lincoln Project and a former Republican strategist, argued in a new Substack essay that these issues can lead one to believe things are about to return to normal. However, Wilson warned, Trump is likely to become more dangerous as his support fades. "Trump is not planning a quiet sunset", Wilson wrote. "He is planning a siege."
The president appears to be laying the groundwork for this siege by appointing people who challenged the legitimacy of the 2020 election to key posts within the federal government. One such individual is Heather Honey, Trump's deputy assistant secretary for election integrity at the Department of Homeland Security. Honey worked for a state anti-voting group in Pennsylvania and continues to spread the debunked theory that Trump lost the 2020 election because of widespread voter fraud, according to Democracy Docket.
"Trump is already aiming the federal machine at the midterms...If you think a lame duck can't cause chaos, you didn't learn the lesson of 2020", Wilson wrote. That lame-duck period "gave Trump and his allies space to organize a coup attempt...Now imagine that same playbook with four years of institutional capture, a more radical staff, and a president who knows he can't be re-elected and doesn't care who he burns. Watch what happens in red-state legislatures and courts when Trump calls on them to throw out the election results, or when Mike Johnson declines to seat newly elected members."


Seth Meyers: MAGA Stunned After Zohran Mamdani Charms Donald Trump In The Oval Office. (11-min. YouTube video; A Closer Look; November 24, 2025)
[TrumPutin lied hard to keep him out; but now that he IS the new mayor of NYC, where Trump owns big-time property...]


PvtJarHead: Numerous Top MAGA X.COM/Twitter Accounts Revealed To Be Foreign Agitators After New-Feature Rollout. (Daily KOS, November 23, 2025)
Elon Musk's social-media site X has rolled out a new feature in an effort to increase transparency - and unwittingly revealed that many of the site's top MAGA influencers are actually foreign actors.
The new "About This Account" feature, which became available to X users two days ago, allows others to see where an account is based, when they joined the platform, how often they have changed their username, and how they downloaded the X app.
Upon rollout, rival factions began to inspect just where their online adversaries were really based on the combative social platform - with dozens of major MAGA and right-wing influencer accounts revealed to be based overseas.
Twitter users rounded up dozens of these accounts, sharing their disbelief. Some Democratic influencers rejoiced: Harry Sisson, a Gen-Z, pro-Biden creator, said, "This is easily one of the greatest days on this platform. Seeing all of these MAGA accounts get exposed as foreign actors trying to destroy the United States is a complete vindication of Democrats, like myself and many on here, who have been warning about this."
There were some rumors that Musk had disabled the feature upon seeing so many of his biggest fans unmasked, but as of today, it seems to still be intact.
Bots spreading misinformation and propaganda has been a long-running problem on Twitter, a problem that has been significantly exacerbated since Musk bought it in October 2022 and then renamed it X. Its AI chatbot, Grok, has also been found to frequently make and amplify false claims.
Some of the many articles re this new discovery:
The Daily Beast:
"Musk and MAGA are suffering a self-inflicted injury..."
New Republic: "They've spent years stoking division in America..."
The Guardian: "Now their arrogance has blown up in their faces..."
RawStory: "The hits keep coming…"
Reddit: "I've warned of shit like this before..."
[Whoops! More trouble for TrumPutin...]


Ken Klippenstein: National Security Moms Are Here. Trump's Call For Arresting Democrats Targets New Political Bloc. (Substack, November 20, 2025)
"SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!", Trump bellowed on social media today in one of his headline-grabbing attacks on Democrats. It obscures a more important issue: the rise of the national security moms.
Ever since Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill won their governor seats, the "next generation" of Democrats have declared a multi-front war against the Party old guard, yes, but also against the populist wave embodied by Zohran Mamdani. Spanberger, a former CIA officer, and Sherrill, a former Navy helicopter pilot, embody the national-security-state-alum-turned-politician that the Democratic Party has come to see as its salvation. Seen as the alternative to the anti-establishment Mamdani-types, they're cast as a return to sober, responsible, and (most importantly) predictable leadership.
Other Democrats in this mold - Senators Elissa Slotkin (former CIA) and Mark Kelly (former Navy), as well as Representatives Jason Crow (former Army), Chris Deluzio (former Navy), Maggie Goodlander (former Navy) and Chrissy Houlahan (former Air Force) - circulated a video this week urging their colleagues in the military and intelligence community to resist any unlawful orders coming down from the Trump administration. Set to soaring West-Wing-style music, the video featured these members of Congress rattling off their national security credentials before issuing a solemn call for American troops to uphold the Constitution.
Per the video:
"We want to speak directly to members of the military and the intelligence community, who take risks each day to keep Americans safe. We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now. Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk. This administration is pitting our uniform-, military- and intelligence-community professionals against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath to protect and defend this constitution. Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear: you can refuse illegal orders."
Trump responded by calling for the members to be "arrested and put on trial". "Their words cannot be allowed to stand", Trump said in a post on social media "We won't have a Country anymore!!! An example MUST BE SET. President DJT."
The incident is the highest-profile moment yet for the national security moms, a term that appeared in a Democratic-Party press release this summer. In August, the Democratic Governors Association issued a post to its website titled, "The Year of the National Security Mom". While acknowledging that national security isn't a top policy concern for voters, the post went on to argue that national security experience signals qualities that could bring the Party back to power. "Ms. Spanberger and Ms. Sherrill stand as an emerging model of leader, one whose experience combines maternal-nurturing with 'Who's your daddy?' bad-assery in a way that confounds partisan molds", the post says. "Spanberger posits that for voters sizing her up, her work at the CIA can serve as a shortcut to, 'She's tough. She's hard-working. She's thorough.'" The post declared that then-candidates for governor "Spanberger and Sherrill are the next generation of leadership" - a phrase echoed by Democratic Party leaders throughout and since the election.
Before the November elections, when asked if Zohran Mamdani was the future of the Democratic Party, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said simply: "No". Asked about Mamdani earlier this month, Congresswoman Debbie Dingell replied: "I'm going to focus on the election of Abigail Spanberger, who is clearly a moderate, as is Mikie Sherrill. Both women [have] strong military and national intelligence backgrounds."
When asked after the election if Mamdani was now the soul of the Democratic Party, Jeffries further said that that title belonged to Spanberger and Sherrill. Spanberger made clear her disdain for Mamdani when she asserted that "he wasn't a Democrat" - a puzzling remark, given that he had won the Democratic nomination.
The national-security moms have emerged as an alternative to the populist wave, as well as successors to the old guard. Internal Democratic talking points produced in response to Trump's call for them to be arrested - leaked to me from a source close to the national-security moms - provide some insight into their mindset. Put simply, it's an obsession with policies and procedures, citing the Manual for Courts Martial and the Defense Department's Law of War Manual to make the point that what they'd said was accurate and legal.
This edge-of-your-seat reading is what they want the future of politics to look like: a process-obsessed snoozefest that might make sense for a legal briefing, but not talking points for the general public.
What’s more, it's doubtful that many see the endless wars this group of politicians served in as having enhanced our national security. That's what also makes the declaration of war by the national security moms such a losing strategy if it is intended to be the rebranding of the next generation and the path to 2028. It isn't about any meaningful definition of national security - that is, making the country safer. It is about "qualifications" to run, about process and the rules, about sticking with the possible rather than the desirable, a low-risk and low-collateral-damage version of politics that people don't seem to be looking for right now. It promises stability rather than change.
I've already written about Mamdani's own salute to national security in keeping on NYPD commissioner Jessica Tisch and about how the full release of the Epstein files will get steamrolled by "national security concerns". Today's war is national security versus the people, plain and simple.
Judge Orders Trump Administration To End National Guard Deployment In Washington, DC. (1-min. AP video; AP News, November 20, 2025)
U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb concluded that President Donald Trump's military takeover in Washington, D.C. illegally intrudes on local officials' authority to direct law enforcement in the district.
NEW: Oliver Willis: So Much For Day 1: Fox News Says, "Don't Blame Trump For Awful Economy". (2-min. YouTube video of Fox News video, and Cartoon by Drew Sheneman; Daily Kos, November 19, 2025)
Trump's approval has hit a new low but, somehow, Fox News thinks it's not his fault. In a Reuters/Ipsos poll released yesterday, Trump is at 38% overall approval, the lowest rating in that poll since he returned to the White House in January. Of particular concern for respondents was Trump's handling of everyday expenses, with only 26% surveyed approving his approach to the issue.
During a segment on today’s edition of "Fox & Friends", co-host Lawrence Jones lamented the current state of affairs for Trump as "unfair". "It has only been nine months", Jones said, arguing that Trump needs more time in the presidency for his economic ideas to work. "It's kind of unfair for someone that's been there nine months, to put it all on them."
Jones' comment runs in stark contrast to Trump's own rhetoric from the 2024 campaign, where he made a roster of claims about policy that he would implement on Day 1 to address economic issues. The vast majority of those promises were broken, and Trump has squandered the growing economy he inherited from former President Joe Biden (as he did in his first term following former President Barack Obama).
The Fox host's excuses echo Speaker Mike Johnson, who said on November 6 in response to a question about rising food prices, "All of the economists have shown that food prices always go up. There's an inflationary level that's built into grocery prices."
In response to Johnson, New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani noted, "In 2024, Republicans promised to lower the cost of groceries. In 2025, they're shrugging it off, saying 'food prices always go up.'"
Prices have increased for consumers - in large part due to the tariffs that Trump has implemented, artificially-increasing costs that have been passed along to families. Trump's own Commerce Department released data today, showing that Trump's so-called Liberation-Day tariffs increased the trade deficit and reduced imports to the U.S. Trump has dismissed concerns about affordability, arguing that it is simply an issue made up by Democrats.
Simultaneously, Democrats have been winning elections by prioritizing the issue and illustrating the role of Republican policies in increasing costs for families. Democrats won races in New York City, Virginia, New Jersey, and other areas on this platform - while the Right has marched in lockstep behind Trump's failing approach. How unfair.
NEW: Lisa Needham; ICE Expands Surveillance State In New And Awful Ways. (Cartoon by Mike Luckovich; Daily Kos, November 19, 2025)
On November 12, we learned that Immigration and Customs Enforcement was going to hire bounty hunters to track down immigrants and feed them to ICE. But what if government officials made that much, much worse? Welcome to this week.
Is it a good sign of a healthy democracy if the government starts paying people to snitch on their neighbors? 404 Media is reporting that ICE is recruiting ex-military and ex-law enforcement officers to track down immigrants and feed them to ICE. For their troubles, they get $300 for every person whose address they verify and then turn over to the gaping, vicious maw of ICE. Sure, this is theoretically limited to ex-military and ex-cops, but those folks aren't still in the military or law enforcement. They're private citizens with no particular expertise, and there is certainly no reason that this can't just expand to anyone who is willing to take $300-a-pop to surveil and betray their neighbors. It's now time to just throw open the doors - and toss some cash - to anyone craven enough to do this. 404 Media found that at least one government contractor appears to be soliciting applications via LinkedIn. Wouldn't this sort of thing be more successful over at X? It's already a Nazi bar, so it seems like it would be a dandy place to find terrible people.
It's not a stretch to say that you can draw a direct line from SB8, the Texas bounty-hunter law, to this awful plan. In that instance, Texas empowered literally anyone to sue someone who aided or abetted someone obtaining an abortion. This weaponization of private actors has led to things like a dude suing his ex-wife’s friends because they may have helped her get a medication abortion.
In Texas, if the abortion bounty hunters prevail in court - and the law is written so that it is nearly certain they would do so - they get at least $10,000. Whoo! Makes that $300-per-immigrant look pretty paltry. To get your money in Texas requires a trial, but to get your ICE money, you just have to slide over some addresses.
NEW: Alix Breeden: Trump Follows Through On Promise To Destroy The Education Department. (Cartoon by Clay Jones; Daily Kos; November 19, 2025)
President Donald Trump made a promise on the campaign trail to shutter the Department of Education, and now that promise is coming to fruition.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon announced yesterday that six programs under her jurisdiction will be transferred to the Departments of State, Interior, Labor, and Health and Human Services.
"The Trump Administration is taking bold action to break up the federal education bureaucracy and return education to the states", she said in the press release. "As we partner with these agencies to improve federal programs, we will continue to gather best practices in each state through our 50-state tour, empower local leaders in K-12 education, restore excellence to higher education, and work with Congress to codify these reforms."
And, of course, since the sole purpose of education is to prepare students for the workforce, McMahon told reporters yesterday that the Labor Department will take over programs for K-12 students.
The process of tearing apart the Education Department started in March when Trump signed an executive order attempting to shut it down, which was halted because it requires congressional approval. But this hindrance was merely used as an excuse to dismantle the department from within, so McMahon got to work laying off nearly half of her department's workforce. From threatening lawsuits against universities she claims to be racial-profiling white people, to pushing the Trump administration's anti-trans agenda, McMahon has been hard at work hacking away at education from all angles.
Essentially, McMahon has been rendering her department useless to prove to Trump's buddies in Congress that it should be shut down for good. She even argued in an op-ed that, since schools were still able to run during the government shutdown, we don't need the Education Department after all. "Students kept going to class. Teachers continued to get paid. There were no disruptions in sports seasons or bus routes", McMahon wrote.
At least without an Education Department, we won’t have to hear her idiotic takes anymore.
NEW: Lisa Needham: Shady Crypto Company Doesn't "Have A Problem" With Bribing Trump. (Daily Kos; November 19, 2025)
President Donald Trump loves his bribes. He has made no secret of the fact that giving him millions of dollars - be that in the form of sham lawsuit settlements or "donations" to one of his many tacky projects - is a sure-fire way to get what you want.  And while most companies tend to shy away from explicitly saying, "Hell yeah, we’re down for bribes", Coinbase is out and proud about buying the president.  During an appearance at Axios' BFD event, Coinbase President and COO Emilie Choi was asked if the company's donation to Trump's ballroom was meant "to keep good relations with the White House". Choi didn't hesitate or qualify her answer: "Sure!" "Frankly, I don't even have a problem [with it]", she added. "I think if you go to D.C., there's a lot of buildings that need to be updated, and so if private industry has to do that, it is what it is."
We typically fix public buildings using a little thing called "taxpayer money", but that's for suckers. Trump would never know how much you love him, in that situation as just another corporate taxpayer. But if you slide him a bunch of cash directly, you can display the fealty he craves.
Even before Trump's second term began, Coinbase already knew it hit the jackpot. You see, the Biden administration had an annoying habit of trying to regulate the crypto industry. But after Trump won the 2024 election, Coinbase's top lawyer went on X to say that the regulation would “never be adopted; it is DOA with the next admin and DOA in the courts". He was right. In May, the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau withdrew the regulation.
Though that was an abstract giveaway to the entire crypto industry that just happened to benefit Coinbase, the company also got some treats directly:
- In February, the Securities and Exchange Commission helpfully dismissed its civil enforcement action against Coinbase.
- In 2023, the SEC sued Coinbase for making $Billions by acting as an unregistered broker, but it only cost Coinbase a paltry $1-Million donation to Trump's inauguration slush fund to make it disappear. Quite the bargain!
It's just common sense for the crypto folks to suck up to Trump. They get lax regulations, and they can even get a sweet pardon like Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, who received a pardon from President Donald Trump as a reward for his bribes.
For its part, Coinbase is taking a belt-and-suspenders approach. Trump has made sure that the federal government won't touch the company - as long as it keeps the cash flowing. But what if some pesky shareholders or state regulators get it in their head that they have the right to demand that Coinbase follow the law? Fortunately, there's a solution for that. Coinbase is currently incorporated in Delaware, which has long been a business hub. But Texas has recently made a play for companies to reincorporate there, promising:
- even-fewer regulations than Delaware,
- lower taxes, and
- a special business court designed to be extra friendly to businesses.
So that's where Coinbase is going.
But while all of this corruption is playing out right in the open, Coinbase still gets irked if anyone actually points it out. When Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut said that the crypto industry's hand in Trump's ballroom was "an example of how Trump's corruption factory works", Coinbase's chief policy officer whined that "corporations from all industries donated as well".
That makes it okay, then! Everybody knows that, if a broad swath of corporations bribes the president, then it's totally fine.
But in light of Choi's Axios confession, Coinbase's past fury at being called out for its pay-to-play efforts rings pretty hollow. There's no reason to bother pretending that this is above-board, because no government institution is going to intervene. Now is the time to go all in on open corruption, and Coinbase is leading the way.

Finally, many Epstein Files are released:

Seung Min Kim: Trump Signs Bill To Release Jeffrey Epstein Case Files, After Fighting It For Months. (AP News; November 19, 2025)
President Donald Trump signed legislation tonight that compels his administration to release files on convicted sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein, bowing to political pressure from his own party after initially resisting those efforts. Trump could have chosen to release many of the files on his own, months ago.
"Democrats have used the 'Epstein' issue, which affects them far more than the Republican Party, in order to try and distract from our AMAZING Victories", Trump said in a social-media post as he announced he had signed the bill.
Now, the bill requires the Justice Department to release all files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any information about the investigation into his death in a federal prison in 2019, within 30 days. It allows for redactions about Epstein's victims for on-going federal investigations, but DOJ cannot withhold information due to "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity".
It was a remarkable turn of events for what was once a far-fetched effort - by an odd congressional coalition of Democrats, one GOP antagonist of the president, and a handful of erstwhile Trump loyalists - to force the disclosure of case files
. As recently as last week, the Trump administration even summoned one Republican proponent of releasing the files, Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, to the Situation Room to discuss the matter, although she did not change her mind.
[Read the rest, and see Clay Bennett's cartoon, below.]
Emily Singer: Pam Bondi Won't Commit To Releasing Full Epstein Files. (1-min. YouTube video; Daily Kos, November 19, 2025)
Attorney General Pam Bondi today refused to commit to releasing all of the Epstein files, giving a cagey answer that suggests it may be a long time before we ever see the documents related to the accused child-sex trafficker. Bondi's comment came at a news conference, in which a reporter asked whether the investigation that President Donald Trump ordered into the deceased Epstein's ties to Democrats would preclude her from releasing documents in accordance with the bill Congress passed yesterday.
Bondi did not give a yes or no answer, and instead chose to defend her office's handling of the files. "We have released 33,000, over 33,000 Epstein documents to the Hill, and we will continue to follow the law and to have maximum transparency", Bondi said - refusing to answer the question asked of her.
Of course, Bondi has not been transparent about the files. She and her minions - including Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel, who flanked her at today's news conference - have done everything in their power to keep the documents under wraps.
Blanche, who is Trump's former criminal defense attorney, interviewed jailed Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell earlier this year in what amounted to a rigged conversation in which Maxwell said Trump was not involved in Epstein's crimes. Of course, Maxwell had every reason to lie, as she is seeking clemency from Trump in order to be released from her decades-long prison sentence for federal sex-trafficking charges. She was already rewarded handsomely after that interview with a transfer to a minimum-security prison, where she is reportedly receiving more-favorable treatment than other inmates.
[What, she wants us to trust her and TrumPutin's other co-liars?]
Emily Singer: Mike Johnson Looks Like An Idiot After The Epstein Vote. (1-min. YouTube video, and "Nothing To Hide" Cartoon by Clay Bennett; Daily Kos, November 19, 2025)
House Speaker Mike Johnson was "deeply disappointed" with the Epstein files outcome. Despite House Speaker Mike Johnson's best efforts to run interference for President Donald Trump, the bill to force his Dear Leader to release the Epstein files easily passed both chambers of Congress yesterday, and now heads to Trump's desk for a signature.
The Epstein files saga is a total and complete loss for Johnson, who spent months trying to convince the public that there was no need for them to see the documents related to now-deceased convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, while at the same time attempting to block the legislation that would force Trump to release the documents from ever getting a vote in the first place.
In the end, both efforts failed.
[Mike Johnson "looks like an idiot"? No; more like one more TrumPutin-appointed conspirator against democracy. Don't miss the rest of this article, and its TrumPutin cartoon!]
NEW: Stephen Groves, Matt Brown And Joey Cappelletti: What's Next For The Epstein Files, After Trump's Social-Media Posts? (6 short videos; AP News, November 17, 2025)
The House is heading toward a vote tomorrow on a bill to force the Justice Department to release the case files it has collected on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, pushing past a months-long effort by President Donald Trump and Republican leaders to stymie the effort.
The push for more disclosure in the years-old sex-trafficking investigation into Epstein has come roaring back, since the House returned to Washington after a nearly two-month absence during the government shutdown. As lawmakers returned last week, they were greeted by new details from a tranche of Epstein's emails, including claims that Trump had "spent hours" at Epstein's house with a sex-trafficking victim and that he "knew about the girls".
The new revelations and the coming vote showed one of the rare instances where Trump has not been able to exhibit almost-total control over his party. Bowing to the growing momentum behind the bill, Trump indicated today that he would sign the bill if it passes both chambers of Congress.
The sex-trafficking case into Epstein has only grown in political influence, since Epstein killed himself in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial in 2019. He faced charges that he sexually-abused and trafficked under-age girls, and since then many more have said they were abused by the well-connected financier.
Now, many lawmakers say that the Justice Department also needs to release its case files on Epstein, arguing that it could show that other people were aware of or complicit in Epstein’s sexual abuse. House Democrats, joined by a few key Republicans, have been able to force a vote on the bill to do that by using a rarely-successful measure called a discharge petition.
As it became apparent that the bill will pass the House, most likely with significant support from Republican lawmakers, Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson changed their approach from outright opposition to declarations of indifference.
"Here’s what I want: We have nothing to do with Epstein. The Democrats do", Trump told reporters, adding that he believed the issue was distracting from his accomplishments.
[Wrong. This issue, like so many others, is focusing on TrumPutin's accomplishments - for Putin.]
Endless Urgency, with Mike Nellis: The Common Thread Between The Epstein Cover-Up And Trump's Corrupt Pardons. Two Scandals, One Truth. (Substack, November 17, 2025)
I continue to be completely bewildered that the biggest story in the country isn't Donald Trump admitting - on live TV, on 60 Minutes, just two weeks ago - that he has no idea who he's pardoning. He said it out loud, and the media just kind of shrugged and moved on.
NEW: Melissa Quinn: Epstein Said Trump "Knew About The Girls" In 2019 Email, House Democrats Say.
(Yahoo News; November 13, 2025)
Yesterday, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released emails exchanged between Jeffrey Epstein and others about President Trump.
Among the documents is a 2011 message from Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell, his longtime associate, that said Mr. Trump "spent hours at my house" with one of Epstein's victims, whose name is redacted. In another email in 2019 to author Michael Wolff, Epstein wrote, "Of course he knew about the girls as he asked Ghislaine to stop."
Maxwell was convicted of conspiring in Epstein's sex-trafficking ring and is serving a 20-year prison sentence. Wolff has written several books about Mr. Trump.
House Democrats said the emails were turned over by Epstein's estate, which they said released more than 23,000 documents that lawmakers are now reviewing. The full Oversight Committee also released more than 20,000 pages of records from Epstein's estate yesterday, and claimed Democrats "cherry-pick" from the material "to generate clickbait." The latest batch includes emails, records from court proceedings, transcripts from depositions, press clippings and other material.
Mr. Trump has previously said he cut ties with Epstein years ago, and he has not been accused of wrongdoing.
[Democrats on the House Oversight Committee revealed one set of pertinent Epstein/Trump documents. Suddenly, the FULL Committee (e.g., its Republicans) decided to release a large amount of data THEY had been holding back. C,YS? ITN!]
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: Trump Freaks Out Over Epstein Emails In Furious Rant. (New Republic, November 12, 2025)
Donald Trump has finally broken his silence about the damning new Epstein details.
Donald Trump is beginning to squirm under pressure as Congress pushes to release the main Epstein files. Trump ranted on his "Truth Social" today about the bipartisan bid to make the case files public, claiming that the entire effort was a "hoax" to deflect from the government shut-down. "Only a very bad, or stupid, Republican would fall into that trap", Trump posted. "The Democrats cost our Country $1.5-Trillion Dollars with their recent antics of viciously closing our Country, while at the same time putting many at risk - and they should pay a fair price. "There should be no deflections to Epstein or anything else, and any Republicans involved should be focused only on opening up our Country, and fixing the massive damage caused by the Democrats!", he continued.
In a separate post, Trump reiterated that he believed Democrats were "using the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax to try and deflect from their massive failures, in particular, their most recent one - THE SHUTDOWN!"
Congress is potentially hours away from voting on a discharge petition that would force a vote to release the main files.
For months, just four Republicans had penned their signatures on the discharge petition. But in early November, concern swelled among GOP lawmakers that Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was even cozier than previously understood: A few conservative representatives with ties to the FBI and the Justice Department spilled last week that the true details of the Epstein files are "worse" for Trump than previously reported.
Apparently trying to unravel conservative support for the files' release, Trump phoned his MAGA acolytes yesterday in an unsuccessful attempt to get them to remove their signatures from the petition.
Some files released by House Democrats early today shed even more light on the Trump-Epstein connection, illustrating that as late as 2011 Epstein was grateful Trump had stayed quiet about abuse that had taken place at one of the financier's residences. The "dog that hasn't barked is Trump", Epstein wrote to his longtime girlfriend and criminal associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the time. When queried by Michael Wolff in 2019 about the extent of Trump's knowledge of abductions of young girls, Epstein remarked: "Of course he knew about the girls he asked Ghislaine to stop."
[TrumPutin, still:
- lies that Democrats created HIS government shut-down,
- hides facts from the government AND the nation,
- orders Republicans to avoid learning about, let alone releasing, HIS unlawful acts, and
- calls Republicans who no longer do his evil "very bad, or stupid" for daring to escape HIS trap.
TrumPutin, as always, tries to pin HIS evil doings upon others.]


Hafiz Rashid: Federal Judge Orders Hundreds Of ICE Detainees To Be Released. Trump's Federal Takeover Of Chicago Is Ending In A Major Flop. (New Republic; November 12, 2025)
A federal judge today ordered the release of hundreds of immigrants detained in Chicago, amid the Trump administration's reckless "Operation Midway Blitz".
U.S District Judge Jeffrey Cummings said the government may have violated a consent decree against "warrantless arrests" because most of those who were arrested didn't have a criminal record or deportation order. Cummings ordered that those who do not pose a significant risk or have mandatory detention orders be granted bond by November 21.
Right Now, with Perry Bacon: The Young Voters And Minorities Who Backed Trump In 2024 Hate Him Now. (31-min. YouTube video; New Republic; November 12, 2025)
Political analyst Michael Podhorzer discusses why the Republican candidates in New Jersey and Virginia came nowhere near matching Trump's 2024 support among voters of color and young voters.
Voters under age 30, Black voters, and Latinos were much more supportive of President Trump in 2024 than they were of past Republican presidential candidates. But exit polls, conducted last week of the races in New Jersey and Virginia, show that Republican candidates didn't even match Trump's lowered performance. The GOP lost overwhelmingly among all three voting blocs.
Michael Podhorzer, former political director of the AFL-CIO and now a prominent writer on Substack, argues that the idea that Trump had built some kind of durable multi-racial working-class coalition was always over-stated. He says both the 2024 and 2025 elections can be attributed to backlash against the incumbent president.
Podhorzer and Perry also discuss the election results in New York City, which showed that Zohran Mamdani's base isn't really working-class voters but self-identified liberals and those under 30. He won more than 70% of those two blocs, while running about evenly with Andrew Cuomo among voters without college degrees and those with less than $50,000 in family income.
Randy Rainbow and "Donald Trump": "Big Phony Schmuck!" (5-min. YouTube video; Randy Rainbow, November 10, 2025)
Randy lectures Donald in a pseudo White House interview, then skewers serenades him with a new Randy Rainbow song parody.
Brittney Melton: Senators Reach Deal To Re-Open The Government. (14-min. podcast; NPR, November 10, 2025)
A bipartisan group of senators reached a deal last night to reopen the government and end the longest shutdown in U.S. history. The vote on the first procedural step was 60 to 40, with seven Democrats and one independent joining most Republicans on the measure. The agreement would fund the government through Jan. 30.
Along with the stop-gap measure to fund the government, the Democrats who defected received a promise of a vote on health care, NPR's Claudia Grisales tells Up First. Some of the Democrats who voted no were furious about the defection. Sen. Elizabeth Warren stated that the defection was a terrible mistake and that the American people want them to fight for health care. The Senate has several hurdles to clear before the measure can be passed - and even then, it will need to pass the House.
The Trump administration now has two days to increase SNAP benefits from 65% to 100%
after a federal appeals court refused a request to pause a lower court's orders to do so. The administration could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to get involved in the matter for the second time in just a few days.
Another battle is unfolding involving states that have already paid out full benefits after a federal judge ordered it, but before the higher court said "Not so fast!", NPR's Tovia Smith says.
Much of these legal battles could be rendered moot with the expectation that when the government reopens, Congress can appropriate SNAP funding for the fiscal year. Smith says there is no certainty as to when families will receive the benefits after the shutdown ends - but in the past, states motivated to get benefits flowing did so within a matter of days.
Helen Coster, John Shiffman, Christine Soares, Alexandra Ulmer and Linda So: A Reuters Special Report: In Trump 2.0, MAGA-Aligned Influencers And Media Emerge As The New Mainstream.
(Reuters, November 8, 2025)
A Reuters examination details how rightist influencers and Trump officials have formed a powerful alliance, working together to target perceived adversaries, amplify false claims and reshape the media landscape. The shift comes as a growing number of social platforms and traditional outlets accommodate Trump.
For decades, Republicans railed against what they saw as a liberal media establishment shaping American politics from the left. Nearly a year into U.S. President Donald Trump's second term, that narrative is flipping. A new constellation of influencers, billionaire moguls and social-media platforms – many embracing or amplifying White House themes – is pulling the nation's information ecosystem to the right.
Right-wing influencers and conservative media personalities, often working in lockstep with Trump officials, have become a potent force in a widening campaign of retribution against perceived enemies of the Trump administration. Empowered by ownership and technology shifts in the media and bolstered by financial incentives, these figures help discredit Trump's rivals and amplify his administration's talking points and false claims, blurring boundaries between official messaging and private-sector news and opinion.
Jennifer Ludden: Trump Administration Ordered To Restore Full SNAP Benefits BY TOMORROW. (NPR, November 6, 2025)
A Rhode Island federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to find enough money to restore full funding for SNAP benefits by tomorrow.
In failing to fully fund the food-assistance program that covers 42-million low-income Americans, U.S. District Court Judge John McConnell Jr. said the government "failed to consider the harms individuals who rely on those benefits would suffer." He also said President Trump showed "intent to defy a court order" when he posted on Truth Social this week that SNAP benefits would not restart until after the federal shutdown was over - a comment that was walked back by the White House.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture swiftly appealed the judge's ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, keeping food aid in limbo. In a statement to NPR, the USDA blamed Senate Democrats for withholding services to promote their agenda and compromising "not only SNAP, but farm programs, food inspection, animal and plant disease protection, rural development, and protecting federal lands."
The judge's order this afternoon comes in response to a challenge filed by cities and nonprofits after the administration said it would halt funding for the program on Nov. 1. McConnell and another federal judge in Boston ordered the government to use emergency funds to keep SNAP funding flowing, but Trump administration officials said it was only able to partially cover the payments.
"The court could not be more clear", said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, one the groups that brought the lawsuit. "The Trump-Vance administration must stop playing politics with people's lives by delaying SNAP payments they are obligated to issue."
[Perfectly stated, Mr. Perryman! See yesterday's Robert Reich article, below.]
Senate Convenes, As Government Shutdown Breaks Record For Longest In U.S. History. (WATCH LIVE; AP News/PBS News, November 5, 2025)
Government shutdown enters 36th day, breaking record set during Trump's first term as impact spreads nationwide.
The Senate is scheduled to convene today at 10AM
ET.
[Watch in the player above.]
Michelle L. Price and Jill Colvin: Mamdani Tells Trump That New York Is Ready To Fight, After President's Threats Fail To Thwart Voters. (AP News/PBS News, November 5, 2025)
Zohran Mamdani wasted little time as mayor-elect of New York City before making clear that he sees part of his new role as standing up to the president of the United States, who had threatened not only to defund the city if he won but also to arrest and deport him.
Mamdani, a Democrat, addressed the Republican president directly and at length from the stage at his victory party in Brooklyn, last night: "Donald Trump, since I know you're watching, I have four words for you: Turn the volume up", he said, before declaring, "If anyone can show a nation betrayed by Donald Trump how to defeat him, it is the city that gave rise to him."
Mamdani, who was born in Uganda and became a naturalized American citizen after graduating from college, went on to cast himself as the embodiment of resistance:"New York will remain a city of immigrants, a city built by immigrants, powered by immigrants and, as of tonight, led by an immigrant", he said. "So hear me, President Trump, when I say this: To get to ANY of us, you will have to get through ALL of us."
Trump, who has spent months insulting Mamdani and warning that the city would be ruined if he won, seemed to be watching. "…AND SO IT BEGINS!, he posted on social media as Mamdani spoke.
Mamdani, a democratic socialist who campaigned on a slate of far-left progressive policies and a cheery optimism that stands in stark contrast to Trump's darker and hard-line tactics, is expected to continue to face the president's persistent political bashing - along with a federal government that may try to thwart his agenda.
"Mayor Trump": New York has remained relatively unscathed by Trump's administration, as he has targeted cities including Los Angeles and Washington, dispatching the National Guard. The current mayor, Eric Adams, enjoyed an unusual alliance with the Republican president, whose administration dropped a federal corruption case against the mayor so he could better assist with the president's immigration agenda.
Robert Reich: The True Test Of Our Progress. Trump Has Put America Into Reverse. (Substack, November 5, 2025)
The Democrats had a great day yesterday. It's crucial that they hone their economic message for next year's midterms on affordability, based in fairness.
Trump is doing the opposite. Although a federal court ordered Trump to continue to provide food stamps to about 42-million low-income Americans who depend on them, Trump yesterday threatened to deny them anyway until the end of the government shutdown. In a post on social media, he said benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly referred to as food stamps, "will be given only when the Radical-Left Democrats open up the government, which they can easily do, and not before!"
How low Trump has sunk!
Eighty-eight years ago, in his Second Inaugural Address, Franklin D. Roosevelt told America, "The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
It was not a test of the nation's military might or of the size of the national economy. It was a test of our moral authority. We had a duty to comfort the afflicted, even if that required afflicting the comfortable.
The Trump regime has adopted the reverse metric. The test of its progress is whether it adds to the abundance of those who have much and provides less for those who have too little. It is passing this test with flying colors.
The regime initially signaled its willingness to tap $4.65-Billion in emergency money to fund food stamps, which would cover about half of this month’s benefits. As a result, some food aid would have started to go to American families who need it, but not nearly as much as they require - and not for weeks. New applicants this month wouldn't get any.
Now, in direct defiance of the judge's order, Trump is saying no food stamps will be provided at all - unless congressional Democrats relent on their demand.
And what is that demand? That lower-income Americans continue to receive subsidized health care. Otherwise, health care premiums for millions of lower-income Americans will skyrocket next year by an average of 30% because the Trump Republican "Big Beautiful" (Big Ugly) bill slashed Obamacare subsidies.
Republicans had rammed the Big Ugly through Congress without giving Senate Democrats an opportunity to filibuster it because Republicans used a process called "reconciliation", requiring only a majority vote of the Senate.
The Big Ugly also requires Medicaid applicants and enrollees - also low-income - to document at least 80 hours per month of work. Many people dependent on Medicaid won't be able to do this, either because they're incapable of working or won't be able to do the required paperwork to qualify for an exemption from the work requirement.
All told, the Big Ugly cuts roughly $1-Trillion over the next decade from programs for which the main beneficiaries are the poor and working class, and gives about $1-Trillion in tax benefits to the richest members of our society. It is the most dramatic reversal of FDR's moral test in American history.
In the face of this outrage, the shutdown is the only practical leverage Democrats have.

Last weekend, just as millions of low-income Americans were losing their food stamps, Trump threw a lush "Great Gatsby"-themed party at his Mar-a-Lago estate, replete with 1920s flappers and Gatsby-inspired music from the Roaring Twenties. Some critics have called it "tone-
deaf", but it was an accurate rendition of the tone Trump has set for America: Trump is throwing a huge party for America's wealthy - giving them tax cuts and regulatory rollbacks to ensure that their wealth (and support for him) continues to grow.
Meanwhile, he is throwing to poor and working-class Americans the red meat of hatefulness - hate of immigrants, people of color, the "deep state", "socialists", "communists", transgender people, and Democrats. This is the formula strongmen have used for a century - more wealth for the wealthy, more bigotry for the working-class and poor - until the entire facade crumbles under the weight of its own hypocrisy.
But yesterday, millions of American voters refused to go along with this unfairness. They repudiated, loudly and clearly, the formula Trump and his regime have used.
It is now the responsibility of all of us - whether Democrat or Republican or Independent; whether wealthy or middle class or working class or poor; whether conservative or progressive - to return the nation to a path that is MORALLY SUSTAINABLE.
[TrumPutin be damned! He always was. THEY always were. It's HIS CALL whether Congress can return to session immediately. Just STOP STEALING FROM OUR COUNTRY - and GIVE IT BACK with a BIG TARIFF attached!]
Joel Rose: FAA Will Reduce Air Traffic By 10% At Many Airports To Maintain Safety. (NPR, November 5, 2025)
As the U.S. government shutdown enters a record 36th day, air traffic controllers, who are required to work without pay, are feeling the squeeze.
The FAA plans to reduce air traffic in 40 "high-volume markets" beginning in two days. FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford told reporters the agency wants to reduce the pressure at those airports before safety is compromised.
The FAA has already been delaying flights at some airports because of widespread staffing shortages among air traffic controllers. Some have taken on second jobs, and many are calling out sick. Even before the shutdown, the system was more than 3,000 certified controllers short.
[TrumPutin's arbitrary government shutdown continues to cause hardships and deaths in many ways, including today's plane crash.]
NEW: Elon Musk's 14 Kids: Everything You Need to Know (10-min. YouTube video; New York Post; April 18, 2025)
Elon Musk - tech titan, billionaire, and one of the most-influential figures of our time - is also a father to a rapidly-growing family. Over the past two decades, Musk has welcomed 14 children with multiple women, each with a unique story that unfolds behind the headlines. From personal tragedies to public estrangements, secret births to high-profile custody battles, the saga of Musk's ever-expanding lineage is as complex as the man himself. Let's take a closer look at Musk's numerous offspring, their biological mothers, and the controversies that continue to unfold.


Detailed Analysis Of Trump's First-Term Lies ("Bottomless Pinocchio" lists):
[For much more, have your web browser search for "washington post +bottomless pinocchio +trump".
This important section was not posted to these pages until late-June 2026, so it also appears there.]

NEW: Four Years Of Trump Falsehoods (5-min. video, links to more; Fact Checker, Washington Post; January 23, 2021)
The Fact Checker counted a total of 30,573 false or misleading claims made by President Trump during his [first] White House tenure. Here's what we learned.
[What ALL OF US learned, except for Trump's most-radical supporters!]
NEW: Glenn Kessler, Meg Kelly, Salvador Rizzo, Leslie Shapiro and Leo Dominguez: A Term Of Untruths: The Longer Trump Was President, The More Frequently He Made False Or Misleading Claims. (Fact Checker, Washington Post; January 23, 2021)
The Washington Post Fact Checker started tracking President Donald Trump's false or misleading claims as a first-100-days project - but in response to reader requests, continued to add to the database through his entire [first] term.
By the time Trump left office, he had accumulated 30,573 untruths during his presidency - averaging about 21 erroneous claims a day.
Trump made about 6 false or misleading claims a day in his first year as president, 16 a day in his second year, 22 a day in his third year - and 39 a day in his final year.
(Explore the Fact Checker's database of false claims made by President Trump while in office.)
Put another way, it took Trump 27 months to reach 10,000 false or misleading claims and another 14 months to reach 20,000. He then exceeded the 30,000 mark less than 5 months later.
Scroll the timeline below to see how the president's daily false statements added up to a tsunami of untruths that kept rising during his presidency.
NEW: In Four Years, President Trump Made 30,573 False Or Misleading Claims. (graphs, most-repeated claims, etc.; Fact Checker, Washington Post; updated January 20, 2021)
The Fact Checker's database of the false or misleading claims made by President Trump while in office.
NEW: Meet the Bottomless Pinocchio! (2-min. video, links; Fact Checker, Washington Post; December 10, 2018)
President Trump's false and misleading claims that have been repeated more than 20 times led us to create a new Pinocchio rating.

NEW: Edward Klein: Trump Family Values (Vanity Fair; March 1994)
Once on the brink of losing his gaudy empire, Donald Trump is about to take his casinos public in a sale that he figures will net him billions. Joining him in his comeback are new bride Marla Maples and baby daughter Tiffany. For Trump, getting to the altar was as difficult as any of his financial maneuvers. With his parents telling him to go back to Ivana, and Marla setting deadlines, only Marla's mother kept the course of love running smooth. Edward Klein joins the re-emerging mogul as he prepares for the deals of his life.
NEW: Marie Brenner: After The Gold Rush (Vanity Fair; September 1990)
Ivana Trump told her lawyer Michael Kennedy that from time to time her husband reads a book of Adolf Hitler's collected speeches, "My New Order" (1941), which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed. Hitler's speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist.


Return to main section of Money Is Not Wealth.